Cover not available
Article published In:
Terminology
Vol. 22:2 (2016) ► pp.201–222

Writing biology, assessing biology

The nature and effects of variation in terminology

| University of the Western Cape

There has been substantial research into terminology as an issue in learning science, especially against the backdrop of concerns over school literacy in science and as sometimes reflected in the poor performance of high school students in assessment tasks. Relevant research has emphasized issues such as lexical load, complexity and metaphor. Variation in the use of terminology has, however, been relatively under researched, although there is evidence that terminology use does vary within and across high school textbooks of science. Drawing on an eclectic theoretical framework comprising transitivity analysis (Halliday 1994), legitimation code theory semantics (Maton 2013a), and the context-specific term model (Gerzymisch-Arbogast 2008), this article identifies and classifies variations in the terminology employed in three high school textbooks of biology in Nigeria. It then determines what impact assessment tasks which use terms that differ from those employed in students’ study materials have on students. Examples are found of variant terminology impeding science literacy and task performance, even though there is reason to suspect such variation might in fact have been leveraged to enhance cognition.

Keywords: variant terminology, pedagogy of literacy in variant terminology, legitimation code theory, context-specific term model, transitivity analysis, assessment task
Published online: 21 February 2017
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/term.22.2.03ant
References
Antia, B.E
2005 Terminology for Terminographers. ([URL]). Accessed 15 August 2016.Google Scholar
Antia, B.E., and R. Kamai
2006 “African Issues in Terminology: An Educational Perspective.” In Modern Approaches to Terminological Theories and Applications, ed. by H. Picht, 137–144. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Antia, B.E
(ed) 2007 Indeterminacy in Terminology and LSP: Studies in Honour of Heribert Picht. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baker, C
2007 Foundations of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 4th ed. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Bernstein, B
1999 “Vertical and horizontal discourse: An essay.” British Journal of Sociology of Education, 20(2): 157–73. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eggins, S
1994 An Introduction to Systemic Functional Linguistics. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Evans, J.D
1976 “The Treatment of Technical Vocabulary in Textbooks of Biology.” Journal of Biological Education 10(1): 19–30. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fang, Z
2006 “The Language Demands of Science Reading in Middle School.” International Journal of Science Education 28(5): 491–520. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Felber, H
1994 “The Correspondence of Object, Concept & Symbol.” In Terminology Science & Terminology Planning/Theoretical Issues of Terminology Science, ed. by J.K. Draskau and H. Picht, 209–216. Vienna: TermNet.Google Scholar
Gerzymisch-Arbogast, H
1996 Termini im Kontext. Verfahren zur Erschließung und Übersetzung der textspezifischen Bedeutung von fachlichen Ausdrücken. Tubingen: Gunter Narr (FFF 31).Google Scholar
2008 “Fundamentals of LSP Translation.” In LSP Translation Scenarios. Selected contributions to the EU Marie Curie Conference, Vienna 2007, ed. by H. Gerzymisch-Arbogast, G. Budin, and G. Hofer, 7–64. Vienna: ATRC Group.Google Scholar
Groves, F.H
1995 “Science Vocabulary Load of Selected Secondary Science Textbooks.” School Science and Mathematics 95(5): 231–235. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Halliday, M.A.K., and R. Hasan
1976 Cohesion in English. London and New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Halliday, M.A.K
1994 “Language as Social Semiotic.” In Language and Literacy in Social Practice: A Reader, ed. by J. Maybin, 23–43. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Halliday, M.A.K., and J.R. Martin
1993 Writing science. Literacy and Discursive Power. London: The Falmer Press.Google Scholar
Harmon, J.M., W.B. Hendrick, and K.D. Wood
2005 “Research on Vocabulary Instruction in the Content Areas: Implications for Struggling Readers.” Reading & Writing Quarterly 21(3): 261–280. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hoey, M
1991 Patterns of Lexis in Text. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jackson, F
2015 “Using Legitimation Code Theory to Track Pedagogic Practice in a South African English Home Language Poetry Lesson.” Journal of Education 531: 29–55.Google Scholar
Maton, K
2013a Knowledge and Knowers: Towards a Realist Sociology of Education. London & New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013b “Making Semantic Waves: A key to Cumulative Knowledge-Building.” Linguistics and Education 24(1): 8–22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Matruglio, E., K. Maton, and J.R. Martin
2013 “Time Travel: The Role of Temporality in Enabling Semantic Waves in Secondary School Teaching.” Linguistics and Education 24(1): 38–49. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Martin, J.R., K. Maton, and E. Matruglio
2010 “Historical Cosmologies: Epistemology and Axiology in Australian Secondary School History.” Revista Signos 43(74): 433–463. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Martin, J.R
2013 “Embedded Literacy: Knowledge as Meaning.” Linguistics and Education 241: 23–37. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pym, A
2003 “Redefining Translation Competence in an Electronic Age. In Defence of a Minimalist Approach.” Meta: Journal des traducteurs/Meta: Translators’ Journal 48(4): 481–497. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ravelli, L
2000 “Getting Started with Functional Analysis of Texts.” In Researching Language in Schools and Communities, ed. by L. Unsworth, 27–64. London: Cassell.Google Scholar
Rogers, M
2007 “Lexical Chains in Technical Translation: A Case Study in Indeterminacy.” In Indeterminacy in LSP and Terminology: Studies in Honour of Heribert Picht, ed. by B.E. Antia, 15–35. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008 “Consistency in Terminological Choice: Holy Grail or False Prophet?” Synaps. Fagspråk, Kommunikasjon, Kulturkunnskap (Festskrift for Magnar Brekke) 211: 107–113.Google Scholar
Snow, C.E
2010 “Academic Language and the Challenge of Reading for Learning.” Science 328(5977): 450–452. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Szenes, E., N. Tilakaratna, and K. Maton
2015 “The Knowledge Practices of Critical Thinking.” In The Palgrave Handbook of Critical Thinking in Higher Education, ed. by M. Davies and R. Barnett, 573–591. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Temmerman, R
2000 Towards New Ways of Terminology Description. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yager, R.E
1983 “The Importance of Terminology in Teaching K‐12 Science.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 20(6): 577–588. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
[
Exam Focus]: Egunyomi, A., F.G. Bob-Manuel, B.A. Abdulahi, and O.A. Oyetola 2000 Exam Focus. Biology for WASSCE and SSSCE. Ibadan: University Press.Google Scholar
[
New Biology]: Okeke, E.A.C., O.A. Oyetola, J.B. Owolabi, P.P. Udofia, M.A. Abubakar, and C.W. Ayaban 1998 Biology for Secondary Schools: A Publication of Science Teachers’ Association of Nigeria. Ibadan: Heinemann.Google Scholar
[
Essential Biology]: Michael, M.C 2012 Essential Biology for Senior Secondary Schools. Lagos: Tonad.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 3 other publications

Antia, Bassey E. & Madu M. Bassi
2022. Researching teacher multilingual-talk and student-benefits: rethinking knowledge blindness, diglossic cognition and its constructs. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Mohamed, Hashim Issa
2021. Universities and enhancement of English as a second language in Tanzanian secondary schools. International Journal of Research Studies in Education 10:5 DOI logo
Nakakuwa, Tomas & Kavish Jawahar
2020. Intersemiotic Complementarity in Namibian Physical Science Teachers’ Classroom Practice. African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 24:3 ► pp. 387 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 8 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.