Playing with Mental Models

Humour in the BBC comedy series The Office

| FH Dortmund University of Applied Sciences and Arts
ISBN 9789027205599 | EUR 99.00 | USD 149.00
ISBN 9789027261137 | EUR 99.00 | USD 149.00
In this book, the author uses a mental-model theory of communication to investigate the acclaimed British situation comedy The Office. The approach taken is multi-disciplinary, and focuses on questions as:
What are mental models and what role do they play in communication in general, and in creating and watching The Office in particular?
Whose mental models are involved in creating and watching The Office? How do these mental models relate to each other?
How exactly do the creators of The Office and their audience engage in constructing, exchanging and coordinating mental models?
How do mental models and their comic use relate to humour and humour theories and what is the nature of play in the deployment of mental models in comedy?
The book is aimed at humour scholars from various backgrounds and at people interested in communication in general.
[Topics in Humor Research, 9]  2020.  xv, 301 pp.
Publishing status: Available
Table of Contents
Chapter 1. Introduction
Chapter 2. Constructing mental models
Chapter 3. Properties of mental models
Chapter 4. Mental models and The Office
Chapter 5. Humour theories and mental models (1)
Chapter 6. Humour theories and mental models (2)
Chapter 7. Playing with private mental models
Chapter 8. Playing with presenting public mental models
Chapter 9. Playing with negotiating public mental models
Chapter 10. Character personalities
Chapter 11. Concluding remarks


2002Office, The Review – I could catch a Monkey! http://​reviews​.ddns​.net​/204237​.html. Accessed 1 September 2014.
Adler, Nancy J.
1986International dimensions of organizational behavior. Kent Pub. Co., Boston, Mass. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Apter, Michael J.
1982aFawlty Towers: A Reversal Theory Analysis of A Popular Television Comedy Series. The Journal of Popular Culture 16 (3), 128–138. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1982bThe experience of motivation: The theory of psychological reversals. Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
1984Reversal Theory, Cognitive Synergy and the Arts, In: Crozier, W. R., Chapman, Anthony J. (Eds.), Cognitive Processes in the Perception of Art. Elsevier, pp. 411–426. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1989Reversal theory: A new approach to motivation, emotion and personality. Anuario de psicología 42 (3), 19–29.Google Scholar
1991A structural phenomenology of play, In: Kerr, John H., Apter, Michael J. (Eds.), Adult play: A reversal theory approach. Swets & Zeitlinger, pp. 13–29.Google Scholar
2013Developing reversal theory: Some suggestions for future research. Journal of Motivation, Emotion, and Personality 1, 1–8.Google Scholar
Apter, Michael J., Desselles, Mitzi
2012Disclosure humor and distortion humor: A reversal theory analysis. Humor–International Journal of Humor Research 25 (4), 417–435. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Apter, Michael J., Smith, K. C. P.
1977Humour and the theory of psychological reversals, In: It’s a funny thing, humour. Proceedings of The International Conference on Humour and Laughter. Pergamon Press, Oxford, pp. 95–100. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Archakis, Argiris, Tsakona, Villy
2005Analyzing conversational data in GTVH terms: A new approach to the issue of identity construction via humor. Humor–International Journal of Humor Research 18 (1), 41–68. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Arnold, Ben, Aroesti, Rachel, Bakare, Lanre, Bish, Joe, Golby, Joel, Jodelka, Filipa, Lyne, Charlie, MacInnes, Paul, Mumford, Gwilym, Parkinson, Hannah J., Sampson, Issy, Richards, Sam
2014From Python to Seinfeld–are these 12 classic comedies still funny? They’re known as “comedy gold” – but are they? Really? Our critics cast an unsentimental eye over 12 from the hall of fame. The Guardian, October 25.Google Scholar
Arundale, Robert B.
2008Against (Gricean) intentions at the heart of human interaction. Intercultural Pragmatics 5 (2), 229–258. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012On understandings of communication: A response to Wedgwood. Intercultural Pragmatics 9 (2), 137–159. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Attardo, Salvatore
1994Linguistic theories of humor. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin.Google Scholar
2001Humorous texts: A semantic and pragmatic analysis. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin, New York. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2002Cognitive stylistics of humorous texts, In: Semino, Elena, Culpeper, Jonathan (Eds.), Cognitive stylistics. Language and cognition in text analysis. John Benjamins, Amsterdam, Philadelphia, pp. 231–250. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2008A primer for the linguistics of humor, In: Raskin, Victor (Ed.), The Primer of Humor Research, vol. 8. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin, New York, pp. 101–156. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2015Humor and laughter, In: Tannen, Deborah, Hamilton, Heidi E., Schiffrin, Deborah (Eds.), The Handbook of Discourse Analysis, 2nd ed. John Wiley & Sons, Inc, Hoboken, NJ, USA, pp. 168–188.Google Scholar
Attardo, Salvatore, Raskin, Victor
1991Script theory revis(it)ed: joke similarity and joke representation model. Humor–International Journal of Humor Research 4 (3–4), 293–347.Google Scholar
Bain, Alexander
1875The emotions and the will. Longmans, Green, and Co., London.Google Scholar
Baker, Chris L., Saxe, Rebecca, Tenenbaum, Joshua B.
2009Action understanding as inverse planning. Cognition 113 (3), 329–349. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bara, Bruno G.
2011Cognitive pragmatics: The mental processes of communication. Intercultural Pragmatics 8 (3), 443–485. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bardon, Adrian
2005The philosophy of humor, In: Charney, Maurice (Ed.), Comedy. A geographic and historical guide. Praeger, Westport, Conn, pp. 462–476.Google Scholar
Bargh, John A., Chartrand, Tanya L.
1999The unbearable automaticity of being. American psychologist 54 (7), 462–479. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Barnett, Lynn
1990Playfulness: Definition, design, and measurement. Play & Culture 3, 319–336.Google Scholar
Baron-Cohen, Simon
2001Theory of mind in normal development and autism. Prisme 34, 174–183.Google Scholar
Baron-Cohen, Simon, Leslie, Alan M., Frith, Uta
1985Does the autistic child have a “theory of mind”? Cognition 21 (1), 37–46. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Barrett, Deirdre
2010Supernormal stimuli: How primal urges overran their evolutionary purpose. W.W. Norton & Co., New York, London.Google Scholar
Barsalou, Lawrence W.
(1999): Perceptual symbol systems. In Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22, pp. 577–660.Google Scholar
Bateson, Gregory
1953The position of humor in human communication, In: Foerster, Heinz v. (Ed.), Cybernetics. Josiah Macy Jr. Foundation, New York, pp. 1–47.Google Scholar
2011The Office: 10th Anniversary Edition. BBC Worldwide, London.Google Scholar
Bednarek, Monika
2010The language of fictional television: Drama and identity. Continuum, London, New York.Google Scholar
Bell, Nancy
2009aImpolite responses to failed humor, In: Norrick, Neal R., Chiaro, Delia (Eds.), Humor in interaction. John Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp. 143–165. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bell, Nancy D.
2006Interactional adjustments in humorous intercultural communication. Intercultural Pragmatics 3 (1), 1–28. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2009bResponses to failed humor. Journal of Pragmatics 41 (9), 1825–1836. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bell, Nancy D., Attardo, Salvatore
2010Failed humor: Issues in non-native speakers’ appreciation and understanding of humor. Intercultural Pragmatics 7 (3), 423–447. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bergen, Benjamin K.
2007Experimental methods for simulation semantics, In: Gonzalez-Marquez, Monica, Mittelberg, Irene, Coulson, Seana, Spivey, Michael J. (Eds.), Methods in cognitive linguistics. John Benjamins, Amsterdam, Philadelphia, pp. 277–301. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012Louder than words: The new science of how the mind makes meaning. Basic Books, New York, NY.Google Scholar
Bergen, Benjamin, Coulson, Seana
2006Frame-shifting humor in simulation-based language understanding. IEEE Intelligent Systems 21 (2), 59–62.Google Scholar
Bergson, Henri
1900/2002Le rire: Essai sur la signification du comique. J.-M. Tremblay, Chicoutimi.Google Scholar
1911Laughter: an essay on the meaning of the comic. Authorized translation by Cloudesley Brereton and Fred Rothwell. MacMillan, New York. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Billig, Michael
2005Laughter and ridicule: Towards a social critique of laughter. SAGE, London, Thousand Oaks.Google Scholar
Bilmes, Alex
2015Heeeere’s Ricky! http://​www​.rickygervais​.com​/gqapr06​.php. Accessed 27 October 2018.
Birdwhistell, Ray L.
1968Kinesics: Inter- and intra-channel communication research. Social science Information 7 (6), 9–24. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1970Kinesics and context: Essays on body motion communication. University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Booth, Simon
2007Inspirational variations? Culture and leadership in England, In: Chhokar, Jagdeep S., Brodbeck, Felix C., House, Robert J. (Eds.), Culture and leadership across the world. The GLOBE book of in-depth studies of 25 societies. Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ, pp. 335–359.Google Scholar
Boyd, Brian
2004Laughter and Literature: A Play Theory of Humor. Philosophy and Literature 28 (1), 1–22. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2009On the origin of stories: Evolution, cognition, and fiction. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Boyd, Robert, Richerson, Peter J.
2009Culture and the evolution of human cooperation. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London 364 (1533), 3281–3288. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Boyer, Pascal
2001Religion explained: The human instincts that fashion gods, spirits and ancestors. Heinemann, London.Google Scholar
Bratman, Michael
1987Intention, plans, and practical reason. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
Brock, Alexander
2004Blackadder, Monty Python und Red Dwarf: Eine linguistische Untersuchung britischer Fernsehkomödien. Stauffenburg, Tübingen.Google Scholar
2006 [1996]Wissensmuster im humoristischen Diskurs. Ein Beitrag zur Inkongruenztheorie anhand von Monty Python’s Flying Circus, In: Kotthoff, Helga (Ed.), Scherzkommunikation. Beiträge aus der empirischen Gesprächsforschung. Verlag für Gesprächsforschung, Radolfzell, pp. 21–48.Google Scholar
2009Humour as a Metacommunicative Process. Journal of Literary Theory 3 (2), 177–193. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2015Participation frameworks and participation in televised sitcom, candid camera and stand-up comedy, In: Dynel, Marta, Chovanec, Jan (Eds.), Participation in public and social media interactions. John Benjamins, Amsterdam, Philadelphia, pp. 27–47.Google Scholar
2016The borders of humorous intent – The case of TV comedies. Journal of Pragmatics 95, 58–66. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Penelope, Fraser, Colin
1979Speech as a marker of situation, In: Scherer, Klaus R., Giles, Howard (Eds.), Social markers in speech. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 33–62.Google Scholar
Brown, Penelope, Levinson, Stephen C.
1978Universals in language usage: Politeness phenomena, In: Goody, Esther N. (Ed.), Questions and politeness: Strategies in social interaction. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 56–311.Google Scholar
1987Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Stuart L., Vaughan, Christopher C.
2009Play: How it shapes the brain, opens the imagination, and invigorates the soul. Avery, New York.Google Scholar
Burgoon, Judee K.
1993Interpersonal Expectations, Expectancy Violations, and Emotional Communication. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 12 (1–2), 30–48. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Burgoon, Judee K., Ebesu Hubbard, Amy S.
2005Cross-cultural and intercultural applications of expectancy violations theory and interaction adaptation theory, In: Gudykunst, William B. (Ed.), Theorizing about intercultural communication. SAGE, Thousand Oaks, Calif, pp. 149–171.Google Scholar
Byrne, Donn, Clore, Gerald L.
1970A reinforcement model of evaluative responses. Personality: An international journal 1 (2), 103–128.Google Scholar
Byrne, Donn E.
1971The attraction paradigm. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Byrne, Ruth M. J.
2002Mental models and counterfactual thoughts about what might have been. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 6 (10), 426–431. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cantor, Joanne R., Bryant, Jennings, Zillmann, Dolf
1974Enhancement of humor appreciation by transferred excitation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 30 (6), 812–821. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Carrell, Amy
2008Historical views of humor, In: Raskin, Victor (Ed.), The Primer of Humor Research. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin, New York, pp. 303–332. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Castelli, Fulvia, Happé, Francesca, Frith, Uta, Frith, Chris D.
2000Movement and mind: a functional imaging study of perception and interpretation of complex intentional movement patterns. Neuro Image 12 (3), 314–325.Google Scholar
Chafe, Wallace L.
2007The importance of not being earnest: The feeling behind laughter and humor. John Benjamins, Amsterdam, Philadelphia. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Charniak, Eugene, Goldman, Robert P.
1990Plan recognition in stories and in life, In: Henrion, Max, Kanal, Laveen N., Lemmer, John F., Shachter, Ross D. (Eds.), Uncertainty in artificial intelligence 5. North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 343–352. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chhokar, J. S., Brodbeck, F. C., House, R. J.
(Eds.) 2007Culture and leadership across the world: The GLOBE book of in-depth studies of 25 societies. Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chothia, Jean
1978Forging a Language: A Study of Plays of Eugene O’Neill. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Clark, Andy
2013Whatever next? Predictive brains, situated agents, and the future of cognitive science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 36 (3), 181–204. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Clark, Herbert H.
1996Using language. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Clark, Herbert H., Brennan, Susan E.
1991Grounding in communication. Perspectives on socially shared cognition 13, 127–149. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Clark, Herbert H., Fox Tree, Jean E.
2002Using uh and um in spontaneous speaking. Cognition 84 (1), 73–111. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Clark, Herbert H., Krych, Meredyth A.
2004Speaking while monitoring addressees for understanding. Journal of Memory and Language 50 (1), 62–81. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Colle, Livia, Becchio, Cristina, Bara, Bruno G.
2008The non-Problem of the other minds: A neurodevelopmental perspective on shared intentionality. Human Development 51 (5–6), 336–348. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Condon, John W., Crano, William D.
1988Inferred evaluation and the relation between attitude similarity and interpersonal attraction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 54 (5), 789–797. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Coulson, Seana
2001Semantic leaps: Frame-shifting and conceptual blending in meaning construction. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2015Frame-shifting and frame semantics: Joke comprehension on the space structuring model, In: Brône, Geert, Feyaerts, Kurt, Veale, Tony (Eds.), Cognitive linguistics and humor research. De Gruyter Mouton, Berlin, pp. 167–190. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Creeber, G., Miller, T., Tulloch, J.
(Eds.) 2001The television genre book. BFI, London.Google Scholar
(Eds.) 2008The television genre book, 2. ed. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke.Google Scholar
Damasio, Antonio R.
1994Descartes’ error: Emotion, reason, and the human brain. Avon Books, New York.Google Scholar
2000The feeling of what happens: Body and emotion in the making of consciousness. Harcourt, San Diego.Google Scholar
2010Self comes to mind: Constructing the conscious brain. Pantheon Books, New York.Google Scholar
Davies, Catherine E.
1984Joint joking: Improvisational humorous episodes in conversation, in: Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society. Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society. University of California Press, Berkeley, pp. 360–371.Google Scholar
de Jongste, Henri
2013Negotiating humorous intent, In: Dynel, Marta (Ed.), Developments in linguistic humour theory. John Benjamins, Amsterdam, Philadelphia, pp. 179–210. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2016Mental models and humorous intent. Journal of Pragmatics 95, 107–119. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2017Culture and incongruity in The Office (UK). Language & Communication 55, 88–99. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2018Mental models, humorous texts and humour evaluation. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 16 (1), 98–128. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dennett, Daniel C.
1987The intentional stance. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
Dennett, Daniel C., Haugeland
1987Intentionality, In: Gregory, Richard L. (Ed.), The Oxford Companion to the Mind. Oxford University Press, Oxford, New York, pp. 383–386.Google Scholar
Dunbar, Robert I. M.
2014Mind the gap: or why humans aren’t just great apes, In: Dunbar, Robert I. M., Gamble, Clive, Gowlett, John A. J. (Eds.), Lucy to language. The benchmark papers, First edition. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 3–18. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Duranti, A.
2010Husserl, intersubjectivity and anthropology. Anthropological Theory 10 (1–2), 16–35. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dynel, M., Chovanec, J.
(Eds.) 2015Participation in public and social media interactions. John Benjamins, Amsterdam, Philadelphia. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dynel, Marta
2008Introduction to Special Issue on Humour: A Modest Attempt at Presenting Contemporary Linguistic Approaches to Humour Studies. Lodz Papers in Pragmatics 4 (1), 1–12. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2009aBeyond a Joke: Types of Conversational Humour. Language and Linguistics Compass 3 (5), 1284–1299. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2009bHumorous garden-paths: A pragmatic-cognitive study. Cambridge Scholars Publishing, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.Google Scholar
2010Not hearing things – Hearer/listener categories in polylogues. mediAzioni 9, http://​mediazioni​.sitlec​.unibo​.it.
2011aRevisiting Goffman’s postulates on participant statuses in verbal interaction. Language and Linguistics Compass 5 (7), 454–465. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011bStranger than Fiction? A Few Methodological Notes on Linguistic Research in Film Discourse. Brno Studies in English 37 (1). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011c“You talking to me?” The viewer as a ratified listener to film discourse. Journal of Pragmatics 43 (6), 1628–1644. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012Garden Paths, Red Lights and Crossroads: On Finding Our Way to Understanding the Cognitive Mechanisms. Israeli Journal of Humor Research 1 (1), 6–28.Google Scholar
2013Humorous phenomena in dramatic discourse. European Journal of Humour Research 1 (1), 22–60. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2014On the part of ratified participants: Ratified listeners in multi-party interactions. Brno Studies in English 40 (1), 27–44. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2016With or without intentions: Accountability and (un)intentional humour in film talk. Journal of Pragmatics 95, 67–78. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2017But seriously: On conversational humour and (un)truthfulness. Lingua 179, 83–102. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dynel, Marta, Brock, Alexander, de Jongste, Henri
2016A burgeoning field of research: Humorous intent in interaction. Journal of Pragmatics 95, 51–57. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Enfield, N. J., Levinson, S. C.
(Eds.) 2006Roots of human sociality: Culture, cognition and interaction. Berg, Oxford, New York.Google Scholar
Enfield, Nicholas J.
2006Social consequences of common ground, In: Enfield, Nicholas J., Levinson, Stephen C. (Eds.), Roots of human sociality: Culture, cognition and interaction. Berg, Oxford, New York, pp. 399–430.Google Scholar
2008Common ground as a resource for social affiliation, In: Kecskés, István, Mey, Jacob (Eds.), Intention, common ground and the egocentric speaker-hearer. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin, New York, pp. 223–254.Google Scholar
Ermida, Isabel
2008The language of comic narratives: Humor construction in short stories. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin et al. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Erten-Buch, Christiane, Fischer, Anja
2001Englische Kulturstandards aus österreichischer Sicht, In: Fink, Gerhard, Meierewert, Sylvia (Eds.), Interkulturelles Management. Österreichische Perspektiven. Springer, Wien, New York, pp. 17–33. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Evans, Dylan
2001Emotion: The science of sentiment. Oxford University Press, Oxford, New York.Google Scholar
Eysenck, Hans J.
1942The appreciation of humour: An experimental and theoretical study. British Journal of Psychology. General Section 32 (4), 295–309.Google Scholar
Fauconnier, Gilles
1985Mental spaces: Aspects of meaning construction in natural language. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
1997Mappings in thought and language. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K., New York, NY, USA. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fauconnier, Gilles, Turner, Mark
2002The way we think: Conceptual blending and the mind’s hidden complexities. Basic Books, New York, NY.Google Scholar
Ferraro, Gary P., Briody, Elizabeth K.
2013The cultural dimension of global business, 7th ed. Pearson, Boston.Google Scholar
Festinger, Leon
1957A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford University Press, Stanford, Calif.Google Scholar
Firth, J. R.
1957Papers in linguistics: 1934–1951. Oxford University Press, London, New York.Google Scholar
Flamson, Thomas, Barrett, H. C.
2008The encryption theory of humor: A knowledge-based mechanism of honest signaling. Journal of Evolutionary Psychology 6 (4), 261–281. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Flamson, Thomas J., Bryant, Gregory A.
2013Signals of humor, In: Dynel, Marta (Ed.), Developments in linguistic humour theory. John Benjamins, Amsterdam, Philadelphia, pp. 49–74. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Flood, Michael
2013Male and female sluts. Australian Feminist Studies 28 (75), 95–107. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Forabosco, Giovannantonio
1992Cognitive aspects of the humor process: the concept of incongruity. Humor–International Journal of Humor Research 5 (1–2), 45–68.Google Scholar
2008Is the concept of incongruity still a useful construct for the advancement of humor research? Lodz Papers in Pragmatics 4 (1), 45–62. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fox, Kate
2005Watching the English: The hidden rules of English behaviour. Hodder and Stoughton, London.Google Scholar
Freud, Sigmund
1928Humor. International Journal of Psychoanalysis 9, 1–6.Google Scholar
1970 [1905]Der Witz und seine Beziehung zum Unbewußten. S. Fischer Verlag, Frankfurt am Main.Google Scholar
Friedl, John, Pfeiffer, John E.
1977Anthropology: the study of people. Harper’s College Press, New York.Google Scholar
Fry, William
1963Sweet madness: A study of humor. Pacific Books, Palo Alto. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gallese, Vittorio, Goldman, Alvin
1998Mirror neurons and the simulation theory of mind-reading. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2 (12), 493–501. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gallese, Vittorio, Keysers, Christian, Rizzolatti, Giacomo
2004A unifying view of the basis of social cognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 8 (9), 396–403. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Garfinkel, Harold
1967Studies in ethnomethodology. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.Google Scholar
Gaut, Berys N.
1998Just Joking: The Ethics and Aesthetics of Humor. Philosophy and Literature 22 (1), 51–68. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gervais, Ricky
2012As ‘The Office’ Ends, Ricky Gervais Spills Secrets From the Show’s Start. The Wall Street Journal, September 6.Google Scholar
Gervais, Ricky, Merchant, Stephen
2003aThe office: The scripts, series 1. BBC Worldwide, London.Google Scholar
2003bThe office: The scripts, series 2. BBC Worldwide, London.Google Scholar
Giora, Rachel
1999On the priority of salient meanings: Studies of literal and figurative language. Journal of Pragmatics 31 (7), 919–929. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goffman, Erving
1955On face-work: An analysis of ritual elements in social interaction. Psychiatry: Journal for the Study of Interpersonal Processes 18 (3), 213–231. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1967Interaction ritual; essays on face-to-face behavior. Doubleday, Garden City, N. Y.Google Scholar
1971 [1959]The presentation of self in everyday life. Penguin Books, Harmondsworth, Middlesex.Google Scholar
1981Forms of talk. University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Gordon, Gwen
2009What is Play?: In search of a universal definition, In: Kuschner, David S. (Ed.), From children to red hatters. Diverse images and issues of play. University Press of America, Lanham, pp. 1–13.Google Scholar
Gordon, Mordechai
2012Exploring the Relationship between Humor and Aesthetic Experience. The Journal of Aesthetic Education 46 (1), 110–121. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gosling, Samuel D., Ko, Sei J., Mannarelli, Thomas, Morris, Margaret E.
2002A room with a cue: Personality judgments based on offices and bedrooms. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 82 (3), 379–398. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Graham, Lindsay T., Sandy, Carson J., Gosling, Samuel D.
2011Manifestations of individual differences in physical and virtual environments, In: Chamorro-Premuzic, Tomas, von Stumm, Sophie, Furnham, Adrian (Eds.), The Wiley-Blackwell Handbook of Individual Differences. Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford, UK, pp. 773–800.Google Scholar
Greve, Peter F.
2015The role of prediction in mental processing: A process approach. New Ideas in Psychology 39, 45–52. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Grice, H. P.
1957Meaning. The philosophical review 66 (3), 377–388. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1975Logic and conversation, In: Cole, Peter, Morgan, Jerry L. (Eds.), Syntax and semantics. Volume 3: Speech acts. Academic Press, New York, pp. 22–40.Google Scholar
Gruner, Charles R.
1978Understanding laughter: The workings of wit & humor. Nelson-Hall, Chicago.Google Scholar
1997The game of humor: A comprehensive theory of why we laugh. Transaction Publishers, New Brunswick, N.J.Google Scholar
Haidt, Jonathan
2001The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychological Review 108 (4), 814–834. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hall, Edward T.
1959The silent language: An anthropologist reveals how we communicate by our manners and behavior. Doubleday, Garden City NY.Google Scholar
1969The hidden dimension: An anthropologist examines man’s use of space in public and in private. Anchor, Garden City, NY.Google Scholar
1976Beyond culture. Anchor, Garden City, NY.Google Scholar
1984The dance of life: The other dimension of time. Anchor, Garden City, N.Y.Google Scholar
Hamilton, Antonia F. de C.
2009Research review: Goals, intentions and mental states: challenges for theories of autism. Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines 50 (8), 881–892. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hammer, M. R., Nishida, H., Wiseman, R. L.
1996The Influence of Situational Prototypes on Dimensions of Intercultural Communication Competence. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 27 (3), 267–282. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Han, The A., Moniz Pereira, Luís
2013State-of-the-Art of Intention Recognition and its use in Decision Making. A Research Summary. AI Communication Journal 26 (2), 237–246.Google Scholar
Haslett, Beth
1987Communication: strategic action in context. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, N.J.Google Scholar
Haugh, Michael
2008Intention in pragmatics. Intercultural Pragmatics 5 (2), 99–110. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2009Intention(ality) and the conceptualization of communication in pragmatics. Australian Journal of Linguistics 29 (1), 91–113. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012On understandings of intention: A response to Wedgwood. Intercultural Pragmatics 9 (2), 161–194. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013Speaker meaning and accountability in interaction. Journal of Pragmatics 48 (1), 41–56. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hawkins, Jeff, Blakeslee, Sandra
2004On intelligence. Times Books, New York.Google Scholar
Hay, Jennifer
2001The pragmatics of humor support. Humor–International Journal of Humor Research 14 (1), 55–82. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heider, Fritz, Simmel, Marianne
1944An Experimental Study of Apparent Behavior. The American Journal of Psychology 57 (2), 243–259. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Henricks, Thomas S.
2009Play and the rhetorics of time: Progress, regression, and the meanings of the present, In: Kuschner, David S. (Ed.), From children to red hatters. Diverse images and issues of play. University Press of America, Lanham, pp. 14–38.Google Scholar
Hickok, Gregory
2014The myth of mirror neurons: The real neuroscience of communication and cognition. Norton, New York.Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas
1640The Elements of Law Natural and Politic. http://​www​.constitution​.org​/th​/elements​.htm. Accessed 8 December 2013.
Hofstede, Geert H.
1980Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values. SAGE, Beverly Hills, Calif.Google Scholar
1991Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind. McGraw-Hill, London, New York.Google Scholar
Hofstede, Geert H., Hofstede, Gert J., Minkov, Michael
2010Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind: intercultural cooperation and its importance for survival, 3rd ed. McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
Hohwy, Jakob
2013The predictive mind. Oxford University Press, Oxford, New York. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Holland, John H., Holyoak, Keith J., Nisbett, Richard E., Thagard, Paul R.
1989Induction: Processes of inference, learning, and discovering. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Holmes, Janet, Marra, Meredith
2002Having a laugh at work. Journal of Pragmatics 34 (12), 1683–1710. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Holmes, Jonathan
2015The Office named best TV show of the past 20 years. RadioTimes, February 5.Google Scholar
House, Robert J., Hanges, Paul J., Javidan, Mansour, Dorfman, Peter W., Gupta, Vipin
2011Culture, leadership, and organizations: The GLOBE study of 62 societies, 5th ed. SAGE, Thousand Oaks et al.Google Scholar
Hurley, Matthew M., Dennett, Daniel C., Adams, Reginald B.
2011Inside jokes: Using humor to reverse-engineer the mind. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Husserl, Edmund
1985Texte zur Phänomenologie des inneren Zeitbewusstseins (1893–1917). F. Meiner Verlag, Hamburg.Google Scholar
Hyde, Marina
2016Farage is now Britain’s face at the EU: petty, unlovable, essentially terrified. The Guardian, June 28.Google Scholar
Hymes, Dell H.
1974Foundations in sociolinguistics: An ethnographic approach. University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Iacoboni, Marco
2009aImitation, Empathy, and Mirror Neurons. Annual Review of Psychology 60, 653–670. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2009bMirroring people: The science of empathy and how we connect with others. Farrar, Straus and Giroux, New York.Google Scholar
Jacob, Pierre
2010Intentionality, In: Zalta, Edward N. (Eds.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Fall 2010 ed.Google Scholar
Johansson, Gunnar
1973Visual perception of biological motion and a model for its analysis. Perception & psychophysics 14 (2), 201–211. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Johnson-Laird, Philip N.
1983Mental models: Towards a cognitive science of language, inference, and consciousness. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
1980Mental models in cognitive science. Cognitive Science 4 (1), 71–115. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jorgensen, Julia
1996The functions of sarcastic irony in speech. Journal of Pragmatics 26 (5), 613–634. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kahneman, Daniel
2011Thinking, fast and slow. Farrar Straus and Giroux, New York, NY.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel
2000/1790Critique of the power of judgment. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kecskés, István
2010The paradox of communication: Socio-cognitive approach to pragmatics. Pragmatics and Society 1 (1), 50–73. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2014Intercultural pragmatics. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Kendon, Adam
1973The role of visible behavior in the organization of social interaction, In: Cranach, Mario v., Vine, Jan (Eds.), Social communication and movement. Academic Press, London and New York, pp. 29–74.Google Scholar
1980Gesticulation and speech: Two aspects of the process of utterance, In: Key, Mary R. (Ed.), The relationship of verbal and nonverbal communication. Walter de Gruyter, pp. 207–227.Google Scholar
Kerr, J. H., Apter, M. J.
(Eds.) 1991Adult play: A reversal theory approach. Swets & Zeitlinger.Google Scholar
Khemlani, Sunny
2006 – presentMental models & reasoning. Princeton University. http://​mentalmodels​.princeton​.edu. Accessed 6 March 2017.
Koestler, Arthur
1964The act of creation. Pan Books, London.Google Scholar
Kotthoff, H.
(Ed.) 2006a [1996]Scherzkommunikation: Beiträge aus der empirischen Gesprächsforschung. Verlag für Gesprächsforschung, Radolfzell.Google Scholar
Kotthoff, Helga
2006Pragmatics of performance and the analysis of conversational humor. Humor–International Journal of Humor Research 19 (3). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2006b [1996]Vorwort, In: Kotthoff, Helga (Ed.), Scherzkommunikation. Beiträge aus der empirischen Gesprächsforschung. Verlag für Gesprächsforschung, Radolfzell, pp. 7–20.Google Scholar
2009Joint Construction of Humorous Fictions in Conversation. An Unnamed Narrative Activity in a Playful Keying. Journal of Literary Theory 3 (2), 195–218.Google Scholar
Kozak, Megan N., Marsh, Abigail A., Wegner, Daniel M.
2006What do I think you’re doing? Action identification and mind attribution. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 90 (4), 543–555. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kozic, Milena
2012Framing communication as play in the sitcom: Patterning the verbal and the nonverbal in humour, In: Chovanec, Ján, Ermida, Isabel (Eds.), Language and humour in the media. Cambridge Scholars Publ, Newcastle, pp. 107–138.Google Scholar
Krach, Sören, Cohrs, Jan C., de Echeverría Loebell, Nicole Cruz, Kircher, Tilo, Sommer, Jens, Jansen, Andreas, Paulus, Frieder M.
2011Your flaws are my pain: linking empathy to vicarious embarrassment. PLoS ONE 6 (4), e18675. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kress, Gunther R.
2010Multimodality: A social semiotic approach to contemporary communication. Routledge, London, New York.Google Scholar
Krikmann, Arvo
2006Contemporary linguistic theories of humour. Folklore 33, 27–58.Google Scholar
Kuipers, Giselinde
2006Good humor, bad taste: A sociology of the joke. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin, New York. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Laanen, Judith
2015Weekendtips: Missie Aarde, avant-garde kunst en muziekdocumentaires. NRC, January 9.Google Scholar
Lakoff, George
1987Cognitive models and prototype theory. In Ulric Neisser (Ed.): Concepts and conceptual development. Ecological and intellectual factors in categorization. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 63–100.Google Scholar
Lakoff, George, Johnson, Mark
1980Metaphors we live by. Chicago, London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Latta, Robert L.
1998The basic humor process. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin.Google Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C.
1988Putting linguistics on a proper footing: Explorations in Goffman’s participation framework, In: Drew, Paul, Wootton, Anthony (Eds.), Erving Goffman. Exploring the interaction order. Polity Press, Oxford, pp. 161–227.Google Scholar
2006aCognition at the heart of human interaction. Discourse Studies 8 (1), 85–93. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2006bOn the human “interaction engine”, In: Enfield, Nicholas J., Levinson, Stephen C. (Eds.), Roots of human sociality: Culture, cognition and interaction. Berg, Oxford, New York, pp. 39–69.Google Scholar
Lim, Tae-Seop, Bowers, John W.
1991Facework Solidarity, Approbation, and Tact. Human Communication Research 17 (3), 415–450. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Liu, Leigh A., Dale, Claudia
2009Using mental models to study cross-cultural interactions, In: Nakata, Cheryl (Ed.), Beyond Hofstede. Culture frameworks for global marketing and management. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, New York, pp. 222–244. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Livingstone, Sonia
2013Making sense of television: The psychology of audience interpretation. Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Malle, Bertram F.
2002The relation between language and theory of mind in development and evolution, In: Givón, Talmy, Malle, Bertram F. (Eds.), The evolution of language out of pre-language. John Benjamins, Amsterdam, Philadelphia, pp. 265–284. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2004How the mind explains behavior: Folk explanations, meaning, and social interaction. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011Attribution theories: How people make sense of behavior, In: Chadee, Derek (Ed.), Theories in social psychology. John Wiley & Sons, Malden, MA, Oxford, pp. 72–95.Google Scholar
Marszalek, Agnes
2013“It’s not funny out of context!”: A cognitive stylistic approach to humorous narratives, In: Dynel, Marta (Ed.), Developments in linguistic humour theory. John Benjamins, Amsterdam, Philadelphia, pp. 393–421. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Martin, Rod A.
2007The psychology of humor: An integrative approach. Elsevier, Amsterdam. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Matsumoto, David
2007Culture, Context, and Behavior. Journal of Personality 75 (6), 1285–1320. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mayerhofer, Bastian, Schacht, Annekathrin
2013Garden path jokes, In: Dynel, Marta (Ed.), Developments in linguistic humour theory. John Benjamins, Amsterdam, Philadelphia, pp. 341–366. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McAdams, Dan P.
2006The role of narrative in personality psychology today. Narrative Inquiry 16 (1), 11–18. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McGhee, Paul E.
1979Humor: Its origin and development. Freeman, San Francisco.Google Scholar
Meyer, John C.
2000Humor as a Double-Edged Sword: Four Functions of Humor in Communication. Communication Theory 10 (3), 310–331. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Miles, Lynden K., Karpinska, Katarzyna, Lumsden, Joanne, Macrae, C. N.
2010The meandering mind: vection and mental time travel. PLoS ONE 5 (5), e10825. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mills, Brett
2004Comedy verite: contemporary sitcom form. Screen 45 (1), 63–78. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2005Television sitcom. BFI, London.Google Scholar
2009The sitcom. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Milner Davis, Jessica
2014Bergson’s theory of the comic, In: Attardo, Salvatore (Ed.), Encyclopedia of humor studies, I. SAGE, Los Angeles, US [u.a.], pp. 77–80.Google Scholar
Minsky, Marvin
1975A framework for representing knowledge, In: Winston, Patrick Henry, Horn, Berthold K. P. (Eds.), The psychology of computer vision. McGraw-Hill, New York, pp. 211–281.Google Scholar
Mitchell, David
2016Does Amber Rudd hate foreigners, or does she hate us? Guardian, October 9.Google Scholar
Mole, John
2003Mind your manners: Managing business cultures in the new global Europe, 3rd ed. Nicholas Brealey Pub., London, Yarmouth, Me.Google Scholar
Moore, C., Dunham, P. J.
(Eds.) 1995Joint attention: Its origins and role in development. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, N.J.Google Scholar
Morreall, J.
(Ed.) 1987aThe Philosophy of laughter and humor. State University of New York Press, Albany.Google Scholar
Morreall, John
1983Taking laughter seriously. State University of New York, Albany.Google Scholar
1987bIntroduction, In: Morreall, John (Ed.), The Philosophy of laughter and humor. State University of New York Press, Albany, pp. 1–7.Google Scholar
2009aComic Relief: A Comprehensive Philosophy of Humor. Wiley-Blackwell, Chicester. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2009bHumor as Cognitive Play. Journal of Literary Theory 3 (2), 241–260. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2016Philosophy of Humor, In: Edward N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Winter 2016 ed. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University.Google Scholar
Morris, Desmond
1967The naked ape. McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
Morry, Marian M.
2005Relationship satisfaction as a predictor of similarity ratings: A test of the attraction-similarity hypothesis. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships 22 (4), 561–584. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Muir, Hugh, Kettle, Martin, Ryan, Frances, Travis, Alan
2016Michael Gove launches Tory leadership bid: ‘Whatever charisma is, I don’t have it’. The Guardian, July 1.Google Scholar
Németh T., Eniko
2008Verbal information transmission without communicative intention. Intercultural Pragmatics 5 (2), 153–176.Google Scholar
Nerhardt, Göran
1970Humor and inclination to laugh: emotional reactions to stimuli of Emotional Reactions to Stimuli of Different Divergence from a Range of Expectancy. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology 11, 185–195. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nishida, Hiroko
1999A cognitive approach to intercultural communication based on schema theory. International Journal of Intercultural Relations 23 (5), 753–777. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2005Cultural schema theory, In: Gudykunst, William B. (Ed.), Theorizing about intercultural communication. SAGE, Thousand Oaks, Calif, pp. 401–418.Google Scholar
Norrick, N. R., Chiaro, D.
(Eds.) 2009Humor in interaction. John Benjamins, Amsterdam. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Norrick, Neal R.
2009A Theory of Humor in Interaction. Journal of Literary Theory 3 (2), 261–283. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Norrick, Neal R., Spitz, Alice
2010The interplay of humor and conflict in conversation and scripted humorous performance. Humor–International Journal of Humor Research 23 (1), 83–111. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Norris, Sigrid
2004Analyzing multimodal interaction: A methodological framework. Routledge, New York, London. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nuyts, Jan
2000Intentionality, In: Verschueren, Jef, Östman, Jan-Ola (Eds.), Key Notions for Pragmatics. John Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp. 1–17.Google Scholar
Oberman, Lindsay M., Ramachandran, Vilayanur S.
2007The simulating social mind: The role of the mirror neuron system and simulation in the social and communicative deficits of autism spectrum disorders. Psychological Bulletin 133 (2), 310–327. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Oring, Elliott
2016Joking asides: The theory, analysis, and aesthetics of humor. Utah State University Press, Logan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Palmer, Jerry
1994Taking humour seriously. Routledge, London, New York. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Panksepp, Jaak
1998Affective neuroscience: The foundations of human and animal emotions. Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Pessoa, Luiz
2008On the relationship between emotion and cognition. Nature reviews. Neuroscience 9 (2), 148–158. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013Cognitive-emotional brain: From interactions to integration. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Piazza, R., Bednarek, M., Rossi, F.
(Eds.) 2011Telecinematic discourse: Approaches to the language of films and television series. John Benjamins, Amsterdam, Philadelphia. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pien, Diana, Rothbart, Mary K.
1976Incongruity and resolution in children’s humor: A re-examination. Child Development 47 (4), 966–971. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Premack, David, Woodruff, Guy
1978Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 1 (4), 515–526. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Priego-Valverde, Béatrice
2009Failed humor in conversation: A double voicing analysis, In: Norrick, Neal R., Chiaro, Delia (Eds.), Humor in interaction. John Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp. 165–184. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ramachandran, V. S.
2011The tell-tale brain: A neuroscientist’s quest for what makes us human. W. W. Norton, New York.Google Scholar
Ramachandran, V. S., Blakeslee, Sandra
1999Phantoms in the brain: Human nature and the architecture of the mind. Fourth Estate, London.Google Scholar
Raskin, Victor
1985Semantic mechanisms of humor. Reidel, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
Ritchie, Graeme D.
1999Developing the Incongruity-Resolution Theory. Proceedings of AISB Symposium on Creative Language: Stories and Humour, Edinburgh, April 1999, 78–85.Google Scholar
2004The linguistic analysis of jokes. Routledge, London, New York. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2009Variants of Incongruity Resolution. Journal of Literary Theory 3 (2), 313–332. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rizzolatti, Giacomo, Fadiga, Luciano, Fogassi, Leonardo, Gallese, Vittorio
2002From mirror neurons to imitation, In: Meltzoff, Andrew N., Prinz, Wolfgang (Eds.), The imitative mind. Development, evolution, and brain bases. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K, New York, pp. 247–266. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ruch, Willibald
1998Foreword and overview: Sense of humor: A new look at an old concept, In: Ruch, Willibald (Ed.), The sense of humor. Explorations of a personality characteristic, vol. 3. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin, New York, pp. 3–14. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rumelhart, David E., Smolenksy, P., McClelland, James L., Hinton, Geoffrey E.
1986Schemata and sequential processes in PDP models, In: McClelland, James L., Rumelhart, David E. (Eds.), Parallel distributed processing. Explorations in the microstructure of cognition. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass, pp. 7–57.Google Scholar
Sacks, Harvey
1974An analysis of the course of a joke’s telling in conversation, In: Bauman, R., Sherzer, J. (Eds.), Explorations in the Ethnography of Speaking. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 337–353.Google Scholar
Saussure, Ferdinand de
1989 [1916]Cours de linguistique générale: Édition critique par Rudolf Engler. Otto Harrassowitz Verlag, Wiesbaden.Google Scholar
Schank, Roger C., Abelson, Robert P.
1977Scripts, plans, goals and understanding: An inquiry into human knowledge structures. L. Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, N.J, New York.Google Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A., Sacks, Harvey
1973Opening up closings. Semiotica 8 (4), 289–327. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schmid, Stefan, Thomas, Alexander
2003Beruflich in Großbritannien: Trainingsprogramm für Manager, Fach- und Führungskräfte. Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, Göttingen.Google Scholar
Schnurr, Stephanie
2010Humour, In: Locher, Miriam A., Graham, Sage L. (Eds.), Interpersonal pragmatics, vol. 6. De Gruyter Mouton, Berlin, New York, pp. 307–326.Google Scholar
Schopenhauer, Arthur
1909/1844The World As Will And Idea. Translated from the German by R. B. Haldane, M.A. and J. Kemp, M.A. Kegan Paul, Trench, Trübner & Co., London.Google Scholar
Schou, Andreas
2012Myötähäpeä: Vicarious embarrassment at another’s humiliation. https://​plus​.google​.com​/+AndreasSchou​/posts​/JZz19JwEY6E. Accessed 1 September 2014.
Schroll-Machl, Sylvia
2011Doing business with Germans: Their perception, our perception, 4th ed. Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, Göttingen.Google Scholar
Schwind, Kai H.
2015Like Watching a Motorway Crash: Exploring the Embarrassment Humor of The Office. Humor–International Journal of Humor Research 28 (1), 49–70. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Scollon, Ronald, Scollon, Suzanne B. K.
2001Intercultural communication: A discourse approach, 2nd edition ed. Blackwell, Oxford, UK, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
Searle, John R.
1983Intentionality: An essay in the philosophy of mind. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Shepherd, Stephen V.
2010Following gaze: gaze-following behavior as a window into social cognition. Frontiers in integrative neuroscience 4, 1–13.Google Scholar
Short, Mick
1981Discourse Analysis and the Analysis of Drama. Applied Linguistics II (2), 180–202. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1994Discourse analysis and drama, In: Asher, Richard E. (Ed.), The Encyclopedia of language and linguistics. Pergamon Press, Oxford, New York, pp. 949–952.Google Scholar
Shultz, Thomas R.
1972The role of incongruity and resolution in children’s appreciation of cartoon humor. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 13 (3), 456–477. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Spencer-Oatey, Helen
2000Rapport management: A framework for analysis, In: Spencer-Oatey, Helen (Ed.), Culturally speaking. Managing rapport through talk across cultures. Continuum, London, New York, pp. 11–46.Google Scholar
2002Managing rapport in talk: Using rapport sensitive incidents to explore the motivational concerns underlying the management of relations. Journal of Pragmatics 34 (5), 529–545. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2005(Im)politeness, face and perceptions of rapport: Unpackaging their bases and interrelationships. Journal of Politeness Research 1, 95–119. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2007Theories of identity and the analysis of face. Journal of Pragmatics 39 (4), 639–656. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sperber, Dan, Wilson, Deirdre
1986Relevance: Communication and cognition. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
1995Relevance: Communication and cognition, 2. ed. ed. Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
Suddendorf, Thomas, Corballis, Michael C.
1997Mental time travel and the evolution of the human mind. Genetic, social, and general psychology monographs 123 (2), 133–167.Google Scholar
2007The evolution of foresight: What is mental time travel, and is it unique to humans? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 30 (3), 299–313; discussion 313–51. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Suls, Jerry M.
1972A two-stage model for the appreciation of jokes and cartoons, In: Goldstein, Jeffrey H., McGhee, Paul E. (Eds.), The psychology of humor. Theoretical perspectives and empirical issues. Academic Press, New York, pp. 81–100. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1983Cognitive processes in humor appreciation, In: McGhee, Paul E., Goldstein, Jeffrey H. (Eds.), Handbook of humor research. Volume 1. Basic Issues. Springer, New York, pp. 39–57. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Swan, Deniselle
2006–2007Brentisms– My Thoughts on The Office UK. Blog, http://​brentisms​.blogspot​.de/.
Taillard, Marie-Odile
2002Beyond Communicative Intention. UCL Working papers in linguistics 14, 189–206.Google Scholar
Thomas, Alexander
1996Analyse der Handlungswirksamkeit von Kulturstandards, In: Thomas, Alexander (Ed.), Psychologie interkulturellen Handelns. Hogrefe, Göttingen, pp. 107–135.Google Scholar
Ting-Toomey, Stella
1994Face and facework: an introduction, In: Ting-Toomey, Stella (Ed.), The challenge of facework. Cross-cultural and interpersonal issues. State Univ. of New York Press, Albany, NY, pp. 1–14.Google Scholar
2005The matrix of face: An updated face-negotiation theory, In: Gudykunst, William B. (Ed.), Theorizing about intercultural communication. SAGE, Thousand Oaks, Calif, pp. 71–92.Google Scholar
Tomasello, Michael
1995Joint attention as social cognition, In: Moore, Chris, Dunham, Philip J. (Eds.), Joint attention. Its origins and role in development. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, N.J., pp. 103–130.Google Scholar
1999The cultural origins of human cognition. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
2003Constructing a Language: A Usage-based Theory of Language Acquisition. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
2009Why we cooperate. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010Origins of human communication. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass, London.Google Scholar
2014The ultra-social animal. European Journal of Social Psychology 44 (3), 187–194. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tomasello, Michael, Moll, Henrike
2010The gap is social: Human shared intentionality and culture, In: Kappeler, Peter M., Silk, Joan B. (Eds.), Mind the gap. Tracing the origins of human universals. Springer, Berlin, London, New York, pp. 331–349. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Toplak, Maggie, Katz, Albert N.
2000On the uses of sarcastic irony. Journal of Pragmatics 32 (10), 1467–1488. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Triezenberg, Katrina E.
2008Humor in literature, In: Raskin, Victor (Ed.), The Primer of Humor Research, vol. 8. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin, New York, pp. 523–542. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Trompenaars, Alfons, Hampden-Turner, Charles
1998Riding the waves of culture: Understanding cultural diversity in global business, 2nd ed. McGraw Hill, New York.Google Scholar
Tsakona, Villy
2013Okras and the metapragmatic stereotypes of humour, In: Dynel, Marta (Ed.), Developments in linguistic humour theory, vol. 1. John Benjamins, Amsterdam, Philadelphia, pp. 25–48. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
van Dijk, Teun A.
1984Prejudice in Discourse. John Benjamins, Amsterdam. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1987Communicating racism: Ethnic prejudice in thought and talk. Sage Publications, Inc., Newbury Park.Google Scholar
1992Discourse and the Denial of Racism. Discourse & Society 3 (1), 87–118. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1999Context models in discourse processing, In: van Oostendorp, Herre, Goldman, Susan R. (Eds.), The construction of mental representations during reading. L. Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, N.J, pp. 123–148.Google Scholar
2007Discourse and racism, In: Goldberg, David T., Solomos, John (Eds.), A companion to racial and ethnic studies. Blackwell, Malden, Mass., pp. 145–159.Google Scholar
2008Discourse and context: A sociocognitive approach. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2009Society and discourse: How social contexts influence text and talk. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2014Discourse and knowledge: A sociocognitive approach. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
van Dijk, Teun A., Kintsch, Walter
1983Strategies of discourse comprehension. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
van Leeuwen, Theo
2005Introducing Social Semiotics. Routledge, Abingdon, Oxon.Google Scholar
Ventis, Larry
2015Thinking fast and slow in the experience of humor. Humor–International Journal of Humor Research 28 (3), 351–373. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Verschueren, Jef
1999Understanding pragmatics. Arnold, London.Google Scholar
de Vignemont, Frederique, Singer, Tania
2006The empathic brain: how, when and why? Trends in Cognitive Sciences 10 (10), 435–441. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vischer, Jacqueline C.
2005Space meets status: Designing workplace performance. Routledge, London, New York.Google Scholar
Walters, Ben
2005The Office. BFI, London.Google Scholar
Warneken, Felix, Tomasello, Michael
2009The roots of human altruism. British journal of psychology 100, 455–471. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wegner, Daniel M.
1989White bears and other unwanted thoughts: Suppression, obsession, and the psychology of mental control. Viking, New York, N.Y.Google Scholar
Wellman, Henry M.
1992The child’s theory of mind. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
Willis, Kenneth George
2002Making sense of humour. Some pragmatic and political aspects. London: London Metropolitan University.Google Scholar
Wimmer, Heinz, Perner, Josef
1983Beliefs about beliefs: Representation and constraining function of wrong beliefs in young children’s understanding of deception. Cognition 13 (1), 103–128. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wodak, Ruth, Reisigl, Martin
2015Discourse and Racism, In: Tannen, Deborah, Hamilton, Heidi E., Schiffrin, Deborah (Eds.), The Handbook of Discourse Analysis, 2nd ed. John Wiley & Sons, Inc, Hoboken, NJ, USA, pp. 576–596.Google Scholar
Wyer, Robert S., Collins, James E.
1992A theory of humor elicitation. Psychological Review 99 (4), 663–688. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Xenakis, Ioannis, Arnellos, Argyris, Darzentas, John
2012The functional role of emotions in aesthetic judgment. New Ideas in Psychology 30 (2), 212–226. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Yentob, Alan
2013The misfit 2. http://​www​.bbc​.co​.uk​/programmes​/b01s9kcs. Accessed 24 June 2014.
Zacks, Jeffrey M., Kumar, Shawn, Abrams, Richard A., Mehta, Ritesh
2009Using movement and intentions to understand human activity. Cognition 112 (2), 201–216. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Žegarac, Vladimir
2009A cognitive pragmatic perspective on communication and culture, In: Kotthoff, Helga, Spencer-Oatey, Helen (Eds.), Handbook of intercultural communication. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin, pp. 31–53.Google Scholar
Zillmann, Dolf
1983Disparagement Humor, In: McGhee, Paul E., Goldstein, Jeffrey H. (Eds.), Handbook of humor research. Volume 1. Basic Issues. Springer, New York, pp. 85–107. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zillmann, Dolf, Stocking, S. H.
1976Putdown humor. Journal of Communication 26 (3), 154–163. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zwaan, Rolf A., Radvansky, Gabriel A.
1998Situation models in language comprehension and memory. Psychological Bulletin 123 (2), 162–185. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Subjects & Metadata

Communication Studies

Communication Studies
BIC Subject: JFD – Media studies
ONIX Metadata
ONIX 2.1
ONIX 3.0
U.S. Library of Congress Control Number:  2020007382 | Marc record