Cover not available
Part of
Humour in the Beginning: Religion, humour and laughter in formative stages of Christianity, Islam, Buddhism and Judaism
Edited by Roald Dijkstra and Paul van der Velde
[Topics in Humor Research 10] 2022
► pp. 33–46

Derisive laughter and religious identity in ancient Christianity

| University of Bergen
Polemic and mockery were part of Christian identity-making, especially in apologies and heresiologies, where boundaries were created against pagans and other Christians. In this paper, the focus is on the use of derisive laughter in the Nag Hammadi texts. This chapter presents a survey of four variants of the laughter-motif, discusses them and investigates what they have to say about Christian monastic identity in the fourth to fifth century in Upper Egypt. It appears that the motif works as a powerful rhetorical instrument and pedagogical tool. It contributed to guide the readers in the right direction – towards spirituality and superior knowledge, but it was not necessarily intended to make them laugh out loud.
Keywords: derisive laughter, mockery, Nag Hammadi texts, exegesis, monasticism
Article outline
  • Nag Hammadi texts and Christian identity
  • Codex II and Codex VII
  • The laughter of Eve
  • The laughter of the Saviour
  • Laughing at the world-creator and his prophets
  • Jesus smiles to/at the disciples
  • Origin, function and meaning of the laughter motif
  • The contribution of the laughter motif to the religious project of ascetics and monastics
  • Notes
  • Bibliography
Published online: 27 October 2022
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/thr.10.05sel
References (26)
Bibliography
Primary sources
Athanasius (1994). Athanase d’Alexandre. Vie d’Antoine. Introduction, texte critique, traduction et notes par G. J.M. Bartelink (Sources Chrétiennes 400). Paris: Éditions du cerf.Google Scholar
The Coptic Gnostic Library: A Complete Edition of the Nag Hammadi Codices (2000). General editor James M. Robinson. 5 volumes. Leiden: BrillGoogle Scholar
Epiphanius (2016–2017). Panarion, in The Panarion of Epiphanius of Salamis Books I-III, translated by Frank Williams. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Irenaeus (1993). Adversus haereses (Against Heresies). The Ante-Nicene Fathers, volume 1. Edinburgh: T&T Clark, 309–567.Google Scholar
Praecepta, in Pachomian Koinonia: Pachomian Chronicles and Rules (1981). Translated and introduced by Armand Veilleux Kalamazoo, Michigan: Cistercian Publications, 145–167.Google Scholar
The Sayings of the Desert Fathers: The Alphabetical Collection (1984 [1975]). Translated with a Foreword by Benedicta Ward. Kalamazoo: Cistercian Publications.Google Scholar
Secondary sources
Burns, D. M. (2014). Apocalypse of the Alien God: Platonism and the Exile of Sethian Gnosticism. Philadelphia: Philadelphia University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Buzi, P. (2016). Review of Hugo Lundhaug and Lance Jenott, The Monastic Origins of the Nag Hammadi Codices. Studien und Texte zu Antike und Christentum, 97. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck 2015, COMSt Bulletin 2, 95–100.Google Scholar
Crum, W. E. (1962) Coptic Dictionary. Oxford: Clarendon Press [1939].Google Scholar
Dubois, J.-D. (2017). Le docétisme des christologies gnostiques revisité. New Testament Studies, 63, 279–304. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ehrman, B. D. (2003). Lost Christianities: The Battle for Scripture and the Faiths We Never Knew. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fish, S. (1980). Is There a Text in This Class? The Authority of Interpretive Communities. Harvard: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar
Gilhus, I. S. (1997). Laughing Gods, Weeping Virgins. Laughter in the History of Religions. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
(2011). Why did Jesus laugh? Laughing in Biblical-Demiurgical Texts. In H. Geybels & W. Van Herck (Eds.), Humour and Religion: Challenges and Ambiguities (pp.123–140). London: Continuum.Google Scholar
(2018). Historiography as Anti-History: Reading Nag Hammadi Codex II. Archiv für Religionsgeschichte, 22, 77–90. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goldstein, R. and G. Stroumsa (2007). The Greek and Jewish origins of docetism: a new proposal. Zeitschrift für Antikes Christentum, 10 (3), 423–441. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grant, R. M. (1959). Gnostic Origins and the Basilidians of Irenaeus. Vigiliae Christianae, 13, 121–125. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Halliwell, S. (2008). Greek Laughter. A Study of Cultural Psychology from Homer to the Early Christian Church. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lorenz, K. (1963). Das sogennante Böse: Zur Naturgechichte der Aggression. Wien: Dr. G.Borotha-Schoeler.Google Scholar
Lundhaug H. & L. Jenott (2015). The Monastic Origins of the Nag Hammadi Codices. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lundhaug  H. & L. Jenott (2018). Production, Distribution and Ownership of Books in the Monasteries of Upper Egypt: The Evidence of the Nag Hammadi Colophons. In L. I. Larsen and S. Rubenson (eds.), Monastic Education in Late Antiquity: The Transformation of Classical Paideia (pp.306–325). Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Painchaud, L. (2008). Polemical Aspects of the Gospel of Judas. In L. Painchaud (ed.), The Gospel of Judas in Context (pp.171–186). Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Rubio, F. B. (2008). L’ambiguïté du rire dans l’Évangile de Judas : les limites d’une Umwertung gnostique. In M. Scopello (Ed.), The Gospel of Judas in Context (pp.331–359). Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
(2009). Laughing at Judas: Conflicting Interpretations of a New Gnostic Gospel. In A. de Connick (Ed.), The Codex Judas Papers. Proceedings of the International Congress of Tchacos Codex held at Rice University, Houston Texas, March 13–16, 2008 (pp.153–180). Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Stroumsa, G. G. (2004). Christ’s Laughter: Docetic Origins Reconsidered. Journal of Early Christian Studies, 12 (3), 267–288. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Hooff, J. A. R. A. M. (1971). Aspects of the social behavior and communication in human and higher non-human primates. Rotterdam: Bronder-Offset, 17–187.Google Scholar