Part of
The Power of SatireEdited by Marijke Meijer Drees and Sonja de Leeuw
[Topics in Humor Research 2] 2015
► pp. 33–46
Edited by Marijke Meijer Drees and Sonja de Leeuw
[Topics in Humor Research 2] 2015
► pp. 33–46
The Authenticity of Play
Satiric Television's Challenge to Authorative Discourses
Employing the heuristic of space, target, media, rhetoric, and time, this chapter reexamines US scholarship on contemporary television satire. What we see repeatedly are struggles over what constitutes legitimate and illegitimate forms of public speech, language, and actions within televisual and non-televisual spaces. Satire has emerged, employing various forms of fakery and a rhetoric of play, to challenge the representative roles that politicians and news media have claimed for themselves, including the language of authority that undergirds their positions of power. Play and fakery invite popular participation and direct forms of representation, including across media forms. Finally, satire, parody and irony are seen as more authentic forms of public language and critique in an age dominated by the professionally packaged and managed discourses employed by politicians and commercial forces.
References
Baym, Geoffrey
2010 From Cronkite to Colbert: The Evolution of Broadcast News. Boulder: Paradigm.
Baym, Geoffrey and Jeffrey P. Jones
2012 News Parody and Political Satire Across the Globe. London: Routledge.
Bennett, Lance, Reginia Lawrence and Steven Livingson
2008 When the Press Fails: Political Power and the News Media from Iraq to Katrina. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Carlson, Matt and Jason T. Peifer
2013 “The Impudence of Being Earnest: Jon Stewart and the Boundaries of Discursive Responsibility.” Journal of Communication 63(2): 333–350. 
Chouliaraki, Lilie
2010 “Self-mediation: New Media and Citizenship.” Critical Discourse Studies 7(4): 227–232.
Coleman, Stephen
2005 “The Lonely Citizen: Indirect Representation in an Age of Networks.” Political Communication 22: 197–214.
Day, Amber
2011 Satire and Dissent: Interventions in Contemporary Political Debate. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Delwiche, Aaron and Jennifer Jacobs Henderson
2012 The Participatory Cultures Handbook. New York: Routledge.
Ettema, James S. and Theodore L. Glasser
1998 Custodians of Conscience: Investigative Journalism and Public Virtue. New York: Columbia University Press.
Gray, Jonathan
2005 Watching with The Simpsons: Television, Parody, and Intertextuality. London: Routledge.
2009 “Throwing Out the Welcome Mat: Public Figures as Guests and Victims in TV Satire.” In Satire TV: Politics and Comedy in the Post-Network Era, ed. by Jonathan Gray, Jeffrey P. Jones and Ethan Thompson, 147–166. New York: NYU Press.
Gray, Jonathan, Jeffrey P. Jones and Ethan Thompson
(eds.) 2009 Satire TV: Politics and Comedy in the Post-Network Era. New York: NYU Press.
Harrington, Stephen
2014 Australian TV News: New Forms, Functions, and Futures. Intellect, Ltd.
Hart, Roderick P. and Joanne Hartelius
2007 “The Political Sins of Jon Stewart.” Critical Studies in Media Communication 24(3): 263–272.
Hartley, John
2010 “Silly Citizenship.” Critical Discourse Studies 7(4): 233–248.
Jenkins, Henry
2009 “Why Mitt Romney Won’t Debate a Snowman.” In Satire TV: Politics and Comedy in the Post-Network Era, ed. by Jonathan Gray, Jeffrey P. Jones and Ethan Thompson, 187–209. New York: NYU Press.
Jenkins, Henry, Sam Ford and Joshua Green
2013 Spreadable Media: Creating Value and Meaning in a Networked Culture. New York: NYU Press.
Jones, Jeffrey P
2005 Entertaining Politics: New Political Television and Civic Culture. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
2010 Entertaining Politics: Satiric Television and Political Engagement. 2nd ed. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
2012 “Parody, Performativity, and Play: The Reinvigoration of Citizenship through Political Satire.” In A Companion to New Media Dynamics, ed. by John Hartley, Jean Burgess and Axel Bruns, 396–406. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
2013a “Presidential Campaigns as Cultural Events: The Convergence of Politics and Popular Culture in Election 2012.” In The 2012 Presidential Campaign: A Communication Perspective, ed. by Robert E. Denton, Jr, 115–130. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
2013b “Toward a New Vocabulary for Political Communication Research.” International Journal of Communication 7: 510–530.
Jones, Jeffrey P., Geoffrey Baym and Amber Day
2012 “Mr. Stewart and Mr. Colbert Go to Washington: Television Satirists Outside the Box.” Social Research 79(1): 33–60.
Linkins, Jason
McClennen, Sophia A
2011 Colbert’s America: Satire and Democracy. New York: Palgrave McMillan.
Meikle, Graham
2008 “Whacking Bush: Tactical Media as Play.” In Digital Media and Democracy, ed. by Megan Boler, 367–382. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Morris, Meaghan and Paul Patton
(eds.) 1979 Michel Foucault: Power, Truth, Strategy. Sydney: Feral Publications.
Rorty, Richard
1989 Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Silverstone, Roger
1999 Why Study the Media? Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Test, George A
1991 Satire: Spirit and Art. Tampa: University of South Florida Press.
Tinic, Serra
2009 “Speaking ‘Truth’ to Power? Television Satire, Rick Mercer Report, and the Politics of Place and Space.” In Satire TV: Politics and Comedy in the Post-Network Era, ed. by Jonathan Gray, Jeffrey P. Jones and Ethan Thompson, 167–186. New York: NYU Press.
Van Zoonen, Liesbet
2012 “
I-pistemology: Changing Truth Claims in Popular and Political Culture.” European Journal of Communication 27(3): 56–67.