Cover not available
Part of
The Development of Prosody in First Language Acquisition
Edited by Pilar Prieto and Núria Esteve-Gibert
[Trends in Language Acquisition Research 23] 2018
► pp. 165–184

Chapter 9
Prosodic phonology in acquisition

A focus on children’s early word productions

| University of Geneva
This chapter investigates how the theory of prosodic phonology has been applied to child language data, focusing on children’s early words. First, we consider early accounts of prosodic structure development in which the tools of prosodic phonology were used to explain the shape of children’s word productions. We then go on to consider later accounts in which factors apart from prosodic structure, such as the frequency of input forms, perceptual bias, and segmental factors, have been integrated into recent models. Referring to findings on a wide range of languages (e.g., Spanish, Catalan, Portuguese, Hebrew, Greek, and Japanese) we examine support for the minimal word, a bimoraic constraint on word production, and compare prosodic structure development across different groups of languages.
Article outline
  • Introduction
  • Theory of prosodic phonology
  • Prosodic phonology in acquisition
  • Early accounts of prosodic structure development
    • Gerken’s S(W) production template
    • Fikkert’s (1994) model of stress acquisition
    • Demuth and Fee’s (1995) prosodic hierarchy account
  • Later accounts of prosodic structure development
    • Factors influencing word shape apart from prosodic structure
      • Frequency of input forms
      • Perceptual bias or acoustic prominence
      • Segmental factors
    • Minimal word constraint
    • Prosodic structure development
      • Findings on Germanic languages
      • Findings on “Romance and other” languages
      • Prosodic structure development: Final word.
    • Top-down versus bottom-up development
  • Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • References
Published online: 24 May 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/tilar.23.09keh
References (66)
References
Adam, G., & Bat-El, O. (2008a). The trochaic bias is universal: Evidence from Hebrew. Proceedings of the Conference on Generative Approaches to Language Acquisition – Barcelona, 12–24.
(2008b). Segmental effects on syllable selection: Evidence from Hebrew. Proceedings of the Conference on Generative Approaches to Language Acquisition – Barcelona, 1–11.
(2009). When do universal preferences emerge in language development? The acquisition of Hebrew stress. Brill’s Annual of Afroasiatic Languages and Linguistics, 1, 255–282.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Allen, G., & Hawkins, S. (1980). Phonological rhythm: Definition and development. In G. Yeni-Komshian, J. Kavanagh, & C. Ferguson (Eds.), Child phonology: Production (Vol. 1, pp.227–256). New York, NY: Academic Press.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baia, M., & Santos, R. (2011). The discrepancy between naturalistic and experimental studies: The case of the initial prosodic template in Brazilian Portuguese. Selected Proceedings of the 5th Conference on Laboratory Approaches to Romance Phonology – Provo, 127–135.
Bartels, S., Darcy, I., & Höhle, B. (2009). Schwa syllables facilitate word segmentation by 9-month-old German-learning infants. Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development – Boston, 73–84.
Ben-David, A. (2012). The development of prosodic structure: Evidence from typical longitudinal data. Brill’s Annual of Afroasiatic Languages and Linguistics, 4, 55–79.Google Scholar
Blasdell, R., & Jensen, P. (1970). Stress and word position as determinants of imitation in first-language learners. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 13, 193–202. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blevins, J. (1995). The syllable in phonological theory. In J. Goldsmith (Ed.), The handbook of phonological theory (pp.206–244). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Borer, H., & Wexler, K. (1987). The maturation of syntax. In T. Roeper, & E. Williams (Eds.), Parameter setting (pp.123–172). Dordrecht: Reidel. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Braud, V., & Wauquier-Gravelines, S. (2004, April). Approche gabaritique des phénomènes de troncations en français. Paper presented at the Journées d’Etudes sur la Parole, Fez, Morocco.Google Scholar
Clements, G. N., & Keyser, S. (1983). CV phonology: A generative theory of the syllable. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Correia, S. (2009). The Acquisition of primary word stress in European Portuguese. Unpublished PhD dissertation. University of Lisbon.Google Scholar
Cutler, A., & Carter, D. (1987). The predominance of strong initial syllables in the English vocabulary. Computer Speech and Language, 2, 133–142. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dell, F. (1984). L’accentuation dans les phrases en français. In F. Dell, D. Hirst, & J-R. Vergnaud (Eds.), Forme sonore du langage (pp.65–122). Paris: Hermann.Google Scholar
Demuth, K. (1996a). Alignment, stress, and parsing in early phonological words. Proceedings of the UBC International Conference on Phonological Acquisition – Vancouver, 113–125.
(1996b). The prosodic structure of early words. In J. Morgan, & K. Demuth (Eds.), From signal to syntax: Bootstrapping from speech to grammar in early acquisition (pp.171–184). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Demuth, K., & Fee, E. J. (1995). Minimal Words in Early Phonological Development. Unpublished manuscript. Brown University and Dalhousie University.Google Scholar
Demuth, K., & Johnson, M. (2003). Truncation to subminimal words in early French. The Canadian Journal of Linguistics, 48, 211–241. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Demuth, K., Culbertson, J., & Alter, J. (2006). Word minimality, epenthesis, and coda licensing in the early acquisition of English. Language and Speech, 49, 137–174. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dresher, B., & Kaye, J. (1990). A computational learning model for metrical theory. Cognition, 34, 137–195. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Echols, C., & Newport, E. (1992). The role of stress and position in determining first words. Language Acquisition, 2, 189–220. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fikert, P. (1994). On the acquisition of prosodic structure. Dodrecht: ICG Printing.Google Scholar
Gerken, L. (1991). The metrical basis for children’s subjectless sentences. Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 431–451. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1994). A metrical template account of children’s weak syllable omissions from multisyllabic words. Journal of Child Language, 21, 565–584. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goad, H. (2016). Phonological processes in child speech. In J. Lidz, W. Snyder, & J. Pater (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of developmental linguistics (pp.43–67). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Goad, H., & Brannen, K. (2003). Phonetic evidence for phonological structure in syllabification. In J. Van de Weijer., V. Van Heuven, & H. Van de Hulst (Eds.), The phonological spectrum (Vol. 2, pp.3–30). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goad, H., & Buckley, M. (2006). Prosodic structure in child French: Evidence for the foot. Catalan Journal of Linguistics, 5, 109–142.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grimm, A. (2007). The development of early prosodic word structure in child German: Simplex words and compounds. Unpublished PhD dissertation. University of Potsdam.Google Scholar
Hall, A. T., & Kleinhenz, U. (Eds.) (1999). Studies on the phonological word. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Halle, M., & Vergnaud, J. (1987). An essay on stress. (Current Studies in Linguistics 15). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hayes, B. (1995). Metrical stress theory. Principles and case studies. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kehoe, M. (1999/2000).Truncation without shape constraints: The latter stages of prosodic acquisition. Language Acquisition, 8, 23–67. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kehoe, M., & Stoel-Gammon, C. (1997a). The acquisition of prosodic structure: An investigation of current accounts of children’s prosodic development. Language, 73(1), 113–144. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1997b). Truncation patterns in English-speaking children’s word productions. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 40, 526–541. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2001). Development of syllable structure in English-speaking children with particular reference to rhymes. Journal of Child Language, 28, 393–432. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Liberman, M., & Prince, A. (1977). On stress and linguistic rhythm. Linguistic Inquiry, 8, 249–336.Google Scholar
Lleó, C. (2002). The role of markedness in the acquisition of complex prosodic structures in German-Spanish bilinguals. International Journal of Bilingualism, 6, 291–313. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2006). The acquisition of prosodic word structures in Spanish by monolingual and Spanish-German bilingual children. Language and Speech, 49, 205–229. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lleó, C., & Demuth, K. (1999). Prosodic constraints on the emergence of grammatical morphemes: Cross-linguistic evidence from Germanic and Romance languages. Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development – Boston, 407–418.
McCarthy, J., & Prince, A. (1986). Prosodic morphology. Unpublished manuscript. University of Massachusetts and Brandeis University.Google Scholar
(1990). Foot and word in prosodic morphology: The Arabic broken plural. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 8, 209–283. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Miles, K., Yuen, I., Cox, F., & Demuth, K. (2016). The prosodic licensing of coda consonants in early speech: Interactions with vowel length. Journal of Child Language, 43, 265–283.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nespor, M., & Vogel, I. (1986). Prosodic phonology. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Ota, M. (2001). Phonological theory and the development of prosodic structure. Evidence from child Japanese. Annual Review of Language Acquisition, 1, 65–118. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2006). Input frequency and word truncation in child Japanese: Structural and lexical effects. Language and Speech, 49, 261–295. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Paradis, J., Petitclerc, S., & Genesee, F. (1997). Word truncation in French-speaking two year olds. In E. Hughes, M. Hughes, & A. Greenhill (Eds.), Proceedings of the 21st Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp.441–452). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Pater, J. (1997). Minimal violation and phonological development. Language Acquisition, 6, 201–253. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pater, J., & Paradis, J. (1996). Truncation without templates in child phonology. In A. Stringfellow, D. Cahana-Amitay, E. Hughes, & A. Zukowski (Eds.), Proceedings of the 20th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (Vol. 2, pp.540–551). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Peperkamp, S. (1997). Prosodic words. Den Haag: HAG.Google Scholar
Prieto, P. (2006). The relevance of metrical information in early prosodic word acquisition: A comparison of Catalan and Spanish. Language and Speech, 49, 231–259. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Prieto, P., & Bosch-Baliarda, M. (2006). The development of codas in Catalan. Catalan Journal of Linguistics, 5, 237–272.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roark, B., & Demuth, K. (2000). Prosodic constraints and the learner’s environment: A corpus study. In S. C. Howell, S. A. Fish, & T. Keith-Lucas (Eds.), Proceedings of the 24th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp.597–608). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Rose, Y. (2000). Headedness and prosodic licensing in the L1 acquisition of phonology. Unpublished PhD dissertation. McGill University.Google Scholar
Saaristo-Helin, K., Kunnari S., & Savinainen-Makkonen, T. (2011). Phonological development in children learning Finnish: A review. First Language, 31, 342–363. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Santos, R. (2005). Strategies for word stress in Brazilian Portuguese. In M. Tzakosta, C. Levelt, & J. van de Weijer (Eds.), Developmental paths in phonological acquisition. Special issue of Leiden Papers in Linguistics, 2(1), 71–91.Google Scholar
(2006). Word stress acquisition: a comparison between Brazilian Portuguese and Dutch. In D. Bamman, T. Magnitskaia, & C. Zaller (Eds.), Proceedings of the 30th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp.525–536). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Savinainen-Makkonen, T. (2000). Learning long words: A typological perspective. Language and Speech, 43, 205–225. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Segal, O., Nir-Sagiv, B., Kishon-Rabin, L., & Ravid, D. (2009). Prosodic patterns in Hebrew child-directed speech. Journal of Child Language, 36, 629–656. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Selkirk, E. (1980). The role of prosodic categories in English word stress. Linguistic Inquiry, 11, 563–605.Google Scholar
Snow, D. (1998). A prominence account of syllable reduction in early speech development: The child’s prosodic phonology of tiger and giraffe. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 41, 1171–1184. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Taelman, H. (2004). Syllable omissions and additions in Dutch child language: An inquiry into the function of rhythm and the link with innate grammar. Unpublished PhD dissertation. University of Antwerp.Google Scholar
Tzakosta, M. (2004). Multiple parallel grammars in the acquisition of stress in Greek L1. Unpublished PhD dissertation. Utrecht University.Google Scholar
Vigário, M., Freitas, M. J., & Frota, S. (2006). Grammar and frequency effects in the acquisition of prosodic words. Language and Speech, 49, 175–203. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vihman, M., DePaolis, R., & Davis, B. (1998). Is there a “trochaic bias” in early word learning? Evidence from infant production in English and French. Child Development, 69, 935–949. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wijnen, F., Krikhaar, E., & Den Os, E. (1994). The (non)realization of unstressed elements in children’s utterances: Evidence for a rhythmic constraint. Journal of Child Language, 21, 59–83. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Pye, Clifton
2024. A prosodic account of complex predicate acquisition in Mam: A Mayan language. First Language DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.