Multimodal exploration of the thank God expressive
construction and its implications for translation
Multimodal research in communication and translation studies is
increasingly recognized, yet it remains incompletely explored. Leveraging
computational linguistics with both Praat for acoustic analysis and the OpenPose
and Rapid Annotator tools for visual analysis, this study delves into the
intricate dynamics of the expressive construction thank God,
providing a comprehensive examination of both visual and acoustic dimensions.
Our objective is to uncover nuanced patterns of multimodal communication
embedded within this expression and their implications for Translation and
Interpreting. Through an analysis of linguistic features and co-speech gestures
present in thank God, we aim to deepen our comprehension of how
meaning crisscrosses modalities. Our findings underscore the necessity of a
multimodal approach in language studies, emphasizing the requisite to preserve
emotional and contextual nuances. The analysis unveils the phonological
relevance of the duration of the construction’s second vowel, a key factor for
translation. Additionally, data reveals a correlation between the emotion of
relief and gestures executed with both hands closer to the chest. Overall, these
findings contribute to advancing both multimodal communication research and
translation studies, shedding light on the role of multimodal analysis in
understanding language and translation dynamics, particularly in the context of
constructions like thank God.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.The empirical study
- 2.1Aims and hypotheses
- 2.2Instruments
- 2.3Materials and methods
- 2.4Procedure
- 2.5Selection of dependent and independent variables
- 2.6Data processing and statistical analysis
- 2.7Results
- 2.7.1Results for the number of samples, frequency, and ratio
- 2.7.2Results for the normality of the data: Shapiro-Wilk test
- 2.7.3Results for the homoscedasticity of the data: Bartlett test
- 2.7.4Results for the parametric technique: T-Student test
- 2.7.5Results for the linear models
- 2.8Discussion and conclusions
- Notes
-
References