Chapter published in:
Task-Based Approaches to Teaching and Assessing Pragmatics
Edited by Naoko Taguchi and YouJin Kim
[Task-Based Language Teaching 10] 2018
► pp. 288304
References
Bachman, L. F.
(2002) Some reflections on task-based language performance assessment. Language Testing, 19(4), 453–476. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brindley, G.
(1994) Task-centred assessment in language learning programs: The promise and the challenge. In N. Bird, P. Falvey, A. Tsui, D. Allison, & A. McNeill (Eds.), Language and learning (pp. 73–94). Hong Kong: Institute of Language in Education.Google Scholar
(2009) Task-centered language assessment in language learning. The promise and the challenge. In K. Van den Branden, M. Bygate, & J. M. Norris (Eds.), Task-based language teaching. A reader (pp. 435–454). Amsterdamphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Brown, J. D., Hudson, T., Norris, J. M., & Bonk, W.
(2002) An investigation of second language task-based performance assessments (Technical Report #24). Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai‘i, Second Language Teaching & Curriculum Center.Google Scholar
Byrnes, H.
(2002) The role of task and task-based assessment in a content-oriented collegiate foreign language curriculum. Language Testing, 19(4), 419–437. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Byrnes, H., Maxim, H., & Norris, J. M.
(2010) Realizing advanced FL writing development in collegiate education: Curricular design, pedagogy, assessment. Modern Language Journal, Monograph. Cambridge: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Cho, Y., & Choi, I.
(2017) Writing from sources: Does audience matter? Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar
Clyne, M.
(1994) Inter-cultural communication at work: Cultural values in discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Council of Europe
(2001) Common European framework of reference for languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Crystal, D.
(Ed.) (1997) The Cambridge encyclopedia of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Curriculum Development Institute
(2005) Task-based assessment for English language learning at secondary level. Retrieved from http://​cd1​.edb​.hkedcity​.net​/cd​/eng​/TBA​_Eng​_Sec​/index​.html.
Elder, C.
(2001) Assessing the language proficiency of teachers: Are there any border controls? Language Testing, 18(2), 149–170. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2016) Exploring the limits of authenticity in LSP testing: The case of a specific-purpose language test for health professionals. Language Testing, 33(2), 147–152.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Elder, C., McNamara, T., Woodward-Kron, R., Manias, E., McColl, G., Webb, G., & Pill, J.
(2013) Towards improved healthcare communication. Development and validation of the language proficiency standards for non-native English speaking health professionals. (Final report for the occupational English test centre). Melbourne, AUS: The University of Melbourne. Retrieved from https://​www​.occupationalenglishtest​.org​/resources​/uploads​/2015​/07​/Elder​-C​-et​-al​-2013​-Towards​-Improved​-Healthcare​.pdf​?x59645.
Ellis, R.
(2003) Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gilabert, R., & Barón, J.
(2013) The impact of increasing task complexity on L2 pragmatic moves. In A. Mackey & K. McDonough (Eds.), Second language interaction in diverse educational contexts (pp. 45–69). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Grabowski, K.
(2009) Investigating the construct validity of a test designed to measure grammatical and pragmatic knowledge in the context of speaking. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Teachers College, Columbia University, New York, NY.Google Scholar
(2013) Investigating the construct validity of a role-play test designed to measure grammatical and pragmatic knowledge at multiple proficiency levels. In S. Ross & G. Kasper (Eds.), Assessing second language pragmatics (pp. 149–171). Houndmills: Palgrave MacMillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Holmes, J.
(2000) Doing collegiality and keeping control at work: Small talk in government departments. In J. Coupland (Ed.), Small talk (pp. 32–61). London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Hudson, T., Detmer, E., & Brown, J. D.
(1995) Developing prototypic measures f cross-cultural pragmatics. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai‘i, Second Language Teaching and Curriculum Center.Google Scholar
Kasper, G.
(2006) Beyond repair: Conversation analysis as an approach to SLA. AILA Review, 19, 83–99. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kasper, G., & Ross, S.
(2013) Assessing second language pragmatics: An overview and introductions. In S. Ross & G. Kasper (Eds.), Assessing second language pragmatics (pp.1–40). Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kim, Y., & Taguchi, N.
(2015) Promoting task-based pragmatics instruction in EFL classroom contexts: The role of task complexity. Modern Language Journal, 99(4), 656–677. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lockwood, J. E.
(2015) Language for specific purpose (LSP) performance assessment in Asian call centres: Strong and weak definitions. Language Testing in Asia, 5(3), Crossref.Google Scholar
McNamara, T. F.
(1996) Measuring second language performance. London: Longman.Google Scholar
McNamara, T. F., & Roever, C.
(2006) Language testing: The social dimension. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Messick, S. J.
(1994) The interplay of evidence and consequences in the validation of performance assessments. Educational Researcher 23, 13–23. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mislevy, R. J., Steinberg, L. S., & Almond, R. G.
(2002) Design and analysis in task-based language assessment. Language Testing, 19(4), 477–496. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
National Standards in Foreign Language Education Project
(1996) Standards for foreign language learning: Preparing for the 21st century. Yonkers, NY: Author.Google Scholar
Norris, J. M.
(2000) Purposeful language assessment: Selecting the right alternative test. English Teaching Forum, 38(1), 18–23.Google Scholar
(2001) Identifying rating criteria for task-based EAP assessment. In T. Hudson & J. D. Brown, (Eds.), A focus on language test development: Expanding the language proficiency construct across a variety of tests (Technical Report #21, pp. 163–204). Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai‘i, Second Language Teaching and Curriculum Center.Google Scholar
(2009) Task-based teaching and testing. In M. Long & C. Doughty, (Eds.), The handbook of language teaching (pp. 578–594). Malden, MA: Blackwell-Wiley. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2016) Current uses for task-based language assessment. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 36, 230–244.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Norris, J. M., Brown, J. D., Hudson, T., & Yoshioka, J.
(1998) Designing second language performance assessments (Technical Report #18). Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai‘i, Second Language Teaching and Curriculum Center.Google Scholar
Okada, Y., & Greer, T.
(2013) Pursuing a relevant response in oral proficiency interview role plays. In S. Ross & G. Kasper (Eds.), Assessing second language pragmatics (pp. 288–310). Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Quellmalz, E.
(1991) Developing criteria for performance assessments: The missing link. Applied Measurement in Education, 4, 319–331. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Roever, C.
(2006) Validation of a web-based test of ESL pragmalinguistics. Language Testing, 23(2), 229–256. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2011) Testing of second language pragmatics: Past and future. Language Testing, 28(4), 463–481. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Roever, C., Fraser, C., & Elder, C.
(2014) Testing ESL sociopragmatics: Development and validation of a web-based test battery. Frankfurt: Peter Lang. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Roever, C., & McNamara, T. F.
(2006) Preview article. Language testing: The social dimension. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 16(2), 242–258. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Taguchi, N.
(2007) Task difficulty in oral speech act production. Applied Linguistics, 28, 113–135. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Taguchi, N., & Roever, C.
(2017) Second language pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Timpe, V.
(2013a) “The difficulty with difficulty:” The issue of determining task difficulty in TBLA. Journal of Linguistics and Language Teaching, 4(1), 13–28.Google Scholar
(2013b) Assessing intercultural communicative competence. The dependence of receptive sociopragmatic competence and discourse competence on learning opportunities and input. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Timpe-Laughlin, V., Wain, J., & Schmidgall, J.
(2015) Defining and operationalizing the construct of pragmatic competence: Review and recommendations. (Research Report No. RR-15-06). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.Google Scholar
Timpe-Laughlin, V., & Park, I.
(2017) “Are you into beer pong? – Exploring question-answer sequences in an L2 oral performance assessment. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Washburn, G.
(2001) Using situation comedies for pragmatic language teaching and learning. TESOL Journal, 10(4), 21–26.Google Scholar
Youn, S. J.
(2008) Developing a task-based assessment of EAP pragmatics. Retrieved from https://​scholarspace​.manoa​.hawaii​.edu​/bitstream​/10125​/20180​/1​/Youn2008​.pdf.
(2013) Validating task-based assessment of L2 pragmatics in interaction using mixed methods. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Graduate Division of the University of Hawai‘i at Mānoa, Honolulu, HI.Google Scholar
(2015) Validity argument for assessing L2 pragmatics in interaction using mixed methods. Language Testing, 32, 199–225. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Del Bono, Federica & Elisabetta Bonvino
2021. Dalla valutazione in DaD alle scale di valutazione dell’adeguatezza. EuroAmerican Journal of Applied Linguistics and Languages 8:2  pp. 105 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 31 march 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.