Cover not available
Part of
Task-Based Language Learning – Insights from and for L2 Writing
Edited by Heidi Byrnes and Rosa M. Manchón
[Task-Based Language Teaching 7] 2014
► pp. 237–263

Linking task and writing for language development

Evidence from a genre-based curricular approach

This chapter explores the link between task and writing by taking an education-oriented view, in order to contribute to answering the question of how L2 writing development to advanced ability levels might best be fostered through genre-oriented TBLT instruction. A companion to the theoretical treatment of task and writing offered in Chapter 4, the chapter interprets language development as an increase in textual meaning-making through genre-based writing tasks. Within that approach it reshapes ‘complexity’ in terms of choices in textual meaning-making and proposes textually oriented parameters for operationalizing complexification. In addition, it suggests the construct of grammatical metaphor (GM) as theorized in systemic functional linguistics (SFL) as especially well-suited for delineating, fostering, and assessing critical aspects of language development. Reflecting this approach, the chapter presents evidence from a longitudinal study about how L2 writing development unfolded in a genre-based approach to task within a curricular context. The focal area of analysis and interpretation are formal aspects of GM, realized through nominalization, and their implications for a developing textual meaning-making ability. Aligning itself with recent scholarship that has called for the careful specification of educational contexts if research findings are to be relevant for language teaching and learning, the chapter concludes with reflections that affirm the potential for genre-based writing tasks to provide a suitably differentiated awareness of the nature of instructed language development within a well-specified curricular framework.
Published online: 14 November 2014
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/tblt.7.10byr
References (42)
References
Bunch, G., & Willett, K. (2013). Writing to mean in middle school: Understanding how second language writers negotiate textually-rich content-area instruction. Journal of Second Language Writing, 22, 141–178. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bygate, M., Norris, J., & Van den Branden, K. (2009). Coda: Understanding TBLT at the interface between research and pedagogy. In K. Van den Branden, M. Bygate, & J.M. Norris (Eds.), Task-based language teaching: A reader (pp. 495–499). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Byrnes, H. (2002). The role of task and task-based assessment in a content-oriented collegiate FL curriculum. Language Testing, 19, 419–437. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2009a). Emergent L2 German writing ability in a curricular context: A longitudinal study of grammatical metaphor. Linguistics and Education, 20, 50–66. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (Guest Ed.). (2009b). Instructed foreign language acquisition as meaning-making: A systemic-functional approach. Linguistics and Education, 20, 1–79. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2011). Beyond writing as language learning or content learning: Construing foreign language writing as meaning-making. In R.M. Manchón (Ed.), Learning-to-write and writing-to-learn in an additional language (pp. 133–157). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2012). Conceptualizing FL writing development in collegiate settings: A genre-based systemic functional linguistic approach. In R.M. Manchón (Ed.), L2 writing development: Multiple perspectives (pp. 190–218). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Byrnes, H., Crane, C., Maxim, H.H., & Sprang, K.A. (2006). Taking text to task: Issues and choices in curriculum construction. ITL: International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 152, 85–110. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Byrnes, H., Maxim, H.H., & Norris, J.M. (2010). Realizing advanced foreign language writing development in collegiate education: Curricular design, pedagogy, assessment. Modern Language Journal, 94 (Supplement s-1).Google Scholar
Byrnes, H., Norris, J.M., Pfeiffer, P.C., & Ryshina-Pankova, M. (2014). Fifteen years of program evaluation: Innovation and accountability in the Georgetown German program. In J.M. Norris & N. Mills (Eds.), Innovation and accountability in foreign language program evaluation . Boston, MA: Heinle Cengage.Google Scholar
Christie, F. (2012). Language education throughout the school years: A functional perspective. Language Learning, 62(Supplement 1). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Christie, F., & Derewianka, B. (2008). School discourse: Learning to write across the years of schooling . London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Coffin, C. (2006). Historical discourse: The language of time, cause and evaluation . London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Derewianka, B. (1995). Language development in the transition from childhood to adolescence: The role of grammatical metaphor. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia.Google Scholar
. (2003). Grammatical metaphor in the transition to adolescence. In A.-M. Simon-Vandenbergen, M. Tavernier, & L. Ravelli (Eds.), Grammatical metaphor: Views from systemic functional linguistics (pp. 185–219). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gebhard, M., Chen, I.A., Graham, H., & Gunawan, W. (2013). Teaching to mean, writing to mean: SFL, L2 literacy, and teacher education. Journal of Second Language Writing, 22, 107–124. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dörnyei, Z. (2009). The L2 motivational self system. In Z. Dörnyei & E. Ushioda (Eds.), Motivation, language identity and the L2 self (pp. 9–42). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Halliday, M.A.K. (1993). Towards a language-based theory of learning. Linguistics and Education, 5, 93–116. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (1996). On grammar and grammatics. In R. Hasan, C. Cloran, & D.G. Butt (Eds.), Functional descriptions: Theory in practice (pp. 1–38). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (1999). Grammar and the construction of educational knowledge. In R. Berry, B. Asker, K. Hyland, & M. Lam (Eds.), Language analysis, description and pedagogy (pp. 70–87). Hong Kong: Language Centre, The Hong Kong University of Science & Technology and Department of English, Lingnan University.Google Scholar
. (2002). Spoken and written modes of meaning. In J.J. Webster (Ed.), On grammar (pp. 323–351). London: Continuum.Google Scholar
. (2010). Putting linguistic theory to work. Plenary presented at the 2010 AAAL conference, Atlanta, GA, March 6.
Halliday, M.A.K., & Matthiessen, C.M.I.M. (1999). Construing experience through meaning: A language-based approach to cognition . London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Harman, R. (2013). Literary intertextuality in genre-based pedagogies: Building lexical cohesion in fifth-grade L2 writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 22, 125–140. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Liardét, C. (2013). An exploration of Chinese EFL learners’ deployment of grammatical metaphor: Learning to make academically valued meanings. Journal of Second Language Writing, 22, 161–178. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Manchón, R.M. (2011). Situating the learning-to-write and writing-to-learn dimensions of L2 writing. In R.M. Manchón (Ed.), Learning-to-write and writing-to-learn in an additional language (pp. 3–14). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Martin, J.R. (2007). Construing knowledge: A functional linguistic perspective. In F. Christie & J.R. Martin (Eds.), Language, knowledge and pedagogy: Functional linguistic and sociological perspectives (pp. 34–64). London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Norris, J.M. (2008). Validity evaluation in language assessment . Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Norris, J.M., & Manchón, R.M. (2012). Investigating L2 writing development from multiple perspectives: Issues in theory and research. In R.M. Manchón (Ed.), L2 writing development: Multiple perspectives (pp. 219–245). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Norris, J.M., & Ortega, L. (2009). Towards an organic approach to investigating CAF in instructed SLA: The case of complexity. Applied Linguistics, 30, 555–578. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Painter, C. (1999). Learning through language in early childhood . London: Cassell.Google Scholar
Peng, J.-E., & Woodrow, L. (2010). Willingess to communicate in English: A model in the Chinese EFL classroom context. Language Learning, 60, 834–876. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pfeiffer, P.C., & Byrnes, H. (2009). Curriculum, learning, and the identity of majors: A case study of program outcomes evaluation. In J.M. Norris, J. Davis, C. Sinicrope, & Y. Watanabe (Eds.), Toward useful program evaluation in college foreign language education (pp. 183–208). Honolulu, HI: National Foreign Language Resource Center Monograph series.Google Scholar
Robinson, P. (2011). Task-based language learning: A review of issues. Language Learning 61, S-1, 1-36. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ryshina-Pankova, M. (2006). Creating textual worlds in advanced learner writing: The role of complex theme. In H. Byrnes (Ed.), Advanced language learning: The contribution of Halliday and Vygotsky (pp. 164–183). London: Continuum.Google Scholar
. (2010). Towards mastering the discourses of reasoning: Use of grammatical metaphor at advanced levels of foreign language acquisition. Modern Language Journal, 92, 181–197. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2011). Developmental changes in the use of interactional resources. Persuading the reader in FL book reviews. Journal of Second Language Writing, 20, 243–256. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ryshina-Pankova, M., & Byrnes, H. (2013). Analyzing writing as learning to mean: The role of nominalization in L2 German compositions. Journal of Second Language Writing, 22, 179–197. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Samuda, V. (2001). Guiding relationships between form and meaning during task performance. In Bygate, M., Skehan, P. & Swain, M. (Eds.), Researching pedagogic tasks: second language learning, teaching and assessment (pp.119-140). Harlow: Pearson Education Limited.Google Scholar
Schleppegrell, M.J. (2004). The language of schooling: A functional linguistics perspective . Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
. (2013). The role of metalanguage in supporting academic language development. Language Learning, 63 (Supplement s-1), 153–170. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Simon-Vandenbergen, A.-M., Taverniers, M., & Ravelli, L. (Eds.). (2003). Grammatical metaphor: Views from systemic functional linguistics . Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (4)

Cited by four other publications

Abdi Tabari, Mahmoud
2020. Differential Effects of Strategic Planning and Task Structure on L2 Writing Outcomes. Reading & Writing Quarterly 36:4 ► pp. 320 ff. DOI logo
Jackson, Daniel O. & Alfred Rue Burch
2017. Complementary Theoretical Perspectives on Task‐Based Classroom Realities. TESOL Quarterly 51:3 ► pp. 493 ff. DOI logo
Yasuda, Sachiko
2017. Toward a Framework for Linking Linguistic Knowledge and Writing Expertise: Interplay Between SFL‐Based Genre Pedagogy and Task‐Based Language Teaching. TESOL Quarterly 51:3 ► pp. 576 ff. DOI logo
TENG, LIN SOPHIE & LAWRENCE JUN ZHANG
2016. A Questionnaire‐Based Validation of Multidimensional Models of Self‐Regulated Learning Strategies. The Modern Language Journal 100:3 ► pp. 674 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.