Cover not available
Part of
Sources of Variation in First Language Acquisition: Languages, contexts, and learners
Edited by Maya Hickmann †, Edy Veneziano and Harriet Jisa
[Trends in Language Acquisition Research 22] 2018
► pp. 183–200

Chapter 9
Invariance in variation

Frequency and neighbourhood density as predictors of vocabulary size

| Laboratoire Dynamique du Langage, CNRS & Université Lumière Lyon 2
| Université François-Rabelais, Tours & Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire de Tours, INSERM
This article examines the influence of word frequency (WF) and neighbourhood density (ND) in vocabulary acquisition of French-speaking children. Data were collected through the French version of the MacArthur-Bates Communicative Development Inventory. A regression analysis based on 462 children aged between 16 and 30 months who have acquired at least 5 words revealed that ND and WF together predicted 45% of the variance in vocabulary size, with ND and WF uniquely accounting for 32.2% and 12.8% of that variance respectively. The same analysis was done with nouns and predicates only. For nouns, the model predicted 64.6% of the variance whereas for predicates, the size of predicate vocabulary was not correlated with either of the two variables.
Keywords: lexicon, development, word frequency, neighbourhood density, French
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Theoretical background
    • 2.1Frequency and lexical acquisition
    • 2.2Neighbourhood density and lexical acquisition
    • 2.3Frequency and neighbourhood density
  • 3.Method
    • 3.1Subjects
    • 3.2Data collection
    • 3.3Data processing and coding
      • Data reduction
      • Frequency
      • Neighbourhood density
  • 4.Results
    • 4.1ND and WF as predictors of total vocabulary size
    • 4.2ND and WF as predictors of noun vocabulary size
    • 4.3ND and WF as predictors of predicate vocabulary size
  • 5.Discussion
    • 5.1Further research
  • Acknowledgements
  • References
  • Appendix
Published online: 22 February 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/tilar.22.10ker
References (38)
References
Cameron-Faulkner, T., Lieven, E. & Tomasello, M. 2003. A construction based analysis of child directed speech. Cognitive Science: A Multidisciplinary Journal 27(6): 843–873. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Charles-Luce, J. & Luce, P. A. 1990. Similarity neighbourhoods of words in young children’s lexicons. Journal of Child Language 17(1): 205–215. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1995. An examination of similarity neighbourhoods in young children’s receptive vocabularies. Journal of Child Language 22: 727–735. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Coady, J. A. & Aslin, R. N. 2003. Phonological neighbourhoods in the developing lexicon. Journal of Child Language 30: 441–469. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Edwards, J., Beckman, M. E. & Munson, B. 2004. The interaction between vocabulary size and phonotactic probability effects on children’s production accuracy and fluency in nonword repetition. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 47: 421–436. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ellis, N. C. 2002. Frequency effects in language acquisition: A review with implications for theories of implicit and explicit language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 24: 143–188.Google Scholar
Fenson, L., Dale, P. S., Reznick, J. S., Bates, E., Hartung, J. P., Pethick, S. & Reilly, J. S. 1993. MacArthur Communicative Development Inventories: User's Guide and Technical Manual. San Diego CA: Singular.Google Scholar
Gallaway, C. & Richards, B. J. 1994. Input and Interaction in Language Acquisition. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goodman, J. C., Dale, P. S. & Li, P. 2008. Does frequency count? Parental input and the acquisition of vocabulary. Journal of Child Language 35(3): 515–531. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gopnik, A. & Choi, S. 1990. Do linguistic differences lead to cognitive differences? A cross-linguistic study of semantic and cognitive development. First Language 10: 199–215. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1995. Names, relational words, and cognitive development in English and Korean speakers: Nouns are not always learned before verbs. In Beyond Names for Things: Young Children’s Acquisition of Verbs, M. Tomasello & W. E. Merriman (eds), 63–80. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Hart, B. & Risley, T. 1995. Meaningful Differences in the Everyday Experience of Young American Children. Baltimore MD: Paul H. Brookes.Google Scholar
Hirsh-Pasek, K., Golinkoff, R. M. & Hollich, G. 2000. An emergentist coalition model for word learning: Mapping words to objects is a product of the interaction of multiple cues. In Becoming a Word Learner: A Debate on Lexical Acquisition, R. M. Golinkoff, K. Hirsh-Pasek, L. Bloom, L. B. Smith, A. L. Woodward, N. Akhtar, M. Tomasello & G. Hollich (eds), 136–164. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hollich, G., Jusczyk, P. W. & Luce, P. A. 2002. Lexical neighbourhood effects in 17-month-old word learning. In Proceedings of the 26th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, Vol. 1, B. Skarabela, S. Fish & A.H.-J. Do (eds), 314–323. Sommerville MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Jakielski, K. J. 1998. Motor Organization in the Acquisition of Consonant Clusters. PhD dissertation, University of Texas at Austin. Ann Arbor MI: UMI Dissertation services.Google Scholar
Kern, S. & Gayraud, F. 2010. L’IFDC. Grenoble: Editions La Cigale.Google Scholar
Klee, T. & Harrison, C. 2001. CDI words and sentences validity and preliminary norms for British English. Presented at Child Language Seminar, University of Hertfordshire, UK.Google Scholar
Landauer T. K. & Streeter, L. A. 1973. Structural differences between common and rare words: Failure of equivalence assumptions for theories of word recognition. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 12: 119–13. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lieven, E. 2010. Input and first language acquisition: Evaluating the role of frequency. Lingua 120: 2546–2556 DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Logan, J. S. 1992. A Computational Analysis of Young Children’s Lexicons [Research on Spoken Language Processing, Technical Report 8]. Bloomington IN: Speech Research Laboratory, Indiana University.Google Scholar
Maekawa, J. & Storkel, H. L. 2006. Dynamic assessment and word learning. Acquiring Knowledge in Speech, Language, and Hearing 8: 103–105.Google Scholar
New, B., Brysbaert, M., Veronis, J. & Pallier, C. 2007. The use of film subtitles to estimate word frequencies. Applied Psycholinguistics 28(4): 661–677 DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pisoni, D. B., Nusbaum, H. C., Luce, P. A. & Slowiaczek, L. M. 1985. Speech perception, word recognition, and the structure of the lexicon. Speech Communication 4: 75–95. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rice, M. L., Oetting, J. B., Marquis, J., Bode J. & Pae, S. 1994. Frequency of input effects on word comprehension of children with specific language impairment. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 37: 106–122. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Snow, E. 1977. The development of conversation between mothers and babies. Journal of Child Language 4: 1–22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stokes, S. 2010. Neighborhood density and word frequency predict vocabulary size in toddlers. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 53: 670–683. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stokes, S., Kern, S. & dos Santos, C. 2012. Extended statistical learning as an account for slow vocabulary growth. Journal of Child Language 39: 105–129. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stokes, S. F., Bleses, D., Basboll, H. & Lambertsen, C. 2012. Statistical learning in emerging lexicons: The case of Danish. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 55(5): 1265–1273. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Storkel, H. L. 2001. Learning new words: Phonotactic probability in language development. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 44: 1321–1337. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2004a. Do children acquire dense neighbourhoods? An investigation of similarity neighbourhoods in lexical acquisition. Applied Psycholinguistics 25: 201–221 DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2004b. Methods for minimizing the confounding effects of word length in the analysis of phonotactic probability and neighbourhood density. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 47: 1454–1468. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009. Developmental differences in the effects of phonological, lexical, and semantic variables on word learning by infants. Journal of Child Language 36: 291–321. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Storkel, H. L. & Rogers, M. A. 2000. The effect of probabilistic phonotactics on lexical acquisition. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics 14: 407–425. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vitevitch, M. S. 2002. The influence of phonological similarity neighbourhoods on speech production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 28: 735–747.Google Scholar
Vitevitch, M. S. & Sommers, M. S. 2003. The facilitative influence of phonological similarity and neighborhood frequency in speech production in younger and older adults. Memory & Cognition 31: 491–50. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vitevitch, M. S. & Stamer, M. K. 2006. The curious case of competition in Spanish speech production. Language & Cognitive Processes 21: 760–770. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vihman, M. M. 1996. Phonological Development: The Origins of Language in the Child. Cambridge MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Weizman, Z. O. & Snow, C. E. 2001. Lexical output as related to children’s vocabulary acquisition: Effects of sophisticated exposure and support for meaning. Developmental Psychology 37: 265–279. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (4)

Cited by four other publications

Golmohammadi, Golnoosh, Farhad Sakhai, Faezeh Asadollahpour, Kiana Nouhi, Naemeh Jafari & Zahra Baghejari
2024. Adaptation and validation of the word complexity measure for Persian-speaking toddlers. First Language 44:4 ► pp. 422 ff. DOI logo
Kern, Sophie & Christophe dos Santos
2024. Chapter 18. Lexical development of French-Portuguese simultaneous bilinguals. In Multilingual Acquisition and Learning [Studies in Bilingualism, 67], ► pp. 473 ff. DOI logo
Cychosz, Margaret, Jan R. Edwards, Nan Bernstein Ratner, Catherine Torrington Eaton & Rochelle S. Newman
2021. Acoustic-Lexical Characteristics of Child-Directed Speech Between 7 and 24 Months and Their Impact on Toddlers' Phonological Processing. Frontiers in Psychology 12 DOI logo
Stokes, Stephanie F., Elise de Bree, Annemarie Kerkhoff, Mohammad Momenian & Tania Zamuner
2019. Phonology, Semantics, and the Comprehension–Expression Gap in Emerging Lexicons. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 62:12 ► pp. 4509 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.