This chapter looks at task repetition in second language learning from the point of view of skill acquisition theory and related areas of psychology. It explores not only what concepts like procedural and declarative knowledge, automatization, and transfer have to offer the applied linguist, but also summarizes the literature on distribution of practice, interleaving versus blocking, and similarity in repeated practice, drawing on both the psychological and the fledgling second language acquisition (SLA) literature. In general, the literature shows support for distributed practice, for interleaving, and for variety in practice. For all these points there are exceptions, however, in particular in the SLA literature. This chapter discusses some of the possible explanations for these differences, and ends with some recommendations for where to focus future research: how automatization may vary with the domain of language, how distribution of practice may depend on whether the knowledge practiced is declarative or procedural in nature, and how research can help find the ideal context for bringing about transfer from one task to the other.
Article outline
Contributions from skill acquisition theory
Contributions from other areas of cognitive psychology
Anderson, J. R., Fincham, J. M., & Douglass, S. (1997). The role of examples and rules in the acquisition of a cognitive skill. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 23(4), 932–945.
Arevart, S., & Nation, P. (1991). Fluency improvement in a second language. RELC Journal, 22, 84–94.
Bird, S. (2010). Effects of distributed practice on the acquisition of second language English syntax. Applied Psycholinguistics, 31(4), 635–650.
Birnbaum, M. S., Kornell, N., Bjork, E. L., & Bjork, R. A. (2013). Why interleaving enhances inductive learning: The roles of discrimination and retrieval. Memory and Cognition, 41(3), 393–402.
Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (1999). How people learn. Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Bygate, M. (this volume). Introduction. In M. Bygate (Ed.), Learning language through task repetition (pp.1–25). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Carpenter, S. K., & Mueller, F. E. (2013). The effects of interleaving versus blocking on foreign language pronunciation learning. Memory and Cognition, 41, 1–12.
Cepeda, N. J., Pashler, H., Vul, E., Wixted, J. T., & Rohrer, D. (2006). Distributed practice in verbal recall tasks: A review and quantitative synthesis. Psychological Bulletin, 132(3), 354–380.
Chein, J., & Schneider, W. (2005). Neuroimaging studies of practice-related change: fMRI and meta-analytic evidence of a domain-general control network for learning. Cognitive Brain Research, 25(3), 607–623.
de Jong, N. (2005). Can second language grammar be learned through listening? An experimental study. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27(2), 205–234.
de Jong, N., & Perfetti, C. A. (2011). Fluency training in the ESL classroom: An experimental study of fluency development and proceduralization. Language Learning, 62(2), 533–568.
de Jong, N. & Tillman, P. (this volume). Grammatical structures and oral fluency in immediate task repetition. In M. Bygate (Ed.), Learning language through task repetition (pp.43–73). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
DeKeyser, R. M. (1997). Beyond explicit rule learning: Automatizing second language morphosyntax. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19(2), 195–221.
DeKeyser, R. M. (2009). Cognitive-psychological processes in second language learning. In M. Long & C. Doughty (Eds.), Handbook of second language teaching (pp. 119–138). Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
DeKeyser, R. M. (2012). Interactions between individual differences, treatments, and structures in SLA. Language Learning, 62(Suppl. 2), 189–200.
DeKeyser, R. (2015). Skill acquisition theory. In B. VanPatten & J. Williams (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition. An introduction (pp. 94–112). London: Routledge.
DeKeyser, R. (2017). Knowledge and skill in SLA. In S. Loewen & M. Sato (Eds.), Handbook of instructed second language acquisition (pp. 15–32). London: Routledge.
De Ridder, I., Vangehuchten, L., & Seseña Gómez, M. (2007). Enhancing automaticity through task-based language learning. Applied Linguistics, 28(2), 309–315.
Ellis, R. (2003). Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ellis, R. (2016). Focus on Form: A critical review. Language Teaching Research, 20(3), 405–428.
Ericsson, K. A. (2006). The influence of experience and deliberate practice on the development of superior expert performance. In K. A. Ericsson, N. Charness, P. J. Feltovich, & R. R. Hoffman (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance (pp. 683–703). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ericsson, K. A., Krampe, R. T., & Tesch-Römer, C. (1993). The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. Psychological Review, 100(3), 363–406.
Fukuta, J. (2016). Effects of task repetition on learners’ attention orientation in L2 oral production. Language Teaching Research, 20(3), 321–340.
Gade, M., Druey, M. D., Souza, A. S., & Oberauer, K. (2014). Interference within and between declarative and procedural representations in working memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 76, 174–194.
Gatbonton, E., & Segalowitz, N. (1988). Creative automatization: Principles for promoting fluency within a communicative framework. TESOL Quarterly, 22(3), 473–492.
Henke, K. (2010). A model for memory systems based on processing modes rather than consciousness. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 11, 523–532.
Hill, N. M., & Schneider, W. (2006). Brain changes in the development of expertise: Neuroanatomical and neurophysiological evidence about skill-based adaptations. In K. A. Ericsson, N. Charness, P. J. Feltovich, & R. R. Hoffman (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance (pp. 653–682). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kang, S. H. K., & Pashler, H. (2012). Learning painting styles: Spacing is advantageous when it promotes discriminative contrast. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 26(1), 97–103.
Kerr, R., & Booth, B. (1978). Specific and varied practice of motor skill. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 46, 395–401.
Kornell, N., & Bjork, R. A. (2008). Learning concepts and categories: Is spacing the “enemy of induction”?Psychological Science, 19(6), 584–592.
Lightbown, P. (2007). Transfer appropriate processing as a model for classroom second language acquisition. In Z. Han (Ed.), Understanding second language process (pp. 27–44). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Logan, G. (2002). An instance theory of attention and memory. Psychological Review, 109(2), 376–400.
Long, M. (2015). Task-based language learning. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
Martin-Chang, S. L., & Levy, B. A. (2005). Fluency transfer: Differential gains in reading speed and accuracy following isolated word and context training. Reading and Writing, 18, 343–376.
Martin-Chang, S. L., & Levy, B. A. (2006). Word reading fluency: A transfer appropriate processing account of fluency transfer. Reading and Writing, 19, 517–542.
Morris, D. D., Bransford, J. D., & Franks, J. J. (1977). Levels of processing versus transfer appropriate processing. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 16, 519–533.
Nakata, T. (2015). Effects of expanding and equal spacing on second language vocabulary learning: Does gradually increasing spacing increase vocabulary learning?Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 37(4), 677–711.
Newell, A., & Rosenbloom, P. S. (1981). Mechanisms of skill acquisition and the law of practice. In J. R. Anderson (Ed.), Cognitive skills and their acquisition (pp. 1–55). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Norris, J. (2009). Task-based teaching and testing. In M. H. Long & C. J. Doughty (Eds.), Handbook of language teaching (pp. 578–594). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
Osthus, P. (2014). Is interleaved practice better than blocked practice for aurally presented grammar rules? A comparison of online- and laboratory-based methodologies (Unpublished qualifying paper). University of Maryland.
Rodgers, D. M. (2011). The automatization of verbal morphology in instructed second language acquisition. IRAL, 49, 295–319.
Roediger, H. L. I., Gallo, D. A., & Geraci, L. (2002). Processing approaches to cognition: The impetus from the levels-of-processing framework. Memory, 10(5/6), 319–332.
Rohrer, D. (2015). Student instruction should be distributed over long time periods. Educational Psychology Review, 27, 635–643.
Rosenbloom, P., & Newell, A. (1987). Learning by chunking: A production system model of practice. In D. Klahr, P. Langley, & R. Neches (Eds.), Production system models (pp. 221–286). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Samuda, V., & Bygate, M. (2008). Tasks in second language learning. Houndmills: Palgrave MacMillan.
Segalowitz, N. (2003). Automaticity and second languages. In C. Doughty & M. Long (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 382–408). Oxford: Blackwell.
Serrano, R. (2011). The time factor in EFL classroom practice. Language Learning, 61(1), 117–145.
Serrano, R., & Muñoz, C. (2007). Same hours, different time distribution: Any difference in EFL?System, 35, 305–321.
Sheppard, C. (2006). The effects of instruction directed at the gaps second language learners noticed in their oral production. (Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation), University of Auckland, New Zealand.
Singley, M. K., & Anderson, J. R. (1989). The transfer of cognitive skill. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Spada, N., Jessop, L., Tomita, Y., Suzuki, W., & Valeo, A. (2014). Isolated and integrated form-focused instruction: Effects on different types of L2 knowledge. Language Teaching Research, 18(4), 453–473.
Spada, N., & Lightbown, P. M. (2008). Form-focused instruction: isolated or integrated?TESOL Quarterly, 42(2), 181–207.
Squire, L. R., & Wixted, J. T. (2011). The cognitive neuroscience of human memory since H.M. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 34, 259–288.
Stengers, H., Deconinck, J., Boers, F., & Eyckmans, J. (2016). Does copying idioms promote their recall?Computer Assisted Language Learning, 29(2), 289–301..
Suzuki, Y., & DeKeyser, R. (2016). Exploratory research on L2 distributed practice: An aptitude-by-treatment interaction. Applied Psycholinguistics, 38(1), 27–56.
Suzuki, Y., & DeKeyser, R. (2017). Effects of distributed practice on the automatization of L2 morphosyntax. Language Teaching Research, 21(2), 166–188.
Thai, C., & Boers, F. (2016). Repeating a monologue under increasing time pressure: Effects on fluency, complexity, and accuracy. TESOL Quarterly, 50(2), 369–393.
Toppino, T. C., & Gerbier, E. (2014). About practice: Repetition, spacing, and abstraction. Psychology of Learning and Motivation. Advances in Research and Theory, 60, 113–189.
Trofimovich, P. (2005). Spoken-word processing in native and second languages: An investigation of auditory word priming. Applied Psycholinguistics, 26(4), 479–504.
Wahlheim, C. N., Dunlosky, J., & Jacoby, L. L. (2011). Spacing enhances the learning of natural concepts: an investigation of mechanisms, metacognition, and aging. Memory and Cognition, 39(4), 750–763.
Zulkiply, N., & Burt, J. S. (2013). The examplar interleaving effect in inductive learning: moderation by the difficulty of category discriminations. Memory and Cognition, 41(1), 16–27.
Cited by (17)
Cited by 17 other publications
Hiver, Phil, Ali H. Al‐Hoorie & Akira Murakami
2024. Modeling the Effects of Task Repetition in Second Language Writing: Examining Interindividual and Intraindividual Variability. Language Learning
Kakitani, Joe & Judit Kormos
2024. The effects of distributed practice on second language fluency development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition► pp. 1 ff.
Tabari, Mahmoud Abdi & Seyyed Ehsan Golparvar
2024. The interplay of task repetition and task rehearsal in L2 written production across varied proficiency levels. Language Teaching Research
2023. Identification of commonalities across different languages. Frontiers in Language Sciences 2
O’Reilly, David & Emma Marsden
2023. Elicited metaphoric competence in a second language: a construct associated with vocabulary knowledge and general proficiency?. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 61:2 ► pp. 287 ff.
Rogers, John
2023. Spacing Effects in Task Repetition Research. Language Learning 73:2 ► pp. 445 ff.
Le Bouthillier, Josée, Renée Bourgoin & Joseph Dicks
2022. L’acquisition de la langue orale par l’entremise de tâches de centres d’apprentissage de littératie dans des classes d’immersion française. The Canadian Modern Language Review 78:2 ► pp. 91 ff.
Suzuki, Yuichi, Masaki Eguchi & Nel de Jong
2022. Does the Reuse of Constructions Promote Fluency Development in Task Repetition? A Usage‐Based Perspective. TESOL Quarterly 56:4 ► pp. 1290 ff.
Mohammad Javad Ahmadian & Michael H. Long
2021. The Cambridge Handbook of Task-Based Language Teaching,
2021. Conversing with Humans and Objects: On Repetition and the Curative Power in Animation Making. The Canadian Modern Language Review 77:4 ► pp. 353 ff.
Bygate, Martin, Virginia Samuda & Kris Van den Branden
2021. A Pedagogical Rationale for Task-Based Language Teaching for the Acquisition of Real-World Language Use. In The Cambridge Handbook of Task-Based Language Teaching, ► pp. 27 ff.
Doe, Timothy
2021. Fluency development in an EFL setting: A one-semester study. Language Teaching Research► pp. 136216882110585 ff.
Khezrlou, Sima
2021. Explicit instruction through task repetition: effects on explicit and implicit knowledge development. Language Awareness 30:1 ► pp. 62 ff.
Suzuki, Yuichi
2021. Optimizing Fluency Training for Speaking Skills Transfer: Comparing the Effects of Blocked and Interleaved Task Repetition. Language Learning 71:2 ► pp. 285 ff.
Bygate, Martin
2020. Some directions for the possible survival of TBLT as a real world project. Language Teaching 53:3 ► pp. 275 ff.
SUZUKI, YUICHI, TATSUYA NAKATA & ROBERT DEKEYSER
2019. Optimizing Second Language Practice in the Classroom: Perspectives from Cognitive Psychology. The Modern Language Journal 103:3 ► pp. 551 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.