Article published in:
Task-Based Language Learning – Insights from and for L2 Writing
Edited by Heidi Byrnes and Rosa M. Manchón
[Task-Based Language Teaching 7] 2014
► pp. 107136
References

References

Baayen, R.H., Piepenbrock, R., & Guilikers, L.
(1996)  CELEX . Philadelphia, PA: Linguistic Data Consortium.Google Scholar
Baba, K., & Nitta, R.
(2011) Dynamic effects of task type practice on the Japanese EFL university student's writing: Text analysis with Coh-Metrix. In P.M. McCarthy & C. Boonthum-Denecke (Eds.), Applied natural language processing: Identification, investigation and resolution (pp. 398–413). Hershey, PA: IGI Global. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brown, J.D.
(2008) The Bonferroni adjustment. Shiken: JALT Testing & Evaluation SIG Newsletter, 12, 23–28.Google Scholar
Bygate, M.
(1996) Effects of task repetition: Appraising the developing language of learners. In J. Willis & D. Willis (Eds.), Challenge and change in language teaching (pp. 136–146). Oxford: Macmillan.Google Scholar
(2001) Effects of task repetition on the structure and control of oral language. In M. Bygate, P. Skehan, & M. Swain (Eds.). Researching pedagogic tasks, second language learning, teaching and testing (pp. 23–48). London: Longman.Google Scholar
Bygate, M., Norris, J.M., & Van den Branden, K.
(2009) Coda: Understanding TBLT at the interface between research and pedagogy. In K. Van den Branden, M. Bygate, & J.M. Norris (Eds.) Task-based language teaching: A reader (pp. 495–499). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Casanave, C.P.
(2004)  Controversies in second language writing: Dilemmas and decisions in research and instruction . Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Chandler, J.
(2003) The efficacy of various kinds of error feedback for improvement in the accuracy and fluency of L2 student writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 12, 267–296. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Coughlan, P., & Duff, P.
(1994) Same task, different activities: Analysis of a SLA task from an Activity Theory perspective. In J.P. Lantolf & G. Appel (Eds.), Vygotskian approaches to second language research (pp. 173–194). Westport, CT: Ablex.Google Scholar
de Bot, K., & Larsen-Freeman, D.
(2011) Researching second language development from a dynamic systems theory perspective. In M.H. Verspoor, K. de Bot, & W. Lowie (Eds.), A dynamic approach to second language development: Methods and techniques (pp. 5–24). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
de Bot, K., Lowie, W., & Verspoor, M.
(2007) A dynamic systems theory approach to second language acquisition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 10, 7–21. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Duppenthaler, P.
(2004) A study of the effect of three different types of feedback on writing: Part 2 – Data analysis. Tezukayama Gakuin Daigaku Kenkyu Ronju, Bungakubu [Tezukayama Gakuin University Studies and Essays, Faculty of Literature] 39, 1–27.Google Scholar
Ellis, R.
(2009) The differential effects of three types of task planning on the fluency, complexity and accuracy in L2 oral production. Applied Linguistics, 30, 474–509. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ferris, D.R.
(2010) Second language writing research and written corrective feedback in SLA. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32, 181–201. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gass, S., Mackey, A., Alvarez–Torres, M.J., & Fernández–García, M.
(1999) The effects of task repetition on linguistic output. Language Learning, 49 (4), 549–581. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Graesser, A.C., McNamara, D.S., Louwerse, M.M., & Cai, Z.
(2004) Coh-Metrix: Analysis of text on cohesion and language. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36, 193–202. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Harklau, L.
(2002) The role of writing in classroom second language acquisition. Journal of Second Language Writing, 11, 329–350. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Housen, A., & Kuiken, F.
(2009) Complexity, accuracy, and fluency in second language acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 30, 461–473. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ishikawa, S.
(1995) Objective measurement of low-proficiency EFL narrative writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 4, 51–69. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kellogg, R.T.
(1996) A model of working memory in writing. In C.M. Levy & S. Ransdell (Eds.), The science of writing: Theories, methods, individual differences, and applications (pp. 57–72). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Larsen-Freeman, D.
(2006) The emergence of complexity, fluency, and accuracy in the oral and written production of five Chinese learners of English. Applied Linguistics, 27, 590–619. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2009) Adjusting expectations: The study of complexity, accuracy and fluency in second language acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 30, 579–589. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Larsen-Freeman, D., & Cameron, L.
(2008)  Complex systems and applied linguistics . Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Levelt, W.J.M.
(1989)  Speaking: From intention to articulation . Boston, MA: The MIT Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, M.D.
(2005) Bridging emotion theory and neurobiology through dynamic systems modeling. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 28, 169–245. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Liao, M.-T., & Wong, C.-T.
(2010) Effects of dialogue journals on L2 students' writing fluency, reflections, anxiety, and motivation. Reflections on English Language Teaching, 9, 139–170.Google Scholar
Long, M.H.
(2000) Focus on form in task-based language teaching. In R.D. Lambert & E. Shohamy (Eds.), Language policy and pedagogy (pp. 179–192). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lynch, T., & MacLean, J.
(2001) Effects of the benefits of immediate task repetition on learners’ performance. In M. Bygate, P. Skehan, & M. Swain (Eds.), Researching pedagogic tasks, second language learning, teaching and testing (pp. 141–162). London: Longman.Google Scholar
Malvern, D.D., Richards, B.J., Chipere, N., & Duran, P.
(2004)  Lexical diversity and language development: Quantification and assessment . Houndmills: Palgrave. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Manchón, R.M.
(2011) The language learning potential of writing in foreign language contexts: Lessons from research. In T. Cimasko & M. Reichelt (Eds.), Foreign language writing instruction: Principles and practices (pp. 44–64). Anderson, SC: Parlor Press.Google Scholar
Manchón, R.M., & Roca de Larios, J.
(2007) Writing-to-learn in instructed language learning contexts. In E. Alcón-Soler & M.P. Safont-Jordá (Eds.). Intercultural language use and language learning (pp. 101–122). Dordrecht: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2011) Writing to learn in FL contexts: Exploring learners' perceptions of the language learning potential of L2 writing. In R.M. Manchón (Ed.,) Learning-to-write and writing-to-learn in an additional language (pp. 181–207). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McCarthy, P.M., Cai, Z., & McNamara, D.S.
(2009) Computational replication of human paraphrase assessment. In C.H. Lane & H.W. Guesgen (Eds.), Proceedings of the 22 nd International Florida Artificial Intelligence Research Society Conference (pp. 266–271). Menlo Park, CA: The AAAI Press.Google Scholar
McCarthy, P.M., & Jarvis, S.
(2010) MTLD, vocd-D, and HD-D: A validation study of sophisticated approaches to lexical diversity assessment. Behavior Research Methods, 42, 381–392. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Norris, J.M., & Ortega, L.
(2009) Towards an organic approach to investigating CAF in instructed SLA: The case of complexity. Applied Linguistics, 30, 555–578. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ortega, L.
(2003) Syntactic complexity measures and their relationship to L2 proficiency: A research synthesis of college-level L2 writing. Applied Linguistics, 24, 492–518. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ortega, L., & Iberri-Shea, G.
(2005) Longitudinal research in second language acquisition: Recent trends and future directions. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 25, 26–45. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Peyton, J.K.
(1990) Dialogue journal writing and the acquisition of English grammatical morphology. In J.K. Peyton (Ed.), Students and teachers writing together: Perspectives on journal writing (pp. 67–97). Alexandria, VA: Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages.Google Scholar
Polio, C., & Williams, J.
(2009) Teaching and testing writing. In M.H. Long & C.J. Doughty (Eds.), The handbook of language teaching (pp. 486–517). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Samuda, V., & Bygate, M.
(2008)  Tasks in second language learning . Houndmills: Palgrave. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Shaw, P., & Liu, E.T.K.
(1998) What develops in the development of second language writing? Applied Linguistics, 19, 225–254. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Skehan, P.
(1998)  A cognitive approach to language learning . Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Spoelman, M., & Verspoor, M.
(2010) Dynamic patterns in development of accuracy and complexity: A longitudinal case study in the acquisition of Finnish. Applied Linguistics, 31, 532–553. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tabachnick, B.G., & Fidell, L.S.
(2001) Using multivariate statistics (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
Thelen, E., & Smith, L.B.
(1994)  A dynamic systems approach to the development of cognition and action . Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Truscott, J., & Hsu, A.Y.-P.
(2008) Error correction, revision, and learning. Journal of Second Language Writing, 17, 292–305. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tudor, I.
(2001)  The dynamics of the language classroom . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Van den Branden, K.
(2006) Introduction: Task-based language teaching in a nutshell. In K. Van den Branden (Ed.), Task-based language education (pp. 1–16). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2007) Second language education: Practice in perfect learning conditions? In R. DeKeyser (Ed.). Practice in a second language: Perspectives from applied linguistics and cognitive psychology (pp. 161–179). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Van den Branden, K., Bygate, M., & Norris, J.M.
(2009) Task-based language teaching: Introducing the reader. In K. Van den Branden, M. Bygate, & J.M. Norris (Eds.), Task-based language teaching: A reader (pp. 1–13). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
van Dijk, M., Verspoor, M., & Lowie, W.
(2011) Variability and DST. In M.H. Verspoor, K. de Bot, & W. Lowie (Eds.), A dynamic approach to second language development: Methods and techniques (pp. 55–84). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
van Geert, P.
(2008) The dynamic systems approach in the study of L1 and L2 acquisition: An introduction. Modern Language Journal, 92, 179–199. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
van Geert, P., & van Dijk, M.
(2002) Focus on variability: New tools to study intra-individual variability in developmental data. Infant Behavior & Development, 25, 340–374. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
van Gelder, T., & Port, R.F.
(1995) It's about time: An overview of the dynamical approach to cognition. In R.F. Port & T. van Gelder (Eds.), Mind as motion: Explorations in the dynamics of cognition (pp. 1–44). Boston, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
VanPatten, B.
(1996)  Input processing and grammar instruction: Theory and research . Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Verspoor, M., Lowie, W., & van Dijk, M.
(2008) Variability in second language development from a dynamic systems perspective. Modern Language Journal, 92, 214–231. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Verspoor, M.H., & van Dijk, M.
(2011) Visualizing interaction between variables. In M.H. Verspoor, K. de Bot, & W. Lowie (Eds.). A dynamic approach to second language development: Methods and techniques (pp. 85–98). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Weigle, S.C.
(2006) Investing in assessment: Designing tests to promote positive washback. In P.K. Matsuda,. C. Ortmeier–Hooper, & X. You (Eds.), The politics of second language writing: In search of the promised land (pp. 222–244). West Lafayette, IN: Parlor Press.Google Scholar
Weissberg, R.
(1998) Acquiring English syntax through journal writing. College ESL, 8, 1–22.Google Scholar
Williams, J.
(2012) The potential role (s) of writing in second language development. Journal of Second Language Writing, 21, 321–331. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wolfe–Quintero, K., Inagaki, S., & Kim, H.-Y.
(1998)  Second language development in writing: Measures of fluency, accuracy, and complexity. Honolulu, HI: Second Language Teaching & Curriculum Center, University of Hawai’i at Manoa.Google Scholar
Wong, W.
(2001) Modality and attention to meaning and form in the input. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 23, 345–368. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by other publications

Abdi Tabari, Mahmoud
2020. Differential Effects of Strategic Planning and Task Structure on L2 Writing Outcomes. Reading & Writing Quarterly 36:4  pp. 320 ff. Crossref logo
Amiryousefi, Mohammad
2016. The differential effects of two types of task repetition on the complexity, accuracy, and fluency in computer-mediated L2 written production: a focus on computer anxiety. Computer Assisted Language Learning 29:5  pp. 1052 ff. Crossref logo
Butler, Yuko Goto
2017. Motivational elements of digital instructional games: A study of young L2 learners’ game designs. Language Teaching Research 21:6  pp. 735 ff. Crossref logo
Kim, YouJin, Bumyong Choi, Hyunae Yun, Binna Kim & Sujeong Choi
2020. Task repetition, synchronous written corrective feedback and the learning of Korean grammar: A classroom-based study. Language Teaching Research  pp. 136216882091235 ff. Crossref logo
Levine, Glenn S.
2020. References. The Modern Language Journal 104:S1  pp. 103 ff. Crossref logo
Vidal, Karina & Scott Jarvis
2020. Effects of English-medium instruction on Spanish students’ proficiency and lexical diversity in English. Language Teaching Research 24:5  pp. 568 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 22 september 2020. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.