The role of pre-task options in task-based language teaching has received considerable attention, most notably in the work of Peter Skehan. They constitute implementation variables that affect the complexity, accuracy and fluency (CAF) of language production and also, potentially language, development. Initially researchers focused on one preparedness option – pre-task planning – but subsequently broadened this to include within-task planning and rehearsal (i.e. task repetition). More recently a wider range of preparedness options have been investigated, including the pre-teaching of language and topic familiarity. This chapter reviews research on these different options, expanding the survey in Ellis (2005; 2009). In the case of rehearsal, I conclude that it enhances fluency and complexity but is only likely to lead to greater accuracy when combined with some other option such as form-focused instruction between repetitions. Pre-task planning is a complex activity that can vary in a number of ways – for example, the amount of time allocated to it and whether it is guided or unguided – and its impact on task performance depends on learner factors such as working memory. Overall, pre-task planning has been shown to lead to greater fluency and complexity but is less likely to enhance accuracy. Online planning has a powerful effect on how a task is performed, resulting in both increased accuracy and complexity. Relatively little research has investigated how pre-task instruction affects performance of a task but there is some evidence that it can result in increased accuracy albeit with a possible negative impact on fluency and complexity. The chapter concludes with some suggestions for future research, in particular the need to investigate the cognitive and affective processes involved when learners engage with different kinds of preparedness activities and how these processes relate to task performance, and also the impact that task options have on language development as well as language production.
Ahangari, S, & Abdi, M. (2011). The effect of pre-task planning on the accuracy and complexity of Iranian EFL learners’ oral performance. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 29, 1950–1959.
Ahmadian, M. (2011). The effects of guided careful online planning on complexity, accuracy and fluency in intermediate EFL learners’ oral production: The case of English articles. Language Teaching Research, 16, 129–149.
Ahmadian, M. (2012). The relationship between working memory capacity and L2 oral performance under task-based careful online planning condition. TESOL Quarterly, 46, 165–175.
Ahmadian, M., & Tavakoli, M. (2010). The effects of simultaneous use of careful online planning and task repetition on accuracy, complexity and fluency of EFL learners’ oral production. Language Teaching Research, 15, 35–59.
Aubrey, S. (2015). Effect of inter-cultural contact on L2 motivation and L2 learning: A process product study (Unpublished PhD thesis). University of Auckland.
Bui, H. (2014). Task readiness: Theoretical framework and empirical evidence from topic familiarity, strategic planning and proficiency levels. In P. Skehan (Ed.), Processing perspectives on task performance (pp.63–93). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Bygate, M. 2001. Effects of task repetition on the structure and control of oral language. In M. Bygate, P. Skehan, & M. Swain (Eds.), Researching pedagogic tasks: Second language learning, teaching and testing. Harlow: Longman.
De Jong, N. & Perfetti, C. A. (2011). Fluency training in the ESL classroom: An experimental study of fluency development and proceduralization. Language Learning, 61(2), 533–568.
Ellis R. (2009). The differential effects of three types of task planning on the fluency, complexity and accuracy in L2 oral production. Applied Linguistics, 30, 474–509.
Ellis, R., Li, S., & Zhu, Y. (2018). The effects of pre-task explicit instruction on the performance of a focused task. System.
Foster P., & Skehan, P. (1996). The influence of planning on performance in task-based learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18(3), 299–324.
Foster, P., & Skehan, P. (1999). The influence of source of planning and focus of planning on task-based performance. Language Teaching Research, 3, 215–247.
Fukuta, J. (2016). Effects of task repetition on learners’ attention orientation in L2 oral production. Language Teaching Research, 20, 321–340.
Guará-Tavares, M. G. (2008). Pre-task planning, working memory capacity and L2 speech performance (Unpublished PhD dissertation). Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Brazil.
Hawkes, M. (2012). Using task repetition to direct learner attention and focus on form. ELT Journal, 66(3), 327–336.
Hsu, H. (2012). Investigating the effects of planning on L2 chat performance. Calico Journal, 26, 619–638.
Hsu, H. (2015). The effect of task planning on L2 performance in text-based synchronous computer-mediated communication. Applied Linguistics, advance access August 7.
Kim, J. (2012). Effects of pre-task modelling on attention to form and question development. TESOL Quarterly, 47, 8–25.
Kim, Y.2013. Promoting attention to form through task repetition in a Korean EFL context. In K. McDonough & A. Mackey (Eds.). Second language interaction in diverse educational settings (pp.3–24). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Kim, Y., & Tracy-Ventura, N. (2013). The role of task repetition in L2 performance development: What needs to be repeated during task-based interaction?System, 41, 829–840.
Lambert, C., Kormos, J., & Minn, D. (2017). Task repetition and second language speech processing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 39(1),167–196.
Levelt, W. (1989). Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Li, L., Chen, J., & Sun, L. (2015). The effects of different lengths of pre-task planning time on L2 learners’ oral test performance. TESOL Quarterly, 49, 38–66.
Markee, N., & Kunitz, S. (2013). Doing planning and task performance in second language acquisition: An ethnomethodological respecification. Language Learning, 63, 629–664.
Mehnert U.1998. The effects of different lengths of time for planning on second language performance. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 20, 52–83.
Mehrang, F., & Rahimpour, M. (2010). The impact of task structure and planning conditions on oral performance of EFL learners. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2, 3678–3686.
Mochizuki, N., & Ortega, L. (2008). Balancing communication and grammar in beginning-level foreign language classrooms: A study of guided planning and relativization. Language Teaching Research, 12, 11–37.
Nielson, K. (2014). Can planning time compensate for individual differences in working memory capacity?Language Teaching Research, 18, 272–293.
Norris, J. M., & Ortega, L. (2009). Towards an organic approach to investigating CAF in instructed SLA: The case of complexity. Applied Linguistics, 30, 555–578.
Ortega, L. (2005). What do learners plan? Learner-driven attention to form during pre-task planning. In R. Ellis (Ed.), Planning and task performance in a second language (pp.77–109). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Patansorn, C. (2010). Effects of procedural content and task repetition on accuracy and fluency in an EFL context (Unpublished PhD dissertation). Northern Arizona University.
Robinson, P. (2001). Task complexity, task difficulty and task production: Exploring interactions in a componential framework'. Applied Linguistics, 22(1): 27–57.
Saeedi, M. (2015). Unguided planning, task structure and L2 oral performance: Focusing on complexity, accuracy and fluency. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Language Research, 2, 263–274.
Skehan, P. (2016). Tasks versus conditions: Two perspectives on task research and their implications for language pedagogy. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 36, 34–49.
Skehan, P., & Foster, P. (1997). Task type and task processing conditions as influences on foreign language performance. Language Teaching Research, 1, 185–211.
Skehan, P., & Foster, P. (1999). The influence of task structure and processing conditions on narrative retellings. Language Learning, 49(1), 93–120.
Tavakoli, P., & Foster, P. (2011). Task design and second language performance: The effect of narrative type on earner output. Language Learning, 61, 37–72.
Van de Guchte, M., Braaksma, M., Rijlaarsdam, G., & Bimmel, P. (2016). Focus on form through repetition in TBLT. Language Teaching Research, 20, 300–320.
Wen, Z. (2016). Phonological and executive working memory in task-based speech planning and performance. Language Learning Journal, 44, 418–435.
Yuan, F., & Ellis, R.2003. The effects of pre-task and on-line planning on fluency, complexity and accuracy in L2 monologic oral production. Applied Linguistics, 24, 1–27.
Cited by (18)
Cited by 18 other publications
Abdi Tabari, Mahmoud, Sima Khezrlou & Yu Tian
2024. Verb argument construction complexity indices and L2 written production: effects of task complexity and task repetition. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching 18:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Tabari, Mahmoud Abdi, Sima Khezrlou & Yu Tian
2024. Task complexity, task repetition, and L2 writing complexity: exploring interactions in the TBLT domain. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 62:2 ► pp. 871 ff.
Mostafaei Alaei, Mahnaz & Abbas Mansouri
2024. Unraveling the differential effects of task rehearsal and task repetition on L2 task performance: the mediating role of task modality. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching
Tabari, Mahmoud Abdi & Seyyed Ehsan Golparvar
2024. The interplay of task repetition and task rehearsal in L2 written production across varied proficiency levels. Language Teaching Research
2024. Task repetition versus task rehearsal: Understanding effects of task-readiness factors and elemental genres on L2 writing task performance. Language Teaching Research
Wu, Jingwen & Rod Ellis
2023. The effect of pre-task planning on computer-based second language writing. Language Teaching Research
Aubrey, Scott & Andrew Philpott
2022. Use of the L1 and L2 in strategic planning and rehearsal for task performances in an online classroom. Language Teaching Research
Kobayashi, Manami
2022. The distributed practice effects of speaking task repetition. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 32:1 ► pp. 142 ff.
Bui, Gavin
2021. Influence of learners’ prior knowledge, L2 proficiency and pre-task planning on L2 lexical complexity. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 59:4 ► pp. 543 ff.
Bui, Gavin & Rhett Yu
2021. Differentiating Task Repetition from Task Rehearsal. In Task-Based Language Teaching and Assessment, ► pp. 119 ff.
Ellis, Rod
2021. Task-Based Language Teaching: Early Days, Now and into the Future. In Task-Based Language Teaching and Assessment, ► pp. 39 ff.
2021. Learners’ Reflective Practice between the Repeated Performances of Tasks: Effects on Second Language Development. Dutch Journal of Applied Linguistics 10
Khezrlou, Sima
2024. Effects of task repetition with consciousness-raising in wiki-mediated collaborative writing on the development of explicit and implicit knowledge. Computer Assisted Language Learning 37:1-2 ► pp. 243 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 7 november 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.