Chapter published in:
Task-Based Approaches to Teaching and Assessing Pragmatics
Edited by Naoko Taguchi and YouJin Kim
[Task-Based Language Teaching 10] 2018
► pp. 248263
References

References

Babai Shishavan, H., & Sharifian, F.
(2016) The refusal speech act in a cross-cultural perspective: A study of Iranian English-language learners and Anglo-Australian speakers. Language and Communication, 47, 75–88.
Baralt, M.
(2013) The impact of cognitive complexity on feedback efficacy during online versus face-to-face interactive tasks. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 35, 689–725. Crossref link
Bardovi-Harlig, K.
(2000) Pragmatics and second language acquisition. In R. Kaplan (Ed.), Oxford handbook of applied linguistics (pp. 182–192). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
(2012) Pragmatics in SLA. In S. M. Gass & A. Mackey (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 147–162). London: Routledge.
(2013) Developing L2 pragmatics. Language Learning, 63, 68–86. Crossref link
Barron, A.
(2006) Learning to say ‘you’ in German: The acquisition of sociolinguistic competence in a study abroad context. In M. DuFon & E. Churchill (Eds.), Language learners in study abroad contexts (pp. 59–82). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Beebe, L.
(1995) The social rules of speaking: Basics – not frosting on the cake. The Language Teacher, 19(3), 4–11.
Beebe, L., Takahashi, T., & Uliss-Weltz, R.
(1990) Pragmatic transfer in ESL refusals. In R. Scarcella, E. Andersen, & S. D. Krashen (Eds.), On the development of communicative competence in a second language (pp. 55–73). New York, NY: Newbury House.
Beebe, L., & Waring, H.
(2005) Pragmatic development in responding to rudeness. In J. Frodesen & C. Holten (Eds.), The power of context in language teaching and learning (pp. 67–80). Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle/Thomson Learning.
Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C.
(1987) Politeness: Some universals in language use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
DeCapua, A.
(1998) Pragmatic transfer and cultural stereotyping. Issues in Applied Linguistics, 9, 21–36.
Ellis, R.
(2003) Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
(2009) Task-based language teaching: Sorting out the misunderstandings. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 19, 221–246. Crossref link
Gurzynski-Weiss, L., & Révész, A.
(2012) Tasks and teacher feedback in the Spanish foreign language classroom. Language Learning, 62, 851–879. Crossref link
Haverkate, H.
(1984) Speech acts, speakers and hearers (Pragmatics and Beyond 4). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Crossref link
Iwasaki, N.
(2010) Style shifts among Japanese learners before and after study abroad in Japan: Becoming active social agents in Japan. Applied Linguistics, 31, 45–71. Crossref link
Johnson, K., & Johnson, H.
(1999) Encyclopedic dictionary of applied linguistics. Oxford: Blackwell. Crossref link
Kasper, G., & Rose, K.
(2002) Pragmatic development in a second language. Oxford: Blackwell.
Kim, H. -J.
(2006) Providing validity evidence for a speaking test using FACETS. Teachers College Columbia University Working Papers in TESOL & Applied Linguistics, 6 (1). From http://​journals​.tc​-library​.org​/index​.php​/tesol​/article​/view​/180
Kim, Y., Payant, C., & Pearson, P.
(2015) The intersection of task-based interaction, task complexity, and working memory. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 37, 549–581. Crossref link
Kim, Y., & Taguchi, N.
(2015) Promoting task-based pragmatics instruction in EFL classroom contexts: The role of task complexity. Modern Language Journal, 99, 656–677. Crossref link
Leech, G.
(1983) Principles of pragmatics. London: Longman.
Norouzian, R., & Plonsky, L.
(2018). Eta- and partial eta-squared in L2 research: A cautionary review and guide to more appropriate usage. Second Language Research, 34, 257–271. Crossref link
Olshtain, E., & Celce-Murcia, M.
(2001) Discourse analysis and language teaching. In D. Schiffrin, D. Tannen, & H. E. Hamilton (Eds.), The handbook of discourse analysis (pp. 707–724). Oxford: Blackwell.
Ortega, L.
(2003) Syntactic complexity measures and their relationship to L2 proficiency: A research synthesis of college-level L2 writing. Applied Linguistics, 24, 492–518. Crossref link
Pallotti, G.
(2009) CAF: Defining, refining and differentiating constructs. Applied Linguistics, 30, 590–601. Crossref link
Plonsky, L., & Oswald, F.
(2014) How big is “big”? Interpreting effect sizes in L2 research. Language Learning, 64, 878–912. Crossref link
Purpura, J.
(2004) Assessing grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Crossref link
Révész, A.
(2009) Task complexity, focus on form, and second language development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 31, 437–470. Crossref link
Révész, A., Ekiert, M., & Torgersen, E.
(2016) The effects of complexity, accuracy, and fluency on communicative adequacy in oral task performance. Applied Linguistics, 37, 828–848.
Révész, A., Sachs, R., & Hama, M.
(2014) The effects of task complexity and input frequency on the acquisition of the past counterfactual construction through recasts. Language Learning, 64, 615–650. Crossref link
Roever, C.
(2009) Teaching and testing pragmatics. In M. H. Long & C. J. Doughty (Eds.), Handbook of language teaching (pp. 560–577). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. Crossref link
Ross, S., & Kasper, G.
(2013) Assessing second language pragmatics. London: Palgrave Macmillan. Crossref link
Schauer, G.
(2004) ‘May you speaker louder maybe?’ Interlanguage pragmatic development in requests. EUROSLA Yearbook, 4, 253–272. Crossref link
Searle, J.
(1979) Expression and meaning: Studies in the theory of speech acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Crossref link
Skehan, P.
(1998) A cognitive approach to language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Skehan, P., & Foster, P.
(1997) Task-type and task processing conditions as influences on foreign language performance. Language Teaching Research, 1, 1–27. Crossref link
Swales, J.
(1990) Genre analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Taguchi, N.
(2007) Task difficulty in oral speech act production. Applied Linguistics, 28, 113–135. Crossref link
(2011a) Teaching pragmatics: Trends and issues. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 31, 289–310. Crossref link
(2011b) Do proficiency and study-abroad experience affect speech act production? Analysis of appropriateness, accuracy, and fluency. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 49, 265–293. Crossref link
(2011c) The effect of L2 proficiency and study-abroad experience in pragmatic comprehension. Language Learning, 61, 904–939. Crossref link
(2012) Context, individual differences, and pragmatic competence. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
(2015) Instructed pragmatics at a glance: Where instructional studies were, are, and should be going. Language Teaching, 48, 1–50. Crossref link
Takahashi, S.
(2010) Assessing learnability in second language pragmatics. In A. Trosborg (Ed.), Handbook of pragmatics (Vol. 7, pp. 391–421). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Takimoto, M.
(2012) Metapragmatic discussion in interlanguage pragmatics. Journal of Pragmatics, 44, 1240–1253. Crossref link
Thomas, J.
(1983) Cross-cultural pragmatic failure. Applied Linguistics, 4, 91–112. Crossref link
(1995) Meaning in interaction: An introduction to pragmatics. London: Longman.
Trosborg, A.
(1995) Interlanguage pragmatics: Requests, complaints, and apologies. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Crossref link
Young, R.
(2011) Interactional competence in language learning, teaching, and testing. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (pp. 426–443). London: Routledge.