Article published in:
Pragmatic Development in First Language Acquisition
Edited by Danielle Matthews
[Trends in Language Acquisition Research 10] 2014
► pp. 239–260

“The elevator’s buttocks”

Metaphorical abilities in children

Classic studies suggest that metaphor production and comprehension are relatively late developing pragmatic skills, although it is not quite clear why this should be so. This chapter will first provide a sketch of the theoretical and adult processing accounts of metaphor before presenting an overview of the established findings on children’s metaphorical abilities that indicate that these are slow to emerge. The third section examines impeding factors to be taken into account when considering these data, while in the fourth it is argued, based on recent empirical evidence, that when these factors are eliminated, children display both early comprehension and production of metaphors. In the conclusion, I will point to some future directions of research emerging from this outline of the metaphor development landscape.
Published online: 26 June 2014
https://doi.org/10.1075/tilar.10.14pou
References
Amanzio, M., Geminiani, G., Leotta, D., & Cappa, S.
(2007) Metaphor comprehension in Alzheimer’s disease: Novelty matters. Brain and Language , 107(1), 1–10. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Asch, S. & Nerlove, H.
(1960) The development of double function terms in children: An exploratory investigation. In B. Kaplan & S. Wapner (Eds), Perspectives in Psychological Theory: Essays in Honor of Heinz Werner (pp. 47–60). New York, NY: International Universities Press.Google Scholar
Berger, F., & Höhle, B.
(2012) Restrictions on addition: Children’s interpretation of the focus particles auch (‘also’) and nur (‘only’) in German. Journal of Child Language , 39, 383–410. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Billow, R.
(1981) Observing spontaneous metaphor in children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology , 31(3), 430–45. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bloom, L.
(1973)  One Word at a Time: The Use of Single Word Utterances Before Syntax . The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Bloom, P.
(2000)  How Children Learn the Meaning of Words . Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Clark, E.V.
(2003)  First Language Acquisition . Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Carston, R.
(2010) Metaphor: Ad hoc concepts, literal meaning and mental images. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society , 110(3), 295–32. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cometa, M., & Eson, M.
(1978) Logical operations and metaphor interpretation: A piagetian model. Child Development , 49, 649–659. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Deamer, F.
(2013)  An Investigation into the Processes and Mechanisms Underlying the Comprehension of Metaphor and Hyperbole . Unpublished PhD dissertation. University College London.Google Scholar
Dryll, E.
(2009) Changes in metaphor comprehension in children. Polish Psychological Bulletin , 40(4), 201–212. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gentner, D.
(1977) If a tree had a knee, where would it be? Children’s performance on simple spatial metaphors. Papers and Reports on Child Language Development , 13, 157–164.Google Scholar
(1988) Structure-mapping in analogical development: The relational shift. Child Development , 59, 47–59. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gentner, D., Bowdle, B.F., Wolff, P., & Boronat, C.
(2001) Metaphor is like analogy. In D. Gentner, K.J. Holyoak, & B.N. Kokinov (Eds.), The Analogical Mind: Perspectives from Cognitive Science (pp. 199–253). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Gershkoff-Stowe, L., Connell, B., & Smith, L.
(2006) Priming overgeneralizations in two- and four-year-old children. Journal of Child Language , 33, 461–486. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, R.W.
(1994)  The Poetics of Mind: Figurative Thought, Language and Understanding . ­Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Giora, R.
(1997) Understanding figurative and literal language: The graded salience hypothesis. Cognitive Linguistics , 8, 183–206. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gold, R., Faust, M., & Goldstein, A.
(2010) Semantic integration during metaphor comprehension in Asperger syndrome. Brain & Language , 113, 124–134. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Grice, H.P.
(1975) Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and Semantics: Speech Acts (Vol. 3) (pp. 41–58). New York, NY: Academic Press. Reprinted in Grice (1989), 22–40.Google Scholar
(1989)  Studies in the Ways of Words . Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Glucksberg, S.
(2001)  Understanding Figurative Language: From Metaphor to Idioms . Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2003) The psycholinguistics of metaphor. Trends in Cognitive Sciences , 7(2), 92–96. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Glucksberg, S., & Haught, C.
(2006) On the relation between metaphor and simile: When comparison fails. Mind and Language , 21(3), 360–378. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Glucksberg, S., & Keysar, B.
(1993) How metaphors work. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and Thought , 2nd edn (pp. 401–424). Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, P.
(1998) The truth-value judgment task. In D. McDaniel, C. McKee, & H. Smith (Eds.) Methods for Assessing Children’s Syntax (pp. 211–231). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Goswami, U.
(2001) Analogical reasoning in children. In K. Holyoak, D. Gentner, & B. Kokinov (Eds), The Analogical Mind: Perspectives from Cognitive Science (pp. 437–470). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Happé, F.
(1993) Communicative competence and theory of mind in autism: A test of relevance theory. Cognition , 48, 101–19. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Harris, P.
(1982) Cognitive prerequisites to language? British Journal of Psychology , 73, 187–195. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, J.
(1982)  The Development of Metaphor Comprehension: Its Mental-Model Demand Measurement and its Process Analytical Models . Unpublished PhD dissertation. York ­University, Toronto.Google Scholar
Katsos, N. & Bishop, D.V.M.
(2011) Pragmatic tolerance: Implications for the acquisition of informativeness and implicature. Cognition , 120, 67–81. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Keil, F.
(1986) Conceptual domains and the acquisition of metaphor. Cognitive Development , 1, 73–96. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G.
(1987)  Women, Fire and Dangerous Things . Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1993) The contemporary theory of metaphor. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and Thought (2nd Ed., pp. 202–251). Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M.
(1980)  Metaphors We Live By . Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
McDaniel, D., McKee, C. & Smith, H.
(1998)  Methods for Assessing Children’s Syntax . ­Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
McElree, B., & Nordlie, J.
(1999) Literal and figurative interpretations are computed in parallel. Psychonomic Bulletin Review , 6, 486–494. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Monetta, L., & Pell, M.D.
(2007) Effects of verbal working memory deficits on metaphor comprehension in patients with Parkinson’s disease. Brain and Language , 101, 80–89. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Norbury, C.
(2005) The relationship between Theory of Mind and metaphor: Evidence from children with language impairment and autistic spectrum disorder. British Journal of Developmental Psychology , 23, 383–399. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Noveck, I, Bianco, M., & Castri, A.
(2001) The costs and benefits of metaphor. Metaphor & Symbol , 16(1–2), 79–91. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nippold, M.A.
(1988/1998)  Later Language Development: The School-Age and Adolescent Years (2nd Ed.). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.Google Scholar
Özçaliskan, S.
(2005) On learning to draw the distinction between physical and metaphorical motion: Is metaphor an early emerging cognitive and linguistic capacity? Journal of Child Language , 32, 291–318. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2007) Metaphors we move by: Children’s developing understanding of metaphorical motion in typologically distinct languages. Metaphor and Symbol , 22(2), 147–168. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Papagno, C. Lucchelli, F. Muggia, S., & Rizzo, S.
(2003) Idiom comprehension in Alzheimer’s disease: The role of the central executive. Brain , 126, 2419–2430. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pearson, B.
(1990) The comprehension of metaphor by preschool children. Journal of Child Language , 17(1), 185–203. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pierce, R. Maclaren, R., & Chiappe, D.
(2010) The role of WM in the metaphor interference effect. Psyhonomic Bulletin & Review , 17(3), 400–404. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pouscoulous, N.
(2011) Metaphor: For adults only?, Belgian Journal of Linguistics , 25, 64–92. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2013) Early pragmatics with words. In F. Liedke & C. Schulze (Eds.), Beyond the Words: Content, Context and Inference (pp. 149–171). Berlin: De Gruyter ­Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pouscoulous, N., Noveck, I., Politzer, G., & Bastide, A.
(2007) Processing costs and implicature development. Language Acquisition , 14(4), 347–376. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pouscoulous, N., & Tomasello, M.
In preparation). Very early understanding of metaphors.
Rabagliati, H., Marcus, G.F., & Pylkkänen, L.
(2010) Shifting senses in lexical semantic development. Cognition, 117 , 17–37. Crossref
Recanati, F.
(2004)  Literal Meaning . Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Rubio Fernández, P.
(2007) Suppression in metaphor interpretation: Differences between meaning selection and meaning construction. Journal of Semantics , 24, 345–371. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rundblad, G., & Annaz, D.
(2010) The atypical development of metaphor and metonymy comprehension in children with autism. Autism , 14, 29–46. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Searle, J.
(1979) Metaphor. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and Thought (pp. 92–123). Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Siqueira, M. & Gibbs, R.
(2007) Children’s acquisition of primary metaphors: A crosslinguistic study. Organon , 21(43), 161–179.Google Scholar
Smith, J.
(1976) Children’s comprehension of metaphor: A piagetian interpretation. Language and Speech , 19, 236–243.Google Scholar
Sperber, D., & Wilson, D.
(2008) A deflationary account of metaphors. In R. Gibbs (Ed.), Handbook of Metaphor and Thought (pp. 84–105). Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Swinney, D.A.
(1979) Lexical access during sentence comprehension: (Re)consideration of context effects. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour , 18, 645–659. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tomasello, M.
(2003)  Constructing a Language: A Usage-Based Theory of Language Acquisition . Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
(2008)  Origins of Human Communication . Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Vosniadou, S., Ortony, A. Reynolds, R, & Wilson, P.
(1984) Sources of difficulty in children’s understanding of metaphorical language. Child Development , 55, 1588–1606. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Walaszewska, E.
(2011) Broadening and narrowing in lexical development: How relevance theory can account for children’s overextensions and underextensions. Journal of Pragmatics , 43(1), 314–326. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Waggoner, J., & Palermo, D.
(1989) Betty is a bouncing bubble: Children’s comprehension of emotion-descriptive metaphors. Developmental Psychology , 25(1), 152–63. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, D., & Carston, R.
(2006) Metaphor, relevance and the emergent property issue. Mind and Language , 21(3), 404–433. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2007) A unitary approach to lexical pragmatics: Relevance, inference and ad hoc concepts. In N. Burton-Roberts (Ed.), Advances in Pragmatics (pp. 230–260). Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Winner, E.
(1988/1997)  The Point of Words: Children’s Understanding of Metaphor and Irony . Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Winner, E., Rosenstiel, A. & Gardner, H.
(1976) The development of metaphoric understanding. Developmental Psychology , 12, 289–297. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wolff, P., & Gentner, D.
(2000) Evidence for role-neutral initial processing of metaphors. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition , 26, 529–541. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Kalandadze, Tamar, Courtenay Norbury, Terje Nærland & Kari-Anne B Næss
2018. Figurative language comprehension in individuals with autism spectrum disorder: A meta-analytic review. Autism 22:2 ► pp. 99 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 26 february 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.