References

(Studies with asterisks are included in the narrative review)

Abrams, Z. I.
(2003) The effect of synchronous and asynchronous CMC on oral performance in German. The Modern Language Journal, 87(2), 157–167. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
AbuSeileek, A. F., & Qatawneh, K.
(2013) Effects of synchronous and asynchronous computer-mediated communication (CMC) oral conversations on English language learners’ discourse functions. Computers & Education, 62, 181–190. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
An, H., & Li, S.
(2022) Working memory and second language interaction. In J. Schwieter & Z. Wen (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of working memory and language (pp. 656–698). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(2024) The effects of planning type, working memory, and anxiety on L2 writing performance. In S. Li (Ed.), Individual difference factors in task-based language teaching (pp. 166–201). John Benjamins.Google Scholar
*Arnold. N. (2007) Reducing foreign language communication apprehension with computer-mediated communication: A preliminary study. System, 35(4), 469–486. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bailey, P., Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Daley, C. E.
(2000) Using learning style to predict foreign language achievement at the college level. System, 28(1), 115–133. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
*Baralt, M., & Gurzynski-Weiss, L. (2011) Comparing learners’ state anxiety during task-based interaction in computer-mediated and face-to-face communication. Language Teaching Research, 15(2), 201–229. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
*Bashori, M., van Hout, R., Strik, H., & Cucchiarini, C. (2022) Web-based language learning and speaking anxiety. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 35(5–6), 1058–1089. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Beauvois, M. H.
(1998) E-talk: Computer-assisted classroom discussion – attitudes and motivation. In Swaffar, J., Romano, S., Markley, P., Arens, K. (Eds.), Language learning online: Theory and practice in the ESL and L2 computer classroom (pp. 99–120). Labyrinth Publications.Google Scholar
*Bistline-Bonilla, C. (2020) Interaction in synchronous computer-mediated communication: The effects of interlocutor, task, and state anxiety (Publication No. 28086452, Doctoral dissertation). Georgetown University. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.
Bradley, T., & Lomicka, L.
(2000) A case study of learner interaction in technology-enhanced language learning environments. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 22(3), 347–368. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chastain, K.
(1975) Affective and ability factors in second language acquisition. Language Learning, 25, 153–161. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
*Chen, M. R. A., & Hwang, G. J. (2020) Effects of a concept mapping-based flipped learning approach on EFL students’ English-speaking performance, critical thinking awareness and speaking anxiety. British Journal of Educational Technology, 51(3), 817–834. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cheng, Y. S.
(2004) A measure of second language writing anxiety: Scale development and preliminary validation. Journal of Second Language Writing, 13, 313–335. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
*Côté, S., & Gaffney, C. (2021) The effect of synchronous computer-mediated communication on beginner L2 learners’ foreign language anxiety and participation. The Language Learning Journal, 49(1), 105–116. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
*Di Loreto, S., & McDonough, K. (2013) The relationship between instructor feedback and ESL student anxiety. TESL Canada Journal, 31(1), 20–41. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
*Donate, Á. (2018) Cognitive task complexity, foreign language anxiety and L2 performance in Spanish: A task-based language teaching perspective (Publication No. 10840376, Doctoral dissertation). Georgetown University. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.
Donate, A., & Leow, R.
(2024) Task complexity, task features, task anxiety, and low L2 proficiency levels. In S. Li (Ed.), Individual difference factors in task-based language teaching (pp. 115–142). John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Dörnyei, Z., & MacIntyre, P.
(2006) Questionnaire item pool |(Unpublished manuscript). School of English Studies, University of Nottingham.
Ellis, R.
(1994) The study of second language acquisition. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ellis, R., Skehan, P., Li, S., Shintani, N., & Lambert, C.
(2020) Task-based language teaching: Theory and practice. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Eysenck, M.
(1979) Anxiety, learning and memory: A reconceptualization. Journal of Research in Personality, 13, 363–385. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fukuda, Y.
(2004) Treatment of spoken errors in Japanese high school oral communication classes (Unpublished master’s thesis). California State University.
Gardner, R. C., & MacIntyre, P. D.
(1993) A student’s contributions to second-language learning: Part II. Affective variables. Language Teaching, 26(1), 1–11. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hsieh, J. S. C., Wu, W. -C. V., & Marek, M. W.
(2017) Using the flipped classroom to enhance EFL learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 30(1–2), 1–21. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Horwitz, E.
(2001) Language anxiety and achievement. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 21, 112–126. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Horwitz, E., Horwitz, M. B., & Cope, J.
(1986) Foreign language classroom anxiety. The Modern Language Journal, 70, 125–132. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ishikawa, M., & Révész, A.
(2024) Written languaging, language aptitude, and L2 learning through dictogloss tasks. In S. Li (Ed.), Individual difference factors in task-based language teaching (pp. 144–165). John Benjamins.Google Scholar
*Jang, J. D. (2003) Relationship between student anxiety and corrective feedback: Case of Korean college-level EFL learners (Publication No. 3102374, Doctoral dissertation. State University of New York at Buffalo. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.
Kim, S. Y.
(1998) Affective experiences of Korean college students in different instructional contexts: Anxiety and motivation in reading and conversation courses (Publication No. 9838018, Doctoral dissertation). The University of Texas at Austin. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.
*Kim, Y., & Tracy-Ventura, N. (2011) Task complexity, language anxiety, and the development of the simple past. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Second language task complexity: Researching the Cognition Hypothesis of language learning and performance (pp. 287–306). John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ko, C.
(2012) Can synchronous computer-mediated communication (CMC) help beginning-level foreign language learners speak? Computer Assisted Language Learning, 25(3), 217–236. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kormos, J., & Dörnyei, Z.
(2004) The interaction of linguistic and psychological variables in second language task performance. Zeitschrift fur Interkulturellen Fremdsprachunterricht [Online], 9(2). [URL]Google Scholar
*Kruk, M. (2021) Fluctuations in self-perceived foreign language anxiety during visits to Second Life: A case study. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 15(5), 393–405. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
*Kruk, M. (2022) Dynamicity of perceived willingness to communicate, motivation, boredom and anxiety in Second Life: The case of two advanced learners of English. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 35(1–2), 190–216. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
*Lee, E. J. (2016) Reducing international graduate students’ language anxiety through oral pronunciation corrections. System, 56, 78–95. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Li. S.
(2010) The effectiveness of corrective feedback in SLA: A meta-analysis. Language Learning, 60(2), 309–365. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Li, S., & Vuono, A.
(2019) Twenty-five years of research on oral and written corrective feedback in System. System, 84, 93–109.Google Scholar
Lin, C. -J., & Hwang, G. -J.
(2018) A learning analytics approach to investigating factors affecting EFL students’ oral performance in a flipped classroom. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 21(2), 205–219. [URL]Google Scholar
Long, M. H.
(1980) Input, interaction and second language acquisition (Publication No. 8111249, Doctoral dissertation). University of California, Los Angeles. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.
(1996) The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W. C. Ritchie, & T. K. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 413–468). Academic Press.Google Scholar
MacIntyre, P.
(2002) Motivation, anxiety, and emotion in second language acquisition. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Individual differences and instructed language learning (pp. 45–68). John Benjamins.Google Scholar
MacIntyre, P., & Gardner, R.
(1994) The effects of induced anxiety on three stages of cognitive processing in computerized vocabulary learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 16(1), 1–17. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mackey, A., Oliver, R., & Leeman, J.
(2003) Interactional input and the incorporation of feedback: An exploration of NS-NNS and NNS-NNS adult and child dyads. Language Learning, 53(1), 35–66. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
*Martin, S., & Alvarez Valdivia, I. M. (2017) Students’ feedback beliefs and anxiety in online foreign language oral tasks. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 14(1), 1–15. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mayo, M. P. G., & Pica, T.
(2000) Interaction among proficient learners: are input, feedback and output needs addressed in a foreign language context? Studia Linguistica, 54(2), 272–279. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
*Melchor-Couto, S. (2017) Foreign language anxiety levels in Second Life oral interaction. ReCALL, 29(1), 99–119. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
*Muñoz, G. S. (2021) Second Life: A virtual environment to reduce students’ foreign language anxiety. Vivat Academia, 1–24. Retrieved on 15 January 2024 from [URL]Google Scholar
*Namaziandost, E., Razmi, M. H., Hernández, R. M., Ocaña-Fernández, Y., & Khabir, M. (2021) Synchronous CMC text chat versus synchronous CMC voice chat: Impacts on EFL learners’ oral proficiency and anxiety. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 1–18. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Namkung, Y., & Kim, Y.
(2024) A review of learner motivation and engagement research in task-based language teaching. In S. Li (Ed.), Individual difference factors in task-based language teaching (pp. 204–234). John Benjamins.Google Scholar
*Poza, M. I. C. (2005) The effects of asynchronous computer voice conferencing on learners’ anxiety when speaking a foreign language (Publication No. 3170905, Doctoral dissertation), West Virginia University. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.
*Rahimi, M., & Zhang, L. J. (2019) Writing task complexity, students’ motivational beliefs, anxiety and their writing production in English as a second language. Reading and Writing, 32(3), 761–786. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
*Rassaei, E. (2015a) Oral corrective feedback, foreign language anxiety and L2 development. System, 49, 98–109. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
*Rassaei, E. (2015b) The effects of foreign language anxiety on EFL learners’ perceptions of oral corrective feedback. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 9(2), 87–101. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
*Révész, A. (2011) Task complexity, focus on L2 constructions, and individual differences: A classroom-based study. The Modern Language Journal, 95, 162–181. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Robinson, P.
(2001) Task complexity, task difficulty, and task production: Exploring interactions in a componential framework. Applied Linguistics, 22(1), 27–57. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2005) Cognitive complexity and task sequencing: Studies in a componential framework for second language task design. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 43(1), 1–32. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
*Robinson, P. (2007) Task complexity, theory of mind, and intentional reasoning: Effects on L2 speech production, interaction, uptake and perceptions of task difficulty. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 45(3), 193–214. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2011) Second language task complexity, the Cognition Hypothesis, language learning, and performance. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Second language task complexity: Researching the Cognition Hypothesis of language learning and performance (pp. 3–37). John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Roed, J.
(2003) Language learner behaviour in a virtual environment. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 16(2–3), 155–172. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
*Satar, H. & Ozdener, N. (2008) The effects of synchronous CMC on speaking proficiency and anxiety: Text versus voice chat. The Modern Language Journal, 92, 595–613. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, R.
(2001) Attention. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 3–32). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Scovel, T.
(1978) The effect of affect on foreign language learning: A review of the anxiety research. Language Learning, 28(1), 129–142. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Seedhouse, P.
(2004) The interactional architecture of the language classroom: A conversation analysis perspective. Blackwell.Google Scholar
*Sheen, Y. (2008) Recasts, language anxiety, modified output, and L2 learning. Language Learning, 58(4), 835–874. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Swain, M., & Lapkin, S.
(1998) Interaction and second language learning: Two adolescent French immersion students working together. The Modern Language Journal, 82, 320–337. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Teimouri, Y., Goetze, J., & Plonsky, L.
(2019) Second language anxiety and achievement: A meta-analysis. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 41(2), 363–387. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
*Trebits, A. (2014) Sources of individual differences in L2 narrative production: The contribution of input, processing, and output anxiety. Applied linguistics, 37(2), 155–174. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
*Tsao, J. J., Tseng, W. T., & Wang, C. (2017) The effects of writing anxiety and motivation on EFL college students’ self-evaluative judgments of corrective feedback. Psychological Reports, 120(2), 219–241. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wang, Q., East, M., & Li, S.
(2021) Measuring Chinese EFL learners’ motivation and anxiety when completing a video narration task: Initial steps in designing two questionnaires. System, 100, 102559. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Warschauer, M.
(1996) Comparing face-to-face and electronic discussion in the second language classroom. CALICO Journal, 13(2), 7–26. [URL]Google Scholar
*Wehner, A. K. (2014) Exploring the relationship of motivation, anxiety, and virtual worlds in the experiences of two Spanish language learners: A case study (Publication No. 3618510, Doctoral dissertation). University of South Florida. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.
*Wu, H. J. (2015) The effects of blog-supported collaborative writing on writing performance, writing anxiety and perceptions of EFL college students in Taiwan (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of South Florida.
Wu, W. -C. V., Hsieh, J. S. C., & Yang, J. C.
(2017) Creating an online learning community in a flipped classroom to enhance EFL learners’ oral proficiency. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 20(2), 142–157. [URL]Google Scholar
*Wu, Y. (2016) Effects of form-focused instruction, corrective feedback, and individual differences on the acquisition of Chinese wh-questions and classifiers (Publication No. 10194652, Doctoral dissertation). Boston University. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.
*Xiangming, L., Liu, M., & Zhang, C. (2020) Technological impact on language anxiety dynamic. Computers & Education, 150, 103839. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
*Yang, Y. F., Hsieh, W. M., Wong, W. K., Hong, Y. C., & Lai, S. C. (2022) Reducing students’ foreign language anxiety to improve English vocabulary learning in an online simulation game. Computer Assisted Language Learning, Ahead-of-print, 1–23. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
*York, J., Shibata, K., Tokutake, H., & Nakayama, H. (2021) Effect of SCMC on foreign language anxiety and learning experience: A comparison of voice, video, and VR-based oral interaction. ReCALL, 33(1), 49–70. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
*Zabihi, R., Mousavi, S. H., & Salehian, A. (2020) The differential role of domain-specific anxiety in learners’ narrative and argumentative L2 written task performances. Current Psychology, 39(4), 1438–1444. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zhang, X.
(2019) Foreign language anxiety and foreign language performance: A meta-analysis. The Modern Language Journal, 103(4), 763–781. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
*Zhang, L. J., & Rahimi, M. (2014) EFL learners’ anxiety level and their beliefs about corrective feedback in oral communication classes. System, 42, 429–439. DOI logoGoogle Scholar