Cover not available
Part of
Processing Perspectives on Task Performance
Edited by Peter Skehan
[Task-Based Language Teaching 5] 2014
► pp. 27–62

Chapter 2. On-line time pressure manipulations

L2 speaking performance under five types of planning and repetition conditions

 | University of Pittsburgh
This chapter is concerned with an investigation of the underlying mechanisms of second language speaking. It reports on an experiment containing five different types of planning and repetition conditions, each relevant to certain processes and stages of speech production. The five conditions were two forms of strategic planning, two forms of on-line planning, and task repetition. Data were collected from 77 undergraduates (L1: Chinese and L2: English) doing a video narrative task in English. Speech samples were transcribed and coded. The study found: (1) strategic planning improved speech complexity and fluency, suggesting that support for the conceptualization stage in speech production helps language complexity and fluency; (2) on-line planning solely focusing on the formulation stage did not enhance speech complexity and accuracy, whereas on-line planning supported by an earlier opportunity to watch the video did, indicating a ‘meaning priority’ principle in speaking; (3) repetition enhanced speech complexity, fluency, and accuracy, suggesting that repetition is a robust way to improve speaking quality. Based on the results, an instructional model of L2 speech intervention is proposed. It argues that speech monitoring is the key to accuracy. Interventions at the speech formulation stage, which are often emphasized in pedagogy, work for accuracy only when speakers are instructed to attend to monitoring.
Published online: 30 April 2014
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/tblt.5.02wan
References (102)
References
Ahmadian, M.J., & Tavakoli, M. (2011). The effects of simultaneous use of careful online planning and task repetition on accuracy, fluency, and complexity of EFL learners’ oral production. Language Teaching Research, 15, 35–59. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Anderson, J.R. (1983). The architecture of cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Anderson, J.R., & Lebiere, C. (1998). The atomic components of thought. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Anderson, J.R., Bothell, D., Byrne, M.D., Douglass, S., Lebiere, C., & Qin, Y. (2004). An integrated theory of the mind. Psychological Review, 111(4), 1036–1060. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baddeley, A.D. (1986). Working Memory. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
. (2003). Working memory and language: An overview. Journal of Communication Disorders, 36, 189–208. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bell, H. (2003). Using frequency lists to assess L2 texts. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, University of Swansea.Google Scholar
Bygate, M. (1996). Effects of task repetition: Appraising the developing language of learners. In D. Willis & J. Willis (Eds.), Challenge and change in language teaching (pp. 134–146). London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
. (1999). Task as context for the framing, reframing and unframing of language. System, 27(1), 33–48. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2001). Effects of task repetition on the structure and control of oral language. In M. Bygate, et al. (Eds.), Researching pedagogic tasks: Second language learning, teaching, and testing (pp. 23–48). Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
Bygate, M., & Samuda, V. (2005). Integrative planning through the use of task-repetition. In R. Ellis (Ed.), Planning and task performance in a second language (pp. 37–76). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 155–159. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (1994). The earth is round (p <.05). American Psychologist, 49, 997–1003. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cortina, J.M., & Nouri, H. (2000). Effect size for ANOVA Designs. State University Papers Series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences, 07–129. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Crookes, G. (1989). Planning and interlanguage variation. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 11, 367–83. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Jong, N. & Perfetti, C.A. (2011). Fluency training in the ESL classroom: An experimental study of fluency development and proceduralization. Language Learning, 61, 533–568. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dörnyei, Z., & Scott, M.L. (1997). Communication strategies in a second language: Definitions and taxonomies. Language Learning, 47, 173–210. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Doughty, C. (2001). Cognitive underpinnings of focus on form. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 206–257). Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ellis, R. (2009). The differential effects of three types of task planning on the fluency, complexity and accuracy in L2 oral production. Applied Linguistics, 30(4), 474−507. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (1987). Interlanguage variability in narrative discourse: Style shifting in the use of the past tense. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 9, 1–20. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2003). Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
. (2005). Integrative planning through the use of task-repetition. In R. Ellis (Ed.), Planning and task performance in a second language (pp. 3–36). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2008). The study of second language acquisition. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
. (2009). The differential effects of three types of task planning on the fluency, complexity and accuracy in l2 oral production. Applied Linguistics, 30, 474–509. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ellis, R. & Barkhuizen, G. (2005). Analysing learner language. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Foster, P. (1996). Doing the task better: How planning time influences students’ performance. In J. Willis & D. Willis (Eds.), Challenge and change in language teaching (pp. 126–135). Oxford: Heinemann.Google Scholar
. (2001). Rules and routines: A consideration of their role in the task-based language production of native and non-native speakers. In M. Bygate, P. Skehan, & M. Swain (Eds.), Researching pedagogic tasks: Second language learning, teaching, and testing (pp. 23–48). Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
Foster, P., Tonkyn, A., & Wigglesworth, J. (2000). Measuring spoken language: A unit for all reasons. Applied Linguistics, 21(3), 354−75. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Foster, P., & Skehan, P. (1996). The influence of planning on performance in task-based learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18, 299–324. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (1999). The influence of source of planning and focus of planning on task-based performance. Language Teaching research, 3, 185–214. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gass, S., Mackey, A., Álvarez-Torres, M.J., & Fernández-García, M. (1999). The effects of task repetition on linguistic output. Language Learning, 49, 549–581. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gilabert, R. (2007). Effects of manipulating task complexity on self-repairs during L2 oral production. IRAL, 45, 215–240. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Guará-Tavares, M.G. (2008). Pre-task planning, working memory capacity and L2 speech performance. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis. Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Brazil.Google Scholar
Hinkel, E. (2004). TOEFL test strategies with practice tests (3rd ed.) Hauppauge, NY: Barron’s.Google Scholar
Housen, A., & Kuiken, F. (2009). Complexity, accuracy, and fluency in second language acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 30(4), 461–473. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hulstijn, J.H., & Hulstijn, W. (1984). Grammatical errors as a function of processing constraints and explicit knowledge. Language Learning, 34, 23–43. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hunter, J.E., & Schmidt, F.L. (1990). Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting error and bias in research findings. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Kawauchi, C. (2005). The effects of strategic planning on the oral narratives of leaners with low and high intermediate L2 proficiency. In R. Ellis (Ed.), Planning and task performance in a second language (pp. 37–76). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kello, C.T, & Plaut, D. (2003). Strategic control over rate of processing in word reading: A computational investigation. Journal of Memory and Language, 48, 207–232. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kello, C.T. (2004). Control over the time course of cognition in the tempo-naming task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 30(5), 942–955. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kello, C.T., & Plaut, D.C. (2000). Strategic control in word reading: Evidence from speeded responding in the tempo-naming task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 26, 719–750. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kello, C., Plaut, D., & MacWhinney, B. (2000). The task-dependence of staged versus cascaded processing: An empirical and computational study of Stroop interference in speech production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129(3), 340–360. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kempen, G., & Hoenkamp, E. (1987). An incremental procedural grammar for sentence formulation. Cognitive Science, 11, 201–258. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kormos, J. (2006). Speech production and second language acquisition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Kroll, J.F., & Stewart, E. (1994). Category interference in translation and picture naming: Evidence for asymmetric connections between bilingual memory representations. Journal of Memory and Language, 33, 149–174. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lashley, K.S. (1951). The problem of serial order in behavior. In L.A. Jeffress (Ed.), Cerebral mechanisms in behavior (pp. 112–146). New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
Levelt, W.J.M, Roelofs, A., & Meyer, A.S. (1999). A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 1–75.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levelt, W.J.M. (1983). Monitoring and self-repair in speech. Cognition, 33, 41–103. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (1989). Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
. (1993). Language use in normal speakers and its disorders. In G. Blanken, J. Dittmann, H. Grimm, J.C. Marshall, & C–W. Wallesch, (Eds.), Linguistic disorders and pathologies (pp. 1–15). Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
. (1999). Producing spoken language: A blueprint of the speaker. In C. Brown & P. Hagoort (Eds.), Neurocognition of language (pp. 83–122). Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
. (2001). Spoken word production: A theory of lexical access. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 98(23), 13464–13471. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Long M., & Robinson, P. (1998). Focus on form: Theory, research, and practice. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom SLA (pp. 15–41). Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Lynch, T., & Maclean, J. (2000). Exploring the benefits of task repetition and recycling for classroom language learning. Language Teaching Research, 4, 221–50.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2001). Effects of immediate task repetition on learners’ performance. In M. Bygate, P. Skehan, & M. Swain (Eds.), Researching pedagogic tasks, second language learning, teaching and testing (pp. 99–118). Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
MacWhinney, B. (2000). The CHILDES Project: Tools for Analyzing Talk (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Malvern, D., & Richards, B. (2002). Investigating accommodation in language proficiency interviews using a new measure of lexical diversity. Language Testing, 19, 85–104. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meara, P., & Bell, H. (2001). P_Lex: A simple and effective way of describing the lexical characteristics of short L2 texts. Prospect, 16(3), 5–19.Google Scholar
Meehl, P.E. (1990). Why summaries of research on psychological theories are often uninterpretable. Psychological Reports, 66, 195–244. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mehnert, U. (1998). The effects of different lengths of time for planning on second language performance. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 20, 83–108. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meyer, D.E., & Gordon, P.C. (1985). Speech production: Motor programming of phonetic features. Journal of Memory and Language, 24, 3–26. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mochizuki, N., & Ortega, L. (2008). Balancing communication and grammar in beginning level foreign language classrooms: A study of guided planning and relativization, Language Teaching Research, 12, 11–37. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Norris, J.M., & Ortega, L. (2009). Towards an organic approach to investigating CAF in SLA: The case of complexity. Applied Linguistics, 30(4), 555–578. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2000). Effectiveness of L2 Instruction: A research synthesis and quantitative meta-analysis. Language Learning, 50(3), 417–528. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ortega, L. (1999). Planning and focus on form in L2 oral performance. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21, 109–148. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Read, J. (2000). Assessing vocabulary. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Richards, B.J., & Malvern, D.D. (1998). A new research tool: Mathematical modelling in the measurement of vocabulary diversity (Award reference no. R000221995). Final Report to the Economic and Social Research Council , Swindon, UK.
Robinson, P. (1995). Task complexity and second language narrative discourse. Language Learning, 45, 99–140. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2011). Task-based language learning: A review of issues. Language Learning, 61(Suppl. 1), 1–36. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roelofs, A. (1997). The WEAVER model of word-form encoding in speech production. Cognition, 64, 249–284. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rosenthal, R. (1991). Meta-analytic procedures for social research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Samuda, V., & Bygate, M. (2008). Tasks in second language learning. Basingstoke: Palgrave.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sangarun, J. (2005). The effects of focusing on meaning and form in strategic planning. In R. Ellis (Ed.), Planning and task performance in a second language (pp. 111–141). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sawaki, Y., Stricker, L.J., & Oranje, A.H. (2009). Factor structure of the TOEFL internet-based test. Language Testing, 26(1), 5–30. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, R. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11, 129–158. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schneider, W., & Chein, J.M. (2003). Controlled & automatic processing: Behavior, theory, and biological mechanisms. Cognitive Science, 27, 525–559. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schriefers, H., Meyer, A.S., & Levelt, W.J.M. (1990). Exploring the time course of lexical access in language production: Picture-word interference studies. Journal of Memory and Language, 29, 86–102. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Seidenberg, M.S. (1997). Language acquisition and use: Learning and applying probabilistic constraints. Science, 275, 1599–1603. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shiffrin, R.M., & Schneider, W. (1977). Controlled and automatic human information processing, II: Perceptual learning, automatic attending and a general theory. Psychological Review, 84(2), 127–190. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Skehan, P. (1998). A cognitive approach to language learning. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
. (2009a). Modelling second language performance: Integrating complexity, accuracy, fluency and lexis. Applied Linguistics, 30(4), 510–532. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2009b). Lexical performance by native and non-native speakers on language-learning tasks. In H. Daller, D. Malvern, P. Meara, J. Milton, B. Richards, & J. Treffers-Daller (Eds.), Vocabulary studies in first and second language acquisition: The interface between theory and application (pp. 107–124). London: Palgrave Macmillan.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Skehan, P., & Foster, P. (1997). The influence of planning and post-task activities on accuracy and complexity in task-based learning. Language Teaching Research, 1(3), 16–33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (1999). The influence of task structure and processing conditions on narrative retellings. Language Learning, 49, 93–120. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2005). Strategic and online planning: The influence of surprise information and task time on second language performance. In R. Ellis (Ed.), Planning and task performance in a second language (pp. 193–218). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2008). Complexity, accuracy, fluency and lexis in task-based performance: A meta-analysis of the Ealing research. In S. Van Daele, A. Housen, F. Kuiken, M. Pierrard, & I. Vedder, (Eds.), Complexity, accuracy and fluency in second language use, learning and teaching (pp. 263–284). Brussels: Royal Flemish Academy of Belgium for Sciences and Arts.Google Scholar
Skehan, P., Bei, X., Li, Q., & Wang, Z. (2012). The task is not enough: Processing approaches to task-based performance. Language Teaching Research, 16(3), 170–187. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Squire, L.R. (1987). Memory and brain. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Tajima, M. (2003). The effects of planning on oral performance of Japanese as a foreign language. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Purdue University.Google Scholar
Tavakoli, P., & Foster, P. (2008). Task design and second language performance: The effect of narrative type on learner output. Language Learning, 58, 439–473. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tavakoli, P., & Skehan, P. (2005). Strategic planning, task structure, and performance testing. In R. Ellis (Ed.), Planning and task performance in a second language (pp. 239–276). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ullman, M.T. (2001a). The declarative/procedural model of lexicon and grammar. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 30(1), 37–69. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2001b). The neural basis of lexicon and grammar in first and second language: The declarative/procedural model. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 4(1), 105–122. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2004). Contributions of memory circuits to language: The declarative/procedural model. Cognition, 92(1–2), 231–270. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2008). The role of memory systems in disorders of language. In B. Stemmer & H.A. Whitaker (Eds.), Handbook of the neuroscience of language (pp. 189–198). Oxford: Elsevier. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ullman, M.T., Pancheva, R., Love, T., Yee, E., Swinney, D., & Hickok, G. (2005). Neural correlates of lexicon and grammar: Evidence from the production, reading, and judgment of inflection in aphasia. Brain and Language, 93(2), 185–238. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
VanPatten, B. (1990). Attending to content and form in the input: An experiment in consciousness. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 12, 287–301. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wendel, J. (1997). Planning and second language narrative production. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Temple University, Japan.Google Scholar
Wigglesworth, G. (1997). An investigation of planning time and proficiency level on oral test discourse. Language Testing, 14, 85–106. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yuan, F., & Ellis, R. (2003). The Effects of pre-task planning and online planning on fluency, complexity, and accuracy in L2 monologicoral production. Applied Linguistics, 24, 1–2. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (56)

Cited by 56 other publications

Albarqi, Ghadah
2024. Self-Monitoring Foci, Speed, and the Relationship with Pausing Behavior in an EFL Context. Sage Open 14:4 DOI logo
Gu, Qianqian & Kris Van den Branden
2024. The effects of two methods of on-line planning on L2 task-based speaking performance and strategy use. Language Teaching Research DOI logo
Hunter, Ann‐Marie
2024. The Poster Carousel in theESLClassroom: What Happens to Learners'L2Fluency During Same and Parallel‐Task Repetition?. TESOL Quarterly 58:1 ► pp. 479 ff. DOI logo
Lu, Jinmiao, Qing Ma & Shaofeng Li
2024. Effect of localized task‐based language teaching on Chinese secondary school English learners’ oral production in examination‐oriented contexts. International Journal of Applied Linguistics DOI logo
Mostafaei Alaei, Mahnaz & Abbas Mansouri
2024. Unraveling the differential effects of task rehearsal and task repetition on L2 task performance: the mediating role of task modality. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching DOI logo
Takase, Nami
2024. Synchronous and Asynchronous Online Communication for Developing Foreign Language Speaking Skills. AsiaCALL Online Journal 15:2 ► pp. 60 ff. DOI logo
Aaj, Ali, Parviz Maftoon & Masood Siyyari
2023. Do young EFL learners benefit from task repetition?. The Language Learning Journal ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Cavicchio, Federica & Maria Grazia Busà
2023. Lending a hand to speech. Language, Interaction and Acquisition 14:2 ► pp. 218 ff. DOI logo
Duong, Phuong-Thao, Maribel Montero Perez, Long-Quoc Nguyen, Piet Desmet & Elke Peters
2023. The impact of input, input repetition, and task repetition on L2 lexical use and fluency in speaking. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching 13:1 ► pp. 101 ff. DOI logo
Hassanzadeh-Taleshi, Mobin, Baqer Yaqubi & Hossein Bozorgian
2023. The effects of combining task repetition with immediate post-task transcribing on L2 learners’ oral narratives. The Language Learning Journal 51:2 ► pp. 133 ff. DOI logo
Ryan, Jonathon, Pauline Foster, Anthea Fester, Yi Wang, Jenny Field, Celine Kearney & Jia Rong Yap
2023. First Language Literacy and Second Language Oracy: A Partial Replication of Foster and Skehan (1996). Language Learning 73:4 ► pp. 1003 ff. DOI logo
Sobhanifar, Hadi & Fatemeh Ranjbaran
2023. Impact of Listening and Reading Skills Transfer on Speaking Accuracy, Fluency and Complexity of Iranian EFL Learners. Journal of Contemporary Language Research 2:2 ► pp. 109 ff. DOI logo
Xing, Jiaxin
2023. How do EFL learners process oral tasks with different complexity: an exploratory study. Frontiers in Psychology 14 DOI logo
Aubrey, Scott, Craig Lambert & Paul Leeming
2022. The impact of first as opposed to second language pre-task planning on the content of problem-solving task performance. Language Teaching Research 26:5 ► pp. 867 ff. DOI logo
Aubrey, Scott & Andrew Philpott
2022. Use of the L1 and L2 in strategic planning and rehearsal for task performances in an online classroom. Language Teaching Research DOI logo
Farahanynia, Mahsa & Mohammad Khatib
2022. Participatory structure of planning and cognitive task complexity in L2 oral performance: a processing perspective. The Language Learning Journal 50:6 ► pp. 777 ff. DOI logo
Feng, Ruiling
2022. Cognitive Factors Influencing Utterance Fluency in L2 Dialogues: Monadic and Non-monadic Perspectives. Frontiers in Psychology 13 DOI logo
Johnson, Mark D & Mahmoud Abdi Tabari
2022. Task Planning and Oral L2 Production: A Research Synthesis and Meta-analysis. Applied Linguistics 43:6 ► pp. 1143 ff. DOI logo
Qin, Jie & Yan Zhang
2022. Pre-task planning and discourse cohesion: Analysis of Chinese EFL learners’ referential use in oral narratives. Language Teaching Research 26:1 ► pp. 60 ff. DOI logo
Qiu, Xuyan & Gavin Bui
2022. “We Are Responsive on Zoom, but…”. International Journal of Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Teaching 12:2 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Mohammad Javad Ahmadian & Michael H. Long
2021. The Cambridge Handbook of Task-Based Language Teaching, DOI logo
Bui, Gavin
2021. Influence of learners’ prior knowledge, L2 proficiency and pre-task planning on L2 lexical complexity. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 59:4 ► pp. 543 ff. DOI logo
Bui, Gavin & Rhett Yu
2021. Differentiating Task Repetition from Task Rehearsal. In Task-Based Language Teaching and Assessment, ► pp. 119 ff. DOI logo
Gu, Qianqian
2021. Impact of task preparedness on L2 oral performance and strategy use. TASK. Journal on Task-Based Language Teaching and Learning 1:2 ► pp. 196 ff. DOI logo
Lambert, Craig, Scott Aubrey & Paul Leeming
2021. Task Preparation and Second Language Speech Production. TESOL Quarterly 55:2 ► pp. 331 ff. DOI logo
Qiu, Xuyan
2020. Functions of oral monologic tasks: Effects of topic familiarity on L2 speaking performance. Language Teaching Research 24:6 ► pp. 745 ff. DOI logo
Qiu, Xuyan
2022. Picture or non-picture? The influence of narrative task types on lower- and higher-proficiency EFL learners’ oral production. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 60:2 ► pp. 383 ff. DOI logo
van Batenburg, Eline, Ron Oostdam, Amos van Gelderen, Ruben Fukkink & Nivja de Jong
2020. The effects of instructional focus and task type on pre-vocational learners’ ability in EFL oral interaction. ITL - International Journal of Applied Linguistics 171:2 ► pp. 153 ff. DOI logo
van Batenburg, Eline SL, Ron J Oostdam, Amos JS van Gelderen, Ruben G Fukkink & Nivja H de Jong
2020. Evaluating opportunities in Dutch EFL course books for developing pre-vocational learners’ oral interactional ability. Language Teaching Research 24:4 ► pp. 434 ff. DOI logo
York, James
2020. Pedagogical considerations for teaching with games: Improving oral proficiency with self-transcription, task repetition, and online video analysis. Ludic Language Pedagogy 2 ► pp. 225 ff. DOI logo
Choi, Ikkyu, Mikyung Kim Wolf, Emilie Pooler, Lorraine Sova & Molly Faulkner-Bond
2019. Investigating the Benefits of Scaffolding in Assessments of Young English Learners: A Case for Scaffolded Retell Tasks. Language Assessment Quarterly 16:2 ► pp. 161 ff. DOI logo
Ellis, Rod
2019. Chapter 1. Task preparedness. In Researching L2 Task Performance and Pedagogy [Task-Based Language Teaching, 13], ► pp. 15 ff. DOI logo
Ellis, Rod, Peter Skehan, Shaofeng Li, Natsuko Shintani & Craig Lambert
2019. Task-Based Language Teaching, DOI logo
Khoram, Alireza & Zuochen Zhang
2019. The impact of task type and pre-task planning condition on the accuracy of intermediate EFL learners’ oral performance. Cogent Education 6:1 DOI logo
Lambert, Craig
2019. Chapter 12. Task-induced second language development. In Researching L2 Task Performance and Pedagogy [Task-Based Language Teaching, 13], ► pp. 279 ff. DOI logo
Lambert, Craig & Sachiko Nakamura
2019. Proficiency‐related variation in syntactic complexity: A study of English L1 and L2 oral descriptive discourse. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 29:2 ► pp. 248 ff. DOI logo
LAMBERT, CRAIG & GRACE ZHANG
2019. Engagement in the Use of English and Chinese as Foreign Languages: The Role of Learner‐Generated Content in Instructional Task Design. The Modern Language Journal 103:2 ► pp. 391 ff. DOI logo
Souza Ferraz D'Ely, Raquel Carolina, Mailce Borges Mota & Martin Bygate
2019. Chapter 9. Strategic planning and repetition as metacognitive processes in task performance. In Researching L2 Task Performance and Pedagogy [Task-Based Language Teaching, 13], ► pp. 199 ff. DOI logo
Wang, Zhan, Peter Skehan & Gaowei Chen
2019. The effects of hybrid online planning and L2 proficiency on video-based speaking task performance. Instructed Second Language Acquisition 3:1 ► pp. 53 ff. DOI logo
Xing, Jiaxin & Shaoqian Luo
2019. Chapter 7. The effects of reasoning demands on Chinese EFL learners’ oral performance and cognitive processes. In Researching L2 Task Performance and Pedagogy [Task-Based Language Teaching, 13], ► pp. 153 ff. DOI logo
Boers, Frank
2018. Between rigour and reality. Language Teaching Research 22:1 ► pp. 5 ff. DOI logo
Bui, Gavin & Zeping Huang
2018. L2 fluency as influenced by content familiarity and planning: Performance, measurement, and pedagogy. Language Teaching Research 22:1 ► pp. 94 ff. DOI logo
Bui, Gavin & Peter Skehan
2018. Complexity, Accuracy, and Fluency. In The TESOL Encyclopedia of English Language Teaching, ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Bui, Gavin, Peter Skehan & Zhan Wang
2018. Task Condition Effects on Advanced‐Level Foreign Language Performance. In The Handbook of Advanced Proficiency in Second Language Acquisition, ► pp. 219 ff. DOI logo
Sadeghi, Karim & Farah Ghaderi
2018. Pre-task planning and explicit instruction: Effects on CALF in an oral jigsaw task and gains in linguistic knowledge. Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies 36:4 ► pp. 365 ff. DOI logo
Wang, Zhan & Gaowei Chen
2018. Chapter 4. Discourse performance in L2 task repetition. In Learning Language through Task Repetition [Task-Based Language Teaching, 11], ► pp. 97 ff. DOI logo
Butler, Yuko Goto
2017. The Role of Affect in Intraindividual Variability in Task Performance for Young Learners. TESOL Quarterly 51:3 ► pp. 728 ff. DOI logo
Butler, Yuko Goto
2017. Motivational elements of digital instructional games: A study of young L2 learners’ game designs. Language Teaching Research 21:6 ► pp. 735 ff. DOI logo
Lambert, Craig, Judit Kormos & Danny Minn
2017. TASK REPETITION AND SECOND LANGUAGE SPEECH PROCESSING. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 39:1 ► pp. 167 ff. DOI logo
Qiu, Xuyan & Yuen Yi Lo
2017. Content familiarity, task repetition and Chinese EFL learners’ engagement in second language use. Language Teaching Research 21:6 ► pp. 681 ff. DOI logo
Skehan, Peter
2016. Foreign language aptitude, acquisitional sequences, and psycholinguistic processes. In Cognitive Individual Differences in Second Language Processing and Acquisition [Bilingual Processing and Acquisition, 3], ► pp. 17 ff. DOI logo
Skehan, Peter
2016. Tasks Versus Conditions: Two Perspectives on Task Research and Their Implications for Pedagogy. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 36 ► pp. 34 ff. DOI logo
Skehan, Peter
2021. The Psycholinguistics of Task-Based Performance. In The Cambridge Handbook of Task-Based Language Teaching, ► pp. 3 ff. DOI logo
Skehan, Peter
2022. Chapter 11. Performance on second language speaking tasks. In Second Language Acquisition Theory [Bilingual Processing and Acquisition, 14], ► pp. 211 ff. DOI logo
Skehan, Peter
2023. Linking second language speaking task performance and language testing. Language Teaching ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Thai, Chau & Frank Boers
2016. Repeating a Monologue Under Increasing Time Pressure: Effects on Fluency, Complexity, and Accuracy. TESOL Quarterly 50:2 ► pp. 369 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 7 november 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.