Chapter published in:
Social Environment and Cognition in Language Development: Studies in honor of Ayhan Aksu-Koç
Edited by F. Nihan Ketrez, Aylin C. Küntay, Şeyda Özçalışkan and Aslı Özyürek
[Trends in Language Acquisition Research 21] 2017
► pp. 179198
References

References

Aksu-Koç, A.
1994Development of linguistic forms: Turkish. In Relating Events in Narrative, R. Berman & D. I. Slobin (eds), 329–388. Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Aguiar, A. & Baillargeon, R.
19992.5-month-old infants’ reasoning about when objects should and should not be occluded. Cognitive Psychology 39: 116–157.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Allen, S., Özyürek, A., Kita, S., Brown, A., Furman, R., Ishizuka, T. & Fujii, M.
2007Language-specific and universal influences in children’s syntactic packaging of manner and path: A comparison of English, Japanese, and Turkish. Cognition 102: 16–48.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Arterberry, M. E. & Bornstein, M. H.
2002Infant perceptual and conceptual categorization: The roles of static and dynamic stimulus attributes. Cognition 86: 1–24.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bahrick, L. E. & Pickens, J. N.
1995Infant memory for object motion across a period of three months: Implications for a four- phase attention function. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 59: 341–373.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Baillargeon, R.
2004Infants’ physical world. Current Directions in Psychological Science 13: 89–94.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Baillargeon, R. & Wang, S. H.
2002Event categorization in infancy. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 6: 85–93.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Baldwin, D. A., Baird, J. A., Saylor, M. M. & Clark, A. M.
2001Infants parse dynamic action. Child Development 72: 708–717.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bogartz, R. S., Shinskey, J. L. & Schilling, T. H.
2000Object permanence in five-and-a-half-month-old infants. Infancy 1: 403–428.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bowerman, M. & Choi, S.
1994Linguistic and nonlinguistic determinants of spatial semantic development. Paper presented at the Boston University Conference on Language Development , Boston, MA.
Brown, A. & Gullberg, M.
2008Bidirectional crosslinguistic influence in L1-L2 encoding of manner in speech and gesture: A study of Japanese speakers of English. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 30: 225–251.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Casasola, M.
2005When less is more: How infants learn to form an abstract categorical representation of support. Child Development 76: 279–290.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Casasola, M., Bhagwat, J. & Burke, A. S.
2009Learning to form a spatial category of tight-fit relations: how experience with a label can give a boost. Developmental Psychology 45: 711–723.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Casasola, M., Cohen, L. B. & Chiarello, E.
2003Six-month-old infants’ categorization of containment spatial relations. Child Development 74: 679–693.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Casasola, M. & Park, Y.
2013Developmental changes in infant spatial categorization: When more is best and when less is enough. Child Development 84: 1004–1019.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chen, L. & Guo, J.
2009Motion events in Chinese novels: Evidence for an equipollently-framed language. Journal of Pragmatics 41: 1749–1766.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Choi, S.
2006Influence of language-specific input on spatial cognition: Categories of containment. First Language 26: 207–232.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Choi, S. & Bowerman, M.
1991Learning to express motion events in English and Korean: The influence of language-specific lexicalization patterns. Cognition 41: 83–121.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Choi, S. & Hattrup, K.
2012Relative contribution of perception/cognition and language on spatial categorization. Cognitive Science 36: 102–129.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Clark, E. V.
2003First Language Acquisition. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Csibra, G., Gergely, G., Biro, S., Koos, O. & Brockbank, M.
1999Goal attribution without agency cues: The perception of “pure reason” in infancy. Cognition 72: 237–267.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Erciyes, A. & Göksun, T.
2016, January. On the way to learn relational words: Detecting event components in dynamic events. Poster presented at the 16th BCCCD conference , Budapest, Hungary.
Flecken, M., Carroll, M., Weimar, K. & von Stutterheim, C.
2015Driving along the road or heading for the village? Conceptual differences underlying motion event encoding in French, German, and French–German L2 users. The Modern Language Journal 99: 100–122.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Furman, R., Küntay, A. C. & Özyürek, A.
2014Early language-specificity of children's event encoding in speech and gesture: evidence from caused motion in Turkish. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience 29: 620–634.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gentner, D.
1982Why nouns are learned before verbs: Linguistic relativity versus natural partitioning. In Language Development: Language, Thought, and Culture, S. Kuczaj (ed.), 301–334. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Gentner, D. & Bowerman, M.
2009Why some spatial semantic categories are harder to learn than others: The typological prevalence hypothesis. In Crosslinguistic Approaches to the Psychology of Language: Research in the Tradition of Dan Isaac Slobin, J. Guo, E. Lieven, S. Ervin-Tripp, N. Budwig, S. Özçalışkan & K. Nakamura (eds), 465–480. New York NY: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
George, N.
2014The Force of Language: How Children Acquire the Semantic Categories. PhD dissertation, Temple University.
George, N., Göksun, T., Hirsh-Pasek, K. & Golinkoff, R. M.
2014Carving the world for language learning: How neuroscientific research can enrich the study of first and second language learning. Developmental Neuropsychology 39: 262–284.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
George, N., Hirsh-Pasek, K. & Golinkoff, R.
Under review. Force dynamics: A semantic window into event hierarchies.
Golinkoff, R. M., & Hirsh-Pasek, K.
2008How toddlers begin to learn verbs. Trends in Cognitive Science 12: 397–403.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Göksun, T.
2010The “Who” and “Where” of Events: Infants’ Processing of Figures and Grounds in Nonlinguistic Events. PhD dissertation, Temple University.
Göksun, T., George, N. R., Hirsh-Pasek, K. & Golinkoff, R. M.
2013Forces and motion: How young children understand causal events. Child Development 84: 1285–1295.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Göksun, T., Hirsh-Pasek, K. & Golinkoff, R. M.
2010aTrading spaces: Carving up events for learning language. Perspectives on Psychological Science 5: 33–42.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010bHow do preschoolers express cause in gesture and speech? Cognitive Development 25: 56–68.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Göksun, T., Hirsh-Pasek, K., Golinkoff, R. M., Imai, M., Konishi, H. & Okada, H.
2011Who is crossing where? Infants’ discrimination of figures and grounds in events. Cognition 121: 176–195.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gullberg, M., Hendriks, H. & Hickmann, M.
2008Learning to talk and gesture about motion in French. First Language 28: 200–236.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Han, Z., & Cadierno, T.
(eds) 2010Linguistic Relativity in SLA: Thinking for Speaking. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Hespos, S. J. & Baillargeon, R.
2001Reasoning about containment events in very young infants. Cognition 78: 207–245.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2008Young infants’ actions reveal their developing knowledge of support variables: Converging evidence for violation-of-expectation findings. Cognition 107: 304–316.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hespos, S. J., Grossman, S. R. & Saylor, M. M.
2010Infants’ ability to parse continuous actions: Further evidence. Neural Networks 23: 1026–1032.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hespos, S. J. & Piccin, T.
2009To generalize or not to generalize: Spatial categories are influenced by physical attributes and language. Developmental Science 12: 88–95.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hespos, S. J. & Spelke, E. S.
2004Conceptual precursors to language. Nature 430: 453–456.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hespos, S. J., Saylor, M. M. & Grossman, S. R.
2009Infants' ability to parse continuous actions. Developmental Psychology 45: 575–585.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hohenstein, J., Eisenberg, A. & Naigles, L.
2006Is he floating across or crossing afloat? Cross-influence of L1 and L2 in Spanish-English bilingual adults. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 9: 249–261.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Imai, M., Li, L., Haryu, E., Okada, H., Hirsh-Pasek, H. & Golinkoff, R. M.
2008Novel noun and verb learning in Chinese, English, and Japanese children: Universality and language specificity in novel noun and verb learning. Child Development 79: 979–1000.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jackendoff, R.
1983Semantics and Cognition [Current Studies in Linguistics Series 8]. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Johanson, M., Selimis, S., & Papafragou, A.
2008Cross-linguistic biases in the semantics and the acquisition of spatial language. Paper presented at the 33rd Boston University Conference on Language Development , Boston, MA.
Konishi, H.
2015Semantic Reorganization: Does Language Influence Infants’ Perception of Components of Events? PhD dissertation, University of Delaware.
Konishi, H., Pruden, S. M., Golinkoff, R. M. & Hirsh-Pasek, K.
2016Categorization of dynamic realistic motion events: Infants form categories of path before manner. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 152: 54–70.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Konishi, H., Stahl, A. E., Golinkoff, R. M. & Hirsh-Pasek, KK.
In press. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology.
Lai, V. T., Rodríguez, G. G. & Narasimhan, B.
2014Thinking-for-speaking in early and late bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 17: 139–152.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lakusta, L. & Carey, S.
2008, March. Infants’ categorization of sources and goals in motion events. Paper presented in Conceptual primitives for processing events and learning relational terms. Symposium at the 16th International Conference on Infant Studies , S. Pruden, & T. Göksun (Chairs), Vancouver, Canada.
Lakusta, L., Wagner, L., O’Hearn, K. & Landau, B.
2007Conceptual foundations of spatial language: evidence for a goal bias in infants. Language Learning and Development 3: 179–197.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lakusta, L. & Landau, B.
2012Language and memory for motion events: Origins of the asymmetry between source and goal paths. Cognitive Science 36: 517–544.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lakusta, L. & Carey, S.
2015Twelve-month-old infants’ encoding of goal and source paths in agentive and non-agentive motion events. Language Learning and Development 11: 152–175.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Leslie, A. M. & Keeble, S.
1987Do six-month-old infants perceive causality? Cognition 25: 265–288.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Maguire, M. J., Hirsh-Pasek, K., Golinkoff, R. M., Haryu, E., Imai, M., Vengas, S. & Sanchez-Davis, B.
2010A developmental shift from similar to language-specific strategies in verb acquisition: A comparison of English, Spanish and Japanese. Cognition 114: 299–319.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mandler, J. M.
2012On the spatial foundations of the conceptual system and its enrichment. Cognitive Science 36: 421–451.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McCabe, A., Tamis-LeMonda, C. S., Bornstein, M. H., Cates, C. B., Golinkoff, R., Guerra, A. W. & Mendelsohn, A.
2013Multilingual children. Social Policy Report 27: 2014–51.Google Scholar
McDonough, L., Choi, S. & Mandler, J. M.
2003Understanding spatial relations: Flexible infants, lexical adults. Cognitive Psychology 46: 229–259.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Muentener, P. & Carey, S.
2010Infants’ causal representations of state change events. Cognitive Psychology 61: 63–86.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Negueruela, E., Lantolf, J. P., Jordan, S. R., & Gelabert, J.
2004The “private function” of gesture in second language communicative activity: A study on motion verbs and gesturing in English and Spanish. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 14: 113–147.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Özçalışkan, Ş.
2016Do gestures follow speech in bilinguals’ description of motion? Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 19: 644–653.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Özçalışkan, Ş. & Slobin, D. I.
1999Learning “how to search for the frog”: Expression of manner of motion in English, Spanish, and Turkish. In Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, A. Greenhill, H. Littlefield, & C. Tano (eds) 541–552. Somerville MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Özçalışkan, Ş., Gentner, D. & Goldin-Meadow, S.
2014Do iconic gestures pave the way for children's early verbs? Applied Psycholinguistics 35: 1143–1162.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Papafragou, A., Hulbert, J. & Trueswell, J.
2008Does language guide event perception? Evidence from eye movements. Cognition 108: 155–184.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pruden, S. M. & Hirsh-Pasek, K.
2006Foundations of verb learning: Labels promote action category formation. In Proceedings of the 30th annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, D. Bamman, T. Magnitskaia & C. Zaller (eds), 476–488. Somerville MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Pruden, S. M., Göksun, T., Roseberry, S., Hirsh-Pasek, K. & Golinkoff, R. M.
2012Find your manners: How do infants detect the invariant manner of motion in dynamic events? Child Development 83: 977–991.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pruden, S. M., Roseberry, S., Göksun, T., Hirsh-Pasek, K. & Golinkoff, R. M.
2013Infant categorization of path relations during dynamic events. Child Development 84: 331–345.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pulverman, R., Golinkoff, R. M., Hirsh-Pasek, K. & Sootsman-Buresh, J.
2008Infants discriminate paths and manners in non- linguistic dynamic events. Cognition 108: 825–830.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pulverman, R., Song, L., Pruden, S. M., Golinkoff, R. M. & Hirsh-Pasek, K.
2013Preverbal infants’ attention to manner and path: Foundations for learning relational terms. Child Development 84: 241–252.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rakison, D. H. & Krogh, L.
2012Does causal action facilitate causal perception in infants younger than 6 months of age? Developmental Science 15: 43–53.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Regier, T. & Zheng, Z.
2007Attention to endpoints: A cross- linguistic constraint on spatial meaning. Cognitive Science 31: 705–719.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Roseberry, S., Richie, R., Hirsh-Pasek, K., Golinkoff, R. M. & Shipley, T. F.
2011Babies catch a break 7-to 9-month-olds track statistical probabilities in continuous dynamic events. Psychological Science 22: 1422–1424.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Roseberry, S., Göksun, T., Hirsh-Pasek, K. & Golinkoff, R. M.
2012Carving categories in a continuous world: Preverbal infants discriminate categorical changes before distance changes in dynamic events. Spatial Cognition & Computation 12: 231–251.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Saylor, M. M., Baldwin, D. A., Baird, J. A. & LaBounty, J.
2007Infants' on-line segmentation of dynamic human action. Journal of Cognition and Development 8: 113–128.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Shafto, C. L., Havasi, C. & Snedeker, J.
2014On the plasticity of semantic generalizations: Children and adults modify their verb lexicalization biases in response to changing input. Developmental Psychology 50: 794–808.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sharon, T. & Wynn, K.
1998Individuation of actions from continuous motion. Psychological Science 9: 357–362.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Slobin, D. I.
1996From “thought and language” to “thinking to speaking.” In Rethinking Linguistic Relativity, J. J. Gumperz & S. C. Levinson (eds), 70–96. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
2001Form-function relations: How do children find out what they are? In Language Acquisition and Conceptual Development, M. Bowerman & S. C. Levinson (eds), 406–449. Cambridge: CUP.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Song, L., Pulverman, R., Pepe, C., Golinkoff, R. M. & Hirsh-Pasek, K.
2016Does the owl fly out of the tree or does the owl exit the tree flying? How L2 learners overcome their L1 lexicalization biases. Language Learning and Development 12(1): 42–59.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Song, L. Pruden, S. Golinkoff, R. M. & Hirsh-Pasek, K.
In press. Prelinguistic foundations of verb learning: Infants discriminate and categorize dynamic human actions. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology.
Stahl, A. E., Romberg, A. R., Roseberry, S., Golinkoff, R. M. & Hirsh‐Pasek, K.
2014Infants segment continuous events using transitional probabilities. Child Development 85: 1821–1826.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Talmy, L.
1985Lexicalization patterns: Semantic structure in lexical forms. In Language Typology and Syntactic Description, T. Shopen (ed.), 57–149. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
2000Toward a Cognitive Semantics: Vol. 1. Concept Structuring Systems. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Waxman, S., Fu, X., Arunachalam, S., Leddon, E., Geraghty, K. & Song, H. J.
2013Are nouns learned before verbs? Infants provide insight into a long‐standing debate. Child Development Perspectives 7: 155–159.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wolff, P.
2003Direct causation in the linguistic coding and individuation of causal events. Cognition 88: 1–48.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zacks, J. M. & Tversky, B.
2001Event structure in perception and conception. Psychological Bulletin 127: 3–21.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar