Cover not available
Part of
Domains and Directions in the Development of TBLT: A decade of plenaries from the international conference
Edited by Martin Bygate
[Task-Based Language Teaching 8] 2015
► pp. 123–156

Limited Attention Capacity and Cognition

Two hypotheses regarding second language performance on tasks

| St. Mary’s University, Twickenham
The chapter is part of a Point-Counterpoint (with Robinson, this volume), exploring the Limited Attention Capacity (LAC) and Cognition Hypotheses (CH) as alternative accounts of second language task performance. It starts by presenting five principles which underlie the LAC, covering memory and attentional functioning; the dimensions of performance; the role of research on task characteristics and conditions; the linkage with Levelt’s model of speaking; and the notion of, and influences on task difficulty. Then a survey is presented of the empirical work that is relevant to the LAC, organised in terms of the stages of the Levelt Model. Next, the Cognition Hypothesis is described, particularly resource-directing and resource-dispersing features, and the hypothesis is critiqued, both in relation to the constructs of the model and in relation to relevant evidence. This leads to a comparison between the two approaches, regarding hinterland, regarding how influences on second language task performance are analysed, and regarding what the two approaches say, or do not say, about acquisition. Finally some suggestions are made as to how the two approaches may be brought into resolution, at least to some degree.
Published online: 5 November 2015
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/tblt.8.05ske
References (65)
References
Baddeley, A. (2015). Working memory in second language learning. In Z. Wen, M.B. Mota, & A. McNeill (Eds.), Working memory in second language acquisition and processing: Theories, research, and commentaries (pp. 17–28). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Baralt, M.L. (2010). Task complexity, the cognition hypothesis, and interaction in CMC and FTF environments. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation. Georgetown University.Google Scholar
Bialystok, E. (1994). Analysis and control in the development of second language proficiency. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 16, 157–168. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown, G.,Anderson, A., Shilcock, R., & Yule, G. (1984). Teaching talk: Strategies for production and assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bui, H.Y.G. (2014). Task readiness: Theoretical framework and empirical evidence from topic familiarity, strategic planning, and proficiency levels. In P. Skehan (Ed.), Processing perspectives on task performance (pp. 63–94). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bygate, M. (2001). Effects of task repetition on the structure and control of oral language. In M. Bygate, P. Skehan, & M. Swain (Eds.), Researching pedagogic tasks: Second language learning, teaching and testing (pp. 23–48). Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
Bygate M. (2006). Areas of research that influence L2 speaking instruction. In E. Uso-Juan & A. Martinez-Flor (Eds.), Current trends in the development and teaching of the four language skills (pp. 159–186). Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bygate M., & Samuda V. (2009). Creating pressure in task pedagogy: The joint roles of field, purpose, and engagement within the interactional approach. In A. Mackey & C. Polio (Eds.), Multiple perspectives on interaction (pp. 90–116). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cowan, N. (2015). Second-language use, theories of working memory, and the Vennian mind. In Z. Wen, M.B. Mota, & A. McNeill (Eds.), Working memory in second language acquisition and processing: Theories, research, and commentaries (pp. 29–40). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
De Bot, K. (1992). A bilingual production model: Levelt's “Speaking” model adapted. Applied Linguistics, 13, 1–24. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ellis, D. (2011). The role of task complexity in the linguistic complexity of native speaker output. Qualifying Paper, Ph.D. in Second Language Acquisition program. College Park, MD.: University of Maryland.Google Scholar
Ellis, R. (2005). Planning and task-based performance: Theory and research. In R. Ellis (Ed.), Planning and task performance in a second language (pp. 3–36). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ellis, R., & Yuan, F. (2005). The effect of careful within-task planning on oral and written task performance. In R. Ellis (Ed.), Planning and task performance in a second language (pp. 167–192). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Foster, P., & Skehan, P. (1996). The influence of planning on performance in task-based learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18(3), 299–324. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2012). Complexity, accuracy, fluency and lexis in task-based performance: A synthesis of the Ealing research. In A. Housen, F. Kuiken, & I. Vedder (Eds.), Dimensions of L2 performance and proficiency: Complexity, accuracy, and fluency in SLA (pp. 199–220). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2013). Anticipating a post-task activity: The effects on accuracy, complexity and fluency of L2 language performance. Canadian Modern Language Review, 69(3), 249–273. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Foster, P., & Tavakoli, P. (2009). Native speakers and task performance: Comparing effects on complexity, fluency, and lexical diversity. Language Learning, 59(4), 866–896. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Garcia-Mayo, M.P. (2007). Investigating tasks in formal language learning. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Givón, T. (1985). Function, structure, and language acquisition. In D. Slobin (Ed.), The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition, Vol. 1 (pp. 1008–1025). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Hoey, M. (1983). On the surface of discourse. London: George Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Jackson, D.O., & Suethanapornkul, S. (2013). The Cognition Hypothesis: A synthesis and meta-analysis of research on second language task complexity. Language Learning, 63(2), 330–367.Google Scholar
Kim, Y. (2013). Investigating learners’ cognitive processes by using stimulated recall methodology in task-based research. In A. Revesz & R. Gilabert (Organizers), SLA methodological advances in TBLT research: Measurement of task demands and processes. Colloquium presented at American Association for Applied Linguistics 2013 conference, Dallas, TX.Google Scholar
Kormos, J. (2006). Speech production and second language acquisition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Levelt, W.J.M. (1989). Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
. (1999). Producing spoken language: A blueprint of the speaker. In C. Brown & P. Hagoort (Eds.), Neurocognition of language (pp. 83–122). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Li, Q. (2014). Get it right in the end: The effects of post-task transcribing on learners' oral performance. In P. Skehan (Ed.), Processing perspectives on task performance (pp. 129–154). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Long, M.H. (1985). A role for instruction in second language acquisition: Task-based language teaching. In K. Hyltenstam & M. Pienemann (Eds.), Modelling and assessing second language development (pp. 77–99). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
. (2015). Second language acquisition and task-based language teaching. New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
Lynch, T. (2001). Seeing what they meant: Transcribing as a route to noticing. ELT Journal, 55, 124–132. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2007). Learning from the transcripts of an oral communication task. ELT Journal, 61, 311–320. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Malicka, A., & Levkina, M. (2012). Measuring task complexity: Does L2 proficiency matter? In A. Shehadeh & C. Coombe (Eds.), Task-based language teaching in foreign language contexts: Research and implementation (pp. 43–66). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meara, P., & Bell, H. (2001). P_Lex: A simple and effective way of describing the lexical characteristics of short L2 texts. Prospect, 16(3), 5–19.Google Scholar
Michel, M.C. (2011). Effects of task complexity and interaction on L2 performance. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Second language task complexity: Researching the cognition hypothesis of language learning and performance (pp. 141–174). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Miller, G. (1956). The magical number 7, plus or minus 2: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63, 81–97. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Norris, J.M., & Ortega, L. (2009). Towards and organic approach to investigating CAF in instructed SLA: the case of complexity. Applied Linguistics, 30(4), 555–578. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ortega, L. (2005). What do learners plan? Learner-driven attention to form during pre-task planning. In R. Ellis (Ed.), Planning and task performance in a second language (pp. 77–109). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pang, F., & Skehan, P. (2014). Self-reported planning behaviour and second language performance in narrative retelling. In P. Skehan (Ed.), Processing perspectives on task performance (pp. 95–128). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Plough, I., & Gass, S. (1993). Interlocutor and task familiarity: Effects on interactional structure. In G. Crookes & S. Gass (Eds.), Tasks and language learning (pp. 35–56). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Revesz, A. (2009). Task complexity, focus on form, and second language development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 31(3), 437–470. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2014). Towards a fuller assessment of cognitive models of task-based learning: Investigating task-generated cognitive demands and processes. Applied Linguistics, 35(1), 93–98. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Revesz, A., Sachs, R., & Mackey, A. (2011). Task complexity, uptake of recasts, and L2 development. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Second language task complexity: Researching the cognition hypothesis of language learning and performance (pp. 203–235). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Revesz, A., Sachs, R., & Hama, M. (2013). Eye tracking as a means of investigating task-based cognitive processes . In A. Revesz & R. Gilabert (Organizers), SLA methodological advances in TBLT research: Measurement of task demands and processes. Colloquium presented at American Association for Applied Linguistics 2013 conference, Dallas, TX.Google Scholar
Robinson, P. (2011). Second language task complexity, the Cognition Hypothesis, language learning, and performance. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Second language task complexity: Researching the cognition hypothesis of language learning and performance (pp 3–38). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sanders, A. (1998). Elements of human performance. Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Sasayama, S. (2014). Measuring cognitive task complexity from the learners' perspective. Presentation at TBL In Asia Conference. Osaka, Japan.
Schur, E. (2007). Insights into the structure of L1 and L2 vocabulary networks: Intimations of small worlds. In H. Daller & J. Treffers-Daller (Eds.), Modelling and assessing vocabulary knowledge (pp. 182–204). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Skehan, P. (1996). A framework for the implementation of task based instruction. Applied Linguistics, 17(1), 38–62. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2009a). Models of speaking and the assessment of second language proficiency. In A. Benati (Ed.), Issues in second language proficiency (pp. 202–215). London: Continuum.Google Scholar
. (2009b). Lexical performance by native and non-native speakers on language-learning tasks. In B. Richards, H. Daller, D.D. Malvern, & P. Meara (Eds.), Studies in first and second language vocabulary acquisition: The interface between theory and application (pp. 107–124). Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
. (2012), Researching tasks: performance, assessment, pedagogy. Shanghai: Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press.Google Scholar
. (2013). Nurturing noticing. In J. Bergsleithner, S.N. Frota, & J.K. Yoshioka (Eds.), Noticing and second language acquisition: Studies in honor of Richard Schmidt (pp. 169–180). Honolulu, HI: National Foreign Language Center.Google Scholar
. (Ed.) (2014a). Processing perspectives on task performance, Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2014b). Synthesising and applying task research. In P. Skehan (Ed.), Processing perspectives on task performance (pp. 211–260). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Skehan, P., & Foster, P. (1997). The influence of planning and post-task activities on accuracy and complexity in task based learning. Language Teaching Research, 1, 185–211. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Skehan, P., & Shum, S. (2014). Structure and processing condition in video-based narrative retelling. In P. Skehan (Ed.), Processing perspectives on task performance (pp. 197–210). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Skehan, P., Bei, X.,Li, Q., & Wang, Z. (2012). The task is not enough: Processing approaches to task-based performance. Language Teaching Research, 16(2), 170–187. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tavakoli, P. (2009). Investigating task difficulty: Learners’ and teachers’ perceptions. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 19(1), 1–25. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tavakoli, P., & Foster, P. (2008). Task design and second language performance: The effect of narrative type on learner output. Language Learning, 58(2), 439–473. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tavakoli, P., & Skehan, P. (2005). Planning, task structure, and performance testing. In R. Ellis (Ed.), Planning and task performance in a second language (pp. 239–276). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wang, Z. (2009). Modelling speech production and performance: Evidence from five types of planning and two task structures. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation. Chinese University of Hong Kong.
. (2014). On-line time pressure manipulations: L2 speaking performance under five types of planning and repetition conditions. In P. Skehan (Ed.), Processing perspectives on task performance (pp. 27–62). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wang, Z., & Skehan, P. (2014). Task structure, time perspective and lexical demands during video-based narrative retellings. In P. Skehan (Ed.), Processing perspectives on task performance (pp. 155–186). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wickens, C.D. (2007). Attention to the second language. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 45, 177–191. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Willis, J. (1996). A framework for task-based learning. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Winter, E. (1976). Fundamentals of information structure: a pilot manual for further development according to student need. Ms., Hatfield Polytechnic, English Department.Google Scholar
Cited by (37)

Cited by 37 other publications

Imaz Agirre, Ainara, Roberto Arias-Hermoso & Nagore Ipiña
2024. The effect of an intervention focused on academic language on CAF measures in the multilingual writing of secondary students. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching DOI logo
Jin, Chaoyang & Jing Yan
2024. The effects of task complexity and task sequencing on L2 performance: a systematic review. The Language Learning Journal ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Yenkimaleki, Mahmood & Vincent J. van Heuven
2024. The effect of fluency training on interpreter trainees’ speech fluency, comprehensibility, and accentedness. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada/Spanish Journal of Applied Linguistics DOI logo
Barkaoui, Khaled
2023. Exploring task effects on register variation in second language learners’ writing. TASK. Journal on Task-Based Language Teaching and Learning 3:1 ► pp. 109 ff. DOI logo
Kaufmann, Austin, Adam Gacs, Luca Giupponi & Koen Van Gorp
2023. A Model for Scaffolded Technology-Enhanced Oral Communicative Tasks. In Optimizing Online English Language Learning and Teaching [English Language Education, 31], ► pp. 129 ff. DOI logo
Santos, Sara
2023. Efeitos da repetição procedimental e da complexidade cognitiva da tarefa no desempenho oral em português língua estrangeira: estudo exploratório . Diacrítica 36:2 ► pp. 9 ff. DOI logo
Wu, Jingwen & Rod Ellis
2023. The effect of pre-task planning on computer-based second language writing. Language Teaching Research DOI logo
Awwad, Anas & Parvaneh Tavakoli
2022. Task complexity, language proficiency and working memory: Interaction effects on second language speech performance. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 60:2 ► pp. 169 ff. DOI logo
González-Lloret, Marta
2022. The present and future of functional adequacy. TASK. Journal on Task-Based Language Teaching and Learning 2:1 ► pp. 146 ff. DOI logo
Qiu, Xuyan & Gavin Bui
2022. Pre-task planning effects on learner engagement in face-to-face and synchronous computer-mediated communication. Language Teaching Research ► pp. 136216882211352 ff. DOI logo
Qiu, Xuyan & Hong Cheng
2022. The effects of task types on L2 oral production and learner engagement. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 60:4 ► pp. 1063 ff. DOI logo
Spada, Nina
2022. Reflecting on task-based language teaching from an Instructed SLA perspective. Language Teaching 55:1 ► pp. 74 ff. DOI logo
Awwad, Anas & Rashed Alhamad
2021. Online task planning and L2 oral fluency:does manipulating time pressure affect fluency in L2 monologic oral narratives?. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 59:4 ► pp. 605 ff. DOI logo
Awwad, Anas & Rashed Alhamad
2021. Online task planning and L2 oral fluency:does manipulating time pressure affect fluency in L2 monologic oral narratives?. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 59:4 ► pp. 605 ff. DOI logo
Crawford, William J. & Meixiu Zhang
2021. How can register analysis inform task-based language teaching?. Register Studies 3:2 ► pp. 180 ff. DOI logo
Duran-Karaoz, Zeynep & Parvaneh Tavakoli
2020. PREDICTING L2 FLUENCY FROM L1 FLUENCY BEHAVIOR. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 42:4 ► pp. 671 ff. DOI logo
TAVAKOLI, PARVANEH, FUMIYO NAKATSUHARA & ANN–MARIE HUNTER
2020. Aspects of Fluency Across Assessed Levels of Speaking Proficiency. The Modern Language Journal 104:1 ► pp. 169 ff. DOI logo
Granena, Gisela & Yucel Yilmaz
2019. Phonological short-term memory capacity and L2 oral performance. Journal of Second Language Studies 2:2 ► pp. 317 ff. DOI logo
Granena, Gisela & Yucel Yilmaz
2021. Phonological short-term memory capacity and L2 oral performance. In Aptitude-Treatment Interaction in Second Language Learning [Benjamins Current Topics, 116], ► pp. 153 ff. DOI logo
Long, Michael H., Jiyong Lee & Kyoko Kobayashi Hillman
2019. Task-Based Language Learning. In The Cambridge Handbook of Language Learning, ► pp. 500 ff. DOI logo
Michel, Marije C., Andrea Révész, Danni Shi & Yanmei Li
2019. Chapter 6. The effects of task demands on linguistic complexity and accuracy across task types and L1/L2 speakers. In Researching L2 Task Performance and Pedagogy [Task-Based Language Teaching, 13], ► pp. 133 ff. DOI logo
Sasayama, Shoko & John M. Norris
2019. Chapter 5. Unravelling cognitive task complexity. In Researching L2 Task Performance and Pedagogy [Task-Based Language Teaching, 13], ► pp. 95 ff. DOI logo
Souza Ferraz D'Ely, Raquel Carolina, Mailce Borges Mota & Martin Bygate
2019. Chapter 9. Strategic planning and repetition as metacognitive processes in task performance. In Researching L2 Task Performance and Pedagogy [Task-Based Language Teaching, 13], ► pp. 199 ff. DOI logo
Tavakoli, Parvaneh
2019. Chapter 2. Automaticity, fluency and second language task performance. In Researching L2 Task Performance and Pedagogy [Task-Based Language Teaching, 13], ► pp. 39 ff. DOI logo
Wang, Zhan, Peter Skehan & Gaowei Chen
2019. The effects of hybrid online planning and L2 proficiency on video-based speaking task performance. Instructed Second Language Acquisition 3:1 ► pp. 53 ff. DOI logo
Xing, Jiaxin & Shaoqian Luo
2019. Chapter 7. The effects of reasoning demands on Chinese EFL learners’ oral performance and cognitive processes. In Researching L2 Task Performance and Pedagogy [Task-Based Language Teaching, 13], ► pp. 153 ff. DOI logo
Bui, Gavin, Peter Skehan & Zhan Wang
2018. Task Condition Effects on Advanced‐Level Foreign Language Performance. In The Handbook of Advanced Proficiency in Second Language Acquisition, ► pp. 219 ff. DOI logo
Bygate, Martin
2018. Chapter 7. Creating and using the space for speaking within the foreign language classroom. In Speaking in a Second Language [AILA Applied Linguistics Series, 17], ► pp. 153 ff. DOI logo
Han, ZhaoHong & Eun Young Kang
2018. Revisiting the Cognition Hypothesis: Bridging a gap between the conceptual and the empirical. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 28:3 ► pp. 391 ff. DOI logo
Samuda, Virginia, Martin Bygate & Kris Van den Branden
2018. Introduction. In TBLT as a Researched Pedagogy [Task-Based Language Teaching, 12], ► pp. 2 ff. DOI logo
Taguchi, Naoko & YouJin Kim
2018. Chapter 1. Task-based approaches to teaching and assessing pragmatics. In Task-Based Approaches to Teaching and Assessing Pragmatics [Task-Based Language Teaching, 10], ► pp. 2 ff. DOI logo
Vangehuchten, Lieve, Mariëlle Leijten & Iris Schrijver
2018. Reading-to-write tasks for professional purposes in Spanish as a foreign language. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada/Spanish Journal of Applied Linguistics 31:2 ► pp. 638 ff. DOI logo
Lee, Josephine & Alfred Rue Burch
2017. Collaborative Planning in Process: An Ethnomethodological Perspective. TESOL Quarterly 51:3 ► pp. 536 ff. DOI logo
García Mayo, Maria del Pilar & Ainara Imaz Agirre
2016. Task repetition and its impact on EFL children’s negotiation of meaning strategies and pair dynamics: an exploratory study. The Language Learning Journal 44:4 ► pp. 451 ff. DOI logo
Révész, Andrea & Laura Gurzynski-Weiss
2016. Teachers’ Perspectives on Second Language Task Difficulty: Insights From Think-Alouds and Eye Tracking. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 36 ► pp. 182 ff. DOI logo
Skehan, Peter
2016. Tasks Versus Conditions: Two Perspectives on Task Research and Their Implications for Pedagogy. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 36 ► pp. 34 ff. DOI logo
Skehan, Peter
2022. Chapter 11. Performance on second language speaking tasks. In Second Language Acquisition Theory [Bilingual Processing and Acquisition, 14], ► pp. 211 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.