Cover not available
Part of
Sources of Variation in First Language Acquisition: Languages, contexts, and learners
Edited by Maya Hickmann †, Edy Veneziano and Harriet Jisa
[Trends in Language Acquisition Research 22] 2018
► pp. 265–284

Chapter 13
Texting by 12-year-olds

Features shared with spoken language

| Centre de Recherches sur la Cognition et l’Apprentissage, Université de Poitiers & CNRS
| Laboratoire Cognitions Humaine et Artificielle, Université Paris Nanterre
| Centre de Recherches sur la Cognition et l’Apprentissage, Université Poitiers & CNRS
| Laboratoire Cognition, Langues, Langages, Ergonomie, Université de Toulouse Jean Jaurès & CNRS
The objective of this chapter is to investigate the development and use of the texting register. Our hypothesis is that this language register shares features with spoken language. In contrast to traditional writing, texting language is not the result of explicit academic instruction. Rather, it is acquired through daily interactions, as is spoken language. We collected a one-year longitudinal corpus of text messages (4,524 texts) produced by 19 teens aged 11–13 years, with no previous experience using a mobile phone. The messages were analyzed using orthographic indices (categories of spelling errors) and dialogic indices (presence/absence of an opening or closing). The data are discussed in terms of the specifics of the texting register. Unlike other registers, the texting register is not stable over time and evolves at an extremely rapid rate.
Keywords: SMS, texting, register, writing, orthography, adolescents, dialogic opening/closing, French, netspeak
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
    • 1.1Evolution of text-message spelling with use: Previous studies
    • 1.2Dialogic structure of text messages: Previous studies
    • 1.3Aims
  • 2.Method
    • 2.1Participants
    • 2.2Equipment
    • 2.3Data collection
    • 2.4Coding
      • 2.4.1Coding of textisms
      • 2.4.2The dialogic structure of the messages
  • 3.Results
  • 4.Discussion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
  • Appendix
Published online: 22 February 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/tilar.22.14ber
References (64)
References
Adam, J. -M. 1998. Les genres du discours épistolaire: De la rhétorique à l’analyse pragmatique: pratiques discursives. In La lettre entre réel et fiction, J. Siess (ed.), 37–53. Paris: SEDES.Google Scholar
Andersen, E. 1996. A cross-cultural study of children’s register knowledge. In Social Interaction, Social Context, and Language, D. Slobin, J. Gerhardt, A. Kyratzis & G. Jiansheng (eds), 125–142. Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Anis, J. 2001. Parlez-vous texto ? Guide des nouveaux langages du réseau. Paris: Le Cherche Midi.Google Scholar
2007. Neography: Unconventional spelling in French SMS text messages. In The Multilingual Internet: Language, Culture and Communication Online, B. Danet & S. C. Herring (eds), 87–115. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baron, N. S. 1981. Speech, Writing and Sign. Bloomington IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Bernicot, J., Volckaert-Legrier, O., Goumi, A. & Bert-Erboul, A. 2012a. Forms and functions of SMS messages: A study of variations in a corpus written by adolescents. Journal of Pragmatics 44: 1701–1715. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012b. SMS experience and textisms in young adolescents: Presentation of a longitudinally collected corpus. Lingvisticae Investigationes 35(2): 181–198. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, D. 1988. Variation across Speech and Writing. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1995. Dimensions of register variation: A cross-linguistic comparison. New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, D. & Conrad, S. 2001. Variation in English: Multi-dimensional Studies. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
Bou-Franch, P. 2011. Openings and closings in Spanish email conversations. Fuel and Energy Abstracts 43(6): 1772–1785.Google Scholar
Bouillaud, C., Chanquoy, L. & Gombert, J. -E. 2007. Cyberlangage et orthographe: Quels effets sur le niveau orthographique des élèves de CM2, 5e et 3e? Bulletin de Psychologie 60(6): 553–565. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bushnell, C., Kemp, N. & Martin, F. H. 2011. Text-messaging practices and links to general spelling skill: A study of Australian children. Australian Journal of Educational & Developmental Psychology 11: 27–38.Google Scholar
Chafe, W. & Tannen, D. 1987. The relation between written and spoken language. Annual Review of Anthropology 16: 383–407. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Crystal, D. 2001. Language and the Internet. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Daugmaudytė, J. & Kėdikaitė, D. 2006. Le langage SMS dans le Français. Kalbotyra 56(3): 39–47.Google Scholar
Drouin, M. A. 2011. College students' text messaging, use of textese and literacy skills. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 27: 67–75. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Drouin, M. A & Davis, C. 2009. R u txting ? Is the use of text speaking hurting your literacy? Journal of Literacy Research 41: 46–67. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dürscheid, C. & Stark, E. 2011. Sms4science: An international corpus-based texting project and the specific challenges for multilingual Switzerland. In Digital Discourse. Language in the New Media, C. Thurlow & K. Mroczek (eds), 299–320. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eckert, P. & Rickford, J. R. 2001. Style and Sociolinguistic Variation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ellis, J. & Ure, J. 1977. Register in descriptive linguistics and linguistic sociology. In Issues in Sociolinguistics, O. Uribe Villegas (ed.), 197–243. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Eggins, S. & Martin, J. R. 1997. Genres and register of discourse. In Discourse as Structure and Process [Discourse Studies: A Multidisciplinary Introduction], T.A. van Dijk (ed.), 230–256. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Elmiger, D. 2012. L'écriture SMS: Émergence de nouvelles pratiques orthographiques. Langage & Pratiques 49: 74–81.Google Scholar
Ferguson, C. A. 1977. Baby talk as a simplified register. In Talking to Children: Language Input and Acquisition, C. E Snow & C. A. Ferguson (eds), 209–235. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Fernandez, J. & Yuldashev, A. 2011. Variation in the use of general extenders and stuff in instant messaging interactions. Journal of Pragmatics 43(10): 2610–2626. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goffman, Erving. 1967. Les rites d’interaction. Paris: Editions de Minuit.Google Scholar
Goumi, A., Volckaert-Legrier, O., Bernicot, J. & Bert-Erboul, A. 2011. SMS length and function: A comparative study of 13 to 18 year-old girls and boys. European Review of Applied Psychology 61(4): 175–184. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grace, A., Kemp, N., Martin, F. H. & Parrila, R. 2015. Undergraduates’ text messaging language and literacy skills. Reading and Writing 27: 855–873. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grimshaw, A. D. 2003. Genres, registers, and contexts of discourse. In Handbook of Discourse Processes, A. C. Graesser, M. A. Gernsbacher & S. R. Goldman (eds), 25–82. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Grinter, R. & Eldridge, M. 2003. Wan2tlk? Everyday text messaging. In CHI ’03 Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 441–448.Google Scholar
Guenthner, S. & Knoblauch, H. 1995. Culturally patterned speaking practices: The analysis of communicative genres. Pragmatics 5: 1–32. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. 1964. The Linguistic Sciences and Language Teaching. London: University Park Press.Google Scholar
1978. The Social Interpretation of Language and Meaning. Language as a Social Semiotics. Baltimore MD: University Park Press.Google Scholar
1985. Dimensions of discourse analysis: Grammar. In Handbook of Discourse Analysis, Vol. 2: Dimensions of Discourse, T.A. Van Dijk (ed.), 29–56. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Harris, R. 2000. Rethinking Writing. London: The Athlone Press.Google Scholar
Hudson, R. A. 1980. Sociolinguistics. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Herring, S. C. 1996. Computer-Mediated Communication: Linguistic, Social, and Cross-cultural Perspectives [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 39]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hudson, R. A. 1980. Sociolinguistics. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Kemp, N. & Bushnell, C. 2011. Children’s text messaging: Abbreviations, input methods and links with literacy. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 27: 18–27. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kemp, N., Wood, C. & Waldron, S. 2014. do i know its wrong: Children's and adults' use of unconventional grammar in text messaging. Reading and Writing 27: 1585–1602. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Laursen, D. 2005. Please reply! The replying norm in adolescent SMS communication. In The Inside Text [The Kluwer International Series on Computer Supported Cooperative Work 4], R. Harper, L. Palen & A. Taylor (eds), 53–73. Amsterdam: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ling, R. 2005. The Socio-linguistics of SMS: An analysis of SMS use by a random sample of Norwegians. In Mobile Communications: Renegotiation of the Social Sphere, R. Ling & P. E. Pedersen (eds), 335–349. London: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010. Texting as a life phase medium. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 15: 277–292. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Martin, J. R. 1992. English Text: System and Structure. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Olson, D. R. 1994. The World on Paper: The Conceptual and Cognitive Implications of Writing and Reading. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Panckhurst, R. 2009. Short message service (SMS): Typologie et problematiques futures. In Polyphonies, pour Michelle Lanvin, T. Arnavielle (ed.), 33–52. Montpellier: Éditions LU.Google Scholar
2010. Texting in three European languages: Does the linguistic typology differ? Actes du Colloque i-Mean 2009 Issues in Meaning in Interaction, University of the West of England, Bristol. <[URL]>
Panckhurst, R. & Moïse, C. 2011. SMS ‘conversationnels’: Caractéristiques interactionnelles et pragmatiques. In 79e Colloque ACFAS, Sherbrooke, Canada. <[URL]>
2012. French text messages: From SMS data collection to preliminary analysis. Lingvisticae Investigationes 35(2): 289–317. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Plester, B., Lerkkanen, M. -K., Linjama, L. J., Rasku-Puttonen, H. & Littleton, K. 2011. Finnish and UK English pre-teen children’s text message language and its relationship with their literacy skills. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 27: 37–48. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Plester, B., Wood, C. & Bell, V. 2008. Txt Msg n school literacy: Does texting and knowledge of text abbreviations adversely affect children’s literacy attainment? Literacy 42(3): 137–144. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Plester, B., Wood, C. & Joshi, P. 2009. Exploring the relationship between children’s knowledge of text message abbreviations and school literacy outcomes. British Journal of Developmental Psychology 27: 145–161. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ravid, D. & Tolchinsky, L. 2002. Developing linguistic literacy: A comprehensive model. Journal of Child Language 29(2): 417–447. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rettie, R. 2009. Mobile phone communication: Extending Goffman to mediated interaction. Sociology 43(3): 421–438. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Spagnolli, A. & Gamberini, L. 2007. Interacting via SMS : Practices of Social Closeness and Reciprocation. British Journal of Social Psychology 46: 343–364. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Spilioti, T. 2011. Beyond genre: Closings and relational work in text-messaging. In Digital Discourse: Language in the New Media, C. Thurlow & C. Mroczel (eds), 67–85. Oxford: OUP. <[URL]> DOI logo
Stark, E. 2011. La morphosyntaxe dans les SMS suisses francophones: Le marquage de l’accord sujet – verbe conjugué. Linguistik Online 48(4): 35–47.Google Scholar
Thurlow, C. & Brown, A. 2003. Generation txt ? The sociolinguistics of young people’s text-messaging. Discourse Analysis Online 1(1).Google Scholar
Volckaert-Legrier, O. 2007. Le courrier électronique chez les adolescents: Un nouveau registre de la langue écrite. PhD dissertation, Université de Poitiers. <[URL]>
Volckaert-Legrier, O., Bernicot, J. & Bert-Erboul, A. 2009. Electronic email: A new written-language register: A study with French-speaking adolescents. British Journal of Developmental Psychology 27: 163–181. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013. Le courrier électronique chez les adolescents. In Culture, Identity and Digital Writing, F. Liénard (ed.). Epistèmé 9: 341–362.Google Scholar
Waldvogel, J. 2007. Greetings and closings in workplace email. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(2), 456–477. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Wood, C., Jackson, E., Hart, L., Plester, B., & Wilde, L. 2011a. The effect of text messaging on 9- and 10-yearold children’s reading, spelling and phonological processing skills. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 27, 28–36. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Wood, C., Meachem, S., Bowyer, S., Jackson, E., Tarczynski-Bowles, M. L., & Plester, B. 2011b. A longitudinal study of children’s text messaging and literacy development. British Journal of Psychology, 102, 431–442. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Tolchinsky, Liliana & Ruth A. Berman
2023. Growing into Language, DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.