References
Ahmadian, M.
(2012) The relationship between working memory capacity and L2 oral performance under task-based careful online planning condition. TESOL Quarterly, 46(1),165–175. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Al Khalil, M.
(2011) Second language motivation: Its relationship to noticing, affect, and production in task-based interaction (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Georgetown University.
An, H., & Li, S.
(2022) Working memory and second language interaction. In J. Schwieter & Z. Wen (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of working memory and language (pp. 656–698). Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2024a) Anxiety in task-based language teaching: A state-of-the-art review. In S. Li (Ed.), Individual difference factors in task-based language teaching (pp. 52–86). John Benjamins.Google Scholar
(2024b) The effects of planning type, working memory, and anxiety on L2 writing performance. In S. Li (Ed.), Individual difference factors in task-based language teaching (pp. 166–201). John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Baralt, M. & Gurzynski-Weiss, L.
(2011) Comparing learners’ state anxiety during task-based interaction in computer-mediated and face-to-face communication. Language Teaching Research, 15(2), 201–29. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bryfonski, L., & Ma, X.
(2020) Effects of implicit and explicit corrective feedback on Mandarin tone acquisition in a SCMC learning environment. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 42(1), 61–88. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bui, G., & Huang, Z.
(2018) L2 fluency as influenced by content familiarity and planning: Performance, measurement, and pedagogy. Language Teaching Research, 22(1), 94–114. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bygate, M.
(Ed.) (2018) Learning language through task repetition. John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cho, M.
(2018) Task complexity, modality, and working memory in L2 task performance. System, 72, 85–98. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cronbach, L.
(2002) Remaking the concept of aptitude: Extending the legacy of Richard E. Snow. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Dao, P., Iwashita, N., Nguyen, M., & Arias-Contreras, C.
(2024) Teachers’ and learners’ beliefs about task-based language teaching: A systematic review. In S. Li (Ed.), Individual difference factors in task-based language teaching (pp. 235–268). John Benjamins.Google Scholar
DeKeyser, R.
(2000) The robustness of critical period effects in second language acquisition. Studies in second language acquisition, 22(4), 499–533. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2012) Interactions between individual differences, treatments, and structures in SLA. Language Learning, 62, 189–200. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2022) Skill acquisition theory and individual difference factors in SLA. In S. Li, P. Hiver, & M. Papi (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of SLA and individual differences (pp. 3–33, Chapter 1: Individual Differences in Second Language Acquisition: Theories, research, and pedagogy). Routledge.Google Scholar
Dembovskaya, S.
(2009) Task-based instruction: The effect of motivational and cognitive pre-tasks on second language oral production (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Iowa.
Dewaele, J.
(2022) Enjoyment. In S. Li, P. Hiver, & M. Papi (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition and individual differences (pp. 190–206). Routledge.Google Scholar
Dewaele, J., & MacIntyre, P.
(2014) The two faces of Janus? Anxiety and enjoyment in the foreign language classroom. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 4(2), 237–274. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Donate, A., & Leow, R.
(2024) Task complexity, task features, task anxiety, and low L2 proficiency levels. In S. Li (Ed.), Individual difference factors in task-based language teaching (pp. 115–142). John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Dörnyei, Z.
(2002) The motivational basis of language learning tasks. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Individual differences and instructed language learning (pp. 137–158). John Benjamins.Google Scholar
(2005) The psychology of the language learner: Individual differences in second language acquisition. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Ellis, R.
(2024) Conclusion: Some thoughts on investigating individual differences in task-based language teaching. In S. Li (Ed.), Individual difference factors in task-based language teaching (pp. 356–374). John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Ellis, R., Skehan, P., Li, S., Shintani, N., & Lambert, C.
(2020) Task-based language teaching: Theory and practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Erlam, R.
(2005) Language aptitude and its relationship to instructional effectiveness in second language acquisition. Language Teaching Research, 9(2), 147–171. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fu, M., & Li, S.
(2021) The associations between the timing of corrective feedback and procedural, declarative, and working memory. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 43(2), 498–522. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2023) The associations between foreign language anxiety and the effectiveness of immediate and delayed corrective feedback. Foreign Language Annals, 1–28. First view. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gardner, R.
(1985) Social psychology and second language learning: The role of attitudes and motivation. Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Geng, X., & Ferguson, G.
(2013) Strategic planning in task-based language teaching: The Effects of participatory structure and task type. System, 41(4), 982–993. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gurzynski-Weiss, L., Bryfonski, L., & Reagan, D.
(2024) Teacher IDs and task adaptations: Making use of the TBLT Language Learning Task Bank. In S. Li (Ed.), Individual difference factors in task-based language teaching (pp. 324–355). John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Gurzynski-Weiss, L., Giacomino, L., & Jarrett, D.
(2021) Examining high-school learners’ experience of task motivation and difficulty in a two-week Spanish immersion camp. In M. Ahmadian & M. Long (Eds.), Task-based language teaching (pp. 566–584). Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Horwitz, E., Horwitz, M., & Cope, J.
(1986) Foreign language classroom anxiety. Modern Language Journal, 70(2), 125–32. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ishikawa, M., & Révész, A.
(2024) Written languaging, language aptitude, and L2 learning through dictogloss tasks. In S. Li (Ed.), Individual difference factors in task-based language teaching (pp. 144–165). John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Kang, E., Sok, S., & Han, Z.
(2019) Thirty-five years of ISLA on form-focused instruction: A meta-analysis. Language Teaching Research, 23(4), 428–453. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kim, Y. J., Jung, Y. J., & Skalicky, S.
(2019) Linguistic alignment, learner characteristics, and the production of stranded prepositions in relative clauses: Comparing FTF and SCMC contexts. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 41(5), 937–969. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kopinska, M., & Azkarai, A.
(2020) Exploring young EFL learners’ motivation: Individual versus pair work on dictogloss tasks. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 10(3), 607–630. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kormos, J., & Dörnyei, Z.
(2004) The interaction of linguistic and motivational variables in second language task performance. Zeitschrift für interkulturellen Fremdsprachenunterricht, 9(2), 1–19.Google Scholar
Kourtali, N., & Révész, A.
(2020) The roles of recast, task complexity, and aptitude in child Language development. Language Learning, 70(1), 179–218. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lambert, C., & Zhang, G.
(2019) Engagement in the use of English and Chinese as foreign languages: The role of learner-generated content in instructional task design. The Modern Language Journal, 103(2), 391–411. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Larsen-Freeman, D.
(2022) Complexity Theory and individual difference factors in SLA. In S. Li, P. Hiver, & M. Papi (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of SLA and individual differences (pp. 3–33, Chapter 1: Individual Differences in Second Language Acquisition: Theories, research, and pedagogy. Routledge.Google Scholar
Li, C., & Dewaele, J.
(2024) Understanding, measuring, and differentiating task enjoyment from foreign language enjoyment. In S. Li (Ed.), Individual difference factors in task-based language teaching (pp. 87–114). John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Li, S.
(2015) The associations between language aptitude and second language grammar acquisition: A meta-analytic review of five decades of research. Applied Linguistics, 36(3), 385–408. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2017a) The effects of cognitive aptitudes on the process and product of L2 interaction: A synthetic review. In L. Gurzynski (Ed.), Expanding individual difference research in the interaction approach: Investigating learners, instructors and researchers (pp. 41–70). John Benjamins.Google Scholar
(2017b) Teacher and learner beliefs about corrective feedback. In H. Nassaji & E. Kartchava (Eds.), Corrective feedback in second language teaching and learning (pp. 143–157). Routledge.Google Scholar
(2022a) Explicit and implicit language aptitudes. In S. Li, P. Hiver, & M. Papi (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of SLA and individual differences (pp. 37–53). Routledge.Google Scholar
(2023) Working memory and second language learning: A critical and synthetic review. In A. Godfroid & H. Hopp (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition and psycholinguistics (pp. 348–360). Routledge.Google Scholar
Li, S., & DeKeyser, R.
(2021) Implicit aptitude: Conceptualizing the construct, validating the measures, and examining the evidence. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 43(3), 473–497. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Li, S., Ellis, R., & Zhu, Y.
(2019) The associations between cognitive ability and L2 development under five different instructional conditions. Applied Psycholinguistics, 40(3), 693–722. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Li, S., & Fu, M.
(2018) Strategic and unpressured within-task planning and their associations with working memory. Language Teaching Research, 22(2), 230–253. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Li, S., Hiver, P., & Papi, M.
(2022) Individual differences in second language acquisition: Theory, research, and practice. In S. Li, P. Hiver, & M. Papi (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of SLA and individual differences (pp. 3–34). Routledge.Google Scholar
Li, S., & Qian, J.
(2021) Exploring syntactic priming as a measure of implicit language aptitude. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 43(3), 574–605. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Li, S., & Wang, H.
(2018) Traditional literature review and research synthesis. In A. Phakiti, P. De Costa, L. Plonsky, & S. Starfield (Eds.), Palgrave handbook of applied linguistics research methodology (pp. 123–144). Palgrave.Google Scholar
Long, M.
(2015) Second language acquisition and task-based language teaching. Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar
Lyster, R. & Mori, H.
(2006) Interactional feedback and instructional counterbalance. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28(2), 269–300. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
MacIntyre, P., & Ducker, N.
(2022) The idiodynamic method: A practical guide for researchers. Research Methods in Applied Linguistics, 1(2), 1–10. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
MacIntyre, P., & Gardner, R.
(1994) The subtle effects of language anxiety on cognitive processing in the second language. Language Learning, 44(2), 283–305. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Masgoret, A., & Gardner, R.
(2003) Attitudes, motivation, and second language learning: A meta-analysis of studies conducted by Gardner and associates. Language Learning, 53(1), 23–163. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McDonough, K., Kielstra, P., Crowther, D., & Smith, G.
(2016) Structural priming in L2 speech production: Examining relationships among English L2 speakers’ production, cognitive abilities, and awareness. In A. Mackey & E. Marsden (Eds.), Advancing methodology and practice: The IRIS repository of instruments for research into second languages (pp. 112–131). Routledge.Google Scholar
McDonough, K., & Kim, Y.
(2016) Working memory and L2 English speakers’ primed and subsequent production of passives. In G. Granena, D. Jackson, & Y. Yilmaz (Eds.), Cognitive individual differences in second language processing and acquisition (pp. 205–222). Benjamins.Google Scholar
Mozgalina, A.
(2015) More or less choice? The influence of choice on task motivation and task engagement. System, 49, 120–132. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Namkung, Y., & Kim, Y.
(2024) A review of learner motivation and engagement research in task-based language teaching. In S. Li (Ed.), Individual difference factors in task-based language teaching (pp. 204–234). John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Norris, J. M., & Ortega, L.
(Eds.) (2006) Synthesizing research on language learning and teaching. John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Oliver, R., & Bogachenko, T.
(2024) Task-based language learning and teaching: Differences according to age. In S. Li (Ed.), Individual difference factors in task-based language teaching (pp. 270–295). John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Philp, J., Oliver, R., & Mackey, A.
(2006) The impact of planning time on children’s task-based interactions. System, 34(4), 547–565. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pili-Moss, D., Brill-Schuetz, K. A., Faretta-Stutenberg, M., & Morgan-Short, K.
(2019) Contributions of declarative and procedural memory to accuracy and automatization during second language practice. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 23(3), 639–651. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rassaei, E.
(2015) Oral corrective feedback, foreign language anxiety and L2 development. System 49, 98–109. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reinders, H., Lee, B., & Bonner, E.
(2023) Tracking learner engagement in the L2 classroom with experience sampling, Research Methods in Applied Linguistics, 2(2). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Robinson, P.
(Ed.) (2011) Second language task complexity: Researching the cognition hypothesis of language learning and performance. John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Satar, H., & Ozdener, N.
(2008) The effects of synchronous CMC on speaking proficiency and Anxiety: Text versus voice chat. The Modern Language Journal, 92(4), 595–613. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sheen, R.
(2008) Recasts, language anxiety, modified output, and L2 learning. Language Learning, 58(4), 835–74. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shintani, N.
(2016) Input-based tasks in foreign language instruction for young learners. John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Skehan, P.
(Ed.) (2014) Processing perspectives on task performance. John Benjamins.Google Scholar
(2024) Foreword: Individual differences bridge the divides between task-based research and pedagogy. In S. Li (Ed.), Individual difference factors in task-based language teaching (pp. 1–8). John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Snow, R. E.
(1991) Aptitude-treatment interaction as a framework for research on individual differences in psychotherapy. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 59(2), 205–216.Google Scholar
Teimouri, Y., Goetze, J., & Plonsky, L.
(2019) Second language anxiety and achievement: A meta-analysis. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 41(2), 363–387. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van den Branden, K., Bygate, M., & Norris, J.
(Eds.) (2009) Task-based language teaching: A reader. John Benjamins.Google Scholar
VanPatten, B.
(2022) Input processing theory and individual difference factors in SLA. In S. Li, P. Hiver, & M. Papi (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of SLA and individual differences (pp. 3–33, Chapter 1: Individual Differences in Second Language Acquisition: Theories, research, and pedagogy). Routledge.Google Scholar
Wang, Q., East, M., & Li, S.
(2021) Measuring Chinese EFL learners’ motivation and anxiety when completing a video narration task: Initial steps in designing two questionnaires. System, 100, 1–14. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wang, Q., & Li, S.
(2019) The relationship between task motivation and L2 motivation. In Z. Wen & M. Ahamadian (Eds.), Researching L2 task performance and pedagogy in honor of Peter Skehan (pp. 67–92). John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Willis, J.
(2024) Practitioners’ perspectives: How teachers use TBLT to accommodate individual differences. In S. Li (Ed.), Individual difference factors in task-based language teaching (pp. 298–323). John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Yilmaz, Y., & Granena, G.
(2021) Implicitness and explicitness in cognitive aptitudes and corrective feedback. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 43(3), 523–550. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zalbidea, J.
(2017) One task fits all? The role of task complexity, modality, and working memory in L2 performance. The Modern Language Journal, 101(2), 335–352. DOI logoGoogle Scholar