Cover not available
Part of
Social Environment and Cognition in Language Development: Studies in honor of Ayhan Aksu-Koç
Edited by F. Nihan Ketrez, Aylin C. Küntay, Şeyda Özçalışkan and Aslı Özyürek
[Trends in Language Acquisition Research 21] 2017
► pp. 223–240

Chapter 14
A first study on the development of spatial viewpoint in sign language acquisition

The case of Turkish Sign Language

| Radboud University Nijmegen, the Netherlands | Koç University, Turkey
| University of Brighton, UK
| Radboud University Nijmegen, the Netherlands | Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, the Netherlands
The current study examines, for the first time, the viewpoint preferences of signing children in expressing spatial relations that require imposing a viewpoint (left-right, front-behind). We elicited spatial descriptions from deaf children (4–9 years of age) acquiring Turkish Sign Language (TİD) natively from their deaf parents and from adult native signers of TİD. Adults produced these spatial descriptions from their own viewpoint and from that of their addressee depending on whether the objects were located on the lateral or the sagittal axis. TİD-acquiring children, on the other hand, described all spatial configurations from their own viewpoint. Differences were also found between children and adults in the type of linguistic devices and how they are used to express such spatial relations.
Keywords: sign language acquisition, spatial language, viewpoint
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
    • 1.1Viewpoint encoding in spoken languages
    • 1.2Linguistic forms of encoding spatial relations
    • 1.3Encoding viewpoint in sign languages
    • 1.4Acquisition of viewpoint by speaking and signing children
  • 2.Present study
  • 3.Participants
  • 4.Method and procedure
  • 5.Data coding and analysis
  • 6.Results
  • 7.Discussion
    • 7.1Adult patterns
    • 7.2Child patterns
  • 8.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 18 July 2017
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/tilar.21.14sum
References (29)
References
Arık, E.. 2008. Locative constructions in Turkish Sign Language (TID). In Sign Languages: Spinning and Unraveling the Past, Present, and Future. TISLR9, the Theoretical Issues in Sign Languages Research Conference, R. M. de Quadros (ed.), 15–31. Petropolis/RJl: Editorar Arara Azul.Google Scholar
. 2009. Spatial Language: Insights from Signed and Spoken Languages. PhD dissertation, Purdue University.Google Scholar
. 2012. Expressions of space during interaction in American Sign Language, Croatian Sign Language, and Turkish Sign Language. Poznań Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 48(2): 179–202.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chamberlain, J. Morford & Mayberry, R. I. (eds). 2000. Language Acquisition by Eye. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Chen-Pichler, D.. 2012. Language acquisition. In Handbook of Linguistics and Communication Science: Sign Language, R. Pfau, B. Woll & M. Steinbach (eds), 647–686. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Coie, J. D., Costanzo, P. R. & Farnill, D.. 1973. Specific transitions in the development of spatial perspective-taking ability. Developmental Psychology 9: 167–177.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Emmorey, K.. 1996. The confluence of space and language in signed language. In Language and Space, P. Bloom, M. A. Peterson, L. Nadel & M. Garrett (eds), 171–210. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Emmorey, K., Klima, E. & Hickok, G.. 1998. Mental rotation within linguistic and nonlinguistic domains in users of American Sign Language. Cognition 68: 221–246.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Emmorey, K.. 2002. Language, Cognition, and the Brain: Insights from Sign Language Research. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Johnston, J. R. & Slobin, D. I.. 1979. The development of locative expressions in English, Italian, Serbo-Croatian and Turkish. Journal of Child Language 6: 529–545.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johnston. J. R.. 1988. Children's verbal representation of spatial location. In Spatial Cognition: Brain Bases and Development, J. Stiles-Davis, M. Kritchevsky & U. Bellugi (eds), 195–205. Hillside NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Levelt, W.J.M. 1989. Speaking: From Intention to Articulation. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Loewenstein, J. & Gentner, D.. 2005. Relational language and the development of relational mapping. Cognitive Psychology 50: 315–353.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mainwaring, S. D., Tversky, B. & Schiano, D. J.. 1996. Perspective choice in spatial descriptions. IRC Technical Report 1996-06. Palo Alto CA: Interval Research Corporation.Google Scholar
Mainwaring, S. D., Tversky, B., Ohgishi, M. & Schiano, D. J.. 2003. Descriptions of simple spatial scenes in English and Japanese. Spatial Cognition and Computation 3: 3–42.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Martin, A. J. & Sera, M. D.. 2006. The acquisition of spatial constructions in American Sign Language and English. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education 11(4): 391–402.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moll, H., Meltzoff, A. N., Merzsch, K. & Tomasello, M.. 2013. Taking versus confronting visual perspectives in preschool children. Developmental Psychology 49(4): 646–654.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Morgan, G., Herman, R., Barriere, I. & Woll, B.. 2008. The onset and the mastery of spatial language in children acquiring British Sign Language. Cognitive Development 23: 1–19.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Newport, E. L. & Meier, R. P.. 1985. Acquisition of American Sign Language. In The Crosslinguistic Study of Language Acquisition, Vol. 1: The data, D. Slobin (ed.), 881–938. Hillside NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Perniss, P.. 2007. Space and Iconicity in German Sign Language (DGS). PhD dissertation, Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics.
Piaget, J. & Inhelder, B.. [1948]1971. The Child's Conceptualization of Space. New York NY: Norton.Google Scholar
Piaget, J.. [1928]1972. Judgment and Reasoning in the Child. Totowa NJ: Littlefield, Adams. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pyers, J., Perniss, P., & Emmorey, K.. 2015. Viewpoint in the visual-spatial modality: The coordination of spatial perspective. Spatial Cognition and Computation 15(3): 143–169.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roberts, R. J. & Aman, C. J.. 1993. Developmental differences in giving directions: Spatial frames of reference and mental rotation. Child Development 64: 1258–1270.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schober, M.. 1993. Spatial perspective taking in conversation. Cognition 47: 1–24.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sümer, B., Perniss, P. M., Zwitserlood, I. & Özyürek, A.. 2014. Learning to express "left-right" & "front-behind" in a sign versus spoken language. In Proceedings of the 36th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (CogSci 2014), P. Bello, M. Guarini, M. McShane & B. Scassellati (eds), 1550–1555. Austin TX: Cognitive Science Society.Google Scholar
Sümer, B.. 2015. Acquisition of Spatial Language by Signing and Speaking Children: A Comparison of Turkish Sign Language (TİD) and Turkish. PhD dissertation, Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics.
Tomasello, M.. 1987. Learning to use prepositions: A case study. Journal of Child Language 14: 79–98.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wittenburg, P., Brugman, H., Russel, A., Klassmann, A. & Sloetjes, H.. 2006. ELAN: A professional Framework for Multimodality Research. Proceedings of LREC 2006. Fifth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation . <[URL]>
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Rowley, Katherine
2020. Sign Language Acquisition. In The Encyclopedia of Child and Adolescent Development, ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.