Article published in:
Task-Based Language Learning – Insights from and for L2 Writing
Edited by Heidi Byrnes and Rosa M. Manchón
[Task-Based Language Teaching 7] 2014
► pp. 1–23

Task-based language learning

Insights from and for L2 writing - an introduction

In this introduction we provide an overview of the intended contribution of the volume to TBLT theory and research. It starts from the perspective that TBLT-oriented theoretical framing and explicitly theorized empirical research endeavours have, in general, taken oral communication as their main focus. This focus has prevented the construct of ‘task’ from attaining the kind of status that it deserves in the field of applied language studies. Based on that belief, this introductory chapter positions the contributions in the volume as showcasing diverse facets of the complex phenomenon of writing. It foreshadows how including a focus on L2 writing might influence theory and research into TBLT and, beyond that, contribute to fostering language development in a TBLT environment. Concluding with a synthesis of the volume’s individual contributions, the chapter creates an encompassing context for the diverse treatments of task and writing offered in the volume’s individual studies.
Published online: 14 November 2014
https://doi.org/10.1075/tblt.7.01byr
References

References

Adams, R. (
2006) L2 tasks and orientation to form: A role for modality? ITL: International Journal of Applied Linguistics , 152, 7–34. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Adams, R., & Ross-Feldman, L.
(2008) Does writing influence learner attention to form? In D. Belcher & A. Hirvela (Eds.), The oral-literate connection (pp. 243–266). Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Alegría de la Colina, A., & García Mayo, M.P.
(2007) Attention to form across collaborative tasks by low-proficiency learners in an EFL setting. In M.P. García Mayo (Ed.), Investigating tasks in foreign language learning (pp. 91–116). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Benati, A.
(2005) The effects of processing instruction, traditional instruction and meaning-output instruction on the acquisition of the English past simple tense. Language Teaching Research, 9, 67–93. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M.
(1987) The psychology of written composition. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Biber, D., Gray, B., & Kornwipa Poonpon, K.
(2011) Should we use characteristics of conversation to measure grammatical complexity in L2 writing development? TESOL Quarterly, 45, 5–35. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bitchener, J.
(2012) A reflection on ‘the language learning potential’ of written CF. Journal of Second Language Writing, 21, 348–363. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Breen, M.
(1987/2009) Learner contributions to task design. In K. Van den Branden, M. Bygate, & J.M. Norris (Eds.), Task-based language teaching: A reader (pp. 333–356). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Byrnes, H.
(2011) Beyond writing as language learning or content learning: Construing foreign language writing as meaning-making. In R.M. Manchón (Ed.), Learning-to-write and writing-to-learn in an additional language (pp. 133–157). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2012) Conceptualizing FL writing development in collegiate settings: A systemic functional linguistic approach. In R.M. Manchón (Ed.), L2 writing development: Multiple perspectives (pp. 191–219). Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2013a) Positioning writing as meaning-making in writing research: An introduction. Journal of Second Language Writing, 22, 95–106. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
. (Guest Ed) (2013b) Writing as meaning-making – Teaching to mean. Special issue of the Journal of Second Language Writing, 22(2).Google Scholar
Byrnes, H., Maxim, H.H., & Norris, J.M.
(2010) Realizing advanced foreign language writing development in collegiate education: Curricular design, pedagogy, assessment. Modern Language Journal, 94(Supplement s-1).Google Scholar
Carless, D.
(2012) TBLT in EFL settings: Looking back and moving forward. In A. Shehadeh & C.A. Coombe (Eds.), Task-based language teaching in foreign language contexts (pp. 345–358). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cook, V.
(2009) Developing links between second language acquisition research and language teaching. In K. Knapp & B. Seidlhofer (Eds.), The handbook of foreign language communication and learning (pp. 139–161). Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Cumming, A.
(1990) Metalinguistic and ideational thinking in second language composing. Written Communication, 7, 482–511. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2013) Writing development in second language acquisition. In C. Chapelle (Ed.), Encyclopedia of applied linguistics . Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dörnyei, Z.
(2009) The L2 motivational self system. In Z. Dörnyei & E. Ushioda (Eds.), Motivation, language identity and the L2 self (pp. 9–42). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Ellis, R.
(2005)  Planning and task performance in a second language . Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2012)  Language teaching research and language pedagogy . Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, R., & Yuan, F.
(2004) The effects of planning on fluency, complexity and accuracy in second language narrative writing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26, 59–84. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2005) The effects of careful within-task planning on oral and written task performance. In R. Ellis (Ed.), Planning and task performance in a second language (pp. 167–193). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fortune, A., & Thorp, D.
(2001) Knotted and entangled: New light on the identification, classification and value of language related episodes in collaborative output tasks. Language Awareness, 10, 143–160. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
García Mayo, M.P.
(2002a) The effectiveness of two form-focused tasks in advanced EFL pedagogy. InJAL, 12, 156–175.Google Scholar
(2002b) Interaction in advanced EFL pedagogy: A comparison of form-focused activities. International Journal of Educational Research, 37, 323–341. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Genc, Z.S.
(2012) Effects of strategic planning on the accuracy of oral and written tasks in the performance of Turkish EFL learners. In A. Shehadeh & C.A. Coombe (Eds.), Task-based language teaching in foreign language contexts. Research and implementation (pp. 67–88). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gilabert, R., Baron, J., & Llanes, A.
(2009) Manipulating cognitive complexity across task types and its impact on learners' interaction during oral performance. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Teaching, 47, 367–395. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gunnarsson, C.
(2012) The development of complexity, accuracy and fluency in the written production of L2 French. In A. Housen, F. Kuiken, & I. Vedder (Eds.), Dimensions of L2 performance and proficiency. Complexity, accuracy and fluency in SLA (pp. 247–276). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heath, S.B.
(1991) The sense of being literate: Historical and cross-cultural features. In R. Barr, M. Kamil, P.B. Mosenthal, & P.D. Pearson (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. II) (pp. 3–25). New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Housen, A., Kuiken, F., & Vedder, I.
(Eds.) (2012)  Dimensions of L2 performance and proficiency. Complexity, accuracy and fluency in SLA . Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Izumi, S.
(2002) Output, input enhancement, and the noticing hypothesis: An experimental study of ESL relativization. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24, 541–577. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Izumi, S., & Bigelow, M.
(2000) Does output promote noticing and second language acquisition? TESOL Quarterly, 34, 239–278. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Izumi, S., Bigelow, M., Fujiwara, M., & Fearnow, S.
(1999) Testing the output hypothesis: Effects of output on noticing and second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21, 421–452. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kormos, J.
(2011) Task complexity and linguistic and discourse features of narrative writing performance. Journal of Second Language Writing, 20, 215–240. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kormos, J., & Trebits, A.
(2012) The role of task complexity, modality and aptitude in narrative task performance. Language Learning, 62, 439–472. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kuiken, F., & Vedder, I.
(2002a) The effect of interaction in acquiring the grammar of a second language. International Journal of Educational Research, 37, 343–358. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2002b) Collaborative writing in L2: The effect of group interaction on text quality. In S. Ransdell & M. Barbier (Eds.), New directions for research in L2 writing (pp. 169–188). Dordrecht: Kluwer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2007) Task complexity and measures of linguistic performance in L2 writing. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 45, 261–284. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2011) Task performance in L2 writing and speaking: The effect of mode. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Second language task complexity: Researching the Cognition Hypothesis of language learning and performance (pp. 91–104). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2012a) Speaking and writing tasks and their effects on second language performance. In S. Gass & A. Mackey (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 364–377). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
(2012b) Syntactic complexity, lexical variation and accuracy as a function of task complexity and proficiency level in L2 writing and speaking. In A. Housen, F. Kuiken, & I. Vedder (Eds.), Dimensions of L2 performance and proficiency. Complexity, accuracy and fluency in SLA (pp. 143–169). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lynch, T., & McLean, J.
(2000) Exploring the benefits of task repetition and recycling for classroom language learning. Language Teaching Research, 4, 221-250 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2001) ”A case of exercising”: effects of immediate task repetition on learner’s performance. In M. Bygate, P. Skehan, & M. Swain (Eds.), Researching pedagogic tasks: Second language learning, teaching and testing (pp. 141-162). London: LongmanGoogle Scholar
Manchón, R.M.
(2011) Writing to learn the language: Issues in theory and research. In R.M. Manchón (Ed.), Learning-to-write and writing-to-learn in an additional language (pp. 61–82). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2012) L2 writing development: Multiple perspectives . In R.M. Manchón (Ed.), L2 writing development: Multiple perspectives (pp. 1–6). Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2013) Writing. In F. Grosjean & Li Ping (Eds.), The psycholinguistics of bilingualism (pp. 100–115). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
(2014) Learning and teaching writing in the FL classroom: Fostering writing-to-learn approaches. In P. Driscoll, E. Macaro, & A. Swarbrick (Eds.), Debates in modern language education (pp. 96–107). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Manchón, R.M., & Roca de Larios, J.
(2007) Writing-to-learn in instructed language learning contexts. In E.A. Soler & M.P.S. Jordá (Eds.), Intercultural language use and language learning (pp. 101–121). Berlin: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Manchón, R.M., Roca de Larios, J., & Murphy, L.
(2009) The temporal dimension and problem-solving nature of foreign language composing processes. Implications for theory. In R.M. Manchón (Ed.), Writing in foreign language contexts: Learning, teaching, and research (pp. 102–124). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
McCaffery, J., Merrifield, J., & Millican, J.
(2007)  Developing adult literacy: Approaches to planning, implementing, and delivering literacy initiatives . Oxford, UK: Oxfam GB. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mohan, B.A.
(2001) The second language as a medium of learning. In B.A. Mohan, C. Leung, & C. Davison (Eds.), English as a second language in the mainstream: Teaching, learning and identity (pp. 107–126). New York: Longman.Google Scholar
National Assessment of Adult Literacy (NAAL).
Accessed 10 November 2013 at <http://​nces​.ed​.gov​/naal​/>
National Adult Literacy Survey (NALS).
Accessed 10 November 2013 at <http://​www​.ets​.org​/literacy​/research​/surveys>
Niu, R.
(2009) Effect of task-inherent production modes on EFL learners’ focus on form. Language Awareness, 18, 384–402. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Norris, J.M.
(2002) Interpretations, intended uses, and designs in task-based assessment: Introduction to the special issue. Language Testing, 19, 337–346. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Norris, J.M., & Manchón, R.M.
(2012) Investigating L2 writing development from multiple perspectives: Issues in theory and research. In R.M. Manchón (Ed.), L2 writing development: Multiple perspectives (pp. 221–244). Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Norris, J.M., & Ortega, L.
(2009) Towards an organic approach to investigating CAF in instructed SLA: The case of complexity. Applied Linguistics, 30, 555–578. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Norris, J.M., & Pfeiffer, P.C.
(2003) Exploring the use and usefulness of ACTFL oral proficiency ratings and standards in college foreign language departments. Foreign Language Annals, 36, 572–581. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ong, J., & Zhang, L.J.
(2010) Effects of task complexity on the fluency and lexical complexity in EFL students’ argumentative writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 19, 219–233. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ontario Adult Literacy Curriculum Framework.
Accessed 10 November 2013 at <http://​www​.essentialskillsontario​.ca​/essential​-skills​/skills​-delivery​/OALCF>
Ortega, L.
(1999) Planning and focus on form in L2 oral performance. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21, 109–148. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2012a) Epilogue: Exploring L2 writing–SLA interfaces. Journal of Second Language Writing, 21, 404–415. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2012b) Interlanguage complexity: A construct in search of theoretical renewal. In B. Szmrecsanyi & B. Kortmann (Eds.), Linguistic complexity: Second language acquisition, indigenization, contact (pp. 127–155). Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Polio, C.
(2012) The relevance of second language acquisition theory to the written error correction debate. Journal of Second Language Writing, 21, 375–389. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Qin, J.
(2008) The effects of processing instruction and dictogloss tasks on the acquisition of the English passive voice. Language Teaching Research, 12, 61–82. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Revesz, A.
(2011) Task complexity, focus on L2 constructions, and individual differences: A classroom-based study. Modern Language Journal, 95(s1), 162–181. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rijlaarsdam, G., Janssen, T., Braaksma, M., Van Steendam, E., Van den Branden, K., Couzijn, M., & Verheyden, L.
(2013) Learning and instruction in writing. In C.A. Stone, E.R. Silliman, B.J. Ehren, & G.P. Wallach (Eds.), Handbook of language and literacy (pp. 545–566). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Robinson, P.
(2001a) Task complexity, cognitive resources, and syllabus design: A triadic framework for examining task influences on SLA. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 287–318). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2001b) Task complexity, task difficult, and task production: Exploring interactions in a componential framework. Applied Linguistics, 22, 27–57. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2003) The Cognition Hypothesis of adult, task-based language learning. Second Language Studies, 21, 45–107.Google Scholar
(2005) Cognitive complexity and task sequencing: Studies in a componential framework for second language task design. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 43, 1–32. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2011a) Second language task complexity, the Cognition Hypothesis, language learning, and performance. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Second language task complexity. Researching the Cognition Hypothesis of language learning and performance (pp. 3–37). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(Ed.) (2011b)  Second language task complexity. Researching the Cognition Hypothesis of language learning and performance . Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2011c) Task-based learning: A review of issues. Language Learning, 61(Supplement 1), 1–36. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, P., & Gilabert, R.
(2013) Task-based learning: Cognitive underpinnings. In C. Chapelle (Ed.), Encyclopedia of applied linguistics . Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. Crossref.Google Scholar
Roca de Larios, J., Murphy, L., & Marín, J.
(2002) Critical examination of L2 writing process research. In S. Ransdell & M.-L. Barbier (Eds.), New directions for research in L2 writing (pp. 11–47). Boston: Kluwer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ryshina-Pankova, M., & Byrnes, H.
(2013) Writing as learning to know: Tracing knowledge construction in L2 German compositions. Journal of Second Language Writing, 22, 179–197. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Samuda, V., & Bygate, M.
(2008)  Tasks in second language learning . New York: Palgrave Macmillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C.
(1986) Research on written composition. In C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (pp. 778–803). New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
(1987) Knowledge telling and knowledge transforming in written composition. In S. Rosenberg (Ed.), Advances in applied psycholinguistics (pp. 143–175). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Selinker, L.
(1972) Interlanguage. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 10, 209–231. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Slimani-Rolls, A.
(2005) Rethinking task-based language learning: What we can learn from the learners. Language Teaching Research, 9, 195–218. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Shintani, N.
(2012) Input-based tasks and the acquisition of vocabulary and grammar: A process–product study. Language Teaching Research, 16, 253–279. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Skehan, P.
(1998a)  A cognitive approach to language learning . Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(1998b) Task-based instruction. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 18, 268–286. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2001) Tasks and language performance. In M. Bygate, P. Skehan, & M. Swain (Eds.), Researching pedagogic tasks: Second language learning, teaching and testing (pp. 167–185). London: Longman.Google Scholar
(2003) Task-based instruction. Language Teaching, 36, 1–14. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Skehan, P., & Foster, P.
(1999) The influence of task structure and processing conditions on narrative retellings. Language Leaning, 49, 93–120. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2001) Cognition and tasks. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 183–205). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Storch, N.
(1998a) Comparing second language learners’ attention to form across tasks. Language Awareness, 7, 176–191. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1998b) A classroom-based study: Insights from a collaborative test reconstruction task. ELT Journal, 52, 291–300. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2001) Comparing ESL learners’ attention to grammar on three different collaborative tasks. RELC Journal, 32, 104–124. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Swain, M., & Lapkin, S.
(2000) Task-based second language learning: The uses of the first language. Language Teaching Research, 4, 251–274. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Swales, J.M.
(1990)  Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Swales, J.M., & Feak, C.B.
(1994)  Academic writing for graduate students: Essential tasks and skills: A course for nonnative speakers of English . Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Suzuki, W., & Itagaki, N.
(2007) Learner metalinguistic reflections following output-oriented and reflective activities. Language Awareness, 16, 131–146. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tavakoli, P., & Foster, P.
(2008) Task design and second language performance: The effect of narrative type on learner output. Language Learning, 58, 439–473. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Towell, R., & Tomlinson, P.
(1999) Language curriculum development research at university level. Language Teaching Research, 3, 1–32. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Uggen, M.S.
(2012) Reinvestigating the noticing function of output. Language Learning, 62, 506–540. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Van den Branden, K.
(Ed.) (2006) Task-based language education: From theory to practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Van den Branden, K., Bygate, M., & Norris, J.
(2009) Task-based language teaching. Introducing the reader. In K. Van den Branden, M. Bygate, & J.M. Norris (Eds.), Task-based language teaching: A reader (pp. 2–13). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Verheyden, L., van den Branden, K., Rijlaarsdam, G., van den Bergh, H., & De Maeyer, S.
(2010) Written narrations by 8- to 10-year-old Turkish pupils in Flemish primary education: A follow-up of seven text features. Journal of Research in Reading, 33, 20–38. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Verspoor, M., Schmid, M.S., & Xu, X.
(2012) A dynamic usage based perspective on L2 writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 21, 239–263. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Verspoor, M., & Smiskova, H.
(2012) Foreign language writing development from a dynamic usage based perspective. In R.M. Manchón (Ed.), L2 writing development: Multiple perspectives (pp. 17–46). Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
White, S.
(2011) Understanding adult functional literacy: Connecting text feautures, task demands, and respondent skills. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Williams, J.
(2012) The potential role (s) of writing in second language development. Journal of Second Language Writing, 21, 321–331. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Willis, J.
(1996)  A framework for task-based language teaching . New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Yasuda, S.
(2011) Genre-based tasks in foreign language writing: Developing writers' genre awareness, linguistic knowledge, and writing competence. Journal of Second Language Writing, 20, 111–133. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Yu, G.
(2010) Lexical diversity in writing and speaking task performances. Applied Linguistics, 31, 236–259. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Yuan, F., & Ellis, R.
(2003) The effects of pre-task planning and online planning on fluency, complexity and accuracy in L2 oral production. Applied Linguistics, 24, 1–27. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 11 other publications

Abdi Tabari, Mahmoud, Gavin Bui & Yizhou Wang
2021. The effects of topic familiarity on emotionality and linguistic complexity in EAP writing. Language Teaching Research ► pp. 136216882110335 ff. Crossref logo
Abrams, Zsuzsanna & David R. Byrd
2017. The effects of meaning-focused pre-tasks on beginning-level L2 writing in German: An exploratory study. Language Teaching Research 21:4 ► pp. 434 ff. Crossref logo
Andersen, Katja N.
2020. Assessing task‐orientation potential in primary science textbooks: Toward a new approach. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 57:4 ► pp. 481 ff. Crossref logo
Byrnes, Heidi
2019.  In The Cambridge Handbook of Systemic Functional Linguistics, ► pp. 512 ff. Crossref logo
East, Martin
2017. Research into practice: The task-based approach to instructed second language acquisition. Language Teaching 50:3 ► pp. 412 ff. Crossref logo
García Mayo, María del Pilar & Udane Loidi Labandibar
2017. The Use of Models as Written Corrective Feedback in English as a Foreign Language (EFL)Writing. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 37 ► pp. 110 ff. Crossref logo
Gomez Laich, Maria Pia & Naoko Taguchi
2021. Effects of task complexity on the learning of genre specific rhetorical moves and linguistic forms: the case of contrast and argumentative essays. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 0:0 Crossref logo
Huang, Yu & Lawrence Jun Zhang
2020. Does a Process-Genre Approach Help Improve Students’ Argumentative Writing in English as a Foreign Language? Findings From an Intervention Study. Reading & Writing Quarterly 36:4 ► pp. 339 ff. Crossref logo
Vangehuchten, Lieve, Mariëlle Leijten & Iris Schrijver
2018. Reading-to-write tasks for professional purposes in Spanish as a foreign language. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada/Spanish Journal of Applied Linguistics 31:2 ► pp. 638 ff. Crossref logo
Yang, Weiwei & YouJin Kim
2020. The effect of topic familiarity on the complexity, accuracy, and fluency of second language writing . Applied Linguistics Review 11:1 ► pp. 79 ff. Crossref logo
Zhan, Ju, Qiyu Sun & Lawrence Jun Zhang
2021. Effects of manipulating writing task complexity on learners’ performance in completing vocabulary and syntactic tasks. Language Teaching Research ► pp. 136216882110243 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 08 september 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.