Article published in:Technology-mediated TBLT: Researching Technology and Tasks
Edited by Marta González-Lloret and Lourdes Ortega
[Task-Based Language Teaching 6] 2014
► pp. 51–78
Chapter 3. Prior knowledge and second language task production in text chat
The Cognition Hypothesis framed by Robinson (2001; 2003; 2005) has generated a large body of research on how varying task complexity may influence second language (L2) production and learning opportunities; however, most of these studies were conducted in a face-to-face setting (e.g. Gilabert 2007; Gilabert, Baron & Llanes 2009; Kim 2009; Michel, Kuiken & Vedder 2007; Nuevo 2006; Nuevo, Adams & Ross-Feldman 2011). As computer-mediated communication becomes more pervasive in educational contexts, research that extends current understandings of principles of second language learning is increasingly important to help learners and teachers understand how best to make use of this technology to promote specific learning goals (see Kern 2006). The role of task complexity in computer-mediated environments may be particularly important, as this may influence how learners commit attentional resources to language processing during communication (Robinson 2005; Skehan 1998). This study examines the role of one task complexity factor, prior knowledge, on second language production in text-based chat. Analysis of the language produced by first language Malay engineering students engaged in text-based chat group tasks in English indicated that prior knowledge of the task subject area had a limited effect on the complexity and accuracy of language production. We conclude with a critical discussion of the applicability of the Cognition Hypothesis to task-based communication via text chat. We also provide suggestions for how L2 tasks can be implemented in computer-mediated contexts in order to promote attention to form, noting that considering language production and learning in CMC tasks challenges task-based theories and requires transformation of research methods and analysis.
Published online: 24 July 2014
Akyel, A., & Erçetin, B.. (
Anderson, T., & Elloumi, F.. (
2004) Theory and practice of online learning . Athabasca, Canada: Athabasca University.
Baron, N. s. (
2010) Discourse structures in instant messaging: The case of utterance breaks. LanguageInternet , 7, article 4.
Barry, S., & Lazarte, A.. (
Belz, J. A.. (
2006) At the intersection of telecollaboration and learner corpus research: Considerations for language program direction. In J. A. Belz & S. L. Thorne (Eds.), Internet-mediated intercultural foreign language education (pp. 207–246). Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle.
Belz, J. A., & Müller-Hartmann, A.. (
Blake, C.. (
Blake, R.. (
2005) Bimodal CMC: The glue of language learning at a distance. CALICO Journal , 22, 497–511.
Böhlke, O.. (
2003) A comparison of student participation levels by group size and language stages during chat room and face-to-face discussions in German. CALICO Journal , 21, 67–87.
Carrell, P., & Wise, T.. (
Chang, Y. F.. (
1999) Discourse topics and interlanguage variation. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Representation and Process: Proceedings of the Third Pacific Second Language Research Forum (pp. 235–241), Tokyo: PacSLRF.
Clapham, C.. (
1996) The development of IELTS: A study on the effect of background knowledge on reading comprehension . Cambridge, UK: CUP.
Cook, C., Irwin, W., & Churcher, N.. (
2004) Towards synchronous collaborative software engineering (Technical Report TR-03/04, June 2004). Software Engineering & Visualisation Group, Department of Computer Science and Software Engineering, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10092/3037
Daller, H., Hout, R., & Treffers-Daller, J.. (
Danet, B., & Herring, S. C.. (
Ellis, R., & Yuan, F.. (
Emde, S., Schneider, J., & Kötter, M.. (
Erçetin, G.. (
Fiori, M. L.. (
2005) The development of grammatical competence through synchronous computer-mediated communication. CALICO Journal , 22, 567–602.
Fitze, M.. (
2006) Discourse and participation in ESL face-to-face and written electronic conferences. Language Learning & Technology , 10(1), 67–86.
Foster, P., & Skehan, P.. (
Foster, P., Tonkyn, A., & Wigglesworth, G.. (
Gilabert, R.. (
2007) The simultaneous manipulation of task complexity along planning time and ( Here-and-Now): Effects on L2 oral production. In M. P. Garcia Mayo (Ed.), Investigating tasks in formal language learning (pp. 44–68). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
Gilabert, R., Baron, J., & Llanes, A.. (
2009) Manipulating cognitive complexity across task types and its impact on learners' interaction during oral performance. IRAL: International Review of Applied Linguistics , 47, 367–395.
Gonzalez, D.. (
2003) Teaching and learning through chat: A taxonomy of educational chat for EFL/ESL. IAIEFL Poland: Computer Special Interest Group , 3(4).
Good, D. A., & Butterworth, B.. (
1980) Hesitancy as a conversational resource: Some methodological implications. In H. Dechert & M. Rapach (Eds.), Temporal variables in speech production (pp. 145–152). The Hague: Mouton.
Hampel, R.. (
2010) Task design for a virtual learning environment in a distance language course. In M. Thomas & H. Reinders (Eds.), Task-based language learning and teaching with technology (pp. 131–153). London: Continuum.
Hardy, I. M., & Moore, J. L.. (
Hill, M. O.. (
Housen, A., & Kuiken, F.. (
Ismail, F.. (
2010) The role of grammar courses on teacher learners’ grammar teaching . (Unpublished doctoral dissertation), Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Malaysia.
Johnson, A., & Sheehan, M.. (
2006) English with Shrek: A multi-media based CALL course, PacCALL Journal , 2, 108–125.
Kern, R.. (
Kim, Y.. (
Kuiken, F., & Vedder, I.. (
Laufer, B., & Nation, I.S.P.. (
Lee, L.. (
2004) Learners' perspectives on networked collaborative interaction with native speakers of Spanish in the US. Language Learning & Technology , 8, 83–100.
Long, M.. (
2007) Problems in SLA. Mahwah , NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Long, M. H., & Crookes, G.. (
Meskill, C.. (
2005) Triadic scaffolds: Tools for teaching English language learners with computers. Language Learning & Technology , 9, 46–59.
Michel, M., Kuiken, F., & Vedder, I.. (
Ministry of Education Malaysia
(2004) The development of education: National report of Malaysia . Malaysia.
Mochizuki, N., & Ortega, L.. (
Murugesan, V.. (
2003) Malaysia promotes excellence in English. ESL Magazines , 6(2), 26–28.
Nation, I.S.P.. (
Nation, I. S. P., & Heatley, A.. (
2002) Range: A program for the analysis of vocabulary in texts [software]. Retrieved from www.vuw.ac.nz/lals/staff/paul-nation/nation.aspx
Naughton, D.. (
Newlands, A., Anderson, A. H., & Mullin, J.. (
Nik, N.. (
2010) Examining the language learning potential of a task-based approach to synchronous computer-mediated communication. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Victoria University of Wellington, New Zealand.
Nik, N., & Adams, R.. (
2009) TBLT and SCMC: How do students use communication strategies? Asian Journal of English Language Teaching , 19, 135–158.
Nik, N., Adams, R., & Newton, J.. (
Norris, J., & Ortega, L.. (
Nuevo, A. M.. (
2006) Task complexity and interaction: L2 learning opportunities and development . (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses database. (UMI No. 3247335)
Nuevo, A. M., Adams, R., & Ross-Feldman, L.. (
. (Ed) (2007). Online intercultural exchange: An introduction for foreign language teachers . Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
Ortega, L.. (
2009) Interaction and attention to form in L2 text-based computer-mediated communication. In A. Mackey & C. Polio (Eds.), Multiple perspectives on interaction in second language acquisition: Second language research in honor of Susan M. Gass . New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
Payne, J. S., & Whitney, P. J.. (
2002) Developing L2 oral proficiency through synchronous CMC: Output, working memory, and interlanguage development. CALICO Journal , 20, 7–32.
Peterson, M.. (
2010) Task-based language teaching in network-based CALL: An analysis of research on learner interaction in synchronous CMC. In M. Thomas & H. Reinders (Eds.), T ask-based language learning and teaching with technology (pp. 41–62). London, UK: Continuum.
Philp, J., Oliver, R., & Mackey, A.. (
Pulido, D.. (
Quan-Haase, A., Cothrel, J., & Wellman, B.. (
2005) Instant messaging for collaboration: A case study of a high-tech firm. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication , 10(4). Retrieved from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol10/issue4/quan-haase.html
Révész, A.. (
Robinson, P.. (
2003) The Cognition Hypothesis of adult, task-based language learning. Second Language Studies , 21, 45–107.
2007a) Criteria for grading and sequencing pedagogic tasks. In M. P. Gárcia Mayo (Ed.), Investigating tasks in formal language learning (pp. 7–27). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
2007b) Task complexity, theory of mind, and intentional reasoning: Effects on L2 speech production, interaction, uptake and perceptions of task difficulty. IRAL , 45, 193–213.
Robinson, P., & Gilabert, R.. (
2007) Task complexity, the Cognition Hypothesis and second language learning and performance. IRAL , 45, 161–176.
Samuda, V., & Bygate, M.. (
2008) Tasks in second language learning . London: Palgrave.
Sanders, R.. (
2006) A comparison of a chat room productivity: In-class versus out-of-class. CALICO Journal , 24, 59–76.
Sauro, S.. (
2011) SCMC for SLA: A research synthesis. CALICO Journal , 28, 369–391.
2009) Computer-mediated corrective feedback and the development of L2 grammar. Language Learning & Technology , 13, 96–120.
Skehan, P.. (
1998) A cognitive approach to language learning . Oxford: OUP.
Skehan, P., & Foster, P.. (
Smith, B.. (
2008) Methodological hurdles in captures CMC data: The case of the missing self-repair. Language Learning & Technology , 12(1), 85–103.
Sotillo, M. S.. (
2005) Corrective feedback via instant messenger learning activities in NS-NNS and NNS-NNS dyads. CALICO Journal , 22, 467–496.
Spencer, Jr., B., Finholt, T. A., Foster, I., Kesselman, C., Beldica, C., Futrelle, J., Yang, G.. (
2004, August). NEESGRID: A distributed collaboratory for advanced earthquake engineering experiment and simulation . Paper presented at the 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Vancouver, B. C., Canada. Retrieved from <http://globustoolkit.com/alliance/publications/papers/13worldconferenceonEarthquakeEngineering-rad8A451.pdf>
Stockwell, G.. (
2010) Effects of multimodality in computer-mediated communication tasks. In M. Thomas & H. Reinders (Eds.), Task-based language learning and teaching with technology (pp. 83–104). London, UK: Continuum.
Tavakoli, P., & Foster, P.. (
Tavakoli, P., & Skehan, P.. (
Toyoda, E., & Harrison, R.. (
2002) Categorization of text chat communication between learners and native speakers of Japanese. Language Learning & Technology , 6(1), 82–99.
Tudini, V.. (
2003) Using native speakers in chat. Language Learning & Technology , 7(3), 141–159.
Vermeer, A.. (
Ware, P. D., & Kramsch, C.. (
Warschauer, M.. (
Yilmaz, Y.. (
Cited by other publications
Bowles, Melissa A. & Rebecca J. Adams
Egbert, Joy, Seyed Abdollah Shahrokni, Xue Zhang, David Herman, Intissar Yahia, Adnan Mohamed, Faraj M. Aljarih, Chioma Ezeh, Nataliia Borysenko & Sonia Lopez-Lopez
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 june 2020. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.