Chapter published in:
Task-Based Approaches to Teaching and Assessing PragmaticsEdited by Naoko Taguchi and YouJin Kim
[Task-Based Language Teaching 10] 2018
► pp. 248–263
Chapter 10. The effects of task type and L2 proficiency on discourse appropriacy in oral task performance
Conceived within the TBLT framework, the present study examined pedagogic tasks as vehicles for demonstrating L2 learners’ discourse appropriacy in oral production. Eighty ESL learners’ discourse appropriacy was measured using three pragmatically-oriented task types (complaint, refusal, and advice) across four different proficiency levels. The findings showed that, for all task types, as general proficiency increased, ratings of discourse appropriacy also increased. We found that there was a pronounced difference in discourse appropriacy between the intermediate and advanced proficiency levels, and that for learners at higher levels of proficiency, discourse appropriacy did not vary from task to task. In contrast, task type made a difference for less proficient learners in that the refusal task was particularly challenging compared with other tasks.
Published online: 15 August 2018
https://doi.org/10.1075/tblt.10.10eki
https://doi.org/10.1075/tblt.10.10eki
References
References
Babai Shishavan, H., & Sharifian, F.
(2016) The refusal speech act in a cross-cultural perspective: A study of Iranian English-language learners and Anglo-Australian speakers. Language and Communication, 47, 75–88.
Baralt, M.
(2013) The impact of cognitive complexity on feedback efficacy during online versus face-to-face interactive tasks. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 35, 689–725. 
Bardovi-Harlig, K.
(2000) Pragmatics and second language acquisition. In R. Kaplan (Ed.), Oxford handbook of applied linguistics (pp. 182–192). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
(2012) Pragmatics in SLA. In S. M. Gass & A. Mackey (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 147–162). London: Routledge.
(2013) Developing L2 pragmatics. Language Learning, 63, 68–86.
Barron, A.
(2006) Learning to say ‘you’ in German: The acquisition of sociolinguistic competence in a study abroad context. In M. DuFon & E. Churchill (Eds.), Language learners in study abroad contexts (pp. 59–82). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Beebe, L.
(1995) The social rules of speaking: Basics – not frosting on the cake. The Language Teacher, 19(3), 4–11.
Beebe, L., Takahashi, T., & Uliss-Weltz, R.
(1990) Pragmatic transfer in ESL refusals. In R. Scarcella, E. Andersen, & S. D. Krashen (Eds.), On the development of communicative competence in a second language (pp. 55–73). New York, NY: Newbury House.
Beebe, L., & Waring, H.
(2005) Pragmatic development in responding to rudeness. In J. Frodesen & C. Holten (Eds.), The power of context in language teaching and learning (pp. 67–80). Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle/Thomson Learning.
Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C.
(1987) Politeness: Some universals in language use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
DeCapua, A.
(1998) Pragmatic transfer and cultural stereotyping. Issues in Applied Linguistics, 9, 21–36.
Ellis, R.
(2003) Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
(2009) Task-based language teaching: Sorting out the misunderstandings. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 19, 221–246.
Gurzynski-Weiss, L., & Révész, A.
(2012) Tasks and teacher feedback in the Spanish foreign language classroom. Language Learning, 62, 851–879.
Haverkate, H.
(1984) Speech acts, speakers and hearers (Pragmatics and Beyond 4). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Iwasaki, N.
(2010) Style shifts among Japanese learners before and after study abroad in Japan: Becoming active social agents in Japan. Applied Linguistics, 31, 45–71.
Johnson, K., & Johnson, H.
(1999) Encyclopedic dictionary of applied linguistics. Oxford: Blackwell.
Kasper, G., & Rose, K.
(2002) Pragmatic development in a second language. Oxford: Blackwell.
Kim, H. -J.
(2006) Providing validity evidence for a speaking test using FACETS. Teachers College Columbia University Working Papers in TESOL & Applied Linguistics, 6 (1). From http://journals.tc-library.org/index.php/tesol/article/view/180
Kim, Y., Payant, C., & Pearson, P.
(2015) The intersection of task-based interaction, task complexity, and working memory. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 37, 549–581.
Kim, Y., & Taguchi, N.
(2015) Promoting task-based pragmatics instruction in EFL classroom contexts: The role of task complexity. Modern Language Journal, 99, 656–677.
Leech, G.
(1983) Principles of pragmatics. London: Longman.
Norouzian, R., & Plonsky, L.
(2018). Eta- and partial eta-squared in L2 research: A cautionary review and guide to more appropriate usage. Second Language Research, 34, 257–271.
Olshtain, E., & Celce-Murcia, M.
(2001) Discourse analysis and language teaching. In D. Schiffrin, D. Tannen, & H. E. Hamilton (Eds.), The handbook of discourse analysis (pp. 707–724). Oxford: Blackwell.
Ortega, L.
(2003) Syntactic complexity measures and their relationship to L2 proficiency: A research synthesis of college-level L2 writing. Applied Linguistics, 24, 492–518.
Pallotti, G.
(2009) CAF: Defining, refining and differentiating constructs. Applied Linguistics, 30, 590–601.
Plonsky, L., & Oswald, F.
(2014) How big is “big”? Interpreting effect sizes in L2 research. Language Learning, 64, 878–912.
Purpura, J.
(2004) Assessing grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Révész, A.
(2009) Task complexity, focus on form, and second language development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 31, 437–470.
Révész, A., Ekiert, M., & Torgersen, E.
(2016) The effects of complexity, accuracy, and fluency on communicative adequacy in oral task performance. Applied Linguistics, 37, 828–848.
Révész, A., Sachs, R., & Hama, M.
(2014) The effects of task complexity and input frequency on the acquisition of the past counterfactual construction through recasts. Language Learning, 64, 615–650.
Roever, C.
(2009) Teaching and testing pragmatics. In M. H. Long & C. J. Doughty (Eds.), Handbook of language teaching (pp. 560–577). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
Ross, S., & Kasper, G.
(2013) Assessing second language pragmatics. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Schauer, G.
(2004) ‘May you speaker louder maybe?’ Interlanguage pragmatic development in requests. EUROSLA Yearbook, 4, 253–272.
Searle, J.
(1979) Expression and meaning: Studies in the theory of speech acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Skehan, P.
(1998) A cognitive approach to language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Skehan, P., & Foster, P.
(1997) Task-type and task processing conditions as influences on foreign language performance. Language Teaching Research, 1, 1–27.
Swales, J.
(1990) Genre analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Taguchi, N.
(2007) Task difficulty in oral speech act production. Applied Linguistics, 28, 113–135.
(2011a) Teaching pragmatics: Trends and issues. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 31, 289–310.
(2011b) Do proficiency and study-abroad experience affect speech act production? Analysis of appropriateness, accuracy, and fluency. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 49, 265–293.
(2011c) The effect of L2 proficiency and study-abroad experience in pragmatic comprehension. Language Learning, 61, 904–939.
(2012) Context, individual differences, and pragmatic competence. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
(2015) Instructed pragmatics at a glance: Where instructional studies were, are, and should be going. Language Teaching, 48, 1–50.
Takahashi, S.
(2010) Assessing learnability in second language pragmatics. In A. Trosborg (Ed.), Handbook of pragmatics (Vol. 7, pp. 391–421). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Takimoto, M.
(2012) Metapragmatic discussion in interlanguage pragmatics. Journal of Pragmatics, 44, 1240–1253.
Thomas, J.
(1983) Cross-cultural pragmatic failure. Applied Linguistics, 4, 91–112.
(1995) Meaning in interaction: An introduction to pragmatics. London: Longman.
Trosborg, A.
(1995) Interlanguage pragmatics: Requests, complaints, and apologies. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Young, R.
(2011) Interactional competence in language learning, teaching, and testing. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (pp. 426–443). London: Routledge.