Cover not available
Part of
Social Environment and Cognition in Language Development: Studies in honor of Ayhan Aksu-Koç
Edited by F. Nihan Ketrez, Aylin C. Küntay, Şeyda Özçalışkan and Aslı Özyürek
[Trends in Language Acquisition Research 21] 2017
► pp. 113–132

Chapter 8
Evidentiality, questions and the reflection principle in Tibetan

What do children learn when they learn about evidentiality?

| Smith College, U.S.A.
| Smith College, U.S.A.

Evidentials fall in the borderland between traditional semantics and pragmatics. A situation semantics for evidentials helps to explain their puzzling developmental pathway in children. Drawing on our work in Tibetan, we argue that there is no necessity for a child to master Theory of Mind, that is, awareness of others' mental states, in order to make or to understand assertions that carry evidential force. The meaning of evidentials does not make reference to states of knowledge of persons, but rather encodes relations between discourse, evidence and evaluation situations. On the other hand, when a Tibetan speaker asks a question, the form of the evidential used in the question must anticipate the kind of knowledge the interlocutor can access in reply. Full mastery of questions in Tibetan-speaking children does require attention to and representation of others' states of knowledge and belief.

Keywords: evidentials, Tibetan, questions, Theory of Mind, semantics
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Overview of the Tibetan evidential system
  • 3.Evidentiality and acquisition challenges
  • 4.Tibetan evidentials and maternal-child speech
  • 5.The semantics of evidentials
  • 6.The reflection principle for questions
  • 7.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgement
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 18 July 2017
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/tilar.21.08vil
References
Aikhenvald, A.
2004 Evidentiality. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Aksu, A. A.
1978 Aspect and Modality in the Child's Acquisition of the Turkish Past Tense. PhD dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Aksu- Koç, A.
1988 The Acquisition of Aspect and Modality: The Case of Past Reference in Turkish. Cambridge: CUP.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aksu-Koc, A. & Alıcı, D. M.
2000 Understanding sources of beliefs and marking of uncertainty: the child’s theory of evidentiality. In Proceedings of the 30th Annual Child Language Research Forum, E. V. Clark (ed.), 123–30. Stanford CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Apperly, I. A. & Butterfill, S. A.
2009 Do humans have two systems to track beliefs and belief-like states? Psychological Review 116(4): 953–970.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Astington, J. W.
2000 Language and metalanguage in children's understanding of mind. In Minds in the Making: Essays in Honor of David R. Olson, J. W. Astington (ed.), 267–284. Malden: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Astington, J. W. & Baird, J. A.
2005 Representational development and false-belief understanding. In Why Language Matters for Theory of Mind, J. W. Astington & J. A. Baird (eds), 163–185. Oxford: OUP.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baillargeon, R., Scott, R. M. & He, Z.
2010 False-belief understanding in infants. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 14(3): 110–118.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bartsch, K. & Wellman, H. M.
1995 Children Talk about the Mind. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Barwise, J. & Perry, J.
1981 Situations and attitudes. The Journal of Philosophy 78(11): 668–691.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1983 Situations and Attitudes. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Choi, S.
1991 Early acquisition of epistemic meanings in Korean: A study of sentence-ending suffixes in the spontaneous speech of three children. First Language 11(3): 93–119.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1995 The development of epistemic sentence-ending modal forms and functions in Korean children. In Modality in Grammar and Discourse [Typological Studies in Language 32], J. Bybee & S. Fleischman (eds), 165–204. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
de Villiers, J. G.
In preparation. Perspectives on truth: The case of language and false belief reasoning. In Semantics in Language Acquisition [Trends in Language Acquisition Research], K. Syrett & S. Arunachalam (eds) Amsterdam John Benjamins
de Villiers, J. G. & de Villiers, P. A.
2000 Linguistic determinism and the understanding of false beliefs. In Children’s Reasoning and the Mind, P. Mitchell & K. Riggs (eds), 191–228. Hove: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
de Villiers, J. G., Garfield, J., Gernet Girard, H., Roeper, T. & Speas, M.
2009 Evidentials in Tibetan: Acquisition, semantics and cognitive development. In Evidentiality: A Window into Language and Cognitive Development [Special Issue], S. Fitneva & T. Matsui (eds), New Directions for Adolescent and Child Development 125: 29–48.Google Scholar
Fenici, M.
2015a Social cognitive abilities in infancy: Is mindreading the best explanation? Philosophical Psychology 28(3): 387–411.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2015b A simple explanation of apparent early mindreading: infants’ sensitivity to goals and gaze direction. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 14(3): 497–515.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Garrett, E.
2001 Evidentiality and Assertion in Tibetan. PhD dissertation, UCLA.
Gopnik, A. & Astington, J. W.
1988 Children’s understanding of representational change and its relation to the understanding of false belief and the appearance-reality distinction. Child Development 59: 26–37.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kalsang, T., Garfield, J., Speas, M. & de Villiers, J. G.
2013 Direct evidentials, case, tense and aspect in Tibetan. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 31: 517–561.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kyuchukov, H. & de Villiers, J. G.
2009 Theory of Mind and evidentiality in Romani-Bulgarian bilingual children. Psychology of Language and Communication 13(2): 21–34. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Low, J. & Perner, J.
2012 Implicit and explicit theory of mind: State of the art. British Journal of Developmental Psychology 30: 1–13.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Low, J. & Watts, J.
2013 Attributing false beliefs about object identity reveals a signature blind spot in humans’ efficient mind-reading system. Psychological Science 24(3): 305–311.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marcus, G. F.
1993 Negative evidence in language acquisition. Cognition 46(1): 53–85.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Milligan, K., Astington, J. W. & Dack, L. A.
2007 Language and theory of mind: Meta-analysis of the relation between language ability and false-belief understanding. Child development 78(2): 622–646.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Öztürk, Ö. & Papafragou, A.
2008 Acquisition of evidentiality and source monitoring. In Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, H. Chan, H. Jacob & E. Kapia (eds), 368–377. Somerville MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Papafragou, A., Li, P., Choi, Y., & Han, C. H.
2007 Evidentiality in language and cognition. Cognition 103(2): 253–299.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Perner, J. & Ruffman, T.
2005 Infants' insight into the mind: How deep. Science 308(5719): 214–216.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pillow, B. H.
1989 Early understanding of perception as a source of knowledge. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 47(1): 116–129.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pratt, C. & Bryant, P.
1990 Young children understand that looking leads to knowing (so long as they are looking into a single barrel). Child Development 61(4): 973–982.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schenner, M.
2010 Evidentials in complex sentences: foundational issues and data from Turkish and German. In Evidence from Evidentials, T. Peterson & U. Sauerland (eds), 28: 183–220. University of British Columbia Working Papers in Linguistics. Google Scholar
Shatz, M., Wellman, H. M. & Silber, S.
1983 The acquisition of mental verbs: A systematic investigation of the first reference to mental state. Cognition 14(3): 301–321.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Southgate, V., Senju, A. & Csibra, G.
2007 Action anticipation through attribution of false belief by 2-year-olds. Psychological Science 18(7): 587–592.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Speas, P.
2010 Evidentials as generalized functional heads. Linguistik aktuell: Amsterdamer Arbeiten zur theoretischen & angewandten Linguistik 156: 127–150. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ünal, E. & Papafragou, A.
2016 Production-comprehension asymmetries and the acquisition of evidential morphology. Journal of Memory and Language 89: 179–199.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Uzundağ, B., Taşçı, S., Küntay, A. & Aksu-Koç, A.
2015 Functions of evidentials in Turkish child and child-directed speech in early child-caregiver interactions. Paper presented at the 40th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development .
Wimmer, H. & Perner, J.
1983 Beliefs about beliefs: Representation and constraining function of wrong beliefs in young children’s understanding of deception. Cognition 13(1): 103–128.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

de Villiers, Jill
2021. With Language in Mind. Language Learning and Development 17:2 ► pp. 71 ff. DOI logo
de Villiers, Jill G.
2018. Chapter 10. Perspectives on truth. In Semantics in Language Acquisition [Trends in Language Acquisition Research, 24], ► pp. 222 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 7 september 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.