References
Abrahamsson, N., & Hyltenstam, K
(2009) Age of onset and nativelikeness in a second language: Listener perception versus linguistic scrutiny. Language Learning, 59, 249–306. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Alderson, J.C., & Beretta, A
(Eds.) (1992) Evaluating second language education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Azurmendi, J
(1984) El hombre cooperative. Pensamiento de Arizmendiarrieta. Mondragon: Caja Laboral Popular.Google Scholar
Bachman, L.F., & Palmer, A.S
(1996) Language testing in practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bartlett, N.J.D
(2005) A double shot 2% mocha latte, please, with whip: Service encounters in two coffee shops and at a coffee cart. In M.H. Long (Ed.), Second language needs analysis (pp. 305–343). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Benson, S
(2013) TBLT: An empirical study of task transfer. Qualifying Paper. College Park, MD: University of Maryland, Ph.D. in Second Language Acquisition Program.Google Scholar
Beretta, A
(1986) Towards a methodology for ESL program evaluation. TESOL Quarterly, 20(1), 144–155. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Boers, F., & Lindstromberg, S
(2012) Experimental and intervention studies on formulaic sequences in a second language. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 32, 83–110. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brown, J.D., & Hudson, T
(2002) Criterion-referenced language testing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Corder, S.P
(1967) The significance of learners’ errors. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 5, 161–170. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
De la Fuente, M.J
(2006) Classroom L2 vocabulary acquisition: Investigating the role of pedagogical tasks and form-focused instruction. Language Teaching Research, 10, 263–295. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
De Ridder, I., Vangehuchten, L., & Sesena Gomez, M
(2007) Enhancing automaticity through task-based language learning. Applied Linguistics, 28(2), 309–315. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
DeKeyser, R
(2005) What makes learning second language grammar difficult? A review of issues. Language Learning, 55(Supplement 1), 1–21. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Doughty, C.J
(2001) Cognitive underpinnings of focus on form. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 206–57). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2003) Instructed SLA: Constraints, compensation, and enhancement. In C.J. Doughty & M.H. Long (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 256–310). Oxford: Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Doughty, C.J., & Long, M.H
(2003) Optimal psycholinguistic environments for distance foreign language learning. Language Learning and Technology, 7(3), 50–80. http://​llt​.msu​.eduGoogle Scholar
Doughty, C.J., & Williams, J
(1998) Pedagogical choices in focus on form. In C.J. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 197–261). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ellis, N.C
(2005) At the interface: Dynamic interactions of explicit and implicit language knowledge. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27, 305–52.Google Scholar
(2006) Selective attention and transfer phenomena in L2 acquisition: Contingency, cue competition, salience, interference, overshadowing, blocking, and perceptual learning. Applied Linguistics, 27(2), 164–94. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2007) The associative-cognitive CREED. In B. VanPatten & J. Williams (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition. An introduction (pp. 77–95). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
(2008) Usage-based and form-focused language acquisition: The associative learning of constructions, learned attention, and the limited L2 end-state. In P. Robinson & N.C. Ellis (Eds.), Handbook of cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition (pp. 372–405). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
(2009) Optimizing the input: Frequency and sampling in usage-based and form-focussed learning. In M.H. Long & C.J. Doughty, (Eds.), Handbook of language teaching (pp. 139–158). Oxford: Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, R
(1989) Are classroom and naturalistic language acquisition the same? A study of the classroom acquisition of German word order rules. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 11(3), 305–28. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2003) Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2012) Language teaching research and language pedagogy. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gass, S.M
(1997) Input, interaction, and the development of second languages. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
González-Lloret, M
(2003) Designing task-based CALL to promote interaction: En Busca de Esmeraldas. Language Learning & Technology, 7(1), 86–104. Retrieved February 3, 2003, from http://​llt​.msu​.edu​/vol7num1​/gonzalez​/default​.htmlGoogle Scholar
Gonzalez-Lloret, M., & Nielson, K.B
(2014) Evaluating TBLT: The case of a task-based Spanish program. Language Teaching Research, 19(1). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goo, J., Granena, G., Novella, M., & Yilmaz, Y
(2015) Implicit and explicit instruction in L2 learning: Norris and Ortega (2000) revisited and updated. Paper presented at the Second Language Research Forum, Michigan State University. In P. Rebuschat (Ed.), Implicit and explicit learning of languages (pp. 443–482 ). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goo, J., & Mackey, A
(2013) The case against the case against recasts. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 35(1), 127–165. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Granena, G., & Long, M.H
(2013) Age of onset, length of residence, language aptitude, and ultimate L2 attainment in three linguistic domains. Second Language Research, 29(3), 311–343. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hoyer, W.J., & Lincourt, A.E
(1998) Ageing and the development of learning. In M.A. Stadler & P.A. Frensch (Eds.), Handbook of implicit learning (pp. 445–470). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Hyltenstam, K
(1977) Implicational patterns in interlanguage syntax variation. Language Learning, 27(2), 383–411. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1984) The use of typological markedness conditions as predictors in second language acquisition: the case of pronominal copies in relative clauses. In R.W. Andersen (Ed.), Second language: A cross-linguistic perspective (pp. 39–58). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Janacsek, K., Fiser, J., & Nemeth, D
(2012) The best time to acquire new skills: age-related differences in implicit sequence learning across the human lifespan. Developmental Science, 15(4), 496–505. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kim, Y., Kong, D.-K., Lee, J.-H., & Lee, Y-G
(2000) Implementation and evaluation of an approach to task-based Korean language teaching. Honolulu, HI: National Foreign Language Resource Center, University of Hawai‘i at Mānoa. [An abridged version of this paper appeared with the same title in Korean language in America (Vol. 6, pp. 45-51, 2001), the Proceedings of the 6th Annual American Association of Teachers of Korean].Google Scholar
Krashen, S.D., & Terrell, T
(1983) The natural approach. Hayward, CA: Alemany Press.Google Scholar
Lai, C., Zhao, Y., & Wang, J
(2011) Task-based language teaching in online ab initio foreign language classrooms. Modern Language Journal, 95(Supplementary Issue), 81–103. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Li, S
(2010) The effectiveness of corrective feedback in SLA: A meta-analysis. Language Learning, 60(2), 309–365. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lightbown, P.M
(1983) Exploring relations between developmental and instructional sequences in L2 acquisition. In H.G. Seliger & M.H. Long (Eds.), Classroom-oriented research in second language acquisition (pp. 217–43). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Long, M.H
(1984) Process and product in ESL program evaluation. TESOL Quarterly, 18(3), 409–425. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1985) A role for instruction in second language acquisition: Task-based language teaching. In K. Hyltenstam & M. Pienemann (Eds.), Modeling and assessing second language acquisition (pp. 77–99). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
(1991) Focus on form: A design feature in language teaching methodology. In K. de Bot, R. Ginsberg, & C. Kramsch (Eds.), Foreign language research in cross-cultural perspective (pp. 39–52). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1996) The Mondragon Co-operative Federation: A model for our times? Libertarian Labor Review, 19, 19–36.Google Scholar
(2000) Focus on form in Task-Based Language Teaching. In R.E. Lambert & E. Shohamy (Eds.), Language policy and pedagogy. Essays in honor of A. Ronald Walton (pp. 179–92). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(Ed.) (2005a) Second language needs analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2005b) Methodological issues in learner needs analysis. In M.H. Long (Ed.), Second language needs analysis (pp. 19–76). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2009) Methodological principles in language teaching. In M.H. Long & C.J. Doughty (Eds.), Handbook of language teaching (pp. 373–94). Oxford: Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2013) Identifying and satisfying language needs in the tourist industry. Plenary address to the first annual conference on Language and Tourism. Mallorca: University of the Balearic Islands, April 14-15, 2011. In G.I. Bosch Roig (Ed.), Teaching foreign languages for tourism: Research and practice (pp. 21–44). Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
(2015) Second language acquisition and Task-Based Language Teaching. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Long, M.H., & Crookes, G
(1987) Intervention points in second language classrooms. In B. Das (Ed.), Patterns of interaction in classrooms in Southeast Asia (pp. 177–203). Singapore: Regional English Language Centre.Google Scholar
(1992) Three approaches to task-based syllabus design. TESOL Quarterly, 26(1), 27–56. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Long, M.H., & Norris, J.M
(2000) Task-based teaching and assessment. In M. Byram, (Ed.), Encyclopedia of language teaching (pp. 597–603). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
(2014) Research issues and evaluation frameworks in task-based language assessment. Ms.Google Scholar
Long, M.H., & Robinson, P
(1998) Focus on form: Theory, research, and practice. In C. Doughty, & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 15–41). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Long, M.H., & Sato, C.J
(1984) Methodological issues in interlanguage studies: an interactionist perspective. In A. Davies, C. Criper & A.P.R. Howatt (Eds.), Interlanguage (pp. 253–80). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Lynch, B.K
(1990) A context-adaptive model for program evaluation. TESOL Quarterly, 24(1), 23–42. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1996) Language program evaluation: Theory and practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mackey, A
(1999) Input, interaction and second language development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21, 4, 557–587. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2012) Input, interaction, and corrective feedback in L2 learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mackey, A., & Goo, J
(2007) Interaction research in SLA: A meta-analysis and research synthesis. In A. Mackey (Ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition (pp. 407–452). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Markee, N
(1993) The diffusion of innovation in language teaching. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 13, 229–243. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1997) Second language acquisition research: A resource for changing teachers’ professional cultures? Modern Language Journal, 81(1), 80–93. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2007) Managing curricular innovation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
McDonough, K., & Chaitmongkol, W
(2007) Teachers’ and learners’ reactions to a task-based EFL course in Thailand. TESOL Quarterly, 41(1), 107–132. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Messick, S
(1994) The interplay of evidence and consequences in the validation of performance assessments. Educational Researcher, 23, 13–23. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Morrison, R
(1991) We build the road as we travel: Mondragon, a co-operative system. Philadelphia, PA: New Society Publishers.Google Scholar
Musumechi, D
(1997) An exploration of the historical relationship between theory and practice in second language teaching. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Nation, I.S.P
(2006) How large a vocabulary is needed for reading and listening? Canadian Modern Language Review, 63, 59–82. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nielson, K.B., Masters, M.C., Rhoades, E., & Freynik, S
(2009) Prototype implementation of an online Chinese course: An analysis of course implementation and learner performance. (TTO 82131). College Park, MD: University of Maryland Center for Advanced Study of Language.Google Scholar
Norris, J.M
(2009) Task-based teaching and testing. In M.H. Long & C.J. Doughty (Eds.), Handbook of language teaching (pp. 578–594). Oxford: Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Norris, J.M., & Ortega, L
(2000) Effectiveness of L2 instruction: A research synthesis and quantitative meta-analysis. Language Learning, 50(3), 417–528. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ortega, L
(2009) Sequences and processes in language learning. In M.H. Long & C.J. Doughty. (Eds.), Handbook of language teaching (pp. 81–105). Oxford: Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pavesi, M
(1986) Markedness, discoursal modes, and relative clause formation in a formal and an informal context. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 8(1), 38–55. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pica, T
(1994) Research on negotiation: What does it reveal about second language learning conditions, processes, and outcomes? Language Learning, 44(4), 493–527. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2009) Second language acquisition in the instructional environment. In W.C. Ritchie & T.K. Bhatia (Eds.), The new handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 473–501). Bingley, UK: Emerald.Google Scholar
Pienemann, M
(1984) Psychological constraints on the teachability of languages. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 6(2), 186–214. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2011) Explaining developmental schedules. In M. Pienemann & J.-V. Kessler (Eds.), Studying processability theory (pp. 50–63). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Popham, W.J
(2000) Modern educational measurement (3rd edition). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Robinson, P
(2001) Task complexity, cognitive resources, and second language syllabus design. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 149–95). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2007) Criteria for classifying and sequencing pedagogic tasks. In M.P. Garcia Mayo (Ed.), Investigating tasks in formal language learning (pp. 7–26). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Sato, C.J
(1990) The syntax of conversation in interlanguage development. Tubingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
Schmidt, R.W
(2001) Attention. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 3–32). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Shintani, N
(2011) A comparative study of the effects of input-based and production-based instruction on vocabulary acquisition by young EFL learners. Language Teaching Research, 15, 137–158. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2012) Repeating input-based tasks with young beginner learners. RELC Journal, 43(1), 39–51. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2013) The effect of focus on form and focus on forms instruction on the acquisition of productive knowledge of L2 vocabulary by young beginner learners. TESOL Quarterly, 47(1), 36–62. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Shintani, N., & Ellis, R
(2010) The incidental acquisition of English plural -s by Japanese children in comprehension-based and production-based lessons: A process-product study. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32(4), 607–637. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sorace, A
(2003) Near-nativeness. In C.J. Doughty & M.H. Long (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 130–152). Oxford: Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stauble, A.-M
(1984) A comparison of the Spanish-English and Japanese-English interlanguage continuum. In R.W. Andersen (Ed.), Second language: A cross-linguistic perspective (pp. 323–353). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Swain, M
(1991) French immersion and its offshoots: Getting two for one. In B. Freed (Ed.), Foreign language acquisition research and the classroom (pp. 91–103). Lexington, MA: D. C. Heath.Google Scholar
Van den Branden, K
(Ed.) (2006a) Task-based language education: From theory to practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2006b) Training teachers: Task-based as well? In K. Van den Branden (Ed.), Task-based language education: From theory to practice (pp. 217–248). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
White, L
(1987) Against comprehensible input; The Input Hypothesis and the development of L2 competence. Applied Linguistics, 8(1), 95–110. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Widdowson, H.G
(1972) The teaching of English as communication. English Language Teaching, 27(1), 15–19. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Whyte, W.F., & Whyte, K.K
(1991) Making Modragon: The growth and dynamics of the worker co-operative complex (Second edition). Ithaca, NY: ILR Press.Google Scholar
Wilkins, D
(1976) Notional syllabuses. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Yano, Y., Long, M.H., & Ross, S
(1994) The effects of simplified and elaborated texts on foreign language reading comprehension. Language Learning, 44(2), 189–219. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zobl, H
(1982) A direction for contrastive analysis: The comparative study of developmental sequences. TESOL Quarterly 16(2), 169–183. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 6 other publications

Andon, Nick
2018.  In TBLT as a Researched Pedagogy [Task-Based Language Teaching, 12],  pp. 132 ff. Crossref logo
East, Martin
2015.  In Second and Foreign Language Education,  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Ellis, Rod
2021. Options in a task-based language-teaching curriculum. TASK. Journal on Task-Based Language Teaching and Learning 1:1  pp. 11 ff. Crossref logo
Liu, Yuying, Freda Mishan & Angela Chambers
2021. Investigating EFL teachers’ perceptions of task-based language teaching in higher education in China. The Language Learning Journal 49:2  pp. 131 ff. Crossref logo
Norris, John M.
2021. The Long road to TBLT. TASK. Journal on Task-Based Language Teaching and Learning 1:2  pp. 162 ff. Crossref logo
Wang, Zhan, Peter Skehan & Gaowei Chen
2019. The effects of hybrid online planning and L2 proficiency on video-based speaking task performance. Instructed Second Language Acquisition 3:1  pp. 53 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 08 november 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.