Article published in:
Terminology
Vol. 25:1 (2019) ► pp. 1–31

Eliciting specialized frames from corpora using argument-structure extraction techniques

| University of Granada
| Aix-Marseille Université, Université de Toulon, CNRS, LIS
Frame Semantics provides a powerful cross-lingual model to describe the conceptual structure underlying specialized language. Building specialized frames is challenging because of the complex nature of predicate-argument structures, and because of the domain-specific uses of general-language predicates. Our semi-automatic method elicits semantic frames from specialized corpora. It aims to discover lexical patterns that reveal the structure of specialized frames and to populate them with corpus-based data. Firstly, we automatically extracted verb-noun triples from corpora using bootstrapping to identify noun-verb-noun phraseological patterns. Secondly, we annotated each noun-verb-noun triple with the lexical domain of the verbs and the semantic class and role of the noun filling each argument slot. We then used these annotations and patterns to classify similar triples. Thus, the structure and the types of lexical units that belong to each specialized frames were inferred. Specialized corpora analysis of environmental science texts in English and in Spanish illustrate our methodology.
Keywords: Frame Semantics, frame-based terminology, corpora, corpus-based extraction, argument structure
Published online: 24 July 2019
https://doi.org/10.1075/term.00026.san
References

References

Baroni, Marco, Adam Kilgarriff, Jan Pomikálek, and Pavel Rychlý
2006 “WebBootCaT: Instant Domain-specific Corpora to Support Human Translators.” In Proceedings of EAMT. 11th Annual Conference of the European Association for Machine Translation, 247–252, Oslo (Norway).
Barrière, Caroline
2001 “Investigating the Causal Relation in Informative Texts.” Terminology 7(2): 135–154. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Buendía-Castro, M.
2013 Phraseology in Specialized Language and its Representation in Environmental Knowledge Resources. PhD Thesis. Universidad de Granada, Granada, Spain.Google Scholar
Buendía-Castro, Miriam, and Beatriz Sánchez-Cárdenas
2016 “Using Argument Structure to Disambiguate Verb Meaning.” In Proceedings of the XVII EURALEX International Congress, ed. by Margalitadze, T., and G. Meladze, 482–490. Tbilisi: Ivane Javakhishvili Tbilisi University Press.Google Scholar
Cabré Castellví, María Teresa
2003 “Theories of terminology: Their Description, Prescription and Explanation.” Terminology 9 (2): 163–199. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Church, Kenneth Ward, and Patrick Hanks
1990 “Word association norms, mutual information, and lexicography.” Computational linguistics 16 (1): 22–29.Google Scholar
Condamines, Anne
2002 “Corpus Analysis and Conceptual Relation Patterns.” Terminology 8 (1): 141–162. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Condamines, Anne, and Josette Rebeyrolle
2001 “Searching for and Identifying Conceptual Relationships via a Corpus-based Approach to a Terminological Knowledge Base (CTKB).” In Recent Advances in Computational Terminology, ed. by Bourigault, D., C. Jacquemin, and M. C. L’Homme, 127–148. Amsterdam/Philadephia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Coseriu, Eugenio
1977 Principios de semántica estructural, Madrid: Gredos.Google Scholar
Dik, Simon
1978 Functional Grammar, Dordrecht: Foris Publications.Google Scholar
Dubois, Jean, and Françoise Dubois-Charlier
1997 “Synonymie syntaxique et classification des verbes français.” Langages 128: 51–71. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Durán-Muñoz, Isabel
2017 “Producing Frame-based Definitions.” Terminology 22 (2): 223–249. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
EcoLexicon
http://​ecolexicon​.ugr​.es​/en/). Accessed 30 March 2019.
Faber, Pamela
(ed.) 2012 A Cognitive Linguistics View of Terminology and Specialized Language 20. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2015 “Frames as a Framework for Terminology.” In Handbook of Terminology 1(14), ed. by Kockaert, H. J., and F. Steurs, 14–33. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Faber, Pamela, and Pilar León-Araúz
2014 “Specialized Knowledge Dynamics.” In Dynamics and Terminology: An Interdisciplinary Perspective on Monolingual and Multilingual Culture-bound Communication, ed. by Temmerman, R., and M. Van Campenhoudt, 135–158. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
2016 “Specialized Knowledge Representation and the Parameterization of Context.” Frontiers in psychology 7. ( Crossref).Google Scholar
Faber, Pamela, Pilar León Araúz, and Jose Antonio Prieto Velasco
2009 “Semantic Relations, Dynamicity, and Terminological Knowledge Bases.” Current Issues in Language Studies 1(1): 1–23.Google Scholar
Faber, Pamela, and Ricardo Mairal Usón
1999 Constructing a Lexicon of English Verbs, New York: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Faber, Pamela, and Ricardo Mairal Usón
2017 “The Functional Lexematic Model: Past, Present and Future.” In Estudios de Filología Inglesa, ed. by Cutillas Espinosa, J. A. H. C., R. Manchón Ruiz, and F. Mena Martínez, 315–340. Murcia: Editum.Google Scholar
Faber, Pamela, Juan Verdejo-Román, Pilar León-Araúz, Arianne Reimerink, and Gloria Guzmán Pérez-Carrillo
2017 “Specialized Knowledge Processing in the Brain: An fMRI Study.” In Terminological Approaches in the European Context, ed. by P. Faini, 168–182. Newcastle-upon-Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
Faber, Pamela, and M. C. África Vidal Claramonte
2017 “Food Terminology as a System of Cultural Communication.” Terminology 23 (1): 155–179. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Feliu, Judit
2004 Relacions conceptuals i terminologia: anàlisi i proposta de detecció semiautomàtica. PhD Thesis. Universitat Pompeu Fabra.Google Scholar
Fellbaum, Christiane J.
1990 “English Verbs as a Semantic Net.” International Journal of Lexicography 3(4): 278–301. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(ed.) 1998 WordNet: An Electronic Lexical Database. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fillmore, Charles J.
2006 “Frame Semantics.” In Cognitive linguistics: Basic readings 34, ed. by Geeraerts, D., 373–400. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fillmore, Charles, Christopher Johnson, and Miriam Petruck
2003 “Background to FrameNet.” International Journal of Lexicography 16(3): 235–250. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Firth, John Ruppert
1961 Papers in Linguistics 1934–1951. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Flaux, Nelly, and Danièle Van de Velde
2000 Les noms en français : esquisse de classement. Paris: Ophrys.Google Scholar
FrameNet
https://​framenet​.icsi​.berkeley​.edu). Accessed 30 March 2019.
François, Jacques, Dennis Le Pesant, and Danielle Leeman
2007 “Présentation de la classification des Verbes français de Jean Dubois et Françoise Dubois-Charlier.” Langue française 1: 3–19. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gaudin, François
2003 Socioterminologie. Une approche sociolinguistique de la terminologie. Bruxelles: De Boeck/Duculot.Google Scholar
Goldberg, Adele E.
1995 Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Granger, Sylviane, and Fanny Meunier
(eds.) 2008 Phraseology: An Interdisciplinary Perspective. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gross, Gaston
1994 “Classes d’objets et description des verbes.” Langages 115: 15–30. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2008 “Les classes d’objets.” Lalies 28: 111–165.Google Scholar
Hadouche, Fadila, Guy Lapalme, and Marie-Claude L’Homme
2011 “Attribution de rôles sémantiques à des actants.” In Actes de Traitement automatique des langues (TALN), Montpellier (France) ( Crossref).Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael, Christian Mim Matthiessen, and Christian Matthiessen
2014 An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hanks, Patrick
2012 “How People Use Words to Make Meanings: Semantic Types meet Valencies.” In Input, Process and Product: Developments in Teaching and Language Corpora, ed. by Boulton, A., and J. Thomas, 54–69. Masaryk: Masaryk University Press.Google Scholar
2004 “Corpus Pattern Analysis.” In 11th EURALEX (European Association for Lexicography) International Congress (Euralex 2004) Proceedings, vol 1: 87–98. Lorient (France).Google Scholar
Hatier, Sylvain, Magdalena Augustyn, Hoai Thi Thu Tran, Rui Yan, Agnès Tutin, and Marie-Paule Jacques
2016 “French Cross-disciplinary Scientific Lexicon: Extraction and Linguistic Analysis.” In Proceedings of the XVII EURALEX International Congress, 355–366, Tbilisi (Georgia).Google Scholar
Huyghe, Richard
2015 “Les typologies nominales: présentation.” Langue française 185(1): 5–27. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
L’Homme, Marie-Claude
1998 “Le statut du verbe en langue de spécialité et sa description lexicographique.” Cahiers de lexicologie 73(2): 61–84.Google Scholar
2004 “A Lexico-semantic Approach to the Structuring of Terminology.” In Proceedings of CompuTerm 2004: 3rd International Workshop on Computational Terminology, 7–14. Geneva, Switzerland.Google Scholar
2012a “Le verbe terminologique: un portrait de travaux récents.” In Actes du 3e Congrès mondial de linguistique française, ed. by Neveu, F. et al., 93–107. Lyon, France: EDP Sciences.Google Scholar
2012b “Adding Syntactico-semantic Information to Specialized Dictionaries: An Application of the FrameNet Methodology.” Lexicographica 28: 233–252. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
L’Homme, Marie-Claude, and Janine Pimentel
2012 “Capturing Syntactico-semantic Regularities among Terms: An application of the FrameNet Methodology to Terminology.” In Languages Ressources and Evaluation (LREC 2012), 262–268, Istambul, Turkey.Google Scholar
L’Homme, Marie-Claude, Robichaud Benoît, and Carlos Subirats Rüggberg
2014 “Discovering Frames in Specialized Domains.” In Languages Ressources and Evaluation (LREC 2014), 1364–1371. Reykjavik, Iceland.Google Scholar
L’Homme, Marie-Claude, Subirats, Carlos, and Robichaud, Benoît
2016 “A Proposal for Combining General and Specialized Frames.” In Proceedings of the 5th Workshop on Cognitive Aspects of the Lexicon, CogALex-V, 156–165, Dublin, Ireland.Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W.
1987 Foundations of Cognitive Grammar: Theoretical Prerequisites (Vol. 1). Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Linardaki, Evita, Carlos Ramisch, Aline Villavicencio, and Aggeliki Fotopoulou
2010 “Towards the Construction of Language Resources for Greek Multiword Expressions: Extraction and Evaluation.” In Proceedings of the LREC Workshop on Exploitation of multilingual resources and tools for Central and (South) Eastern European Languages, 31–40. Valetta, Malta. ELRA.Google Scholar
Mairal Usón, Ricardo, and Pamela Faber
2002 “Functional Grammar and Lexical Templates.” In New Perspectives on Argument Structure in Functional Grammar, ed. by Mairal Usón, R. and M. J. Pérez Quintero, 41–98. Berlin /New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Meyer, Ingrid
2001 “Extracting Knowledge-rich Contexts for Terminography: A Conceptual and Methodological Framework.” In Recent Advances in Computational Terminology, ed. by Bourigault, D., C. Jacquemin, and M. C. L’Homme, 279–302. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, Ingrid, Kristen Mackintosh, Caroline Barrière, and Tricia Morgan
1999 “Conceptual Sampling for Terminological Corpus Analysis.” In Proceedings of the Fifth International Congress on Terminology and Knowledge Engineering (TKE’99), ed. by Sandrini, P., 256–267, Innsbruck (Austria).Google Scholar
Nivre, Joakim, Marie-Catherine de Marneffe, Filip Ginter, Yoav Goldberg, Jan Hajic, Christopher D. Manning, Ryan McDonald, Slav Petrov, Sampo Pyysalo, Natalia Silveira, Reut Tsarfaty, and Daniel Zeman
2016 “Universal Dependencies v1: A Multilingual Treebank Collection.” In Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2016), 1659–1666. Portorož, Slovenia.Google Scholar
Petruck, Miriam R. L.
1996 “Semantic Frames.” In Handbook of Pragmatics, ed. by Verschueren, J., J. Ostman, J. Blommaert, and C. Bulcaen, Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins (https://​benjamins​.com​/online​/hop/). Accessed 1 April 2019.
Ramisch, Carlos
2015 Multiword Expressions Acquisition: A Generic and Open Framework, Charm: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ruppenhofer, Josef, Michael Ellsworth, Miriam R. Petruck, C. R. Johnson, and Jan Scheffczyk
2016 FrameNet II: Extended Theory and Practice. Institut für Deutsche Sprache, Bibliothek.Google Scholar
San Martín, Antonio
2016 La representación de la variación contextual mediante definiciones terminológicas flexibles. PhD Thesis. University of Granada.Google Scholar
San Martín, Antonio, and Pilar León Araúz
2013 “Flexible Terminological Definitions and Conceptual Frames.” In Proceedings of the International Workshop on Definitions in Ontologies (DO2013), ed. by S. Seppälä and A. Ruttenberg, 121–135. Montreal: Concordia University.Google Scholar
Sánchez Cárdenas, Beatriz
2011 “Structuration hiérarchique du lexique verbal à travers la propriété de troponymie.” Revista de Lingüística y Lenguas Aplicadas 6(1): 329–340.Google Scholar
Sánchez Cárdenas, Beatriz, and Miriam Buendía Castro
2012 “Inclusion of Verbal Syntagmatic Patterns in Specialized Dictionaries: The Case of EcoLexicon.” In Proceedings of the 15th EURALEX International Congress, ed. By Ruth Vatvedt Fjeld and Julie Matilde Torjusen: 554–562. Oslo: EURALEX.Google Scholar
Sánchez Cárdenas, Beatriz, and Pamela Faber
2014 “A Functional and Constructional Approach for Specialized Knowledge Resources.” In Language Processing and Grammars: The Role of Functionally Oriented Computational Models, ed. by Brian, N., and C. Periñán Pascua, 297–312. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sinclair, John
1991 Corpus, Concordance, Collocation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Straka, Milan, Jan Hajič, and Jana Straková
2016 “UDPipe: Trainable Pipeline for Processing CoNLL-U Files Performing Tokenization, Morphological Analysis, POS Tagging and Parsing.” In Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2016). Portorož (Slovenia) (http://​ufal​.mff​.cuni​.cz​/~straka​/papers​/2016​-lrec​_udpipe​.pdf). Accessed 1 April 2019.
Temmerman, Rita
1997 “Questioning the Univocity Ideal. The Difference between Socio-cognitive Terminology and Traditional Terminology.” HERMES-Journal of Language and Communication in Business 10(18): 51–90. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2000 Towards New Ways of Terminology Description: The Sociocognitive Approach, Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Williams, Geoffrey
2005 “English Collocation Studies: The OSTI report”. International Journal of Lexicography 18(3): 391–393. CrossrefGoogle Scholar