Chapter published in:Sources of Variation in First Language Acquisition: Languages, contexts, and learners
Edited by Maya Hickmann †, Edy Veneziano and Harriet Jisa
[Trends in Language Acquisition Research 22] 2018
► pp. 183–200
Chapter 9Invariance in variation
Frequency and neighbourhood density as predictors of vocabulary size
This article examines the influence of word frequency (WF) and neighbourhood density (ND) in vocabulary acquisition of French-speaking children. Data were collected through the French version of the MacArthur-Bates Communicative Development Inventory. A regression analysis based on 462 children aged between 16 and 30 months who have acquired at least 5 words revealed that ND and WF together predicted 45% of the variance in vocabulary size, with ND and WF uniquely accounting for 32.2% and 12.8% of that variance respectively. The same analysis was done with nouns and predicates only. For nouns, the model predicted 64.6% of the variance whereas for predicates, the size of predicate vocabulary was not correlated with either of the two variables.
- 2.Theoretical background
- 2.1Frequency and lexical acquisition
- 2.2Neighbourhood density and lexical acquisition
- 2.3Frequency and neighbourhood density
- 3.2Data collection
- 3.3Data processing and coding
- Data reduction
- Neighbourhood density
- 4.1ND and WF as predictors of total vocabulary size
- 4.2ND and WF as predictors of noun vocabulary size
- 4.3ND and WF as predictors of predicate vocabulary size
- 5.1Further research
Published online: 22 February 2018
Cameron-Faulkner, T., Lieven, E. & Tomasello, M.
Charles-Luce, J. & Luce, P. A.
Coady, J. A. & Aslin, R. N.
Edwards, J., Beckman, M. E. & Munson, B.
Ellis, N. C.
Fenson, L., Dale, P. S., Reznick, J. S., Bates, E., Hartung, J. P., Pethick, S. & Reilly, J. S.
Goodman, J. C., Dale, P. S. & Li, P.
Gopnik, A. & Choi, S.
Hart, B. & Risley, T.
Hirsh-Pasek, K., Golinkoff, R. M. & Hollich, G.
2000 An emergentist coalition model for word learning: Mapping words to objects is a product of the interaction of multiple cues. In Becoming a Word Learner: A Debate on Lexical Acquisition, R. M. Golinkoff, K. Hirsh-Pasek, L. Bloom, L. B. Smith, A. L. Woodward, N. Akhtar, M. Tomasello & G. Hollich (eds), 136–164. Oxford: OUP.
Hollich, G., Jusczyk, P. W. & Luce, P. A.
Jakielski, K. J.
Klee, T. & Harrison, C.
Landauer T. K. & Streeter, L. A.
Logan, J. S.
Maekawa, J. & Storkel, H. L.
New, B., Brysbaert, M., Veronis, J. & Pallier, C.
Pisoni, D. B., Nusbaum, H. C., Luce, P. A. & Slowiaczek, L. M.
Rice, M. L., Oetting, J. B., Marquis, J., Bode J. & Pae, S.
Stokes, S., Kern, S. & dos Santos, C.
Stokes, S. F., Bleses, D., Basboll, H. & Lambertsen, C.
Storkel, H. L.
Storkel, H. L. & Rogers, M. A.
Vitevitch, M. S.
Vitevitch, M. S. & Sommers, M. S.
Vitevitch, M. S. & Stamer, M. K.
Vihman, M. M.
Cited by 2 other publications
Cychosz, Margaret, Jan R. Edwards, Nan Bernstein Ratner, Catherine Torrington Eaton & Rochelle S. Newman
Stokes, Stephanie F., Elise de Bree, Annemarie Kerkhoff, Mohammad Momenian & Tania Zamuner
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 31 march 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.