Cover not available
Part of
The Acquisition of Reference
Edited by Ludovica Serratrice and Shanley E.M. Allen
[Trends in Language Acquisition Research 15] 2015
► pp. 1–24

Introduction

An overview of the acquisition of reference

ORCID logo
This chapter serves as an introduction to The Acquisition of Reference. The volume brings together influential recent research on the study of children’s comprehension and production of reference, with a focus on discourse-pragmatic approaches and cross-linguistic comparison. In this chapter, we first provide a brief historical overview of the research on referential choice from syntactic, processing, and discourse-pragmatic perspectives. We then highlight the major themes of the volume including the role in referential choice played by factors such as accessibility, type of interaction, amount of cognitive load, prosody, caregiver input, age, language ability, cognitive ability, language typology, and cognitive prerequisites including theory of mind. We conclude with directions for further research.
Keywords: accessibility, argument realization, cognitive load, cognitive prerequisites, cross-linguistic comparison, discourse-pragmatics, null subjects, referential choice
Published online: 25 November 2015
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/tilar.15.01ser
References (106)
References
Allen, S.E.M. (2000). A discourse-pragmatic explanation for argument representation in child Inuktitut. Linguistics, 38(3), 483–521. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Allen, S.E.M., & Schröder, H. (2003). Preferred argument structure in early Inuktitut spontaneous speech data. In J.W. Du Bois, L.E. Kumpf & W.J. Ashby (Eds.), Preferred argument structure: Grammar as architecture for function (pp. 301–338). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Allen, S.E.M., Skarabela, B., & Hughes, M.E. (2008). Using corpora to examine discourse effects in syntax. In H. Behrens (Ed.), Corpora in language acquisition research: History, methods, perspectives (pp. 99–137). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ariel, M. (1988). Referring and accessibility. Journal of Linguistics, 24(1), 65–87. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (1990). Accessing noun-phrase antecedents. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
. (1991). The function of accessibility in a theory of grammar. Journal of Pragmatics, 16(5), 443–464. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (1994). Interpreting anaphoric expressions: A cognitive versus a pragmatic approach. Journal of Linguistics, 30(01), 3–42. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Avrutin, S., & Brun, D. (2001). The expression of specificity in a language without determiners: Evidence from child Russian. In A. Do, L. Dominguez, & A. Johansen (Eds.), Proceedings of the 25th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 70–81). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Baldwin, D.A. (1993). Infants’ ability to consult the speaker for clues to word reference. Journal of Child Language, 20(2), 395–418. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bassano, D. (2000). Early development of nouns and verbs in French: Exploring the interface between the lexicon and grammar. Journal of Child Language, 27(3), 521–559. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bassano, D., Korecky-Kröll, K., Maillochon, I., & Dressler, W.U. (2013). The acquisition of nominal determiners in French and German: A cross-linguistic perspective on the grammaticalization of nouns. In D. Bassano & M. Hickmann (Eds.), Grammaticalization and first language acquisition: Cross-linguistic perspectives (pp. 37–59). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bergmann, C., Paulus, M., & Fikkert, P. (2012). Preschoolers’ comprehension of pronouns and reflexives: The impact of the task. Journal of Child Language, 39(4), 777–803. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Berman, R. (2015). Language development beyond the sentence. In E. Bavin & L. Naigles (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of child language (2nd edition). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bloom, P. (1990). Subjectless sentences in child language. Linguistic Inquiry, 21(4), 491–504.Google Scholar
Chafe, W. (1970). Meaning and the structure of language. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
. (1974). Language and consciousness. Language, 50(01), 111–133. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chen, A. (2009). The phonetics of sentence-initial topic and focus in adult and child Dutch. In M. Vigário, S. Frota, & M.J. Freitas (Eds.), Phonetics and phonology: Interactions and interrelations (pp. 91–106). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2011). Tuning information structure: Intonational realisation of topic and focus in child Dutch. Journal of Child Language, 38(05), 1055–1083. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clackson, K., Felser, C., & Clahsen, H. (2011). Children’s processing of pronouns and reflexives in English: Evidence from eye-movements during listening. Journal of Memory and Language, 65(02), 128–144. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clahsen, H., & Penke, M. (1992). The acquisition of agreement morphology and its syntactic consequences. In J. Meisel (Ed.), The acquisition of verb placement (pp. 181–223). Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clancy, P.M. (1993). Preferred argument structure in Korean acquisition. In E.V. Clark (Ed.), Proceedings of the 25th Annual Child Language Research Forum (pp. 307–314). Stanford, CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
. (1997). Discourse motivations for referential choice in Korean acquisition. In H.-M. Sohn & J. Haig (Eds.), Japanese/Korean linguistics VI (pp. 639–659). Stanford, CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
. (2003). The lexicon in interaction: Developmental origins of Preferred Argument Structure in Korean. In J.W. Du Bois, L.E. Kumpf, & W.J. Ashby (Eds.), Preferred argument structure: Grammar as architecture for function (pp. 81–108). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clark, H.H. (1996). Using language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clark, H.H., Schreuder, R., & Buttrick, S. (1983). Common ground and the understanding of demonstrative reference. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22(02), 245–258. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Cat, C. (2004). A fresh look at how young children encode new referents. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 42(02), 111–127.Google Scholar
Dell, G.S., & Chang, F. (2014). The P-chain: Relating sentence production and its disorders to comprehension and acquisition. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 369, 20120394.Google Scholar
Demir, Ö., So, W.C., Özyürek, A., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2012). Turkish- and English-speaking children display sensitivity to perceptual context in the referring expressions they produce in speech and gesture. Language and Cognitive Processes, 27(6), 844–867. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
de Ruiter, L. (2010). Studies on intonation and information structure in child and adult German (Doctoral dissertation). Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
Du Bois, J.W. (1987). The discourse basis of ergativity. Language, 63(04), 805–855. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dyakonova, M. (2004). Information structure development: Evidence from acquisition of word order in Russian and English. Nordlyd: Tromsø Working Papers on Language and Linguistics, 32(01), 88–109.Google Scholar
Evans, G. (1973). The causal theory of names. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volume 47, pp. 84–104.Google Scholar
Frege, G. (1892/1948). Sense and reference. Trans. Max Black. The Philosophical Review, 57(03), 209–230. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gallaway, C., & Richards, B. (1994). Input and interaction in language acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Genone, J., & Lombrozo, T. (2012). Concept possession, experimental semantics, and hybrid theories of reference. Philosophical Psychology, 25(05), 717–742. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gentner, D. (1982). Why nouns are learned before verbs: Linguistic relativity versus natural partitioning. In S. Kuczaj (Ed.), Language development, Volume 2: Language, thought, and culture (pp. 301–334). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Gerken, L.A. (1991). The metrical basis for children’s subjectless sentences. Journal of Memory and Language, 30(4), 431–451. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gliga, T., & Csibra, G. (2009). One-year-old infants appreciate the referential nature of deictic gestures and words. Psychological Science, 20(03), 347–353. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goldin‐Meadow, S., Goodrich, W., Sauer, E., & Iverson, J. (2007). Young children use their hands to tell their mothers what to say. Developmental Science, 10(06), 778–785. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Greenfield, P., & Smith, J.H. (1976). The structure of communication in early language development. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Guasti, M.T. (1993/1994). Verb syntax in Italian child grammar: Finite and non-finite verbs. Language Acquisition, 3(01), 1–40. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Guasti, M.T., De Lange J., Gavarró, A., & Caprin, C. (2008). Article omission across child languages. Language Acquisition, 15(02), 89–119. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Guerriero, S., Oshima-Takane, Y., & Kuriyama, Y. (2006). The development of referential choice in English and Japanese: A discourse-pragmatic perspective. Journal of Child Language, 33(04), 823–857. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gundel, J.K., Hedberg, N., & Zacharski, R. (1993). Cognitive status and the form of referring expressions in discourse. Language, 69(02), 274–307. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gundel, J.K., & Johnson, K. (2013). Children’s use of referring expressions in spontaneous discourse: Implications for theory of mind development. Journal of Pragmatics, 56, 43–57. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haegeman, L. (1995). The syntax of negation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hamann, C., & Plunkett, K. (1998). Subjectless sentences in child Danish. Cognition, 69(01), 35–72. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hickmann, M. (2003a). Coherence, cohesion, and context in narrative development: Some comparative perspectives. In S. Strömqvist & L. Verhoeven (Eds.), Relating events in narrative: Typological and contextual perspectives (pp. 281–306). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
. (2003b). Children’s discourse: Person, space and time across languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Huang, C. (2011). Referential choice in Mandarin child language: A discourse-pragmatic perspective. Journal of Pragmatics, 43(07), 2057–2080. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2012a). Preferred argument structure in Mandarin child language. Taiwan Journal of Linguistics, 10(02), 119–168.Google Scholar
. (2012b). Referential choice and informativeness in mother-child conversation: A focus on the mother. Language Sciences, 34(03), 319–338. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hughes, M.E., & Allen, S.E.M. (2013). The effect of individual discourse-pragmatic features on referential choice in child English. Journal of Pragmatics, 56, 15–30. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hyams, N. (1983). The acquisition of parameterized grammars (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). City University of New York, New York, NY.Google Scholar
. (1986). Language acquisition and the theory of parameters. Dordrecht: Reidel. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (1992). A reanalysis of null subjects in child language. In J. Weissenborn, H. Goodluck, & T. Roeper (Eds.), Theoretical issues in language acquisition (pp. 249–267). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
. (2011). Missing subjects in early child language. In J. De Villiers & T. Roeper (Eds.), Handbook of generative approaches to language acquisition (pp. 13–52). Dordrecht: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hyams, N., & Wexler, K. (1993). On the grammatical basis of null subjects in child language. Linguistic Inquiry, 24(03), 421–459.Google Scholar
Jaeggli, O., & Hyams, N. (1988). Morphological uniformity and the setting of the null subject parameter. Proceedings of the North Eastern Linguistic Society (NELS), 18, 238–253.Google Scholar
Kauschke, C., & Hofmeister, C. (2002). Early lexical development in German: A study on vocabulary growth and vocabulary composition during the second and third year of life. Journal of Child Language, 29(04), 735–757. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Köymen, B., Rosenbaum, L., & Tomasello, M. (2014). Reasoning during joint decision-making by preschool peers. Cognitive Development, 32, 74–85. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kripke, S.A. (1972/1980). Naming and necessity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kupisch, T. (2006). The acquisition of determiners in bilingual German-Italian and German-French children. Munich: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar
Lam, B. (2010). Are Cantonese-speakers really descriptivists? Revisiting cross-cultural semantics. Cognition, 115(02), 320–329. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lleó, C. (2001). The interface of phonology and syntax: The emergence of the article in the early acquisition of Spanish and German. In J. Weissenborn & B. Höhle (Eds.), Approaches to bootstrapping (Vol. 2, pp. 23–44). Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lleó, C., & Demuth, C. (1999). Prosodic constraints on the emergence of grammatical morphemes: Cross-linguistic evidence from Germanic and Romance languages. In A. Greenhill, H. Littlefield, & C. Tano (Eds.), Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Boston University Conference on Child Language Development (pp. 407–418). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Martí, G. (2014). For the disunity of semantics. Mind and Language, 29(04), 485–489. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Matthews, D., Lieven, E.V.M., Theakston, A., & Tomasello, M. (2006). The effect of perceptual availability and prior discourse on young children’s use of referring expressions. Applied Psycholinguistics, 27(03), 403–422. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Matthews, D., Butcher, J., Lieven, E.V.M., & Tomasello, M. (2012). Two- and four-year-olds learn to adapt referring expressions to context: Effects of distracters and feedback on referential communication. Topics in Cognitive Science, 4(02), 184–210. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McNeil, N.M., Alibali, M.W., & Evans, J.L. (2000). The role of gesture in children’s comprehension of spoken language: Now they need it, now they don’t. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 24(02), 131–150. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Morford, M., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (1992). Comprehension and production of gesture in combination with speech in one-word speakers. Journal of Child Language, 19(03), 559–580. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Müller, A., Höhle, B., Schmitz, M., & Weissenborn, J. (2006). Focus-to-stress alignment in 4- to 5-year-old German-learning children. In A. Belletti, E. Bennati, C. Chesi, E. Di Domenico, & I. Ferrari (Eds.), Proceedings of Generative Approaches to Language Acquisition 2005 (pp. 379–392). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
Namy, L.L., & Nolan, S.A. (2004). Characterizing changes in parent labelling and gesturing and their relation to early communicative development. Journal of Child Language, 31(04), 821–835. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Narasimhan, B., Budwig, N., & Murty, L. (2005). Argument realization in Hindi caregiver-child discourse. Journal of Pragmatics, 37(04), 461–495. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nelson, K., Hampson, J., & Shaw, L.K. (1993). Nouns in early lexicons: Evidence, explanations, and implications. Journal of Child Language, 20(01), 61–84. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Papadopoulou, D., Peristeri, E., Plemenou, E., Marinis, T. & Tsimpli, I. (2015). Pronoun ambiguity resolution in Greek: Evidence from monolingual adults and children. Lingua, 155, 98–120. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Paradis, J., & Navarro, S. (2003). Subject realization and crosslinguistic interference in the bilingual acquisition of Spanish and English: What is the role of the input? Journal of Child Language, 30(02), 371–393. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pierce, A. (1989). On the emergence of syntax: A crosslinguistic study (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.
Rhee, J., & Wexler, K. (1995). Optional infinitives in Hebrew. In C.T. Schutze, J.B. Ganger, & K. Broihier (Eds.), Papers on Language Processing and Acquisition (pp. 383–402). Cambridge, MA: MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 26.Google Scholar
Rizzi, L. (1993). Some notes on linguistic theory and language development: The case of root infinitives. Language Acquisition, 3(04), 371–393. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2005a). On the grammatical basis of language development: A case study. In G. Cinque & R. Kayne (Eds.), Handbook of comparative syntax (pp. 70–109). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
. (2005b). Grammatically-based target inconsistencies in child language. In K.U. Deen, J. Nomura, B. Schulz, & B.D. Schwartz (Eds.), The proceedings of the Inaugural Conference on Generative Approaches to Language Acquisition – North America (pp. 19–49). Storrs, CT: University of Connecticut Occasional Papers in Linguistics 4.Google Scholar
Rozendaal, M.I., & Baker, A.E. (2008). A cross-linguistic investigation of the acquisition of the pragmatics of indefinite and definite reference in two-year-olds. Journal of Child Language, 35(04), 773–807. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Salazar Orvig, A., Marcos, H., Morgenstern, A., Hassan, R., Leber-Marin, J., & Parès, J. (2010). Dialogical beginnings of anaphora: The use of third person pronouns before the age of 3. Journal of Pragmatics, 42(07), 1842–1865. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sano, T., & Hyams, N. (1994). Agreement, finiteness, and the development of null arguments. Proceedings of the North East Linguistic Society (NELS), 24, 544–558.Google Scholar
Saxton, M. (2005). ‘Recast’ in a new light: Insights for practice from typical language studies. Child Language Teaching and Therapy, 21(01), 23–38. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schmitz, K. (2007). L’interface syntaxe-pragmatique: Le sujet chez des enfants bilingues franco-allemands et italo-allemands [The syntax-pragmatics interface: Use of subjects by bilingual French-German and Italian-German children]. Acquisition et Interaction en Langue Étrangère [Acquisition and Interaction in Foreign Languages], 25, 9–43.Google Scholar
Searle, J.R. (1958). Proper names. Mind, 67, 166–173. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sekerina, I., Stromswold, K. & Hestvik, A. (2004). How do adults and children process referentially ambiguous pronouns? Journal of Child Language, 31(01), 123–152. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Serratrice, L. (2005). The role of discourse pragmatics in the acquisition of subjects in Italian. Applied Psycholinguistics, 26(03), 437–462. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2008). The role of discourse and perceptual cues in the choice of referential expressions in English pre-schoolers, school-age children and adults. Language Learning and Development, 4(04), 309–332. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2013). The role of number of referents and animacy in children’s use of pronouns. Journal of Pragmatics, 56, 31–42. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shield, A., Meier, R.P., & Tager-Flusberg, H. (2015). The use of sign language pronouns by native-signing children with autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 45(07), 2128–2145.. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Silva-Corvalán, C. (2014). Bilingual language acquisition: Spanish and English in the first six years. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Skarabela, B. (2007). The role of social cognition in early syntax: The case of joint attention in argument realization in child Inuktitut (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Boston University, Boston, MA, USA.Google Scholar
So, W.C., Demir, Ö. E., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2010). When speech is ambiguous, gesture steps in: Sensitivity to discourse-pragmatic principles in early childhood. Applied Psycholinguistics, 31(01), 209–224. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
So, W.C., Kita, S., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2009). Using the hands to identify who does what to whom: Gesture and speech go hand-in-hand. Cognitive Science, 33(01), 115–125. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Theakston, A. (2012). “The spotty cow tickled the pig with a curly tail”: How do sentence position, preferred argument structure, and referential complexity affect children’s and adults’ choice of referring expression? Applied Psycholinguistics, 33(04), 691–724. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Valian, V. (1990). Null subjects: A problem for parameter setting models of language acquisition. Cognition, 35(02), 105–122. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (1991). Syntactic subjects in the early speech of American and Italian children. Cognition, 40(01), 21–81. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Valian, V., & Eisenberg, Z. (1996). The development of syntactic subjects in Portuguese-speaking children. Journal of Child Language, 23(01), 103–128. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vigliocco, G., Perniss, P., & Vinson, D. (2014). Language as a multimodal phenomenon: Implications for language learning, processing and evolution. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 369, 20130292. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wittek, A., & Tomasello, M. (2005). Young children’s sensitivity to listener knowledge and perceptual context in choosing referring expressions. Applied Psycholinguistics, 26(04), 541–558. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wonnacott, E., & Watson, D. (2008). Acoustic emphasis in four-year-olds. Cognition, 107(03), 1093–1101. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yang, C. (2002). Knowledge and learning in natural language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cited by (7)

Cited by seven other publications

Le Mené, Marine, Anne Salazar-Orvig, Christine da Silva-Genest & Haydée Marcos
2023. The choice of referring expressions in adult-child dialogues. In Reference [Studies in Language Companion Series, 228], ► pp. 323 ff. DOI logo
Pavlinušić Vilus, Eva, Katharina Korecky-Kröll & Wolfgang U. Dressler
2023. Acquisition of reflexive and reflexively used pronouns in Croatian and Austrian German: A corpus-based study. Lingua 284 ► pp. 103478 ff. DOI logo
Lindgren, Josefin, Valerie Reichardt & Ute Bohnacker
2022. Character introductions in oral narratives of Swedish–German bilingual preschoolers. First Language 42:2 ► pp. 234 ff. DOI logo
Azpiroz, Maialen Iraola, Shanley E.M. Allen, Kalliopi Katsika & Leigh Fernandez
2021. Psycholinguistic approaches to production and comprehension in bilingual adults and children. In Psycholinguistic Approaches to Production and Comprehension in Bilingual Adults and Children [Benjamins Current Topics, 117], ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Azpiroz, Maialen Iraola, Shanley E. M. Allen, Kalliopi Katsika & Leigh Fernandez
2019. Psycholinguistic approaches to production and comprehension in bilingual adults and children. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 9:4-5 ► pp. 505 ff. DOI logo
Bernardini, Petra & Jonas Granfeldt
2019. On cross‐linguistic variation and measures of linguistic complexity in learner texts: Italian, French and English. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 29:2 ► pp. 211 ff. DOI logo
Duguine, Maia
2017. Reversing the Approach to Null Subjects: A Perspective from Language Acquisition. Frontiers in Psychology 8 DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.