Chapter published in:

Learning Language through Task Repetition
Edited by Martin Bygate
[Task-Based Language Teaching 11] 2018
► pp. 143–169

Chapter 6. Effects of task type, task-type repetition, and performance criteria on L2 oral production

Xingchao Hu | Nanjing Medical University, China

This study investigates the impact of task type, task-type repetition, and performance criteria on oral second language production. One hundred and forty-four Chinese learners of English were randomly paired and assigned to either a map task or a picture-story task. Each task type was repeated a week later via a different exemplar. Each experimental group was then further divided between “high” and “low” performance criterion groups, and a control group (CG). Both the high criterion (HC) and the low criterion (LC) groups were informed at the outset that they would be asked to perform an additional activity upon completion of the baseline task. The HC speakers undertook a more demanding post-task activity and the LC group a less demanding one, with no extra post-task requirement for the CG. Analysing participants’ language production in terms of complexity, accuracy, and fluency, a strong effect for task type was observed. Task-type repetition resulted in greater accuracy and affected all fluency measures (though not all in the same direction). Finally, the high criterion condition was positively related to phrasal complexity and fluency on both task types, but negatively associated with subordination complexity on the picture-story task, findings not attested in previous studies. Results are discussed in terms of the limited attentional resources model on second language performance. The study contributes to our understanding of how pre-specified task performance criteria can affect students’ performance of a task.

Published online: 25 September 2018
https://doi.org/10.1075/tblt.11.06hu

References

Allwright, R. L., Woodley, M. P., & Allwright, J. M.

(1988) Investigating reformulation as a practical strategy for the teaching of academic writing. Applied Linguistics, 9(3), 236–256.

Appel, G., & Lantolf, J. P.

(1994) Speaking as mediation: A study of L1 and L2 text recall tasks. The Modern Language Journal, 78, 437–452.

Boers, F., Kappel, J., Stengers, H., & Demecheleer, M.

(2006) Formulaic sequences and perceived oral proficiency: Putting a Lexical Approach to the test. Language Teaching Research, 10(3), 245–261.

Brown, G., & Yule, G.

(1983) Teaching the spoken language: An approach based on the analysis of conversational English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Brumfit, C.

(2000) Accuracy and fluency: The basic polarity. Reprinted in Riggenbach, H. (Ed.) (2000) Perspectives on Fluency (pp. 61–73). Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press.

Bygate, M.

(1996) Effects of task repetition: Appraising the developing language of learners. In J. Willis & D. Willis (Eds.), Challenge and change in language teaching. Oxford: Macmillan Education.

(1999) Quality of language and purpose of task: Patterns of learners’ language on two oral communication tasks. Language Teaching Research, 3(3), 185–214.

(2001) Effects of task repetition on the structure and control of oral language. In M. Bygate, P. Skehan, & M. Swain (Eds.), Researching pedagogic tasks: Second language learning, teaching and testing (pp. 23–48). Harlow: Pearson Education.

Clark, H. H., & Brennan, S. E.

(1991) Grounding in communication. In J. M. L. L. B. Resnick & S. D. Teasley (Ed.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition (pp. 127–149). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

Clark, H. H., & Schaefer, E. F.

(1989) Contributing to discourse. Cognitive Science, 13, 259–294.

Clark, H. H., & Wilkes-Gibbs, D.

(1986) Referring as a collaborative process. Cognition, 22, 1–39.

Coughlan, P., & Duff, P. A.

(1994) Same task, different activities: Analysis of a SLA task from an activity theory perspective. In J. P. Lantolf & G. Appel (Eds.), Vygotskian approaches to second language research (pp. 173–193). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

Crookes, G.

(1989) Planning and interlanguage variation. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 11, 367–383.

Derwing, T. M., Rossiter, M. J., Munro, M. J., & Thomson, R. I.

(2004) Second language fluency: Judgments on different tasks. Language Learning, 54(4), 655–679.

Ehrlich, S., Avery, P., & Yorio, C.

(1989) Discourse structure and the negotiation of comprehensible input. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 11, 397–414.

Ellis, R.

(2009) The differential effects of three types of task planning on the fluency, complexity, and accuracy in L2 oral production. Applied Linguistics, 30(4), 474–509.

Ellis, R., & Yuan, F.

(2005) The effects of careful within-task planning on oral and written task performance. In R. Ellis (Ed.), Planning and task performance in a second language (pp. 167–192). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Foster, P., & Skehan, P.

(1996) The influence of planning and task type on second language performance. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18, 299–323.

Foster, P., Tonkyn, A., & Wigglesworth, G.

(2000) Measuring spoken language: A unit for all reasons. Applied Linguistics, 21(3), 354–375.

Gass, S. M., Mackey, A., Alvarez-Torres, M. J., & Fernandez-Garcia, M.

(1999) The effects of task repetition on linguistic output. Language Learning, 49(4), 549–581.

Kormos, J.

(2006) Speech production and second language acquisition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Longan, G. D.

(1988) Towards an instance theory of automatization. Psychological Review, 95(4), 492–527.

Lynch, T., & Maclean, J.

(2000) Exploring the benefits of task repetition and recycling for classroom language teaching. Language Teaching Research, 4(3), 221–250.

(2001) “A case of exercising”: Effects of immediate task repetition on learners’ performance. In M. Bygate, P. Skehan & M. Swain (Eds.), Researching pedagogical tasks: Second language learning, teaching and testing (pp. 141–162). Harlow: Longman.

Mackey, A., Kanganas, A. P., & Oliver, R.

(2007) Task familiarity and interactional feedback in child ESL classrooms. TESOL Quarterly, 41(2), 285–312.

Mehnert, U.

(1998) The effects of different lengths of time for planning on second language performance. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 20, 83–108.

Norris, J. M., & Ortega, L.

(2009) Towards an organic approach to investigating CAF in instructed SLA: The case of complexity. Applied Linguistics, 30(4), 555–578.

Ortega, L.

(1999) Planning and focus on form in L2 oral performance. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21, 109–148.

(2003) Syntactic complexity measures and their relationship to L2 proficiency: A research synthesis of college-level L2 writing. Applied Linguistics, 24(4), 492–518.

Pawley, A., & Syder, F. H.

(1983) Two puzzles for linguistic theory: Nativelike selection and nativelike fluency. In J. C. Richards & R. W. Schmidt (Eds.), Language and communication (pp. 191–226). London: Longman.

(2000) The one-clause-at-a-time hypothesis. In H. Riggenbach (Ed.), Perspectives on fluency (pp. 163–199). Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press.

Plough, I., & Gass, S. M.

(1993) Interlocutor and task familiarity: Effects on interactional structure. In G. Crookes & S. M. Gass (Eds.), Tasks and language learning: Integrating theory and practice (pp. 35–56). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.

Robinson, P.

(1995) Task complexity and second language narrative discourse. Language Learning, 45(1), 99–140.

(2001) Task complexity, task difficulty, and task production: Exploring interactions in a componential framework. Applied Linguistics, 22(1), 27–57.

(2003) Attention and memory during SLA. In C. J. Doughty & M. H. Long (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 631–678). Oxford: Blackwell.

(2005) Cognitive complexity and task sequencing: Studies in a componential framework for second language task design. IRAL, 43, 1–32.

Sangarun, J.

(2005) The effects of focusing on meaning and form in strategic planning. In R. Ellis (Ed.), Planning and task performance in a second language (pp. 11–141). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Skehan, P.

(1998) A cognitive approach to language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Skehan, P., & Foster, P.

(1999) The influence of task structure and processing conditions on narrative retellings. Language Learning, 49(1), 93–120.

(2005) Strategic and on-line planning: The influence of surprise information and task time on second language performance. In R. Ellis (Ed.), Planning and task performance in a second language (pp. 193–216). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Tannen, D.

(1980) A comparative analysis of oral narrative strategies: Athenian Greek and American English. In W. L. Chafe (Ed.), The pear stories (pp. 51–87). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

Tarone, E.

(1985) Variability in interlanguage use: A study of style-shifting in morphology and syntax. Language Learning, 35(3), 373–403.

Tarone, E., & Parrish, B.

(1988) Task-related variation in interlanguage: The case of articles. Language Learning, 38(1), 21–44.

Tavakoli, P., & Foster, P.

(2008) Task design and second language performance: The effect of narrative type on learner output. Language Learning, 58(2), 439–473.

Tavakoli, P., & Skehan, P.

(2005) Strategic planning, task structure, and performance testing. In R. Ellis (Ed.), Planning and task performance in a second language (pp. 239–273). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Towell, R., Hawkins, R., & Bazergui, N.

(1996) The development of fluency in advanced learners of French. Applied Linguistics, 17(1), 84–119.

Wigglesworth, G.

(1997) An investigation of planning time and proficiency level on oral test discourse. Language Testing, 14, 85–106.

Wilkes-Gibbs, D.

(1997) Studying language use as collaboration. In G. K. E. Kellerman (Ed.), Communication strategies: Psycholinguistic and sociolinguistic perspectives (pp. 238–274). London: Longman.

Yuan, F., & Ellis, R.

(2003) The effects of pre-task planning and on-line planning on fluency, complexity and accuracy in L2 monologic oral production. Applied Linguistics, 24(1), 1–27.

Cited by

Cited by other publications

Hidalgo, María Ángeles & María del Pilar García Mayo

2019. The influence of task repetition type on young EFL learners’ attention to form. Language Teaching Research ► pp. 136216881986555 ff.

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 09 april 2020. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.