This chapter recommends a different understanding of task “repetition” from the perspective of Complex Dynamic Systems Theory (CDST). It suggests that a better term than “repetition” is “iteration”. While substituting one term for another might seem to be purely an academic exercise, doing so actually has important implications for researchers and teachers. For one, it is an acknowledgement of the common observation that learners’ performance on tasks will never be the same from one iteration to the next. In addition, it maintains that useful language pedagogy should build learners’ capacity to make meaning beyond their exploiting conventional uses of language to which learners have already been exposed. Further to this point, iteration instead of repetition is consistent with the CDST position that learning is not limited to reproduction. Through iteration, learners receive practice in adapting their language resources to mutable temporal and spatial contexts, and they construct their own learning paths. Also, the chapter problematizes the notion of transfer of learning, conceiving of it as transformation rather than transfer, and it addresses issues of measurement and nonlinearity. Finally, calling it task iteration honors the agency and uniqueness of learners and the construal that they give to the task at hand. As such, it calls for researchers to adopt a more emic perspective.
Article outline
Introduction
CDST’s interpretation of learning through task repetition
Ahmadian, M. J. (2012). Task repetition in ELT. ELT Journal, 66(3), 380–382.
Ahmadian, M. J. (2013). Working memory and task repetition in second language oral production. Asian Journal of English Language Teaching, 23, 37–55.
Ahmadian, M. J., & Tavakoli, M. (2011). Exploring the utility of action research to investigate second-language classrooms as complex systems. Educational Action Research, 19(2), 121–136.
Bygate, M. (1999), Task as context for the framing, reframing, and unframing of language. System, 27, 33–48.
Bygate, M. (2001). Effects of task repetition on the structure and control of oral language. In M. Bygate, P. Skehan, & M. Swain (Eds.), Researching pedagogic tasks: Second language learning, teaching and testing (pp. 23–48). Harlow: Pearson Longman.
Bygate, M. (2006). Areas of research that influence L2 speaking instruction. In E. Usó-Juan & A. Martínez-Flor (Eds.), Current trends in the development and teaching of the four skills (pp. 159–186.) Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Byrnes, H. (2007). Second and foreign language pedagogy. Paper presented at the 30th anniversary of American Association for Applied Linguistics. Retrieved from: <[URL]> (1 June, 2016).
Carraher, D., & Schliemann, A. D. (2002). The transfer dilemma. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 11, 1–24.
Chan, H. P., Verspoor, M., & Vahtrick, L. (2015). Dynamic development in speaking versus writing in identical twins. Language Learning, 65(2), 298–325.
Dale, R., & Spivey, M. J. (2006). Unraveling the dyad: Using recurrence analysis to explore patterns of syntactic coordination between children and caregivers in conversation. Language Learning, 56(3), 391–430.
Davis, B., & Simmt, E. (2003). Understanding learning systems: Mathematics education and complexity science. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 34(2), 137–167.
Davis, B., & Sumara, D. (2006). Complexity and education: Inquiries into learning, teaching, and research. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Deacon, T. W. (1997) The symbolic species: The coevolution of language and human brain. New York, NY: W. W. Norton.
de Jong, N., & Perfetti, C. A. (2011). Fluency training in the ESL classroom: An experimental study of fluency development and proceduralization. Language Learning, 61(2), 533–568.
Doll, W. E.Jr. (1993). A post-modern perspective on curriculum. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
Eisner, F., & Macqueen, J. M. (2006). Perceptual learning in speech: Stability over time (L). Journal of the Acoustic Society of America, 119(4), 1950–1953.
Ellis, R. (2003). Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ellis, R. (2009). The differential effects of three types of task planning on the fluency, complexity and accuracy in L2 oral production. Applied Linguistics, 30, 474–509.
Fazelpour, S., & Thompson, E. (2015). The Kantian brain: Brain dynamics from a neurophenomenological perspective. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 31, 223–229.
Feldman, J. (2006). From molecule to metaphor: A neural theory of language. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Gass, S., Mackey, A., Fernandez, M., & Alvarez-Torres, M. (1999). The effects of task repetition on linguistic output. Language Learning, 49(4), 549–80.
Gatbonton, E., & Segalowitz, N. (2005). Rethinking communicative language teaching: A focus on access to fluency. Canadian Modern Language Review, 61(3), 325–353.
Gick, M. L., & Holyoak, K. J. (1980). Analogical problem solving. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 306–355.
Gould, S. J. (2007). Punctuated equilibrium. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Gurzynski-Weiss, L., & Baralt, M. (2014). Exploring learner perception and use of task-based interactional feedback in face-to-face and CMC modes. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 36(1), 1–37.
Jaeger, F. T., & Ferreira, V. (2013). Seeking predictions from a predictive framework. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36(4), 359–360.
Johnson, M., Turk-Browne, N. B., & Goldberg, A. (2013). Prediction plays a key role in language development as well as processing. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36(4), 360–361.
Kim, Y., & Ventura-Tracy, N. (2013). The role of task repetition in L2 performance development: What needs to be repeated during task-based interaction?System, 41, 829–841.
Kim, Y., Payant, C., & Pearson, P. (2015). The intersection of task-based interaction, task complexity, and working memory. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 37(3), 549–581.
Koopmans, M. (2014). Change, self‐organization and the search for causality in educational research and practice. Complicity: An International Journal of Complexity and Education, 11(1), 20–39.
Lambert, C., & Kormos, J. (2014). Complexity, accuracy, and fluency in task-based l2 research: Toward more developmentally based measures of second language acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 35(5), 607–614.
Larsen-Freeman, D. (2006). Second language acquisition and the issue of fossilization: There is no end and there is no state. In Z-H. Han & T. Odlin (Eds.), Studies of fossilization in second language acquisition (pp. 189–200). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Larsen-Freeman D. (2009). Adjusting expectations: The study of complexity, accuracy, and fluency in second language acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 30(4), 579–589.
Larsen-Freeman, D. (2012). On the roles of repetition in language teaching and learning. Applied Linguistics Review, 3(2), 195–210.
Larsen-Freeman, D. (2013a). Transfer of learning transformed. Language Learning, 63(Special issue), 107–129.
Larsen-Freeman, D. (2013b). Complex, dynamic systems and technemes. In J. Arnold Morgan & T. Murphey (Eds.), Meaningful action: Earl Stevick’s influence on language teaching (pp. 190–201). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Larsen-Freeman, D. (2015). Research into practice: Grammar learning and teaching. Language Teaching, 48(2), 263–280.
Larsen-Freeman, D. (2016a). Shifting metaphors: From computer input to ecological affordances to adaptation. A plenary address delivered at the 50th International IATEFL Conference. Birmingham, 15 April. in Proceedings from the IATEFL 50th Anniversary Conference, Birmingham (pp.10–19). Kent: IATEFL.
Larsen-Freeman, D. (2016b). The psychology of language learning and “the science of the individual.” Paper presented at PLL2, Jyväskylä, Finland, 24 August.
Larsen-Freeman, D. (2017a). Complexity theory: The lessons continue. In L. Ortega & Z-H. Han (Eds.), Complexity theory and language development: In celebration of Diane Larsen-Freeman (pp. 11–50). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Larsen-Freeman, D. (2017b). On particularizing second language development. A paper presented at the Second Language Research Forum, Ohio State University, 13 October.
Larsen-Freeman, D., & Anderson, M. (2011). Techniques and principles in language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Larsen-Freeman, D., & Cameron, L. (2008). Complex systems and applied linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Leather, J., & van Dam, J. (2003). Towards an ecology of language acquisition. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Levi-Strauss, C. (1962). La pensée sauvage (The savage mind, English translation,1966). Chicago IL: The University of Chicago Press.
Lobato, J. (2006). Alternative perspectives on the transfer of learning: History, issues, and challenges for future research. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15, 431–449.
Long, M. H. (1996). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W. C. Ritchie & T. K. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 413–468). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Loschky, L., & Bley-Vroman, R. (1993). Grammar and task-based methodology. In G. Crookes & S. Gass (Eds.), Tasks and language learning: Integrating theory and practice (pp. 123–167). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Lowie, W. (2013). The CEFR and the dynamics of second language learning: Trends and challenges. Language Learning in Higher Education, 2(1), 17–34.
Lowie, W. (2015). Replication in Complex Dynamic Systems approaches to second language development. A paper presented at the American Association of Applied Linguistics/Canadian Association of Applied Linguistics joint conference, Toronto, Canada, 21 March.
Mackey, A. (1999). Input, interaction, and second language development: An empirical study of question formation in ESL. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21, 557 – 587.
Maurice, K. (1983). The fluency workshop. TESOL Newsletter, 17(4), 29.
Mercer, S. (2012). The complexity of learner agency. Apples – Journal of Applied Language Studies, 6(2), 41–59.
Milroy, J., & Milroy, L. (1999). Authority in language (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
Monaghan, P., & Christiansen, M. H. (2010). Words in puddles of sound: Modelling psycholinguistic effects in speech segmentation. Journal of Child Language, 37, 545–564.
Nitta, R., & Baba, K. (2014). Task repetition and L2 writing development. In H. Byrnes & R. Manchón (Eds.), Task-based language learning: Insights from and form L2 writing (pp. 107–136). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Norris, J. M., & Ortega, L. (2009). Towards an organic approach to investigating CAF in instructed SLA. Applied Linguistics, 30, 555–578.
Nguyen, H., & Larsen-Freeman, D. (2017). Using tasks to teach formulaic sequences: Interindividual and intraindividual variation. In M. J. Ahmadian & M. P. G. Mayo (Eds.), Recent trends in task-based learning and teaching (pp. 167–193). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Otheguy, R., García, O., & Reid, W. (2015). Clarifying translanguaging and deconstructing named languages: A perspective from linguistics. Applied Linguistics Review, 6(3), 281–307.
Plonsky, L. (2014). Study quality in quantitative L2 research (1990–2010): A methodological synthesis and call for reform. The Modern Language Journal, 98(1), 450–470.
Plough, I., & Gass, S. (1993). Interlocutor and task familiarity: Effects on interactional structure. In G. Crookes & S. Gass (Eds.), Tasks and language learning: Integrating theory and practice (pp. 35–56). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Rescorla, R. A., & Wagner, A. R. (1972). A theory of Pavlovian conditioning: Variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and nonreinforcement. In A. H. Black & W. F. Prokasy (Eds.), Classical conditioning, II: Current research and theory (pp. 64–99). New York, NY: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Rose, L. T., Rouhani, P., & Fischer, K. W. (2013). The science of the individual. Mind, Brain and Education, 7(3), 152–158.
Samuda, V. (2001) Guiding relationships between form and meaning during task performance: The role of the teacher. In M. Bygate, P. Skehan, & M. Swain (Eds.), Researching pedagogic tasks: Second language learning, teaching and testing (pp. 119–149). Harlow: Pearson Longman.
Samuda, V., & Bygate, M. (2008). Tasks in second language learning. Houndmills: Palgrave MacMillan.
Savage-Rumbaugh, S., & Lewin, R. (1994). Kanzi: The ape at the brink of the human mind. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
Segalowitz, N., & Trofimovich, P. (2012). Second language processing. In S. Gass & A. Mackey (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 179–192). London: Routledge.
Shanker, S. J., & King, B. J. (2002). The emergence of a new paradigm in ape language research. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 25, 605–656.
Sidman, M. (1960). Tactics of scientific research. New York, NY: Basic Books.
Skehan, P. (2009). Modelling second language performance: Integrating complexity, accuracy, fluency, and lexis. Applied Linguistics, 30(4), 510–532.
Smith, L., & Thelen, E. (Eds). (1993). A dynamic systems approach to development. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Spivey, M. (2007). The continuity of mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Sumner, M., Kim, S. K., King, E., & McGowan, K. (2014). The socially weighted encoding of spoken words: A dual-route approach to speech perception. Frontiers in Psychology, 4(1015), 1–13.
Taylor, J. R.2012. The mental corpus: How language is represented in the mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Thelen, E., & Bates, E. (2003). Connectionism and dynamic systems: Are they really different?Developmental Science, 6, 378–391.
Tomasello, M. (2000). Do young children have adult syntactic competence?Cognition, 74, 209–253.
Urry, J. (2005). The complexity turn. Theory, Culture & Society, 22(5), 1–14.
van de Guchte, M., Braaksma, M., Rijlaarsdam, G., & Bimmel, P. (2015). Focus on form through task repetition in TBLT. Language Teaching Research, 20(3), 1–21.
van Geert, P. (2011). The contribution of complex dynamic systems to development. Child Development Perspectives, 5(4), 273–278.
van Geert, P. (2017). Constructivist theories. In Hopkins, B. (Ed.). The Cambridge encyclopedia of child development (2nd ed.) (pp. 19–34). Cambridge (MA): Cambridge University Press.
van Geert, P., & Steenbeek, H. (2014). The good, the bad and the ugly? The dynamic interplay between educational practice, policy and research. Complicity, 11(2), 22–39.
van Geert, P., & Verspoor, M. (2015). Dynamic systems and language development. In B. MacWhinney & W. O’Grady (Eds.), The handbook of language emergence (pp. 537–556). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
van Lier, L.2004. The ecology and semiotics of language learning: A sociocultural perspective. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Verspoor, M., Schmid, M. S., & Xu, W. (2012). A dynamic usage based perspective on L2 writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 21, 239–263.
Weber, K., Christiansen, M. H., Petersson, K. M., Indefrey, P., & Hagoort, P. (2016). fMRI syntactic and lexical repetition effects reveal the initial stages of learning a new language. The Journal of Neuroscience, 36(26), 6872–6880.
Widdowson, H. G. (1983). Competence and capacity in language learning. In M. Clarke & J. Handscombe (Eds.), On TESOL ‘82: Pacific perspectives on language learning and teaching, (pp. 97–106). Washington, DC: TESOL.
Wolfe-Quintero K., Inagaki, S., & Kim, H.-Y. (1998). Second language development in writing: Measures of fluency, accuracy, & complexity. Honolulu, HI: Second Language Teaching & -Curriculum Center, University of Hawaii Press.
Cited by (10)
Cited by ten other publications
Hiver, Phil, Ali H. Al‐Hoorie & Akira Murakami
2024. Modeling the Effects of Task Repetition in Second Language Writing: Examining Interindividual and Intraindividual Variability. Language Learning
Kakitani, Joe & Judit Kormos
2024. The effects of distributed practice on second language fluency development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition► pp. 1 ff.
Khezrlou, Sima
2024. Effects of task repetition with consciousness-raising in wiki-mediated collaborative writing on the development of explicit and implicit knowledge. Computer Assisted Language Learning 37:1-2 ► pp. 243 ff.
Mostafaei Alaei, Mahnaz & Abbas Mansouri
2024. Unraveling the differential effects of task rehearsal and task repetition on L2 task performance: the mediating role of task modality. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching
Hanzawa, Keiko & Yuichi Suzuki
2023. How do learners perceive task repetition? Distributed practice effects on engagement and metacognitive judgment. The Modern Language Journal 107:2 ► pp. 451 ff.
Jackson, Daniel O.
2022. Task-Based Language Teaching,
Amelohina, Victoria, Florentina Nicolás-Conesa & Rosa M. Manchón
2020. From EMI to ICLHE. In Teacher Training for English-Medium Instruction in Higher Education [Advances in Higher Education and Professional Development, ], ► pp. 179 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.