Cover not available
Part of
Domains and Directions in the Development of TBLT: A decade of plenaries from the international conference
Edited by Martin Bygate
[Task-Based Language Teaching 8] 2015
► pp. 247–270

Teachers evaluating tasks

| University of Auckland and Shanghai International Studies University
Conducting action research is not something that teachers always find easy. Nunan (1990) reported that teachers’ action research proposals tended to be rather grand and unmanageable because they had failed to identify specific research questions. I propose that one practical way in which teachers can research their teaching is by carrying out micro-evaluations of instructional tasks. In this paper I report my experience of requiring students enrolled in a course on task-based teaching as part of their MA studies to undertake an evaluation of a task. They were first asked to design their own task in groups. They then planned a micro-evaluation of the task, taught the task and in the process collected data for the evaluation, and finally wrote a report. I use examples of their reports to discuss how they planned their evaluations, the process of conducting the evaluations, and the kinds of findings they came up with. I also examine the utility of such micro-evaluations as a means of developing teachers’ understanding of task-based teaching.
Published online: 5 November 2015
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/tblt.8.09ell
References (44)
References
Allwright, D. (2003). Exploratory practice: Rethinking practitioner research in language teaching. Language Teaching Research, 7, 113–141. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2005). Developing principles for practitioner research: The case for exploratory practice. Modern Language Journal, 89, 353–366. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bloom, M. (2007). Tensions in a non-traditional classroom. Language Teaching Research, 11, 85–102. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carr, W., & Kemmis, S. (1986). Becoming critical: Education, knowledge and action research. London: The Falmer Press.Google Scholar
Chan, S.H. (1995). A micro-evaluation-based task evaluation. Unpublished MA paper,Temple University, Philadelphia, PA.Google Scholar
Coughlan, P., & Duff, P. 1994. Same task, different activities: analysis of SLA from an activity theory perspective. In J. Lantolf & G. Appel (Eds.), Vygotskian approach to second language research, pp. 173–194. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Cox, D. (2005). Can we predict language items for open tasks? In C. Edwards & J. Willis (Eds.), (pp.171–186).Google Scholar
Eckerth, J. (2008). Task-based language learning and teaching – Old wine in new bottles? In J. Eckerth & S. Siekmann (Eds.), Task-based language learning and teaching: Theoretical, methodological, and pedagogical perspectives, (pp. 13–46). Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Ellis, R. (2005). Planning and task-based performance: Theory and research. In R. Ellis (Ed.), Planning and task performance in a second language (pp. 3–36). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Edwards, C., & Willis, J. (Eds.). (2005). Teachers exploring tasks in English language teaching. Houndmills: Palgrave MacmillanGoogle Scholar
Ellis, R. (1997). The empirical evaluation of language teaching materials. ELT Journal, 51: 36–42. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (1998). The evaluation of communicative tasks. In B. Tomlinson (Ed.), Materials development in language teaching (pp. 217–238). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
. (2001). Non-reciprocal tasks, comprehension and second language acquisition. In M. Bygate, P. Skehan & M. Swain (Eds.), Researching pedagogic tasks: Second Language Learning, teaching and testing (pp. 49–74). Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
. (2003). Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
. (2011). Macro- and micro-evaluations of task-based teaching. In B. Tomlinson (Ed.), Materials development in language teaching, (2nd ed.) (pp. 212–35). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ellis, R., Basturkmen, H. & Loewen, S. (2001). Learner uptake in communicative ESL lessons. Language Learning, 51, 281–318. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Foster, P. (1998). A classroom perspective on the negotiation of meaning. Applied Linguistics, 19, 1–23. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Foster P., & Skehan, P. (1996). The influence of planning on performance in task-based learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18, 299–324. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gass, S., Mackey, A. & Ross-Feldman, L. (2005). Task-based interactions in classroom and laboratory settings. Language Learning, 55, 575–611. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johnston, C. (2005). Fighting fossilization: Language at different stages in the task cycle. In C. Edwards & J. Willis (Eds.), (pp.191–200).Google Scholar
Johnson, K. (2000). What task designers do. Language Teaching Research, 4, 301–21. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lantolf, J. (2000). Introducing sociocultural theory. In J. Lantolf (Ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning (pp. 1–26). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lee, S-M. (2005). Training young learners in meaning negotiation skills: Does it help? In C. Edwards & J. Willis (Eds.), (pp.103–112).Google Scholar
Li, S. (2010). The effectiveness of corrective feedback in SLA: A meta-analysis. Language Learning, 60, 309–365. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Loschky, L. (1994). Comprehensible input and second language acquisition: What is the relationship? Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 16, 303–23. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Loumpourdi, L. (2005). Developing from PPP to TBL: A focused grammar task. In C. Edwards & J. Willis (Eds.), (pp.33–39).Google Scholar
Mackey, A. (1999). Input, interaction and second language development: an empirical study of question formation in ESL. Studies in Second Language Acquisition,21, 557–87. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mackey, A., & Goo, J. (2007). Interaction research in SLA: A meta-analysis and research synthesis. In A. Mackey (Ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition: A collection of empirical studies (pp.407–452). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Markee, N. (1994). Towards an ethnomethodological respecification of second language acquisition studies. In E. Tarone, S. Gass & A. Cohen (Eds.), Research methodology in second language acquisition (pp. 89–116). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
McGrath, I. (2002). Materials evaluation and design for language teaching. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Muller, T. (2005). Adding tasks to textbooks for beginner learners. In C. Edwards & J. Willis (Eds.), (pp. 69–77).Google Scholar
Nunan, D. (1990). The teacher as researcher. In C. Brumfit & R. Mitchell (Eds), Research in the language classroom. ELT documents 133 (pp.16–32). London: Modern English Publications.Google Scholar
Pica, T. (1997). Second language teaching and research relationships: A North American view. Language Teaching Research, 1, 48–72. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pica, T., Kanagy, R., & Falodun, J. (1993). Choosing and using communication tasks for second language research and instruction. In. G. Crookes & S. Gass (Eds.), Tasks and language learning (pp.9–34). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Seedhouse, P. (2005). ‘Task’ as research construct. Language Learning, 55, 533–70. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Skehan, P. (1996). A framework for the implementation of task-based instruction. Applied Linguistics, 17, 38–62. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Slimani, A. (1989). The role of topicalization in classroom language learning. System, 17, 223–34. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Slimani-Rolls, A. (2005). Rethinking task-based language learning: What we can learn from the learners. Language Teaching Research, 9, 195–218. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Storch, N. (2002). Patterns of interaction in ESL pair work. Language Learning, 52, 119–58. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van den Branden, K., Bygate, M. & Norris, J. (Eds.). (2009). Task-based language teaching: A reader. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Weir, C., & Roberts, J. (1994). Evaluation in ELT. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Willis, J. (1996). A framework for task-based learning. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
. (2005). Introduction: Aims and explorations into tasks and task-based teaching. In C. Edwards & J. Willis (Eds.), (pp.1–12).Google Scholar
Wright, T. (1992). Classroom research and teacher education: Towards a collaborative approach. In J. Flowerdew, M. Brock, & S. Hsia (Eds.), Perspectives on second language teacher education (pp.187–209). Hong Kong: City Polytechnic of Hong Kong.Google Scholar
Cited by (8)

Cited by eight other publications

Mostafaei Alaei, Mahnaz & Abbas Mansouri
2024. Unraveling the differential effects of task rehearsal and task repetition on L2 task performance: the mediating role of task modality. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching DOI logo
Jackson, Daniel O.
2022. Task-Based Language Teaching, DOI logo
Ellis, Rod
2021. Options in a task-based language-teaching curriculum. TASK. Journal on Task-Based Language Teaching and Learning 1:1 ► pp. 11 ff. DOI logo
Ellis, Rod
2024. Chapter 12. Conclusion. In Individual Differences and Task-Based Language Teaching [Task-Based Language Teaching, 16], ► pp. 346 ff. DOI logo
Baralt, Melissa
2018. Chapter 10. Becoming a task-based teacher educator. In TBLT as a Researched Pedagogy [Task-Based Language Teaching, 12], ► pp. 266 ff. DOI logo
Baralt, Melissa
2019. Reflections on Task-Based Language Teaching. ELT Journal 73:2 ► pp. 241 ff. DOI logo
Samuda, Virginia, Martin Bygate & Kris Van den Branden
2018. Introduction. In TBLT as a Researched Pedagogy [Task-Based Language Teaching, 12], ► pp. 2 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2022. How to Teach an Additional Language [Task-Based Language Teaching, 15], DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.