Chapter published in:
Learning Language through Task Repetition
Edited by Martin Bygate
[Task-Based Language Teaching 11] 2018
► pp. 75–96

Chapter 3
The effects of task repetition and task complexity on L2 lexicon use

| Georgia State University
| Georgia State University
| Georgia State University
| University of Hawai’i at Mãnoa
| Georgia State University
To date, a growing number of studies in instructed second language acquisition (SLA) have investigated the effects of task repetition on L2 performance (e.g., complexity, accuracy, fluency) as well as on the occurrence of interaction-driven learning opportunities (e.g., Bygate, 2001; Fukuta, 2016; Kim & Tracy-Ventura, 2013). However, studies have not investigated how repeating different aspects of tasks (e.g., content or procedure) during collaborative tasks affects second language lexical use. The current study aims to fill that gap by comparing the impact of procedural repetition and task repetition on the lexical use of paired language learners as they repeat collaborative tasks. Furthermore, how task complexity mediates task repetition effects was also investigated. Four intact junior high school English classes (n = 73) were randomly assigned to one of the following groups: (1) simple task with exact task repetition, (2) simple task with procedural repetition, (3) complex task with exact task repetition, and (4) complex task with procedural repetition. All groups participated in three collaborative tasks over three days. The task repetition groups carried out the same information-exchange task with the same content three times, while the procedural repetition groups followed the same task procedure but had different content for the three sessions. Learners’ interaction data during collaborative tasks were transcribed and analyzed for lexical use using a natural language processing tool. Lexical use was operationalized by word familiarity, age of acquisition (AoA), and word frequency (Kyle & Crossley, 2015). The findings indicated that as learners repeated tasks, they used words that are less familiar and have a higher age of acquisition. Task complexity was found to be a mediating factor for the relationship between task repetition and vocabulary use.
Article outline
  • The effects of task repetition and task complexity on L2 lexicon use
  • Background
    • Task repetition and L2 oral production during monologic tasks
    • Repeating different characteristics of collaborative tasks
    • Beyond task repetition effects: Mediating variables
  • Method
    • Participants
    • Materials
    • Procedure
    • Data analysis: Natural language processing tools (NLPT)
    • Statistical analysis
  • Results
    • Word familiarity
    • Word age of acquisition
    • Word frequency
  • Discussion
  • Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 25 September 2018
https://doi.org/10.1075/tblt.11.03kim
References
Ahmadian, M. J.
(2013) Working memory and task repetition in second language oral production. Asian Journal of English Language Teaching, 23, 37–55.Google Scholar
Ahmadian, M.J., & Tavakoli, M.
(2011) The effects of simultaneous use of careful online planning and task repetition on accuracy, complexity, and fluency in EFL learners’ oral production. Language Teaching Research, 15, 35–59.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brysbaert, M., & New, B.
(2009) Moving beyond Kučera and Francis: A critical evaluation of current word frequency norms and the introduction of a new and improved word frequency measure for American English. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 977–990.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bygate, M.
(1996) Effects of task repetition: Appraising the developing language of learners. In J. Willis & D. Willis (Eds.), Challenge and change in language teaching (pp. 136–146). London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
(2001) Effects of task repetition on the structure and control of oral language. In M. Bygate, P. Skehan & M. Swain (Eds.), Researching pedagogic tasks: Second language learning, teaching and testing (pp. 23–48). Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
(2016) Sources, developments and directions of task-based language teaching. The Language Learning Journal, 44, 381–400.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bygate, M., & Samuda, V.
(2005) Integrative planning through the use of task repetition. In R. Ellis (Ed.), Planning and task performance in a second language (pp. 37–74). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Coltheart, M.
(1981) The MRC psycholinguistic database. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 33, 497–505.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Crossley, S. A., Cobb, T., & McNamara, D. S.
(2013a) Comparing count-based and band-based indices of word frequency: Implications for active vocabulary research and pedagogical applications. System, 41, 965–981.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Crossley, S. A., Feng, S., Cai, Z., & McNamara, D. S.
(2013b) Computer simulations of MRC Psycholinguistics Database word properties: Concreteness, familiarity, and imageability. In S. Jarvis & M. Daller (Eds.), Vocabulary knowledge: Human ratings and automated measures (pp. 135–156). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Crossley, S., & McNamara, D.
(2013) Applications of text analysis tools for spoken response grading. Language Learning & Technology, 17, 171–192.Google Scholar
Crossley, S. A., Salsbury, T., McNamara, D. S., & Jarvis, S.
(2011a) What is lexical proficiency? Some answers from computational models of speech data. TESOL Quarterly, 45, 182–193.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2011b) Predicting lexical proficiency in language learner texts using computational indices. Language Testing, 28, 561–580.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dobao, A. F.
(2012) Collaborative dialogue in learner–learner and learner–native speaker interaction. Applied Linguistics, 33, 229–256.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, R.
(2001) Non-reciprocal tasks, comprehension and second language acquisition. In M. Bygate, P. Skehan, & M. Swain. (Eds.), Researching pedagogic tasks: Second language learning, teaching and testing (pp. 49–74). Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
Foster, P., & Skehan, P.
(1996) The influence of planning and task type on second language performance. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18, 299–323.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Foster, P., Tonkyn, A., & Wigglesworth, G.
(2000) Measuring spoken language: A unit for all reasons. Applied Linguistics, 21, 354–375.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fukuta, J.
(2016) Effects of task repetition on learners’ attention orientation in L2 oral production. Language Teaching Research, 20, 321–340.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gass, S., Mackey, A., Alvarez‐Torres, M. J., & Fernández‐García, M.
(1999) The effects of task repetition on linguistic output. Language Learning, 49, 549–581.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Guo, L. Crossley, S. A., & McNamara, D. S.
(2013) Predicting human judgments of essay quality in both integrated and independent second language writing samples: A comparison study. Writing Assessment, 18, 218–238.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Haberlandt, K. F., & Graesser, A. C.
(1985) Component processes in text comprehension and some of their interactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 114, 357–374.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hawkes, M.
(2012) Using task repetition to direct learner attention and focus on form. ELT Journal, 66, 327–336.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, D. O., & Suethanapornkul, S.
(2013) The cognition hypothesis: A synthesis and meta‐analysis of research on second language task complexity. Language Learning, 63, 330–367.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jung, Y., Crossley, S. A., & McNamara, D. S.
(2015) Linguistic features in MELAB writing task performance (Working Paper No. 2015–05). Retrieved from Cambridge Michigan Language Assessment website: http://​www​.cambridgemichigan​.org​/about​-us​/research​/working​-papers/
Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A.
(1980) A theory of reading: From eye fixations to comprehension. Psychological Review, 87, 329–354.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kim, Y.
(2013) Promoting attention to form through task repetition in. In K. McDonough & A. Mackey (Eds.), Second language interaction in diverse educational contexts (pp. 3–24). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2015) The role of tasks as vehicles for learning in classroom interaction. In N. Markee (Ed.), Handbook of classroom discourse and interaction (pp. 163–181). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Kim, Y., & McDonough, K.
(2011) Using pre-task modeling to encourage collaborative learning opportunities. Language Teaching Research, 15, 1–17.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kim, Y., & Payant, C.
(2014) A pedagogical proposal for task sequencing: An exploration of task repetition and task complexity on learning opportunities. In M. Baralt, R. Gilabert, & P. Robinson (Eds.), Task sequencing and instructed second language learning (pp. 151–177). London: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar
Kim, Y., & Tracy-Ventura, N.
(2013) The role of task repetition in L2 performance development: What needs to be repeated during task-based interaction? System, 41, 829–840.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kormos, J.
(2006) Speech production and second language acquisition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Kuperman, V., Stadthagen-Gonzales, H, & Brysbaert, M.
(2012) Age-of-acquisition ratings for 30,000 English words. Behavior Research Methods, 44, 978–990.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kyle, K. & Crossley, S. A.
(2015) Automatically assessing lexical sophistication: Indices, tools, findings, and application. TESOL Quarterly, 49, 757–786.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2016) The relationship between lexical sophistication and independent and source-based writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 34, 12–24.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lapkin, S., Swain, M., & Smith, M.
(2002) Reformulation and the learning of French pronominal verbs in a Canadian French immersion context. The Modern Language Journal, 86, 485–507.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Laufer, B., & Nation, P.
(1995) Vocabulary size and use: Lexical richness in L2 written production. Applied Linguistics, 16, 307–322.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Levelt, W. J. M.
(1989) Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Long, M.
(2015) Second language acquisition and task-based language teaching. Malden, MA: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar
Lynch, T., & Maclean, J.
(2000) Exploring the benefits of task repetition and recycling for classroom language learning. Language Teaching Research, 4, 221–250.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lynch, T.
(2007) Learning from the transcripts of an oral communication task. ELT journal, 61, 311–320.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mackey, A.
(2007) Interaction as practice. In R. M. DeKeyser (Ed.), Practice in a second language: Perspectives from applied linguistics and cognitive psychology (pp. 85–110). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McCarthy, P. M., & Jarvis, S.
(2010) MTLD, vocd-D, and HD-D: A validation study of sophisticated approaches to lexical diversity assessment. Behavior research methods, 42, 381–392.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Meara, P., & Bell, H.
(2001) P_Lex: A simple and effective way of describing the lexical characteristics of short L2 texts. Prospect, 3, 5–19.Google Scholar
Michel, M. C., Kuiken, F., & Vedder, I.
(2007) The influence of complexity in monologic versus dialogic tasks in Dutch L2. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 45, 241–259.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mochizuki, N., & Ortega, L.
(2008) Balancing communication and grammar in beginning-level foreign language classrooms: A study of guided planning and relativization. Language Teaching Research, 12, 11–37.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nation, P.
(2005) Second language vocabulary. In K. Brown (Ed.), Encyclopedia of language and linguistics (Vol. 14, pp. 413–448). Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Patanasorn, C.
(2010) Effects of procedural, content, and task repetition on accuracy and fluency in an EFL context (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ.Google Scholar
Perfetti, C. A.
(1985) Reading ability. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pickering, M. J., & Garrod, S.
(2004) Toward a mechanistic psychology of dialogue. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 27, 169–190.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Plonsky, L., & Kim, Y.
(2016) Task-based learner production: A substantive and methodological review. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 36, 73–97.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rayner, K, & Pollatsek, A.
(1994) The psychology of reading. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Robinson, P.
(2001) Task complexity, cognitive resources, and syllabus design: A triadic framework for examining task influences on SLA. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 287–318). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2007) Task complexity, theory of mind, and intentional reasoning: Effects on L2 speech production, interaction, uptake and perceptions of task difficulty. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 45, 193–213.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Salsbury, T., Crossley, S. A., & McNamara, D. S.
(2011) Psycholinguistic word information in second language oral discourse. Second Language Research, 27, 343–360.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Skehan, P.
(2009a) Modelling second language performance: Integrating complexity, accuracy, fluency, and lexis. Applied Linguistics, 30, 510–532.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2009b) Models of speaking and the assessment of second language proficiency. In A. Benati (Ed.), Issues in second language proficiency (pp. 203–215). London: Continuum.Google Scholar
(2014) Limited attentional capacity, second language performance, and task-based pedagogy. In P. Skehan (Ed.), Processing perspectives on task performance (pp. 211–260). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Swain, M., & Lapkin, S.
(1998) Interaction and second language learning: Two adolescent French immersion students working together. The cModern Language Journal, 82, 320–337.Google Scholar
Van den Branden, K., Bygate, M., & Norris, J. M.
(2009) Task-based language teaching: Introducing the reader. In K. Van den Branden, M. Bygate & J. M. Norris (Eds.), Task-based language teaching: A reader (pp. 1–13). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Vermeer, A.
(2000) Coming to grips with lexical richness in spontaneous speech data. Language Testing, 17, 65–83.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Yu, G.
(2009) Lexical diversity in writing and speaking task performances. Applied Linguistics, 31, 236–259.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zipf, G. K.
(1935) The psycho-biology of language. New York, NY: Houghton-Mifflin.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 3 other publications

Khezrlou, Sima
2019. Task Repetition and Corrective Feedback: The Role of Feedback Types and Structure Saliency. English Teaching & Learning 43:2 ► pp. 213 ff. Crossref logo
Khezrlou, Sima
2021. Explicit instruction through task repetition: effects on explicit and implicit knowledge development. Language Awareness 30:1 ► pp. 62 ff. Crossref logo
Sánchez, Alberto J., Rosa M. Manchón & Roger Gilabert
2020.  In Writing and Language Learning [Language Learning & Language Teaching, 56], ► pp. 121 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 31 march 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.