Cover not available
Part of
The Dynamics of Interactional Humor: Creating and negotiating humor in everyday encounters
Edited by Villy Tsakona and Jan Chovanec
[Topics in Humor Research 7] 2018
► pp. 283–304

Chapter 12
Positive non-humorous effects of humor on the internet

| University of Alicante
In this chapter, the term (non-)intended non-propositional effect is proposed and applied to the kind of feeling, emotion, impression, etc. that internet humorous texts generate in the user beyond the proposition-centered humor, and which may not be tightly connected to the act of communication. These effects may be intended as part of the effects of the discourse being interpreted, but the main interest of this Chapter lies in those non-propositional effects which are non-intended, and hence not part of humorous communication proper, but nevertheless leak from humorous communication. These non-propositional, non-humorous and non-intended effects may provide reward to the users at different levels and add to the eventual relevance (or even constitute the main relevance) of internet-based humorous texts.
Keywords: cyberpragmatics, relevance theory, contextual constraint, non-propositional effect, internet humor
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction: Cognitive pragmatics and relevance theory
  • 2.Humor, internet and relevance
  • 3.Extended relevance-theoretic research
    • 3.1Extended humor research
    • 3.2Extended cyberpragmatic research
  • 4.Non-humorous effects as positive (non-)intended non-propositional effects on the internet
    • 4.1Positive non-propositional effects at personal level
    • 4.2Positive non-propositional effects at interactive level
      • 4.2.1Value of an environment for interactions
      • 4.2.2Exploitation of shared discursive conventions
      • 4.2.3Encouragement of participation and interaction
    • 4.3Positive non-propositional effects at medium-sized group level
      • 4.3.1Marker of group boundaries and membership
      • 4.3.2Awareness of shared knowledge within group
      • 4.3.3Group bonding and solidarity
      • 4.3.4Feelings of being valuable/valued to/by one’s community
    • 4.4Positive non-propositional effects at large-sized group level
      • 4.4.1Cultural specificity of processing information
      • 4.4.2Mutual awareness of broad values
  • 5.Concluding remarks
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 5 January 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/thr.7.12yus
References (60)
References
Baran, Anneli. (2012). Visual humor on the internet. In Liisi Laineste, Dorota Brzozowska & Wladyslaw Chłopicki (Eds.), Estonia and Poland: Creativity and change in cultural communication. Vol. 1: Jokes and humor (pp. 144–158). Tartu: EKM Teaduskirjastus.Google Scholar
Baym, Nancy K. (1995). The performance of humor in computer-mediated communication. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 1(2).Google Scholar
Bormann, Ernest G. (1972). Fantasy and rhetorical vision: The rhetorical criticism of social reality. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 58(4), 396–407. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boxman-Shabtai, Lillian & Shifman, Limor. (2015). When ethnic humor goes digital. New Media & Society, 17(4), 520–539. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cappelli, Gloria. (2008). “Expats’ Talk”: Humor and irony in an expatriate’s travel blog. Textus, 21(1), 1–26.Google Scholar
Chen, Shih-We. (2014). Baozou manhua (rage comics), internet humor and everyday life. Continuum, 28(5), 690–708. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chovanec, Jan. (2011). Humor in quasi-conversations: Constructing fun in online sports journalism. In Marta Dynel (Ed.), The pragmatics of humor across discourse domains (pp. 243–264). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2012). Conversational humor and joint fantasizing in online journalism. In Jan Chovanec & Isabel Ermida (Eds.), Language and humor in the media (pp. 139–162). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
Clark, Billy. (2013). Relevance theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gorny, Eugene. (2009). More than humor: Jokes from Russia as a mirror of Russian life. In Gerard Goggin & Mark McLelland (Eds.), Internationalizing internet studies. Beyond Anglophone paradigms (pp. 79–95). Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hancock, Jeffrey T. (2004). LOL: Humor online. Interactions, 11(5), 57–58. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Holcomb, Christopher. (1997). A class of clowns: Spontaneous joking in computer-assisted discussions. Computers and Composition, 14(1), 3–18. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Holton, Avery E. & Lewis, Seth C. (2011). Journalists, social media, and the use of humor on Twitter. Electronic Journal of Communication, 21(1–2).Google Scholar
Hübler, Mike T. & Bell, Diana C. (2003). Computer-mediated humor and ethos: Exploring threads of constitutive laughter in online communities. Computers and Composition, 20(3), 277–294. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kurtzberg, Terri R., Naquin, Charles E. & Belkin, Liuba Y. (2009). Humor as a relationship-building tool in online negotiations. International Journal of Conflict Management, 20(4), 377–397. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Laineste, Liisi. (2013). Funny or aggressive? Failed humor in internet comments. Folklore, 53, 29–46.Google Scholar
Locher, Miriam A. & Bolander, Brook. (2015). Humor in microblogging. Exploiting linguistic humor strategies for identity construction in two Facebook focus groups. In Marta Dynel & Jan Chovanec (Eds.), Participation in Public and Social Media Interactions (pp. 135–155). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Maíz-Arévalo, Carmen. (2013). “Just click ‘Like’”: Computer-mediated responses to Spanish compliments. Journal of Pragmatics, 51, 47–67. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2015). Jocular mockery in computer-mediated communication: A contrastive study of a Spanish and English Facebook community. Journal of Politeness Research, 11(2), 289–327. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mak, Chun N. (2014). Humor, Small Talk, and the Construction of Identity and Power in Workplace Instant Messaging. PhD Thesis. Hong Kong: The Chinese University of Hong Kong.Google Scholar
Marone, Vittorio. (2015). Online humor as a community-building cushioning glue. European Journal of Humor Research, 3(1), 61–83. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meyer, John C. (2000). Humor as a double-edged sword: Four functions of humor in communication. Communication Theory, 10(3), 310–331. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Miller, Vincent. (2008). New media, networking and phatic culture. Convergence, 14(4), 387–400. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Miltner, Kate M. (2014). “There’s no place for lulz on LOLCats”: The role of genre, gender, and group identity in the interpretation and enjoyment of an internet meme. First Monday, 19(8). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moalla, Asma. (2015). Incongruity in the generation and perception of humor on Facebook in the aftermath of the Tunisian revolution. Journal of Pragmatics, 75, 44–52. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Norrick, Neal R. (2003). Issues in conversational joking. Journal of Pragmatics, 35(9), 1333–1359. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pennington, Natalie & Hall, Jeffrey A. (2014). An analysis of humor orientation on Facebook: A lens model approach. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 27(1), 1–21. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shifman, Limor & Lemish, Dafna. (2010). Between feminism and fun(ny)mism. Analyzing gender in popular internet humor. Information, Communication & Society, 13(6), 870–891. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2011). ‘‘Mars and Venus’’ in virtual space: Post-feminist humor and the internet. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 28(3), 253–273. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sperber, Dan & Wilson, Deirdre. (1995). Relevance: Communication and Cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Tay, Geniesa. (2012). Embracing LOLitics: Popular culture, online political humor, and play. MA Thesis. Canterbury: University of Canterbury.Google Scholar
Vandregriff, Ilona. (2010). Humor and play in CMC. In Rotimi Taiwo (Ed.), Handbook of research on discourse behavior and digital communication: Language structures and social interaction (pp. 235–251). Hershey, NY: IGI Global. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wilson, Deirdre & Sperber, Dan. (2004). Relevance theory. In Laurence R. Horn & Gregory Ward (Eds.), Handbook of pragmatics (pp. 607–632). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
. (2012). Relevance and meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yus, Francisco. (2001). Ciberpragmática. El uso del lenguaje en internet [Cyberpragmatics. The use of language on the internet]. Barcelona: Ariel.Google Scholar
. (2003). Humor and the search for relevance. Journal of Pragmatics, 35(9), 1295–1331. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2004). Pragmatics of humorous strategies in El club de la comedia . In Rosina Márquez-Reiter & María Elena Placencia (Eds.), Current trends in the pragmatics of Spanish (pp. 319–344). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2006). Relevance theory. In Keith Brown (Ed.), Encyclopedia of language and linguistics (2nd edition), volume 10 (pp. 512–519). Amsterdam: Elsevier. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2007). Virtualidades Reales. Nuevas Formas de Comunidad en la Era de internet. Alicante: University of Alicante, Servicio de Publicaciones.Google Scholar
. (2008). A relevance-theoretic classification of jokes. Lodz Papers in Pragmatics, 4(1), 131–157. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2010a). Ciberpragmática 2.0. Nuevos usos del lenguaje en internet [Cyberpragmatics 2.0. New uses of language on the internet]. Barcelona: Ariel.Google Scholar
. (2010b). Relevance theory. In Bernd Heine & Heiko Narrog (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Analysis (pp. 679–701). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
. (2011a). Cyberpragmatics. Internet-mediated communication in context. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2011b). Relevance equations of effective internet communication. In B. Pennock & F. Suau (Eds.), Interdisciplinarity and languages. Current issues in research, teaching, professional applications and ICT (pp. 65–86). Berlin: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
. (2012). Strategies and effects in humorous discourse. The case of jokes. In B. Eizaga Rebollar (Ed.), Studies in linguistics and cognition (pp. 271–296). Berlin: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
. (2013a). An inference-centered analysis of jokes: The Intersecting Circles Model of humorous communication. In L. Ruiz Gurillo & B. Alvarado (Eds.), Irony and humor: From pragmatics to discourse (pp. 59–82). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2013b). Analyzing jokes with the Intersecting Circles Model of humorous communication. Lodz Papers in Pragmatics, 9(1), 3–24. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2013c). Cyberpragmatics. In Carol A. Chapelle (Ed.), The encyclopedia of applied linguistics. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
. (2014a). Turismo móvil: Discurso, interactividad y usabilidad en las ‘apps’ de turismo [Mobile tourism: Discourse, interactivity and usability in the ‘apps’ for tourism]. Paper presented at Discurso y Géneros del Turismo 2.0. Valencia (Spain): University of Valencia and IULMA, April.
. (2014b). La seducción de lo no codificado [The seduction of what’s not coded]. Paper presented at Intermedialidad en la Lengua y la Literatura Hispánicas. Coloquio Internacional. Lausanne: Université de Lausanne (Switzerland), October.
. (2014c). Not all emoticons are created equal. Linguagem em (Dis)curso, 14(3), 511–529. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2015a). The role of cognition and relevance in new digital narratives. In Elena Carpi (Ed.), Prospettive multilingue e interdisciplinari nel discorso specialistico (pp. 81–107). Pisa (Italy): Pisa University Press.Google Scholar
. (2015b). Should relevance theory analyse what is non-propositional, non-intentional but yet affects the eventual relevance? Paper presented at the Relevance Round Table Meeting 4. Kraków: Institute of English Studies, Jagiellonian University of Kraków, September.
. (2015c). The discursive management of the phatic internet (and how to explain it pragmatically). Paper presented at Approaches to Digital Discourse Analysis (ADDA). Valencia (Spain), November.
. (2015d). Broadening the (propositional) scope of pragmatics in order to address the (non-propositional) quality of humorous effects. Paper presented at the I Workshop on Advanced Studies of Humor and Gender (WASHUM). Alicante (Spain): University of Alicante, November.
. (2016a). Humor and relevance. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
. (2016b). Online identity: A (non)propositional account. Paper presented at EPICS VII. Seventh International Symposium on Intercultural, Cognitive and Social Pragmatics. Seville (Spain): Pablo de Olavide University, May 2016.
. (2017a). Relevance-theoretic treatments of humor. In Salvatore Attardo (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of language and humor. (pp. 189–203). Abingdon: Routledge.
. (2017b). Incongruity-resolution cases in jokes. Lingua, 197, 103–122.
. (2017c). Contextual constraints and non-propositional effects in WhatsApp communication. Journal of Pragmatics, 114, 66–86.
Cited by (9)

Cited by nine other publications

Iliescu-Gheorghiu, Catalina
2023. Translating humour in children’s theatre for (unintended) diasporic audiences. The European Journal of Humour Research 11:2 ► pp. 142 ff. DOI logo
Jiang, Qingsheng, Yansheng Mao & Zhou-min Yuan
2023. Where there is panic, the media are close by. Pragmatics and Society 14:4 ► pp. 611 ff. DOI logo
Mullan, Kerry
2022. On the "Dark Side". The European Journal of Humour Research 10:2 ► pp. 96 ff. DOI logo
Xie, Chaoqun, Francisco Yus & Hartmut Haberland
2021. Introduction. In Approaches to Internet Pragmatics [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 318], ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Yus, Francisco
2018. Identity-related issues in meme communication. Internet Pragmatics 1:1 ► pp. 113 ff. DOI logo
Yus, Francisco
2021. Pragmatics, humour and the internet. Internet Pragmatics 4:1 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Yus, Francisco
2021. Chapter 3. Cyberpragmatics in the age of locative media. In Approaches to Internet Pragmatics [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 318], ► pp. 75 ff. DOI logo
Yus, Francisco
2023. Beyond Humour: Relevant Affective Effects. In Pragmatics of Internet Humour, ► pp. 309 ff. DOI logo
Yus, Francisco
2024. ‘We won the World Cup!’: Collective Identity Among Argentinians Commenting Online. In Evaluating Identities Online, ► pp. 187 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.