Cover not available
Part of
The Acquisition of Turkish in Childhood
Edited by Belma Haznedar and F. Nihan Ketrez
[Trends in Language Acquisition Research 20] 2016
► pp. 1–26

Introduction

| Boğaziçi University
| İstanbul Bilgi University, Turkey
Article outline
  • 1.Recent advances and the acquisition of Turkish
  • 2.Previous studies on child Turkish
    • 2.1Development of morphosyntax and word order
    • 2.2Development of phonology, vowel harmony and word segmentation
    • 2.3Literacy development
    • 2.4Language disorders in Turkish
    • 2.5Key issues in childhood bilingualism
  • 3.The contributions in this volume
  • 4.Summary
  • Acknowledgements
  • Note
  • References
Published online: 18 November 2016
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/tilar.20.01haz
References (140)
References
Acarlar, F. & Johnston, J. R. 2011. Acquisition of Turkish grammatical morphology by children with developmental disorders. International Journal of Communication Disorders 46: 728–738. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aksu-Koç, A. 1988/2006. The Acquisition of Aspect and Modality. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1998. The role of input vs. universal predispositions in the emergence of tense-aspect morphology: Evidence from Turkish. First Language 18: 255–280. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aksu-Koç, A. & Slobin, D.I. 1985. The acquisition of Turkish. In The Crosslinguistic Study of Language Acquisition, Vol. 1, D.I. Slobin (ed.), 839–878. Hillsdale NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Aksu-Koç, A. & Ketrez, F.N. 2003. Early verbal morphology in Turkish: Emergence of inflections. In Mini-paradigms and the Emergence of Verb Morphology , D. Bittner, W.U. Dressler & M. Kilani-Schoch (eds), 27–52. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Aksu-Koç, A., Ögel-Balaban, H. & Alp, I.E. 2009. Evidentials and source knowledge in Turkish. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development 125: 13–28. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aksu-Koç, A., Terziyan, T. & Taylan, E.E. 2014. Input offers and child uptakes: Acquiring mood and modal morphology in Turkish. Language, Interaction and Acquisition 5(1): 62–81. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aktürk, B., Küntay, A.C. & Aksu-Koç, A. 2014. Stimulating home environment mediates the relationship between socio-economic well-being of the family and early language of Turkish-speaking children. Poster presented at the 13th IASCL Conference, Amsterdam, July 14–18.
Allen, S. 1996. Aspects of Argument Structure in Inuktitut [Language Acquisition and Language Disorders 13]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Altınkamış, N.F., Kern, S. & Sofu, H. 2014. When context matters more than language: Verb or noun in French and Turkish caregiver speech. First Language 34(6): 537–550. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Babayiğit, S. 2009. Reading and spelling development in transparent alphabetic orthographies: Points of convergence and divergence. In Contemporary Perspectives on Reading and Spelling , C. Wood & V. Connelly (eds), 133–148. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Babayiğit, S. & Stainthorp, R. 2007. Preliterate phonological awareness and early literacy skills in Turkish. Journal of Research in Reading 30(4): 394–413. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bialystok, E. 2001. Bilingualism in Development: Language, Literacy and Cognition. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2005. Consequences of bilingualism for cognitive development. In Handbook of Bilingualism: Psycholinguistic Approaches, J.F. Kroll & A.M.B. de Groot (eds), 417–432. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
2009. Bilingualism: The good, the bad and the indifferent. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 12(1): 3–11. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bialystok, E. & Martin, M. 2004. Attention and inhibition in bilingual children: Evidence from the dimensional change card sorting task. Developmental Science 7: 325–339. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bishop, D.V.M. 2000. Pragmatic language impairment: A correlate of SLI, a distinct subgroup, or part of the autistic continuum? In Speech and Language Impairments in Children: Causes, Characteristics, Intervention, and Outcome , D.V.M. Bishop & L.B. Leonard (eds), 99–113. Hove: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Blom, E. 2008. Testing the Domain-by-age Model: Inflection and placement of Dutch verbs. In Current Trends in Child Second Language Acquisition: A Generative Perspective, B. Haznedar & E. Gavruseva (eds), 271–300. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010. Effects of input on the early grammatical development of bilingual children. International Journal of Bilingualism 14: 422–446. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bradley, L. & Bryant, P. E. 1983. Categorizing sounds and learning to read: A causal connection. Nature 31: 419–421. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Choi, S. 2000. Caregiver input in English and Korean: Use of nouns and verbs in book-reading and toy play contexts. Journal of Child Language 27: 69–111. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Choi, S. & Gopnik, A. 1995. Early acquisition of verbs in Korean: A cross-linguistic study. Journal of Child Language 22(3) : 497–529. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chondrogianni, V. 2008. The acquisition of the D-domain in child L2 Greek: Effects of age and construction. In Current Trends in Child Second Language Acquisition: A Generative Perspective, B. Haznedar & E. Gavruseva (eds), 97–142. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Houwer, A. 1990. The Acquisition of Two Languages from Birth: A Case Study. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Döpke, S. 1998. Competing language structures: The acquisition of verb placement by bilingual German – English children. Journal of Child Language 25: 555–584. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2000. Generation of and retraction from crosslinguistically motivated structures in bilin¬gual first language acquisition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 3: 209–226. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dulay, H.C. & Burt, M.K. 1974. Natural sequences in child second language strategies. Language Learning 24: 37–53. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Durgunoğlu, A.Y. & Öney, B. 1999. A cross-linguistic comparison of phonological awareness and word recognition. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal 11: 281–299. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2002. Phonological awareness in literacy acquisition: It’s not only for children. Scientific Studies of Reading 52: 189–204.Google Scholar
Ekmekçi, Ö. 1982. Acquisition of verbal inflections in Turkish. Journal of Human Sciences 2: 227–241.Google Scholar
1986. The significance of word order in the acquisition of Turkish. In Studies in Turkish Linguistics [Typological Studies in Language 8], D.I. Slobin & K. Zimmer (eds), 265–272. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Erdoğan, Ö. 2012. The relationship between the phonological awareness skills and reading skills of the first year students at primary school. Education and Science 37: 41–51.Google Scholar
Erguvanlı, E.E. 1984. The Function of Word Order in Turkish Grammar. Berkeley CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Freudenthal, D., Pine, J. M., Aguado-Orea, J. & Gobet, F. 2007. Modeling the developmental patterning of finiteness marking in English, Dutch, German, and Spanish using MOSAIC. Cognitive Science 31(2): 311–341.Google Scholar
Friedmann, N. & Novogrodsky, R. 2008. Subtypes of SLI: SySLI, PhoSLI, LeSLI and PraSLI. In Language Acquisition and Development, A. Gavarró & M.J. Freitas (eds), 205–217. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
García Mayo, M.P. & Hawkins, R.. 2009 Second Language Acquisition of Articles. Empirical Findings and Theoretical Implications [Language Acquisition and Language Disorders 47]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gathercole, V.C.M. & Thomas, E.M. 2005. Minority language survival: Input factors influencing the acquisition of Welsh. In Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Bilingualism, J. Cohen, K. McAlister, K. Rolstad & J. MacSwan (eds), 852–874. Somerville MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Geçkin, V. & Haznedar, B. 2008. The morphology/syntax interface in child L2 acquisition: Evidence from verbal morphology. In Current Trends in Child Second Language Acquisition: A Generative Perspective, B. Haznedar & E. Gavruseva (eds), 237–267. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Genesee, F. 1989. Early bilingual development: One language or two? Journal of Child Language 16: 161–179. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Genesee, F., Nicoladis, E. & Paradis, J. 1995. Language differentiation in early bilingual develop-ment. Journal of Child Language 22: 611–631. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gentner, D. 1982. Why nouns are learned before verbs: Linguistic relativity versus natural partitioning. In Language Development, Vol. 2: Language, Thought and Culture, S.A. Kuczaj (ed.), 301–334. Hillsdale NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Göksun, T., Küntay, A.C. & Naigles, L.R., 2008. Turkish children use morphosyntactic bootstrapping in interpreting verb meaning. Journal of Child Language 35: 291–323. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grinstead, J. 1994. Consequences of the Maturation of Number Morphology in Spanish and Catalan. MA dissertation, UCLA.Google Scholar
Grosjean, F. 2008. Studying Bilinguals. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Grüter, T. & Paradis, J. 2014. Input and Experience in Bilingual Development [Trends in Language Acquisition 13]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Guasti, M.T. 1994. Verb syntax in Italian child grammar: Finite and nonfinite verbs. Language Acquisition 1: 1–40.Google Scholar
Guijarro-Fuentes, P. & Pilar Larrañaga, M. & Clibbens, J. 2008. First Language Acquisition of Morphology and Syntax: Perspectives across Languages and Learners [Language Acquisition and Language Disorders 45]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haegeman, L. 1995. Root infinitives, tense and truncated structures in Dutch. Language Acquisition 3: 205–255. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haznedar, B. 1997. L2 acquisition by a Turkish-speaking child: Evidence for L1 influence. In Proceedings of Boston University Conference on Language Development 21, E. Hughes, M. Hughes & A. Greenhill (eds), 245–256. Somerville MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
2001. The acquisition of the IP system in child L2 acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 23: 1–39. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2003. The status of functional categories in child second language acquisition: Evidence from the acquisition of CP. Second Language Research 19(1): 1–41. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010. Transfer at the syntax-pragmatics interface: Pronominal subjects in bilingual Turkish. Second Language Research 26(3): 355–378. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haznedar, B. & Gavruseva, E. (eds). 2008. Current Trends in Child Second Language Acquisition: A Generative Perspective [Language Acquisition and Language Disorders 46]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haznedar, B. & Schwartz, B.D. 1997. Are there optional infinitives in child L2 acquisition. In BUCLD 21: Proceedings of Boston University Conference on Language Development 21, E. Hughes, M. Hughes & A. Greenhill (eds), 257–268. Somerville MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Hulk, A. & Müller, N. 2000. Bilingual first language acquisition at the interface between syntax and pragmatics. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 3: 227–244. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ionin, T., Zubizarreta, M.L. & Philippov, V. 2009. Acquisition of article semantics by child and adult L2-English learners. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 12: 337–361. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ionin, T., Ko, H. & Wexler, K. 2004. Article semantics in L2 acquisition: The role of specificity. Language Acquisition 12: 3–69. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ionin, T. & Wexler, K. 2002. Why is ‘is’ easier than ‘-s’?: Acquisition of tense/agreement morphology by child second language learners of English. Second Language Research 18(2): 95–136. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Josefsson, G., Platzack, C. & Håkansson, G. 2004. The Acquisition of Swedish Grammar [Language Acquisition and Language Disorders 33]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kabak, B., Maniwa, K. & Kazanina, N. 2010. Listeners use vowel harmony and word-final stress to spot nonsense words: A study of Turkish and French. Journal of Laboratory Phonology 1: 207–224.Google Scholar
van Kampen, A., Parmaksiz, G., van de Vijver, R. & Hohle, B. 2008. Metrical and statistical cues for word segmentation: Vowel harmony and word stress as cues to word boundaries by 6- and 9-month-old Turkish learners. In Language Acquisition and Development, A. Gavarró & M.J. Freitas (eds), 313–24. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
Ketrez, F.N. 1999. Early Verbs and the Acquisition of Turkish Argument Structure. MA dissertation. Boğaziçi University.Google Scholar
2004. Distributional properties of nouns and verbs in Turkish child-directed speech. USC Working Papers in Linguistics 1: 121–144.Google Scholar
2005. Children’s Scope of Indefinite Objects. PhD dissertation, University of Southern California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
2006. A case study on the accusative case in Turkish. In Proceedings of the Thirty-Third Western Conference on Linguistics (WECOL 2004), M.T. Martinez, A. Alcazar & R. Mayoral (eds), 163–173. Fresno CA: California State University, Fresno Publications.Google Scholar
2014. Harmonic cues and speech segmentation: A crosslinguistic study on child-directed speech. Journal of Child Language 41(2): 439–461. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2015 Incomplete acquisition of the differential marking in Turkish. Revue Roumaine de Linguistique LX (4): 421–430.Google Scholar
Ketrez, F.N. & Aksu-Koç, A. 2007. The (scarcity of) diminutives in Turkish child language. In The Acquisition of Diminutives: A Cross-Linguistic Perspective [Language Acquisition and Language Disorders 43], I. Savickiene & W.U. Dressler (eds), 279–293. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009. Early nominal morphology: Emergence of case and number. In The Development of Number and Case in the First Language Acquisition: A Cross-Linguistic Perspective, M. Voeikova & U. Stephany (eds), 15–48. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kohnert, K. J., Hernandez, A.E. & Bates, E. 1998. Bilingual performance on the Boston Naming Test: Preliminary norms in Spanish and English. Brain and Language 65: 422–440. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kornfilt, J. 1994. Some remarks on the interaction of case and word order in Turkish: Implications for acquisition. In Heads, Projections and Learnability, B. Lust, M. Suñer & J. Whitman (eds), 171–199. Hillsdale NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Kornfilt, J., Yağmur, K., Hermon, G., Öztürk, Ö. & Yalnız, T. 2012. Relative clauses in the L1-acquisition of Turkish. The Szeged Conference: Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Turkish Linguistics, E. Kincses-Nagy & M. Biacsi (eds), 291–301. Szeged: University of Szeged.Google Scholar
Köppe, R. 1996. Language differentiation in bilingual children: The development of grammatical and pragmatic competence. Linguistics 34: 927–954. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kuo, L.-J. & Anderson, R.C. 2011. Beyond cross-language transfer: Reconceptualizing the impact of early bilingualism on phonological awareness. Scientific Studies of Reading 14(4): 365–385. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kural, M. 1997. Postverbal constituents in Turkish and the Linear Correspondence Axiom. Linguistic Inquiry 28: 498–519.Google Scholar
Küntay, A. & Slobin, D.I. 1996. Listening to a Turkish mother: Some puzzles for acquisition. In Social Interaction, Social Context, and Language: Essays in Honor of Susan Ervin-Tripp, D.I. Slobin, J. Gerhardt, A. Kyratzis & J. Guo (eds), 265–286. Hillsdale NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Lakshmanan, U. & Selinker, L. 1994. The status of CP and the tensed complementizer that in the developing L2 grammars L2 grammars of English. Second Language Research 10: 25–48. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lardiere, D. 1998. Dissociating syntax from morphology in a divergent end-state grammar. Second Language Research 14: 359–375. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leonard, L. 1998. Children with Specific Language Impairment. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Liberman, I.Y., Shankweiler, D. & Liberman, A. M. 1989. The alphabetic principle and learning to read. In Phonology and Reading Disability, D. Shankweiler & I.Y. Liberman (eds), 1–34. Ann Arbor MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Marinis, T. 2003. The Acquisition of the DP in Modern Greek [Language Acquisition and Language Disorders 31]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meisel, J.M. 1989. Early differentiation of languages in bilingual children. In Bilingualism across the Lifespan: Aspects of Acquisition, Maturity and Loss, K. Hyltenstam & L. Obler (eds), 13–40. Cam¬bridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1994. Bilingual First Language Acquisition: French and German Grammatical Develop¬ment [Language Acquisition and Language Disorders 7]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meisel, J. M. 2008. Child second language acquisition or successive first language acquisition? In Haznedar & Gavruseva (eds), 55–80. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mobaraki, M., Vainikka, A. & Young-Scholten, M. 2008. The status of subjects in early child L2 English. In Haznedar & Gavruseva (eds), 209–236.Google Scholar
Montrul, S.A. 2004. The Acquisition of Spanish: Morphosyntactic Development in Monolingual and Bilingual L1 Acquisition and Adult L2 Acquisition [Language Acquisition and Language Disorders 37]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Müller, N. & Hulk, A. 2001. Crosslinguistic influence in bilingual language acquisition: Italian and French as recipient languages. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 4: 1–21. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Oktay, A. & Aktan, E. 2002. A cross-linguisticcomparison of phonological awareness and word recognition in Turkish and English. International Early Years of Education 10(1): 37–48. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Öney, B. & Durgunoğlu, A.Y. 1997. Learning to read in Turkish: A phonologically transparent orthography. Applied Psycholinguistics 18: 1–15. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Özdemir, F. 2008. The Development of Reading in Early Bilingualism: Evidence from Turkish Child L2 Learners of English. MA dissertation, Boğaziçi University, Istanbul.Google Scholar
Özge, D., Küntay, A.C. & Snedeker, J. 2013. Casemarking as a predictive cue to argument structure in Turkish preschoolers. Paper presented at BUCLD 38, Boston University Conference on Language Development, Boston MA.
Öztürk, Ö. & Papafragou, A. 2016. The acquisition of evidentiality and source monitoring. Language Learning and Development 12(2): 199–230. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Paradis, J., Nicoladis, E., Crago, M., & Genesee, F. 2011. Bilingual children’s acquisition of the past tense: A usage-based approach. Journal of Child Language 38: 544–578. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Paradis, J. & Navarro, S. 2003. Subject realization and crosslinguistic interference in the bilingual acquisition of Spanish and English. Journal of Child Language 30: 1–23. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Paradis, J. & Genesee, F. 1996. Syntactic acquisition in bilingual children: Autonomous or inter-dependent? Studies in Second Language Acquisition 18: 1–25. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Phillips, C. 1995. Syntax at age two: Crosslinguistic differences. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 26: 325–382.Google Scholar
Place, S. & Hoff, E. 2011. Properties of dual language exposure that influence two-year-olds’ bilingual proficiency. Child Development 82: 1834–1849. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Poeppel, D. & Wexler, K. 1993. The Full Competence Hypothesis of clause structure in early German. Language 69: 1–33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Perfetti, C.A. & Bolger, D.J. 2004. The brain might read that way. Scientific Studies of Reading 8(3): 293–304. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pierce, A. 1992. Language Acquisition and Syntactic Theory: A Comparative Analysis of French and English Child Grammars. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Potowski, K. & Rothman, J. 2011. Bilingual Youth: Spanish in English-speaking Societies [Studies in Bilingualism 42]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Prévost, P. & White, L. 2000. Missing surface inflection or impairment in second language? Evidence from tense and agreement. Second Language Research 16: 103–133. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rizzi, L. 1993–94. Some notes on linguistic theory and language development: The case of root infinitives. Language Acquisition 3: 371–393. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1994. Early null subjects and root null subjects. In Language Acquisition Studies in Generative Grammar [Language Acquisition and Language Disorders 8], T. Hoekstra & B.D. Schwartz (eds), 151–176. Amsterdam: John Benjamins,. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Santos, A.L. 2009. Minimal Answers: Ellipsis, Syntax and Discourse in the Acquisition of European Portuguese [Language Acquisition and Language Disorders 48]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sarılar, A., Matthews, D. & Küntay, A. 2015. Hearing relative clauses boosts relative clause usage (and referential clarity) in young Turkish language learners. Applied Psycholinguistics 36(2): 175–202. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schneider, W., Kuspert, P., Roth, E. & Vise, M. 1997. Short and long term effects of training phonological awareness in kindergarten: Evidence from two German studies. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 66: 311–340. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schulz, P. & Roeper, T. 2011. Acquisition of exhaustivity in wh-questions: A semantic dimension of SLI. Lingua 121(3): 383–407. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schütze, C.T. & Wexler, K. 1996. Subject case licensing and English root infinitives. In BUCLD 20: Proceedings of the 20th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, A. Stringfellow, D. Cahana-Amitay, E. Hughes & A. Zukowski (eds), 670–681. Somerville MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Schwartz, B.D. & Eubank, L. 1996. Introduction: What is the ‘L2 initial state? Second Language Research 12: 1–5. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Serratrice, L. & Sorace, A. 2003. Overt and null subjects in monolingual and bilingual Italian acquisition. In Proceedings of the 27th annual Boston University Conference On Language Development, B. Beachley, A. Brown, & F. Conlin (eds), 739–750. Somerville MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Serratrice, L., Sorace, A. & Paoli, S. 2004. Crosslinguistic influence at the syntax – pragmatic inter-face: Subjects and objects in English – Italian bilingual and monolingual acquisition. Bilingual¬ism: Language and Cognition 7: 183–205. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Seymour, P., Aro, M. & Erskine, J. 2003. Foundation literacy acquisition in European orthographies. British Journal of Psychology 94: 143–174. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Slobin, D.I. 1986. The acquisition and use of relative clauses in Turkic and Indo-European Languages. In Studies in Turkish Linguistics [Typological Studies in Language 8], D.I. Slobin & K. Zimmer (eds), 273–291. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Slobin, D.I. & Bever, T.G. 1982. Children use canonical sentence schemas: A crosslinguistic study of word order and inflections. Cognition 12: 229–265. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Taeschner, T. 1983. The Sun is Feminine: A Study on Language Acquisition in Bilingual Children. Berlin: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Topbaş, S. 1997. Turkish children’s phonological acquisition: Implications for phonological disorders. European Journal of Disorders of Communication 2: 377–397. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Topbaş, S. & Konrot, A. 1998. Variability in phonological disorders: Can we search for systematicty? Evidence from Turkish-speaking children. In Clinical Phonetics and Linguistics, W. Ziegler & K. Deger (eds), 79–87. London: Whurr.Google Scholar
Topbaş, S., Maviş, I. & Başal, P. 1997. Acquisition of bound morphemes: Nominal case morphology in Turkish. In Proceedings of the VIIIth International Conference on Turkish Linguistics, K. Emer & N. Engin Uzun (eds), 57–78. Ankara: Ankara University Press.Google Scholar
Topbaş, S. & Yavaş, M. 2006. Phonological acquisition and disorders in Turkish. In Phonological Development and Disorders in Children: A Multilingual Perspective, H. Zhu & B. Dodd (eds), 233–261. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Torrens, V. & Escobar, L. 2006. The Acquisition of Syntax in Romance Languages [Language Acquisition and Language Disorders 41]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Türkay, N.F. 2005. Children’s Early Lexicon in Terms of Noun/Verb Dominance. PhD dissertation, Çukurova University, Adana.Google Scholar
Ud Deen, K. 2005. The Acquisition of Swahili [Language Acquisition and Language Disorders 40]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Unsworth, S. 2013. Assessing age of onset effects in (early) child L2 acquisition. Language Acquisition 20: 74–92. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ural, E., Yuret, D., Ketrez, F.N., Küntay, A. & Koçbaş, D. 2009 Morphological cues vs. number of nominals in learning verb types in Turkish: Syntactic bootsrapping mechanism revisited. Language and Cognitive Processes 24(10): 1393–1405. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ünal, E. & Papafragou, A. 2016. Production-comprehension asymmetries and the acquisition of evidential morphology. Journal of Memory and Language 89: 179–199. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van der Lely, H.K.J. 2005. Domain-specific cognitive systems: Insight from grammatical specific language impairment. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 9(2): 53–59. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Volterra, V. & Taeschner, T. 1978. The acquisition and development of language by bilingual children. Journal of Child Language 5(2): 311–326. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wagner, R. & Torgesen, J. 1987. The nature of phonological processing and its casual role in the acquisition of reading skills. Psychological Bulletin 101: 192–212. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wang, H., Höhle, B., Ketrez, F.N., Küntay, A.C. & Mintz, T.H. 2011. Cross-linguistic distributional analyses with frequent frames: The cases of German and Turkish. In BUCLD 35: Proceedings of the 35th annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, N. Danis, K. Mesh & H. Sung (eds), 628–640. Somerville MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Wexler, K. 1994. Optional infinitives, head movement and the economy of derivations. In Verb Movement, D. Lightfoot & N. Hornstein (eds), 305–350. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wimmer, H. & Goswami, U. 1994. The influence of orthographic consistency on reading development: Word recognition in English and German children. Cognition 51: 91–103. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Xanthos, A., Laaha, S., Gillis, S., Stephany, U., Aksu-Koç, A.A., Christofidou, N., Gagarina, G., Hrzica U., Ketrez, F.N., Kilani-Schoch, M., Korecky-Kröll, K., Kovačević, M., Laalo, K., Palmović, M., Pfeiler, B., Voeikova, M.D. & Dressler, W.U. 2012. On the role of morphological richness in the early development of noun and verb inflection. First Language 31(4): 461–469. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yarbay-Duman, T., Blom, E. & Topbaş, S. 2015. At the intersection of cognition and grammar: Deficits comprehending counterfactuals in Turkish children with specific language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research 58: 410–421. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yarbay-Duman, T., Altınok, N. & Maviş, I. 2016. Grammar and cognition: Deficits comprehending counterfactuals in Turkish individuals with Broca’s aphasia. Aphasiology 30(7): 841–861. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yip, V. & Matthews, S. 2000. Syntactic transfer in a Cantonese – English bilingual child. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 3(3): 193–208. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zdorenko, T. & Paradis, J. 2008. The acquisition of articles in child second language English: Fluctuation, transfer or both? Second Language Research 24(2): 227–250. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011. Articles in child L2 English: When L1 and L2 Acquisition meet at the interface. First Language 31(1): 1–25.Google Scholar