Cover not available
Part of
Sources of Variation in First Language Acquisition: Languages, contexts, and learners
Edited by Maya Hickmann †, Edy Veneziano and Harriet Jisa
[Trends in Language Acquisition Research 22] 2018
► pp. 201–218

Chapter 10
New perspectives on input-output dynamics

Example from the emergence of the Noun category

| Laboratoire Structures Formelles du Langage, CNRS & Université Paris 8
| Department of Psychology, University of Groningen
This study addresses the role of input, i.e., child-directed speech, in child language acquisition. Proposing a dynamic approach of input-output relationships, we examine the development of noun determiners in the spontaneous production data of three monolingual children between one and three years old. Analyses show explosions in determiner use in the three children, although these vary in timing and amplitude. Such explosions are not found in the input, which rather presented striking fluctuations. Dynamic modeling (an extension of the Scaffolding Model) shows corresponding changes over time in child speech and child-directed speech, although the patterns are different across children. This argues for the idea of mutual influences between input and output, congruent with transactional adaptation models.
Keywords: adaptation, child-directed speech, dynamic modeling, early grammatical development, input-output relations, longitudinal data, noun determiners, scaffolding model
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
    • Determiner use and the emergence of the noun category
    • Child-directed speech, child language acquisition and the scaffolding model
  • 2.Data and coding
  • 3.Initial analyses: Frequencies of the noun constructions in the three corpora
  • 4.The mathematical model
  • 5.Modeling analyses: Relations between child speech and CDS in the three corpora
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Note
  • References
  • Appendix
Published online: 22 February 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/tilar.22.11bas
References (32)
References
Aksu-Koç, A., Terziyan, T. & Taylan, E. E. 2014. Input offers and child uptakes: Acquiring mood and modal morphology in Turkish. Language, Interaction and Acquisition 5(1): 62–81. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bassano, D. 2000. Early development of nouns and verbs in French: Exploring the interface between lexicon and grammar. Journal of Child Language 27: 521–559. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010. L’acquisition du déterminant nominal en français : Une construction progressive et interactive de la grammaire. Cognitextes 5. <[URL]> (19 December 2016). DOI logo
2015. The acquisition of nominal determiners: Evidence from crosslinguistic approaches. In The Acquisition of Reference [Trends in Language Acquisition Research 15], L. Serratrice & S. Allen (eds), 25–49. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bassano, D., Korecky-Kröll, K., Maillochon, I. & Dressler, W. U. 2013a. The acquisition of nominal determiners in French and German: A crosslinguistic perspective on the grammaticalization of nouns. In Grammaticalization and First Language Acquisition: Crosslinguistic Perspectives [Benjamins Current Topics 50], D. Bassano & M. Hickmann (eds), 37–59. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bassano, D., Korecky-Kröll, K., Maillochon, I., van Dijk, M., Laaha, S. van Geert, P. & Dressler, W. U. 2013b. Prosody and animacy in the development of noun determiner use: A cross-linguistic approach. First Language 33(5): 476–503. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bassano, D., Maillochon, I., Korecky-Kröll, K., van Dijk, M., Laaha, S., Dressler, W. U. & van Geert, P. 2011. A comparative and dynamic approach to the development of determiner use in three children acquiring different languages. First Language 31(3): 253–279. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bassano, D., Maillochon, I. & Mottet, S. 2008. Noun grammaticalization and determiner use in French children’s speech: A gradual development with prosodic and lexical influences. Journal of Child Language 35: 403–438. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Behrens, H. 2006. The input-output relationship in first language acquisition. Language and Cognitive Processes 21: 2–24. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, A. 2006. Constructions at work: The Nature of Generalization in Language. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Guasti, M. T., De Lange J., Gavarro, A. & Caprin, C. 2008. Article omission across child languages. Language Acquisition 15: 89–119. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huttenlocher, J., Waterfall, H. R., Vasilyeva, M., Vevea, J. L. & Hedges, L. V. 2007. The varieties of speech to young children. Developmental Psychology 43: 1062–1083. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kupisch, T. 2007. Testing the effects of frequency on the rate of learning: Determiner use in early French, German and Italian. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Input Frequencies in Acquisition, I. Gülzow & N. Gagarina (eds), 83–113. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Lieven, E. V. 2010. Input and first language acquisition. Evaluating the role of frequency. Lingua 120: 2546–2556. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lleó, C. 2001. The interface of phonology and syntax: The emergence of the article in the early acquisition of Spanish and German. In Approaches to Bootstrapping, Vol. 2 [Language Acquisition and Language Disorders 24], J. Weissenborn & B. Höhle (eds), 23–44. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lleó, C. & Demuth, C. 1999. Prosodic constraints on the emergence of grammatical morphemes: cross-linguistic evidence from Germanic and Romance languages. In Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Boston University Conference on Child Language Development, A. Greenhill, H. Littlefield & C. Tano (eds), 407–418. Somerville MA: Cascadilla.Google Scholar
Matychuck, P. 2005. The role of child-directed speech in language acquisition: A case study. Language Sciences 27: 301–379. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Molenaar, P. C. M. & Campbell, C. G. 2009. The new person-specific paradigm in psychology. Current Directions in Psychological Science 18: 112–117. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Peters, A. 2001. Filler syllables: What is their status in emerging grammar? Journal of Child Language 28: 229–242. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pine, J. M. & Lieven, E. 1997. Slot and frames patterns and the development of the determiner category. Applied Psycholinguistics 18(2): 123–138. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rozendaal, M. I. & Baker, A. E. 2008. A cross-linguistic investigation of the acquisition of the pragmatics of indefinite and definite reference in two-year-olds. Journal of Child Language 35: 773–807. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Snow, C. E. 1972. Mothers’ speech to children learning language. Child Development 43: 549–565. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sokolov, J. 1993. A local contingency analysis of the fine-tuning process. Developmental Psychology 29: 1008–1023. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Valian, V. 1986. Syntactic categories in the speech of young children. Developmental Psychology 22(4): 562–579. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van der Velde, M. 2004. L’acquisition des articles définis en L1: Une étude comparative entre le français et le néerlandais. Acquisition et Interaction en Langue Étrangère 21: 9–46.Google Scholar
van Dijk, M. & van Geert, P. 2013. Exploring patterns of adaptation in child-directed speech during the process of early grammaticalization in child language. In Grammaticalization and First Language Acquisition: Crosslinguistic Perspectives [Benjamins Current Topics 50], D. Bassano & M. Hickmann (eds), 61–80. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Dijk, M., van Geert, P., Korecky-Kröll, K., Maillochon, I., Laaha, S., Dressler, W. U. & Bassano, D. 2013. Dynamic adaptation in child-adult language interaction. Language Learning 63(2): 243–270. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Geert, P. 1991. A dynamic systems model of cognitive and language growth. Psychological Review 98: 3–53. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1994. Dynamic systems of development. Change between complexity and chaos. Harvester: New York.Google Scholar
2008. Nonlinear-complex-dynamic-systems in developmental psychology. In Chaos and Complexity in Psychology: The Theory of Nonlinear Dynamical Systems, S. Guastello, M. Koopmans & D. Pincus (eds), 242–281. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Geert, P. & Steenbeek, H. 2005. The dynamics of scaffolding. New Ideas in Psychology 23: 115–128. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Veneziano, E. & Sinclair, H. 2000. The changing status of ‘filler syllables’ on the way to grammatical morphemes. Journal of Child Language 27: 461–500. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Pace, Amy, Raúl Rojas, Roger Bakeman, Lauren B. Adamson, Catherine S. Tamis-LeMonda, Margaret O'Brien Caughy, Margaret Tresch Owen & Katharine Suma
2022. A Longitudinal Study of Language Use During Early Mother–Child Interactions in Spanish-Speaking Families Experiencing Low Income. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 65:1 ► pp. 303 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.