Cover not available
Part of
Pragmatic Development in First Language Acquisition
Edited by Danielle Matthews
[Trends in Language Acquisition Research 10] 2014
► pp. 87–104

Ontogenetic Constraints on Grice’s Theory of Communication

For a number of reasons Paul Grice’s account of the nature of intentional communication has often been supposed to be cognitively too complex to work as an account of the communicative interactions of pre-verbal children. Here I review a number of different formulations of this problem, and responses to this problem that others have developed. These include Relevance Theory (by Sperber and Wilson, Section 4.1.1), Pedagogy Theory (by Gergely and Csibra, Section 4.1.2), and recent work on Expressive Communication (by Green and Bar-On). I also discuss my own response to the challenge of Gricean communication (Section 4.2).

Published online: 26 June 2014
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/tilar.10.06moo
References
Akhtar, N., Carpenter, M., & Tomasello, M
(1996) The role of discourse novelty in early word learning. Child Development , 67, 635–645. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Apperly, I
(2011)  Mindreaders: The Cognitive Basis of ‘Theory of Mind’, (pp. 219). Hove: ­Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Apperly, I. & Butterfill, S
(2009) Do humans have two systems to track beliefs and belief-like states? Psychological Review , 116(4), 953–970. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bar-On, D
(2013) Origins of meaning: Must we ‘go Gricean’? Mind and Language , 28(3), ­342–375. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bar-On, D. & Green, M
(2010) Lionspeak: Communication, expression, and meaning. In J.R. O’Shea & E.M. Rubenstein (Eds.), Self, Language, and World: Problems from Kant, Sellars, and Rosenberg . Atascadero, CA: Ridgeview.Google Scholar
Bloom, P
(2000)  How Children Learn the Meanings of Words . Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Breheny, R
(2006) Communication and folk psychology. Mind & Language , 21(1), 74–107. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bucciarelli, M., Colle, L., & Bara, B.G
(2003) How children comprehend speech acts and communicative gestures. Journal of Pragmatics, 35(2), 207–241. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clark, H
(1996)  Using Language . Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Csibra, G
(2010) Recognizing communicative intentions in infancy. Mind & Language , 25(2), 141–168. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Csibra, G., & Gergely, G
(2009) Natural pedagogy. Trends in Cognitive Science , 13(4), 148–153. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gallagher, S
(2008) Inference or interaction: Social cognition without precursors. Philosophical Explorations , 11(3), 163–73. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ganea, P.A., & Saylor, M.M
(2007) Infants’ use of shared linguistic information to clarify ambiguous requests. Child Development , 78(2), 493–502. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gergely, G., & Csibra, G
(2005) The social construction of the cultural mind: Imitative learning as a mechanism of human pedagogy. Interaction Studies , 6(3), 463–481. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gergely, G., Egyed, K., & Király, I
(2007) On pedagogy. Developmental Science , 10(1), 139–146. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Glüer, K., & Pagin, P
(2003) Meaning theory and autistic speakers. Mind & Language , 18(1), 23–51. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gómez, J.C
(1994) Mutual awareness in primate communication: A Gricean approach. In S.T. Parker, R.W. Mitchell, & M.L. Boccia (Eds.), Self-Awareness in Animals and Humans . Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1996) Ostensive behaviour in great apes: the role of eye-contact. In A.E. ­Russon, K.A. Bard, & S.T. Parker (Eds.), Reaching into Thought: The Minds of the Great Apes . ­Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
(2004)  Apes, Monkeys, Children, and the Growth of Mind . Cambridge, MA: ­Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
(2007) Pointing behaviours in apes and human infants: A balanced interpretation. Child Development , 78(3), 729–734. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Green, M
(2007)  Self-Expression . Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grice, P
(1989)  Studies in the Way of Words . Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hobson, P
(2002)  The Cradle of Thought . London: Pan Macmillan.Google Scholar
Hutto, D
(2008)  Folk-Psychological Narratives: The Sociocultural Basis of Understanding Reasons . Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hutto, D. & Gallagher, S
(2008) Understanding others through primary interaction and narrative practice. In J. Zlatev, T.P. Racine, C. Sinha, & E. Itkonen, (Eds), The Shared Mind: Perspectives on Intersubjectivity (pp. 17–38). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leekam, S.R., Solomon, T.L. & Teoh, Y.-S
(2010) Adults’ social cues facilitate young children’s use of signs and symbols. Developmental Science , 13(1), 108–119. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leudar, I. & Costall, A
(2004) On the persistence of the ‘problem of other minds’ in psychology: Chomsky, Grice and ‘theory of mind’. Theory and Psychology , 14, 601–621. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levinson, S.C
(1989) A review of Relevance. Journal of Linguistics , 25, 455–472. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Liebal, K., Behne, T., Carpenter, M., & Tomasello, M
(2009) Infants use shared experience to interpret pointing gestures. Developmental Science , 12, 264–271. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Markman, E. & Wachtel, G
(1988) Children’s use of mutual exclusivity to constrain the meaning of words. Cognitive Psychology , 20, 121–157. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moore, R
(2013) Evidence and interpretation in great ape gestural communication. In M. ­Cappuccio (Ed.), Pointing: Where Embodied Cognition Meets the Symbolic Mind . Special issue of Humana.Mente , Journal of Philosphical Studies, 24, 27–51.Google Scholar
submitted). Enacting and understanding communicative intent.
Moore, R., Liebal, K., & Tomasello, M
(2013) Three-year-olds understand communicative intentions without language, gestures, or gaze. Interaction Studies , 14(1), 62–80. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Neale, S
(1992) Paul Grice and the philosophy of language. Linguistics & Philosophy , 15, 509–559. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Onishi, K., & Baillargeon, R
(2005) Do 15-month-old infants understand false beliefs? Science , 308(8), 255–258. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Perner, J., & Wimmer, H
(1985) “John thinks that Mary thinks that …”: Attribution of second order beliefs by 5-to-10-year-old children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology , 39, 437–471. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reddy, V
(2008)  How Infants Know Minds . Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Saylor, M.M., & Ganea, P.A
(2007) Infants interpret ambiguous requests for absent objects. Developmental Psychology , 43(3), 696–704. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schiffer, S
(1972)  Meaning . Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Schulze, C., Grassman, S., & Tomasello, M
forthcoming). Three year old children make relevance inferences in indirect verbal communication. Child Development . DOI logo.
Senju, A. & Csibra, G
(2008) Gaze following in human infants depends on communicative signals. Current Biology , 18, 668–671. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Southgate, V., Chevallier, C., & Csibra, G
(2010) Seventeen-month-olds appeal to false beliefs to interpret others’ referential communication. Developmental Science , 16, 907–912. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sperber, D., & Wilson, D
(1986)  Relevance: Communication and cognition . Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
(1995)  Relevance: Communication and Cognition (2nd edition). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
(2002) Pragmatics, modularity and mind-reading. Mind and Language , 17(1–2), 3–23. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Surian, L., Caldi, S., & Sperber, D
(2007) Attribution of beliefs by 13-month-old infants. Psychological Science , 18(7), 580–586. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tomasello, M
(2008)  Origins of Human Communication . Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Wimmer, H., & Perner, J
(1983) Beliefs about beliefs: Representation and constraining function of wrong beliefs in young children’s understanding of deception. Cognition , 13, 103–128. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wittgenstein, L
(1953)  Philosophical Investigations (3rd Ed.), trans. G.E.M. Anscombe. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Zahavi, D
(2005)  Subjectivity and Self: Investigating the First Person Perspective . Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 5 other publications

Fridland, Ellen & Richard Moore
2015. Imitation reconsidered. Philosophical Psychology 28:6 ► pp. 856 ff. DOI logo
Geurts, Bart & Paula Rubio‐Fernández
2015. Pragmatics and Processing. Ratio 28:4 ► pp. 446 ff. DOI logo
Mussavifard, Nima
2023. Metarepresenting in communication. Synthese 202:5 DOI logo
Planer, Ronald J. & Peter Godfrey‐Smith
2021. Communication and representation understood as sender–receiver coordination. Mind & Language 36:5 ► pp. 750 ff. DOI logo
Schulze, Cornelia, Gerlind Grosse & Markus Spreer
2018. Erwerb pragmatischer Fähigkeiten und mögliche Störungen (im Kindesalter). In Handbuch Pragmatik, ► pp. 177 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 11 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.