Article published in:
Technology-mediated TBLT: Researching Technology and Tasks
Edited by Marta González-Lloret and Lourdes Ortega
[Task-Based Language Teaching 6] 2014
► pp. 183–212

Chapter 7. Collaborative tasks for negotiation of intercultural meaning in virtual worlds and video-web communication

In many foreign language education settings, communication tasks in the target language mostly take place between nonnative-speaker classmates sharing the same mother tongue. ‘Networked’ environments such as voice-enabled 3D virtual worlds or video-web communication may have an added value in creating opportunities for language learners to synchronously communicate outside the classroom. As such, these tools may facilitate intercultural communication and collaboration with other (native) speakers of the target language. In the European Networked Interaction in Foreign Language Acquisition and Research (NIFLAR) project,* innovative e-learning environments were designed and studied for their potential to create authentic and interactive contexts that support the development of intercultural competence in foreign language learning contexts. The technology-mediated pedagogical tasks targeted intercultural communicative competence (following, e.g. Byram 1997; and Müller-Jacquier 2003), in which intercultural awareness and social interaction seek to play a much larger role than it is possible in current classroom-based foreign language education. The NIFLAR design also took into consideration the set of design principles that have emerged from TBLT research (Ellis 2003; Doughty & Long 2003; Long 2009; Norris 2009; Van den Branden 2006; Willis 1996). In this chapter we present NIFLAR’s technology-mediated, task-based framework for the development of intercultural competence and discuss its application to both video-web task-based communication and the virtual world Second Life by Dutch learners of Spanish communicating with native-speaker teachers of Spanish. We offer qualitative and quantitative data gleaned from the completion of two tasks and discuss the potential effects of technology-mediated TBLT in such environments, focusing on negotiation of intercultural meaning in communication between language learners and native speakers.
Published online: 24 July 2014
https://doi.org/10.1075/tblt.6.07can
References

References

ACTFL, Inc. (
1999)  American council of the teaching of foreign languages proficiency guidelines . Retrieved from <www​.actfl​.org​/sites​/default​/files​/pdfs​/public​/Guidelinesspeak​.pdf>Google Scholar
Belz, J. A.. (
2003) Linguistic perspectives on the development of intercultural competence in telecollaboration. Language Learning & Technology , 7(2), 68–117.Google Scholar
Belz, J. A., & Thorne, S. L.. (
Eds) (2006)  Internet-mediated intercultural foreign language education . Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle.Google Scholar
Breen, M.. (
1987) Learner contributions to task design. In C. Candlin & D. Murphy (Eds.), Language learning tasks (pp. 23–46). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
1989) The evaluation cycle for language learning tasks. In R. K. Johnson (Ed.), The second language curriculum (pp. 187–206). Cambridge, UK: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bryant, T.. (
2006) Using World of Warcraft and other MMORPGs to foster a targeted, social, and cooperative approach toward language learning. Academic Commons , September 2006.Google Scholar
Byram, M.. (
1997)  Teaching and assessing intercultural communicative competence . Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Byram, M., Nichols, A., & Stevens, D.. (
2001)  Developing intercultural competence in practice . Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Byram, M., & Zarate, G.. (
1994)  Definitions, objectives, and evaluation of cultural competence . Strassbourg: Council of Europe.Google Scholar
Council of Europe
(2001)  Common European framework of reference for languages . Retrieved from <www​.pearsonlongman​.com​/ae​/cef​/cefguide​.pdf>Google Scholar
Chaudron, C., Doughty, C., & Kim, Y.. (
2005) A task-based needs analysis of a tertiary Korean as a foreign language program. In. M. H. Long (Ed.), Second language needs analysis (pp. 225–61). Cambridge, UK: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ciekanski, M., & Chanier, T.. (
2008) Developing online multimodal verbal communication to enhance the writing process in an audio-graphic conferencing environment. ReCALL , 20, 162–182. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cooke-Plagwitz, J.. (
2008) New directions in CALL: An objective introduction to Second Life. CALICO Journal , 25, 547–557.Google Scholar
Coughlan, P., & Duff, P. A.. (
1994) Same task, different activities: Analysis of SLA task from an activity theory perspective. In J. P. Lantolf & G. Appel (Eds.), Vygotskian approaches to SL research (pp. 173–194). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Deutschmann, M., Panichi, L., & Molka Danielsen, J.. (
2009) Designing oral participation in Second Life: A comparative study of two language proficiency courses. ReCALL , 21(2), 206–226. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dieterle, E., & Clarke, J.. (
2008) Multi-user virtual environments for teaching and learning. In M. Pagani (Ed.), Encyclopedia of multimedia technology and networking (pp. 1033–1035). Hershey, PA: Idea Group. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Doughty, C., & Long. M.. (
2003) Optimal psycholinguistic environments for distance foreign language learning. Language Learning and Technology , 7(3), 50–75.Google Scholar
Eckerth, J.. (
2009) Negotiated interaction in the L2 classroom. Language Teaching , 42, 109–130. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, R.. (
2003)  Task-based language learning and teaching . Oxford, UK: OUP.Google Scholar
Fernández-García, M., & Martínez-Arbelaiz, A.. (
2002) Negotiation of meaning in nonnative speaker-nonnative speaker synchronous discussions. CALICO Journal , 19, 279–294.Google Scholar
Furstenberg, G., Levet, S., English, K., & Maillet, K.. (
2001) Giving a virtual voice to the silent language of culture: The CULTURA project. Language Learning and Technology , 5(1), 55–102.Google Scholar
González-Lloret, M.. (
2008) Computer-mediated learning of L2 pragmatics. In E. A. Soler & A. Martinez-Flor (Eds.), Investigating pragmatics in foreign language learning, teaching and testin g (pp. 114–132). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Guichon, N.. (
2010) Preparatory study for the design of a desktop videoconferencing platform for synchronous language teaching. Computer Assisted Language Learning , 23, 169–182. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Guth, S., & Maio, M.. (
2010) Close encounters of a new kind: The use of Skype and Wiki in telecollaboration. In S. Guth & F. Helm (Eds.), Telecollaboration 2.0 (pp.413–427). Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Hall, J. K.. (
2004) A prosaic of interaction: The development of interactional competence in another language. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Culture in second language teaching and learning (pp. 137–151). Cambridge, UK: CUP.Google Scholar
Hampel, R., & Hauck, M.. (
2004) Towards an effective use of audio conferencing in distance language courses. Language Learning and Technology , 8(1), 66–82.Google Scholar
Hampel, R., Felix, U., Hauck, M., & Coleman, J. A.. (
2005) Complexities of learning and teaching languages in a real-time audiographic environment. German as a Foreign Language Journal , 3, 1–30. Retrieved from <www​.gfl​-journal​.de​/3​-2005​/hampel​_felix​_hauck​_coleman​.html#​_ftn1#​_ftn1>Google Scholar
Heritage, J.. (
1984) A change-of-state token and aspects of its sequential placement. In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis (pp. 299–345). Cambridge, UK: CUP.Google Scholar
Hinkel, E.
. (Ed) (2004)  Culture in second language teaching and learning . Cambridge, UK: CUP.Google Scholar
Jauregi, K.. (
2011) La negociación de procesos de escritura a través de la videocomunicación. In N. Estévez, N, J. R. Gómez & M. Carbonell (Eds.), La comunicación escrita en el siglo XXI: Cuadernos de filología, estudios lingüísticos , 16, 81–105.Google Scholar
Jauregi, K., & Bañados, E.. (
2008) Virtual interaction through video-web communication: A step towards enriching and internationalizing learning programs. ReCALL , 20, 183–207. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010) An intercontinental video-web communication project between Chile and The Netherlands. In S. Guth & F. Helm (Eds.), Telecollaboration 2.0 (pp. 427–436). Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Jauregi, K., Canto, S., de Graaff, R., Koenraad, A., & Moonen, M.. (
2011) Verbal interaction in Second Life: Towards a pedagogic framework for task design. Computer Assisted Language Learning Journal , 24, 77–101. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jauregi, K., de Graaff, R., Bergh van Den, H., & Kriz, M.. (
in press) Native-non native speaker interactions through video-web communication: A clue for enhancing motivation? CALL Journal .Google Scholar
Kramsch, C.. (
1991) Culture in language learning: A view from the States. In K. de Bot, R. B. Ginsberg & C. Kramsch (Eds.), Foreign language research in cross-cultural perspective (pp. 217–240). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1993)  Context and culture in language teaching . Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kramsch, C., & Thorne, S.. (
2002) Foreign language learning as global communicative practice. In D. Block & D. Cameron (Eds.), Language learning and teaching in the age of globalization (pp. 83–100). London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kuriscak, L. M, & Luke, C. L.. (
2009) Language learner attitudes toward virtual worlds: An investigation of Second Life. In G. Lord & L. Lomicka (Eds.), The next generation: Online collaboration and social networking in CALL (pp. 173–207). San Marcos, TX: CALICO.Google Scholar
Lantolf, J. P.
. (Ed) (2000)  Sociocultural theory and second language learning . Oxford, UK: OUP.Google Scholar
Lantolf, J. P., & Thorne, S. L.. (
Eds) (2006)  Sociocultural theory and second language learning . Oxford, UK: OUP.Google Scholar
Lamy, M. N.. (
2004) Oral conversations online: Redefining oral competence in synchronous environments. ReCALL , 16, 520–538. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Liauw, M.. (
2006) E-learning and the development of intercultural competence. Language Learning & Technology , 10(3), 49–64.Google Scholar
Long, M. H.. (
2009) Methodological principles for language teaching. In M. Long & C. Doughty (Eds.),  The handbook of language teaching (pp. 371–394). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Long, M. H., & Crookes, G.. (
1993) Units of analysis in syllabus design: The case for task. In G. Crookes & S. Gass (Eds.), Tasks in a pedagogical context: Integrating theory and practice (pp. 9–54). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Long, M. H., & Norris, J. M.. (
2000) Task-based teaching and assessment. In M. Byram (Ed.), E ncyclopedia of language teaching (pp. 597–603). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Molka-Danielsen, J., & Deutschmann, M.. (
Eds) (2009): Learning and teaching in the virtual world of Second Life . Trondheim, Norway: Tapir Academic Press.Google Scholar
Moonen, M., De Graaff, R., & Westhoff, G.. (
2006) Focused tasks, mental actions and second language learning: Cognitive and connectionist accounts of task effectiveness. International Journal of Applied Linguistics , 152, 35–53. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Müller-Jacquier, J.. (
2003) Linguistic awareness and cultures. In J. Bolten (Ed.), Studien zur internationalen Unternehmenskommunikation (pp. 20–49). Leipzig: Popp.Google Scholar
Norris, J.. (
2009) Task-based teaching and testing. In M. Long & C. Doughty (Eds.), The handbook of language teaching (pp. 578–594). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
O’Dowd, R.. (
2000) Intercultural learning via videoconferencing: A pilot exchange project. ReCALL , 12, 49–63. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
O'Dowd, R.. (
2011) Online foreign language interaction: Moving from the periphery to the core of foreign language education? Language Teaching , 44, 368–380. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
O’Dowd, R., &
Ritter, M. (2006). Understanding and working with ‘failed communication’ in telecollaborative exchanges. CALICO Journal , 23, 623- 642.
Ortega, L.. (
2009) Interaction and attention to form in L2 text-based computer-mediated communication. In A. Mackey & C. Polio (Eds.), Multiple perspectives on interaction in SLA: Research in honor of Susan M. Gass (pp. 226–253).New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Sauro, S.. (
2011) SCMC for SLA: A research synthesis. CALICO Journal , 28, 369–391.Google Scholar
Skehan, P.. (
1998)  A cognitive approach to language learning . Oxford, UK: OUP.Google Scholar
Smith, B.. (
2003) Computer-mediated negotiated interaction: An expanded model. The Modern Language Journal , 87, 38–57. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Steinkuehler, C.. (
2006) Massively multiplayer online videogaming as participation in a discourse. Mind, Culture & Activity ,13, 38–52. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Steinkuehler, C., & Squire, K.. (
2009) Virtual worlds and learning: Introduction to the special issue. On the Horizon , 17(1), 8–11. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Thorne, S. L.. (
2008) Transcultural communication in open internet environments and massively multiplayer online games. In S. Magnan (Ed.), Mediating discourse online (pp. 305–327). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tudini, V.. (
2007) Negotiation and intercultural learning in Italian native speaker chat rooms. Modern Language Journal , 91, 577–601. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Van den Branden, K.. (
2006) Introduction: task-based language teaching in a nutshell. In K. Van den Branden (Ed.), Task-based language education (pp. 1–17). Cambridge, UK: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Varonis, E. M., & Gass, S.. (
1985a) Miscommunication in native/non native conversation. Language in Society , 14, 327–343. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1985b) Non native/non native conversations: A model for the negotiation of meaning. Applied Linguistics , 6, 71–90. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ware, P. D., & Kramsch, C.. (
2005) Toward an intercultural stance: Teaching German and English through telecollaboration. Modern Language Journal , 89(2), 190–205. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ware, P. D., & O’Dowd, R.. (
2008) Peer feedback on language form in telecollaboration. Language Learning and Technology , 12(1), 43–63.Google Scholar
Westhoff, G.. (
2004) The art of playing a pinball machine: Characteristics of effective SLA-tasks. Babylonia , 12(3), 58–62.Google Scholar
Willis, J.. (
1996)  A framework for task-based learning . Harlow, UK: Longman.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by other publications

No author info given
2019.  In Task-Based Language Teaching, ► pp. xiii ff. Crossref logo
No author info given
2019.  In Task-Based Language Teaching, ► pp. xi ff. Crossref logo
No author info given
2019.  In Task-Based Language Teaching, ► pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
No author info given
2019.  In Task-Based Language Teaching, ► pp. 3 ff. Crossref logo
No author info given
2019.  In Task-Based Language Teaching, ► pp. 27 ff. Crossref logo
No author info given
2019.  In Task-Based Language Teaching, ► pp. 29 ff. Crossref logo
No author info given
2019.  In Task-Based Language Teaching, ► pp. 64 ff. Crossref logo
No author info given
2019.  In Task-Based Language Teaching, ► pp. 103 ff. Crossref logo
No author info given
2019.  In Task-Based Language Teaching, ► pp. 129 ff. Crossref logo
No author info given
2019.  In Task-Based Language Teaching, ► pp. 155 ff. Crossref logo
No author info given
2019.  In Task-Based Language Teaching, ► pp. 175 ff. Crossref logo
No author info given
2019.  In Task-Based Language Teaching, ► pp. 179 ff. Crossref logo
No author info given
2019.  In Task-Based Language Teaching, ► pp. 208 ff. Crossref logo
No author info given
2019.  In Task-Based Language Teaching, ► pp. 241 ff. Crossref logo
No author info given
2019.  In Task-Based Language Teaching, ► pp. 281 ff. Crossref logo
No author info given
2019.  In Task-Based Language Teaching, ► pp. 283 ff. Crossref logo
No author info given
2019.  In Task-Based Language Teaching, ► pp. 303 ff. Crossref logo
No author info given
2019.  In Task-Based Language Teaching, ► pp. 331 ff. Crossref logo
No author info given
2019.  In Task-Based Language Teaching, ► pp. 333 ff. Crossref logo
No author info given
2019.  In Task-Based Language Teaching, ► pp. 353 ff. Crossref logo
No author info given
2019.  In Task-Based Language Teaching, ► pp. 371 ff. Crossref logo
No author info given
2019.  In Task-Based Language Teaching, ► pp. 374 ff. Crossref logo
No author info given
2019.  In Task-Based Language Teaching, ► pp. 412 ff. Crossref logo
Abrams, Zsuzsanna I.
2020.  In Intercultural Communication and Language Pedagogy, Crossref logo
Avgousti, Maria Iosifina
2018. Intercultural communicative competence and online exchanges: a systematic review. Computer Assisted Language Learning 31:8 ► pp. 819 ff. Crossref logo
Bygate, Martin
2016. Sources, developments and directions of task-based language teaching. The Language Learning Journal 44:4 ► pp. 381 ff. Crossref logo
Calvo-Ferrer, José Ramón, Sabela Melchor-Couto & Kristi Jauregi
2016. ReCall Special Issue: Multimodal Environments in CALL. ReCALL 28:3 ► pp. 247 ff. Crossref logo
Chen, Julian
2020. The interplay of avatar identities, self-efficacy, and language practices. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics Crossref logo
Chen, Julian ChengChiang
2018. The interplay of tasks, strategies and negotiations in Second Life. Computer Assisted Language Learning 31:8 ► pp. 960 ff. Crossref logo
Chen, Julian ChengChiang
2020. Restorying a “Newbie” Teacher’s 3D Virtual Teaching Trajectory, Resilience, and Professional Development Through Action Research: A Narrative Case Study. TESOL Quarterly 54:2 ► pp. 375 ff. Crossref logo
Chen, Julian ChengChiang
2020. The effects of pre-task planning on EFL learners’ oral performance in a 3D multi-user virtual environment. ReCALL 32:3 ► pp. 232 ff. Crossref logo
Ellis, Rod, Peter Skehan, Shaofeng Li, Natsuko Shintani & Craig Lambert
2019.  In Task-Based Language Teaching, Crossref logo
González-Lloret, Marta
2016.  In Language and Technology, ► pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
González-Lloret, Marta
2017.  In Language, Education and Technology, ► pp. 193 ff. Crossref logo
González‐Lloret, Marta
2017.  In The Handbook of Technology and Second Language Teaching and Learning, ► pp. 234 ff. Crossref logo
González‐Lloret, Marta
2020. Collaborative tasks for online language teaching. Foreign Language Annals 53:2 ► pp. 260 ff. Crossref logo
Jauregi, Kristi
2015.  In Critical CALL – Proceedings of the 2015 EUROCALL Conference, Padova, Italy, ► pp. 268 ff. Crossref logo
Jauregi, Kristi
2016.  In Technology Implementation in Second Language Teaching and Translation Studies [New Frontiers in Translation Studies, ], ► pp. 155 ff. Crossref logo
Knight, Janine, Melinda Dooly & Elena Barberà
2020. Navigating a multimodal ensemble: Learners mediating verbal and non-verbal turns in online interaction tasks. ReCALL 32:1 ► pp. 25 ff. Crossref logo
Peterson, Mark, Qiao Wang & Maryam Sadat Mirzaei
2019.  In Assessing the Effectiveness of Virtual Technologies in Foreign and Second Language Instruction [Advances in Linguistics and Communication Studies, ], ► pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
van der Kroon, Linda, Kristi Jauregi & Jan D. ten Thije
2020.  In Multicultural Instructional Design, ► pp. 958 ff. Crossref logo
York, James, Koichi Shibata, Hayato Tokutake & Hiroshi Nakayama
2021. Effect of SCMC on foreign language anxiety and learning experience: A comparison of voice, video, and VR-based oral interaction. ReCALL 33:1 ► pp. 49 ff. Crossref logo
Özışık, B. Zeynep, Savaş Yeşilyurt & Dr. Hakan DEMİRÖZ
2019. Developing intercultural awareness in language teaching: Insights from EFL lecturers in Turkey. Dil ve Dilbilimi Çalışmaları Dergisi 15:4 ► pp. 1436 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 06 january 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.