Why traditional terminology theory impedes a realistic description of categories and terms in the life sciences

Temmerman, Rita

doi:10.1075/term.5.1.07tem

Article published In:

Terminology
Vol. 5:1 (1998) ► pp.77–92

Why traditional terminology theory impedes a realistic description of categories and terms in the life sciences

Rita Temmerman

On the basis of an empirical study of categorisation and lexicalisation processes in a corpus of English language scientific publications in the domain of the life sciences, we claim that traditional terminology theory (the Vienna school) has five principles which impede a realistic description of many categories and terms. We propose an alternative socio-cognitive terminology theory inspired by cognitive semantics.

Keywords: Template Representation, Category, Terminography, Univocity, Polysemy, Synonymy, Socio-Cognitive Terminology, Di-Achrony, Metaphor, Prototype Structure, Cognitve Models, Understanding, Life Sciences, Unit of Understanding, Lexicalisation

Published online: 4 July 2000

https://doi.org/10.1075/term.5.1.07tem

Cited by

Cited by 6 other publications

Order by:

Adelstein, Andreína & María Teresa Cabré

2002. The specificity of units with specialized meaning: polysemy as explanatory factor. DELTA: Documentação de Estudos em Lingüística Teórica e Aplicada 18:spe ► pp. 1 ff.

Hebenstreit, Gernot

2007. Defining patterns in Translation Studies. Target. International Journal of Translation Studies 19:2 ► pp. 197 ff.

Le Poder, Marie-Évelyne

2020. Phraséologie spécialisée et variation sociolinguistique. Lingvisticae Investigationes 43:2 ► pp. 338 ff.

Mouhouche, Ali & Abdelkrim El-Hajjami

2014. Étude diachronique et évolution du concept de résonance en physique. Meta 58:2 ► pp. 430 ff.

Zabala Unzalu, Igone, Mª Jesús Aranzabe Urruzola & Izaskun Aldezabal Roteta

2021. Retos actuales del desarrollo y aprendizaje de los registros académicos orales y escritos del euskera. Círculo de Lingüística Aplicada a la Comunicación 88 ► pp. 31 ff.

[no author supplied]

2021. The Corporate Terminologist [Terminology and Lexicography Research and Practice, 21],

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 9 june 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.