Chapter 9
Playing with negotiating public mental models
In the previous chapter, we saw how the collective senders of
The Office use the presentation of public mental
models as a resource for comedy. However, when they communicate, people do
more than merely presenting their public mental models to each other. They
also engage in a negotiation process aimed at establishing an overlap
between their public mental models. Such an overlap can serve as a basis for
further co-operation, under the condition that private mental models are
felt to be sufficiently similar and compatible as well. This aspect of
discursive behaviour, which includes offering the proper amount of
helpfulness to achieve a sufficient degree of similarity and compatibility,
and which includes the re-construction of private mental models, is another
source of comedy for the collective senders of The
Office. There are many scenes in the sitcom in which, for a
variety of reasons, the negotiating process stalls or fails, and no overlap
emerges. As in the previous chapter, we will look at diminishments in the
characters’ role performances in a telic state as well as in a para-telic
state that explain the lack of success. In addition, some scenes involve
characters in different meta-motivational states, which makes it impossible
to reach an overlap in mental models.
Article outline
- 9.1Diminishments in the co-ordination of public mental models – characters
in a telic meta-motivational state
- 9.1.1Managing access rights
- 9.1.2Finding a conversation topic
- 9.1.3Mind-reading
- 9.1.4Manipulative intent
- 9.1.5Overlap claims
- 9.1.6Mock co-operation
- 9.1.7Sabotage
- 9.1.8Lack of helpfulness as a display of power
- 9.1.9Lack of helpfulness as a display of a lack of interest
- 9.1.10Zooming in and out
- 9.2Diminishments in the co-ordination of public mental models – Characters
in different meta-motivational states
- 9.2.1Characters pretend to be in a telic state while in a para-telic
state
- 9.2.2Characters pretend to be in a para-telic state while in a telic
state
- 9.2.3Characters reverse from a para-telic state to a telic state
- 9.2.4Characters have opposite reversals
- 9.2.5Characters discuss a joke in a telic state – plus an inappropriate
reversal
- 9.2.6Character in para-telic state, but mock mental model may reflect
private mental model
- 9.2.7Character and some interactants in a para-telic state; butt and other
interactants in a telic state
- 9.3Diminishments in the co-ordination of public mental models – Characters
in a para-telic meta-motivational state
- 9.3.1Character’s mock mental model is not supported
- 9.3.2Character fails in maintaining a para-telic meta-motivational
state
- 9.3.3Mock mental models are contrived and lack plausibility
- 9.3.4Lack of common ground
- 9.3.5Dispute of ownership
- 9.3.6The consequences of failed humour
- 9.4Summary of the main arguments in this chapter
-
Notes