Article published in:
Terminology
Vol. 22:1 (2016) ► pp. 80–102

Measuring the degree of specialisation of sub-technical legal terms through corpus comparison

A domain-independent method

One of the most remarkable features of the legal English lexicon is the use of sub-technical vocabulary, that is, words frequently shared by the general and specialised fields which either retain a legal meaning in general English or acquire a specialised one in the legal context. As testing has shown, almost 50% of the terms extracted from BLaRC, an 8.85m word legal corpus, were found amongst the most frequent 2,000 word families of West’s (1953) GSL, Coxhead’s (2000) AWL or the BNC (2007), hence the relevance of this type of vocabulary in this English variety. Owing to their peculiar statistical behaviour in both contexts, it is particularly problematic to identify them and measure their termhood based on such parameters as their frequency or distribution in the general and specialised environments. This research proposes a novel termhood measuring method intended to objectively quantify this lexical phenomenon through the application of Williams’ (2001) lexical network model, which incorporates contextual information to compute the level of specialisation of sub-technical terms.
Keywords: Legal English, sub-technical terms, lexical networks, ESP, corpus linguistics
Published online: 19 May 2016
https://doi.org/10.1075/term.22.1.04mar
References
Ahmad, Khurshid, Andrea Davies, Heather Fulford, and Monika Rogers
1994 “What is a Term? The Semi-automatic Extraction of Terms from Text.” In Translation Studies: An Interdiscipline, ed. by Snell-Hornby, M.F. Pöchhacker, and K. Kaindl, 267–278. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Alcaraz Varó, Enrique
1994 El Inglés Jurídico: Textos y Documentos. Madrid: Derecho.Google Scholar
2000 El Inglés Profesional y Académico. Madrid: Alianza Editorial.Google Scholar
Ananiadou, Sofia
1988  A Methodology for Automatic Term Recognition. PhD Thesis, University of Manchester, Institute of Science and Technology, United Kingdom.
Aronson, Alan, and Françoise-Michel Lang
2010 “An Overview of MetaMap: Historical Perspective and Recent Advances.” Journal of American Medical Informatics Association 17 (3): 229–236. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Baker, Mona
1988 “Sub-technical Vocabulary and the ESP Teacher: An Analysis of some Rhetorical Items in Medical Journal Articles.” Reading in a Foreign Language 4 (2): 91–105.Google Scholar
Barrón-Cedeño, Alberto, Gerardo Sierra, Patrick Drouin, and Sofia Ananiadou
2009 “An Improved Automatic Term Recognition Method for Spanish.” In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Intelligent Text Processing and Computational Linguistics (CICLing 2009), ed. by A. Gelbuck, 125–136. Berlin: Springer-Verlag. (http://​users​.dsic​.upv​.es​/~lbarron​/publications​/2009​/BarronTermsCICLING​.pdf). Accessed January 2016. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bourigault, Didier
1992 “Surface Grammatical Analysis for the Extraction of Terminological Noun Phrases.” In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Computational Linguistics , 977–981. Nantes, France.
Borja Albí, Anabel
2000 El Texto Jurídico en Inglés y su Traducción. Barcelona: Ariel.Google Scholar
Cabré, María Teresa, Rosa Estopà, and Jorge Vivaldi
2001 “Automatic Term Detection: A Review of Current Systems.” In Recent Advances in Computational Terminology, ed. by D. Bourigault, C. Jacquemin, and M.C. L’Homme, 53–87. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chung, Teresa M.
2003 “A Corpus Comparison Approach for Terminology Extraction.” Terminology 9 (2): 221–246. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chung, Teresa M., and Paul Nation
2003 “Technical Vocabulary in Specialised Texts.” Reading in a Foreign Language 15 (2): 103–116.Google Scholar
Church, Kenneth W., and Patrick Hanks
1990 “Word Association Norms, Mutual Information, and Lexicography.” Computational Linguistics 16 (1): 22–29.Google Scholar
Church, Kenneth W., and William Gale
1995 “Inverse Document Frequency IDF: A Measure of Deviations from Poisson.” In Proceedings of the Third Workshop on Very Large Corpora, ed. by D. Yarowsky and K. Church, 121–130. Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.Google Scholar
Cowan, Ronayne
1974 “Lexical and Syntactic Research for the Design of EFL.” TESOL Quarterly 8: 389–399. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Coxhead, Averyl
2000 “A New Academic Word List.” TESOL Quarterly 34 (2): 213–238. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dagan, Ido, and Kenneth Church
1994 “TERMIGHT: Identifying and Translating Technical Terminology.” In Proceedings of the 4th Conference on Applied Natural Language Processing , 34–40. Stuttgart, Germany (http://​www​.aclweb​.org​/anthology​-new​/A​/A94​/A94​-1006​.pdf). Accessed January, 2016.
Daille, Beatrice
1996 “Study and Implementation of Combined Techniques for Automatic Extraction of Terminology.” In The Balancing Act: Combining Symbolic and Statistical Approaches to Language, ed. by J.L. Klavans and P. Resnik, 29–36. Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.Google Scholar
David, Sophie, and Pierre Plante
1990 Termino 1.0. Research Report of Centre d’Analyse de Textes par Ordinateur. Université du Québec, Montréal.Google Scholar
Drouin, Patrick
2003 “Term Extraction Using Non-technical Corpora as a Point of Leverage.” Terminology 9 (1): 99–117. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dunning, Ted
1993 “Accurate Methods for the Statistics of Surprise and Coincidence”. Computational Linguistics 19 (1): 61–74.Google Scholar
Fahmi, Ismail, Gosse Bouma, and Lonneke van der Plas
2007 “Improving Statistical Method Using Known Terms for Automatic Term Extraction.” In Proceedings of Computational Linguistics in the Netherlands (CLIN 17), ed. by F. van Eynde, P. Dirix, I. Schuurman, and V. Vandeghinste, 1–8. Belgium: University of Leuven.Google Scholar
Farrell, Paul
1990 Vocabulary in ESL: A Lexical Analysis of the English of Electronics and a Study of Semi-technical Vocabulary. Dublin: Centre for Language and Communication Studies.Google Scholar
Flowerdew, John
2001 “Concordancing as Tool in Course Design.” In Small corpus Studies and ELT: Theory and Practice, ed. by M. Ghadessy, A. Henry, and R. Roseberry, 71–92. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Frantzi, Katerina T., and Sophia Ananiadou
1999 “The C/NC Value Domain Independent Method for Multi-word Term Extraction.” Journal of Natural Language Processing 3 (2): 115–127.Google Scholar
Frantzi, Katerina, Sofia Ananiadoua, and Hideki Mima
2000 “Automatic Recognition of Multi-Word Terms: The C-value/NC-value Method.” International Journal on Digital Libraries 3 (2): 115–130. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Geffet, Maayan, and Ido Dagan
2005 “The Distributional Inclusion Hypotheses and Lexical Entailment.” In Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the ACL , 107–114. Michigan, USA.
Heatley, Alex, and Paul Nation
2002 Range. Computer software. Wellington, New Zealand: Victoria University of Wellington.Google Scholar
Jacquemin, Christian
2001 Spotting and Discovering Terms through NLP. Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.Google Scholar
Joslyn, Cliff, Patrick Paulson, and Karin Verspoor
2008 “Exploiting Term Relations for Semantic Hierarchy Construction.” In Proceedings of the International Conference of Semantic Computing IEEE , 42–49. Santa Clara (CA), USA.
Justeson, John S., and Slava M. Katz
1995 “Technical Terminology: Some Linguistic Properties and an Algorithm for Identification in Text.” Natural Language Engineering 1 (1): 9–27. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kit, Chunyu, and Xiaoyue Liu
2008 “Measuring Mono-word Termhood by Rank Difference via Corpus Comparison.” Terminology 14 (2): 204–229. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lemay, Chantal, Marie-Claude L’Homme, and Patrick Drouin
2005 “Two Methods for Extracting “Specific” Single-Word Terms form Specialised Corpora.” International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 10 (2): 227–255. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Loginova, Elizabeta, Anita Gojun, Helena Blancafort, María Guegan, Tatiana Gornostay, and Ulrich Heid
Reference Lists for the Evaluation of Term Extraction Tools.” In Proceedings of TKE 2012: Terminology and Knowledge Engineering , 177–192. Madrid: Universidad Politécnica de Madrid. (http://​www​.ttc​-project​.eu​/images​/stories​/TTC​_TKE​_2012​.pdf), Accessed January 2016.
Marín, María José
2014 “Evaluation of Five Single-word Term Recognition Methods on a Legal Corpus.” Corpora 9 (1): 83–107. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Marín, María José, and Camino Rea
2012 “Structure and Design of the BLRC: A Legal Corpus of Judicial Decisions from the UK.” Journal of English Studies 10: 131–145. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Maynard, Diana, and Sofia Ananiadou
2000 “TRUCKS: A Model for Automatic Multi-word Term Recognition”. Journal of Natural Language Processing 8 (1): 101–125. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mellinkoff, David
1963 The Language of the Law. Boston: Little, Brown & Co.Google Scholar
Nakagawa, Hiroshi, and Tatsunori Mori
2002 “A Simple but Powerful Automatic Term Extraction Method.” In COLING-02 on COMPUTERM . Proceedings of the Second International Workshop on Computational Terminology , 1–7. Taipei, Taiwan.
Nazar, Rogelio, and María Teresa Cabré
2012 “Supervised Learning Algorithms Applied to Terminology Extraction.” In Proceedings of the 10th Terminology and Knowledge Engineering Conference TKE 2012, ed. by G. Aguado de Cea, M.C. Suárez-Figueroa, R. García-Castro, and E. Montiel-Ponsoda, 209–217. Madrid: Ontology Engineering Group, Association for Terminology and Knowledge Transfer.Google Scholar
Orts, María Ángeles
2006 Aproximación al Discurso Jurídico en Inglés: Las Pólizas de Seguro Marítimo de Lloyd’s. Madrid: Edisofer.Google Scholar
Panzienza, Maria Teresa, Marco Pennacchiotti, and Fabio Massimo Zanzotto
2005 “Terminology Extraction: An Analysis of Linguistic and Statistical Approaches.” Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing 185: 225–279.Google Scholar
Park, Younja, Roy Byrd, and Branimir Boguraev
2002 “Automatic Glossary Extraction: Beyond Terminology Association.” In Proceedings of COLING’02 19th International Conference on Computational Linguistics , ed. by S.C. Zeng, 1–7. Taipei, Taiwan. Crossref
Sclano, Francesco, and Paola Velardi
2007 “A Web Application to Learn the Common Terminology of Interest Groups and Research Communities.” In Proceedings of the Conference TIA-2007, ed. by C. Engehard and R.D. Kuntz, 85–94. Grenoble: Presses Universitaires de Grenoble.
Scott, Mike
2008 WordSmith Tools Version 5. Liverpool: Lexical Analysis Software.Google Scholar
Sparck-Jones, Kathleen
1972 “A Statistical Interpretation of Term Specificity and its Application in Retrieval.” Journal of Documentation 28: 11–21. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tiersma, Peter
1999 Legal Language. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Trimble, Louis
1985 English for Science & Technology: A Discourse Approach. Cambridge: Cambrige University Press.Google Scholar
Vivaldi, Jorge
2001  Extracción de Candidatos a Término mediante Combinación de Estrategias Heterogéneas . PhD Thesis. Universidad Politécnica de Cataluña.
Vivaldi, Jorge, Diego Cabrera, Luis Adrián, Gerardo Sierra and María Pozzi
2012 “Using Wikipedia to Validate the Terminology Found in a Corpus of Basic Textbooks.” In Proceedings of the Eight International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC’12) , 3820–3827. Instambul: Instambul Lütfi Kırdar Convention and Exhibition Centre. (http://​www​.lrec​-conf​.org​/proceedings​/lrec2012​/index​.html). Accessed January 2016.
Wang, Karen, and Paul Nation
2004 “Word Meaning in Academic English: Homography in the Academic Word List.” Applied Linguistics 25 (3): 291–314. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Weeds, Julie, David Weir, and Diana McCarthy
2004 “Characterising Measures of Lexical Distributional Similarity.” In Proceedings of Coling-04 . 1–7, Geneva, Switzerland.
West, Michael
1953 A General Service List of English Words. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Williams, Geoffrey
2001 “Mediating between Lexis and Texts: Collocational Networks in Specialised Corpora.” ASp, la Revue du GERAS 31-33: 63–76. CrossrefGoogle Scholar