References
Brown, G., Anderson, A., Shilcock, R., & Yule, G
(1984) Teaching talk: Strategies for production and assessment. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Bygate, M
(2001) Effects of task repetition on the structure and control of oral language. In M. Bygate, P. Skehan, & M. Swain (Eds.), Researching pedagogic tasks: Second language learning, teaching, and testing (pp. 23–48). Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
Ellis R
(2003), Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Ellis, R
(2009) The differential effects of three types of task planning on the fluency, complexity and accuracy in L2 oral production. Applied Linguistics, 30, 474–509. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Foster, P., & Skehan, P
(1996) The influence of planning on performance in task-based learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18, 299–324. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1999) The influence of source of planning and focus of planning on task-based performance. Language Teaching Research, 3, 185–214. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2013) Anticipating a post-task activity: The effects on accuracy, complexity and fluency of L2 language performance. Canadian Modern Language Review 69, 3, 249–273. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Foster, P., & Tavakoli, P
(2009) Native speakers and task performance: Comparing effects on complexity, fluency and lexical diversity. Language Learning, 59(4), 886–896. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2011) Task design and second language performance: The effect of narrative type on learner output. Language Learning, 61(suppl.1), 37–72. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Foster, P., Tonkyn, A., & Wigglesworth, J
(2000) Measuring spoken language: A unit for all reasons. Applied Linguistics, 21(3), 354−75. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gilabert, R
(2007) Effects of manipulating task complexity on self-repairs during L2 oral production. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 45, 215–240. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hinkel, E
(2004) TOEFL test strategies with Practice Tests (3rd ed.) Hauppauge, NY: Barron’s.Google Scholar
Housen, A., & Kuiken, F
(2009) Complexity, accuracy, and fluency in second language acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 30(4), 461–473. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ishikawa, T
(2006) The effects of task complexity and language proficiency on task- based language performance. The Journal of Asia TEFL, 3(4), 193–225.Google Scholar
Iwashita, N., McNamara, T., & Elder, C
(2001) Can we predict task difficulty in an oral proficiency test? Exploring the potential of an information-processing approach to task design. Language Learning, 51(3), 401–436. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kormos, J
(2006) Speech production and second language acquisition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Kuiken, F., & Vedder, I
(2007) Task complexity and measures of linguistic performance in L2 writing. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 45(3), 261–284. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2008) Cognitive task complexity and written output in Italian and French as a foreign language. Journal of Second Language Writing, 17, 48–60. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levelt, W.J.M
(1989) Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
MacWhinney, B
(2000) The CHILDES Project: Tools for Analyzing Talk (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Malvern, D., & Richards, B
(2002) Investigating accommodation in language proficiency interviews using a new measure of lexical diversity. Language Testing, 19, 85–104. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meara, P., & Bell, H
(2001) P_Lex: A simple and effective way of describing the lexical characteristics of short L2 texts. Prospect, 16, 5–19.Google Scholar
Michel, M., Kuiken, F., & Vedder, I
(2007) the influence of complexity in monologic versus dialogic tasks in Dutch L2. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 45, 241–259. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ortega, L
(1999) Planning and focus on form in L2 oral performance. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21, 109–148. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2005) What do learners plan? Learner-driven attention to form during pre-task planning. In R. Ellis (Ed.), Planning and task performance in a second language (pp. 77–109). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rahimpour, M
(1997) Task complexity, task condition, and variation in L2 oral discourse. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis. University of Queensland, Australia.Google Scholar
Richards, B.J., & Malvern, D.D
(1998) A new research tool: Mathematical modelling in the measurement of vocabulary diversity (Award reference no. R000221995). Final Report to the Economic and Social Research Council, Swindon, UK.Google Scholar
Robinson, P
(1995) Task complexity and second language narrative discourse. Language Learning, 45, 99–140. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2001a) Task complexity, task difficulty, and task production: Exploring interactions in a componential framework. Applied Linguistics, 22(1), 27–57. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2001b) Task complexity, cognitive resources, and syllabus design: A triadic framework for examining task influences on SLA. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 287–318). Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2007) Task complexity, theory of mind, and intentional reasoning: Effects on L2 speech production, interaction, uptake and perceptions of task difficulty. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 45, 193–214.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2011).Task-based language learning: A review of issues. Language Learning, 61(Suppl. 1, June 2011), 1–36. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Robinson, P., & Gilabert, R
(2007) Task complexity, the cognition hypothesis and second language learning and performance. IRAL, 45, 161–176.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sawaki, Y., Stricker, L.J., & Oranje, A.H
(2009) Factor structure of an internet-based test. Language Testing, 26(1), 5–30. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Skehan, P
(2009a) Modelling second language performance: Integrating complexity, accuracy, fluency and lexis. Applied Linguistics, 30(4), 510–532. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2009b) Lexical performance by native and non-native speakers on language-learning tasks. In H. Daller, D. Malvern, P. Meara, J. Milton, B. Richards, & J. Treffers-Daller. (Eds.), Vocabulary studies in first and second language acquisition: The interface between theory and application (pp. 107–124). London: Palgrave Macmillan.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2009c) Models of speaking and the assessment of second language proficiency. In A. Benati. (Ed.), Issues in second language proficiency (pp. 202–215). London: Continuum.Google Scholar
(2011) Researching tasks: Performance, assessment, pedagogy. Shanghai: Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press.Google Scholar
manuscript). Conventions for coding complexity, accuracy, fluency and lexis: The use of TaskProfile. The Chinese University of Hong Kong.
Skehan, P., & Foster, P
(1997) The influence of planning and post-task activities on accuracy and complexity in task-based learning. Language Teaching Research, 1(3), 16–33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2008).Complexity, accuracy, fluency and lexis in task-based performance: A meta-analysis of the Ealing research. In S. Van Daele, A. Housen, F. Kuiken, M. Pierrard, & I. Vedder. (Eds.), Complexity, accuracy and fluency in second language use, learning and teaching (pp. 263–284). Brussels: Royal Flemish Academy of Belgium for Sciences and Arts.Google Scholar
Tavakoli, P., & Foster, P
(2008) Task design and second language performance: The effect of narrative type on learner output. Language Learning, 58(2), 439–473. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tavakoli, P., & Skehan, P
(2005) Strategic planning, task structure, and performance testing. In R. Ellis (Ed.), Planning and task performance in a second language (pp. 239–276). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van den Branden K
(2006) Task-based language education: From theory to practice. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van den Branden, K., Bygate M., & Norris, J
(2009) (Eds.), Task-based language teaching: A reader. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wang, Z
(2009) Modeling L2 speech production and performance: Evidence from five types of planning and two task structure. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis. The Chinese University of Hong Kong.Google Scholar
Yuan, F., & Ellis, R
(2003). The effects of pre-task planning and online planning on fluency, complexity, and accuracy in L2 monologicoral production. Applied Linguistics, 24, 1–27. DOI logoGoogle Scholar