Chapter published in:
Social Environment and Cognition in Language Development: Studies in honor of Ayhan Aksu-Koç
Edited by F. Nihan Ketrez, Aylin C. Küntay, Şeyda Özçalışkan and Aslı Özyürek
[Trends in Language Acquisition Research 21] 2017
► pp. 223–240

Chapter 14
A first study on the development of spatial viewpoint in sign language acquisition

The case of Turkish Sign Language

| Radboud University Nijmegen, the Netherlands | Koç University, Turkey
| University of Brighton, UK
| Radboud University Nijmegen, the Netherlands | Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, the Netherlands
The current study examines, for the first time, the viewpoint preferences of signing children in expressing spatial relations that require imposing a viewpoint (left-right, front-behind). We elicited spatial descriptions from deaf children (4–9 years of age) acquiring Turkish Sign Language (TİD) natively from their deaf parents and from adult native signers of TİD. Adults produced these spatial descriptions from their own viewpoint and from that of their addressee depending on whether the objects were located on the lateral or the sagittal axis. TİD-acquiring children, on the other hand, described all spatial configurations from their own viewpoint. Differences were also found between children and adults in the type of linguistic devices and how they are used to express such spatial relations.
Keywords: sign language acquisition, spatial language, viewpoint
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
    • 1.1Viewpoint encoding in spoken languages
    • 1.2Linguistic forms of encoding spatial relations
    • 1.3Encoding viewpoint in sign languages
    • 1.4Acquisition of viewpoint by speaking and signing children
  • 2.Present study
  • 3.Participants
  • 4.Method and procedure
  • 5.Data coding and analysis
  • 6.Results
  • 7.Discussion
    • 7.1Adult patterns
    • 7.2Child patterns
  • 8.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 18 July 2017
https://doi.org/10.1075/tilar.21.14sum
References
Arık, E.
2008 Locative constructions in Turkish Sign Language (TID). In Sign Languages: Spinning and Unraveling the Past, Present, and Future. TISLR9, the Theoretical Issues in Sign Languages Research Conference, R. M. de Quadros (ed.), 15–31. Petropolis/RJl: Editorar Arara Azul.Google Scholar
2009 Spatial Language: Insights from Signed and Spoken Languages. PhD dissertation, Purdue University.Google Scholar
2012 Expressions of space during interaction in American Sign Language, Croatian Sign Language, and Turkish Sign Language. Poznań Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 48(2): 179–202.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chamberlain, J. Morford & Mayberry, R. I.
(eds) 2000 Language Acquisition by Eye. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Chen-Pichler, D.
2012 Language acquisition. In Handbook of Linguistics and Communication Science: Sign Language, R. Pfau, B. Woll & M. Steinbach (eds), 647–686. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Coie, J. D., Costanzo, P. R. & Farnill, D.
1973 Specific transitions in the development of spatial perspective-taking ability. Developmental Psychology 9: 167–177.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Emmorey, K.
1996 The confluence of space and language in signed language. In Language and Space, P. Bloom, M. A. Peterson, L. Nadel & M. Garrett (eds), 171–210. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Emmorey, K., Klima, E. & Hickok, G.
1998 Mental rotation within linguistic and nonlinguistic domains in users of American Sign Language. Cognition 68: 221–246.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Emmorey, K.
2002 Language, Cognition, and the Brain: Insights from Sign Language Research. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Johnston, J. R. & Slobin, D. I.
1979 The development of locative expressions in English, Italian, Serbo-Croatian and Turkish. Journal of Child Language 6: 529–545.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Johnston. J. R.
1988 Children's verbal representation of spatial location. In Spatial Cognition: Brain Bases and Development, J. Stiles-Davis, M. Kritchevsky & U. Bellugi (eds), 195–205. Hillside NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Levelt, W.J.M
1989 Speaking: From Intention to Articulation. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Loewenstein, J. & Gentner, D.
2005 Relational language and the development of relational mapping. Cognitive Psychology 50: 315–353.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mainwaring, S. D., Tversky, B. & Schiano, D. J.
1996 Perspective choice in spatial descriptions. IRC Technical Report 1996-06. Palo Alto CA: Interval Research Corporation.Google Scholar
Mainwaring, S. D., Tversky, B., Ohgishi, M. & Schiano, D. J.
2003 Descriptions of simple spatial scenes in English and Japanese. Spatial Cognition and Computation 3: 3–42.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Martin, A. J. & Sera, M. D.
2006 The acquisition of spatial constructions in American Sign Language and English. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education 11(4): 391–402.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Moll, H., Meltzoff, A. N., Merzsch, K. & Tomasello, M.
2013 Taking versus confronting visual perspectives in preschool children. Developmental Psychology 49(4): 646–654.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, G., Herman, R., Barriere, I. & Woll, B.
2008 The onset and the mastery of spatial language in children acquiring British Sign Language. Cognitive Development 23: 1–19.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Newport, E. L. & Meier, R. P.
1985 Acquisition of American Sign Language. In The Crosslinguistic Study of Language Acquisition, Vol. 1: The data, D. Slobin (ed.), 881–938. Hillside NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Perniss, P.
2007 Space and Iconicity in German Sign Language (DGS). PhD dissertation, Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics.
Piaget, J. & Inhelder, B.
[1948]1971 The Child's Conceptualization of Space. New York NY: Norton.Google Scholar
Piaget, J.
[1928]1972 Judgment and Reasoning in the Child. Totowa NJ: Littlefield, Adams. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pyers, J., Perniss, P., & Emmorey, K.
2015 Viewpoint in the visual-spatial modality: The coordination of spatial perspective. Spatial Cognition and Computation 15(3): 143–169.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, R. J. & Aman, C. J.
1993 Developmental differences in giving directions: Spatial frames of reference and mental rotation. Child Development 64: 1258–1270.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schober, M.
1993 Spatial perspective taking in conversation. Cognition 47: 1–24.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sümer, B., Perniss, P. M., Zwitserlood, I. & Özyürek, A.
2014 Learning to express "left-right" & "front-behind" in a sign versus spoken language. In Proceedings of the 36th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (CogSci 2014), P. Bello, M. Guarini, M. McShane & B. Scassellati (eds), 1550–1555. Austin TX: Cognitive Science Society.Google Scholar
Sümer, B.
2015 Acquisition of Spatial Language by Signing and Speaking Children: A Comparison of Turkish Sign Language (TİD) and Turkish. PhD dissertation, Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics.
Tomasello, M.
1987 Learning to use prepositions: A case study. Journal of Child Language 14: 79–98.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wittenburg, P., Brugman, H., Russel, A., Klassmann, A. & Sloetjes, H.
2006 ELAN: A professional Framework for Multimodality Research. Proceedings of LREC 2006. Fifth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation . www​.lrec​-conf​.org​/proceedings​/lrec2006
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Rowley, Katherine
2020.  In The Encyclopedia of Child and Adolescent Development, ► pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 31 march 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.