Cover not available
Part of
The Power of Satire
Edited by Marijke Meijer Drees and Sonja de Leeuw
[Topics in Humor Research 2] 2015
► pp. 19–32

Satire and dignity

This chapter examines satire from the target’s point of view: how to respond to satire without losing dignity? The power of satire lies in its capacity to challenge dignity, which threatens social position, political legitimacy and individual well-being. Analysing concrete examples of satire, the essay reviews the merits, risks and limitations of possible responses: laugh, joke back, argue, retaliate, show anger, or withdraw. The capacity to respond with dignity is not distributed evenly: not everyone has the resources to do so. Moreover, there is not always consensus on what counts as a dignified response. In today’s increasingly diverse and globalised societies, this makes satire increasingly contested and risky, but also an increasingly important domain for intercultural encounters and negotiations.
Published online: 22 October 2015
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/thr.2.02kui
References (24)
References
Andersen, Hans C. 2005. The Stories of Hans Christian Andersen: A New Translation from the Danish. Edited and Translated by Diana Crone Frank and Jeffrey Frank. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Bell, Nancy. 2009. “Responses to Failed Humor.” Journal of Pragmatics 41: 1825–1836. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Billig, Michael. 2005. Laughter and Ridicule. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Brillenburg Wurth, Kiene. 2011. “Spitting Image and Pre-televisual Political Satire.” Image & Narrative 12(3): 13–36.Google Scholar
Condren, Conal. 2012. “Satire and Definition.” HUMOR: International Journal of Humor Research 25(4): 375–399. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Condren, Conal, Jessica Milner Davis, Sally McCausland and Robert Phiddian. 2008. “Defining Parody and Satire: Australian Copyright Law and Its New Exception, Part Two.” Media and Arts Law Review 13(4): 401–421.Google Scholar
Ginsborg, Paolo. 2006. Silvio Berlusconi. Television, Power and Patrimony. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Goatly, Andrew. 2012. Meaning and Humour. Cambridge: Cambridge UP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gray, Jonathan. 2009. “Throwing Out the Welcome Mat: Public Figures as Guests and Victims in TV Satire.” In Satire TV, ed. by Gray et al. New York: NYU Press, 147–166.Google Scholar
Gray, Jonathan, Jeffrey Jones and Ethan Thompson. 2009. Satire TV: Politics and Comedy in the Post-network era. New York: NYU Press.Google Scholar
Haugh, Michael. 2010. “Jocular Mockery, (Dis)Affiliation and Face.” Journal of Pragmatics 42(8): 2106–2119. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hay, Jennifer. 2001. “The Pragmatics of Humor Support.” Humor: International Journal of Humor Research 14(1): 55–82. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kuipers, Giselinde. 2006. Good Humor, Bad Taste: A Sociology of the Joke. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2008. “The Sociology of Humor.” In Primer of Humor Research, ed. by Victor Raskin, 365–402. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2011. “The Politics of Humour in the Public Sphere: Cartoons, Power and Modernity in the First Transnational Humour Scandal.” European Journal of Cultural Studies 14(1): 63–80. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lockyer, Sharon and Michael Pickering (eds.). 2006. Beyond the Joke. London: Palgrave MacMillan.Google Scholar
McAleer, Kevin. 1997. Dueling: The Cult of Honor in Fin-de-Siècle Germany. Princeton: Princeton UP.Google Scholar
Meijer Drees, Maaike and Ivo Nieuwenhuis. 2010. “De macht van satire: grenzen testen, grenzen stellen.” [The Power of Satire: Testing Boundaries, Setting Boundaries]. Nederlandse letterkunde 15: 193–220. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Oring, Eliott. 2003. Engaging Humor. Champaign: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Simpson, Paul. 2003. The Discourse of Satire: Towards a Stylistic Model of Satirical Humour. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Test, George. 1980. “The Roast: American Ritual Satire and Humor.” In Rituals and Ceremonies in Popular Culture, ed. by Ray B. Browne, 160–177. Bowling Green: Popular Press.Google Scholar
Vaguelsy, Jean-Michel. 2006. Coluche roi de coeur. [Coluche King of Hearts]. Paris: Plon.Google Scholar
Waters, Clare. 2011. “Being Berlusconi: Sabina Guzzanti’s Impersonation of the Italian Prime Minister Between Stage and Screen.” In Studies in Political Humour, ed. by Diana Popa and Villy Tsakona. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 167–189. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zajdman, Anat. 1995. “Humorous Face-threatening Acts: Humor as Strategy.” Journal of Pragmatics 23: 325–339. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (7)

Cited by seven other publications

Holm, Nicholas
2024. Humour versus dignity in the public sphere . The European Journal of Humour Research 12:1 ► pp. 41 ff. DOI logo
Kuipers, Giselinde & Dick Zijp
2024. Humour and the public sphere. The European Journal of Humour Research 12:1 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Yehorova, Olesia, Antonina Prokopenko & Anna Zinchenko
2023. Towards a typology of humorous wartime tweets. The European Journal of Humour Research 11:1 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Birolini, Christophe
2022. “Some people work a bit more than me, and so we tease them”: the production of an elite student community in an elite French higher education institution. HUMOR 35:1 ► pp. 5 ff. DOI logo
Kuipers, Giselinde
2022. Humour, risk and religion. In Humour in the Beginning [Topics in Humor Research, 10], ► pp. 4 ff. DOI logo
Nieuwenhuis, Ivo & Dick Zijp
2022. The politics and aesthetics of humour in an age of comic controversy. European Journal of Cultural Studies 25:2 ► pp. 341 ff. DOI logo
Ziegele, Marc & Pablo B. Jost
2020. Not Funny? The Effects of Factual Versus Sarcastic Journalistic Responses to Uncivil User Comments. Communication Research 47:6 ► pp. 891 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.