Cover not available
Part of
The Development of Prosody in First Language Acquisition
Edited by Pilar Prieto and Núria Esteve-Gibert
[Trends in Language Acquisition Research 23] 2018
► pp. 207–224

Chapter 11
Understanding the development of prosodic words

The role of the lexicon

| Macquarie University
Children’s early speech productions are not entirely adult-like, with syllables and morphemes often missing from early utterances. However, these patterns of development also appear to be influenced by the language being learned. This chapter explores the role of the lexicon as a driving force in understanding both lower Prosodic Word (PW) and higher Phonological Phrase and Intonational Phrase (PP, IP) aspects of children’s early speech. Using evidence from cross-linguistic studies, it shows how the prosodic shape and structure of the ambient lexicon influences the course of PW development and the implications this has for the acquisition of grammatical morphemes such as determiners. It concludes by exploring the implications of these findings for a developmental model of speech planning and production.
Article outline
  • Introduction
  • Prosodic structure
  • Markedness and the growth of prosodic words
    • Early PWs and feet
    • Syllable structure and coda consonants
    • Minimal prosodic words and moras
    • Truncation of unfooted syllables
  • The development of prosodic clitics: Interactions with PW shape
  • Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • References
Published online: 24 May 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/tilar.23.11dem
References (62)
References
Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (2005). Praat: Doing phonetics by computer (Version 4.4.07). Retrieved from < [URL] >.Google Scholar
Carter, A., & Gerken L. A. (2004). Do children’s omissions leave traces? Journal of Child Language, 31, 561–586. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chen, A., & Fikkert, P. (2007). Intonation of early two-word utterances in Dutch. Proceedings of the 16th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences – Saarbrücken, 315–320.
Demuth, K. (1995). Markedness and the development of prosodic structure. Proceedings of the North East Linguistic Society 25 – Amherst, 13–25.Google Scholar
(1996a). The prosodic structure of early words. In J. Morgan, & K. Demuth (Eds.), Signal to Syntax: Bootstrapping from Speech to Grammar in Early Acquisition. Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. pp.171–184.Google Scholar
(1996b). The prosodic structure of early words. In J. Morgan, & K. Demuth (Eds.), Signal to syntax: Bootstrapping from speech to grammar in early acquisition (pp.171–184). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
(2001). Prosodic constraints on morphological development. In J. Weissenborn, & B. Höhle (Eds.), Approaches to bootstrapping: Phonological, syntactic and neurophysiological aspects of early language acquisition (pp.3–21). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2006). Crosslinguistic perspectives on the development of prosodic words. Guest Editor, Special Issue, Language and Speech, 49, 129–297. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2014). Prosodic Licensing and the development of phonological and morphological representations. In A. Farris-Trimble, & J. Barlow (Eds.), Perspectives on phonological theory and acquisition: Papers in honor of Daniel A. Dinnsen (pp.11–24). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Demuth, K., Culbertson, J., & Alter, J. (2006). Word-minimality, epenthesis, and coda licensing in the acquisition of English. Language & Speech, 49, 137–174. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Demuth, K., & Ellis, D. (2009). Revisiting the acquisition of Sesotho noun class prefixes. In J. Guo, E. Lieven, N. Budwig, S. Ervin-Tripp, K. Nakamura, & S. Ozçalikan (Eds.). Crosslinguistic approaches to the psychology of language: Festschrift for Dan Slobin (pp.93–104). New York, NY: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Demuth, K., & Fee, J. (1995). Minimal prosodic words in early phonological development. Unpublished manuscript. Brown University and Dalhousie University.Google Scholar
Demuth, K., & Johnson, M. (2003). Truncation to subminimal words in early French. Canadian Journal of Linguistics, 48, 211–241. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Demuth, K., & McCullough, E. (2009). The prosodic (re)organization of children’s early English articles. Journal of Child Language, 36, 173–200. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Demuth, K., Patrolia, M., Song, J. Y., & Masapollo, M. (2012). The development of articles in children’s early Spanish: Prosodic interactions between lexical and grammatical form, First Language . Special Issue on Linguistic Interfaces and Language Acquisition in Childhood, 32, 17–37.Google Scholar
Demuth, K., & Tremblay, A. (2008). Prosodically-conditioned variability in children’s production of French determiners. Journal of Child Language, 35, 99–127. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Doke, C. M., & Mofokeng, S. M. (1985). Textbook of Southern Sotho grammar. Cape Town: Longman.Google Scholar
Fikkert, P. (1994). On the acquisition of prosodic structure. Unpublished PhD dissertation. University of Leiden.Google Scholar
Frota, S., M. Cruz, N. Matos, & M. Vigário. (2016). Early prosodic development: Emerging intonation and phrasing in European Portuguese. In M. Armstrong, N. C. Henriksen, & M. M. Vanrell (Eds.), Intonational grammar in Ibero-Romance: Approaches across linguistic subfields (pp.295–324). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Gennari, S., & Demuth, K. (1997). Syllable omission in Spanish. In E. Hughes, M. Hughes, & A. Greenhill (Eds.), Proceedings of the 21st Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (Vol. 1, pp.182–193). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Gerken, L. A. (1996). Prosodic structure in young children’s language production. Language, 72, 683–712. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gerken, L. A., & McIntosh, B. (1993). The interplay of function morphemes and prosody in early language. Developmental Psychology, 29, 448–457. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gnanadesikan, A. (2004). Markedness and faithfulness constraints in child phonology. In R. Kager, J. Pater, & W. Zonneveld (Eds.), Constraints in phonological acquisition (pp.73–109). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Giusti, G., & Gozzi, R. (2006). The acquisition of determiners: Evidence for the Full Competence Hypothesis. Language acquisition and development. Proceedings of Generative Approaches to Language Acquisition 2005 – Siena, 232–238.Google Scholar
Hansson, G. (2001). Theoretical and typological issues in consonant harmony. Unpublished PhD dissertation. University of California at Berkeley.Google Scholar
Hsieh, L., Leonard, L. B., & Swanson, L. (1999). Some difference between English plural noun inflections and third singular verb inflections in the input: The contributions of frequency, sentence position, and duration, Journal of Child Language, 26, 531–543. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hyams, N. (2007). Aspectual effects on interpretation in early grammar. Language Acquisition, 14, 231–268. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kehoe, M., & Stoel-Gammon, C. (1997). The acquisition of prosodic structure: An investigation of current accounts of children’s prosodic development. Language, 73, 113–144. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2001). Development of syllable structure in English-speaking children with particular reference to rhymes. Journal of Child Language, 28, 393–432. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kent, R. D. (1976). Anatomical and neuromuscular maturation of the speech mechanism: Evidence from acoustic studies. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research, 19, 421–447. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kern, S., & Davis, B. (2009). Emergent complexity in early vocal acquisition: Cross-linguistic comparisons of canonical babbling. In I. Chitoran, F. Pellegrino, & E. Marsico (Eds.), Approaches to phonological complexity (pp.353–375). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kirk, C., & Demuth, K. (2006). Accounting for variability in 2-year-olds’ production of coda consonants. Language Learning and Development, 2, 97–118. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levelt, C. C. (1995). Segmental structure of early words: Articulatory frames or phonological constraints. Proceedings of the Twenty-seventh Annual Child Language Research Forum – Stanford, 19–27.Google Scholar
Levelt, C. C., Schiller, N. O., & Levelt, W. J. (2000). The acquisition of syllable types. Language Acquisition, 8, 237–264. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levelt, W. J. M., Roelofs, A., & Meyer, A. S. (1999). A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 1–75. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lleó, C. (2001). The interface of phonology and morphology: the emergence of the article in the early acquisition of Spanish and German. In J. Weissenborn, & B. Höhle (Eds.), Approaches to bootstrapping: Phonological, syntactic and neurophysiological aspects of early language acquisition (pp.23–44). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2003). Prosodic licensing of codas. Probus, 15, 257–281. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lleó, C. (2006). The acquisition of prosodic word structures in Spanish by monolingual and Spanish-German bilingual children. Language and Speech, 49, 207–231. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lleó, C., & Demuth, K. (1999). Prosodic constraints on the emergence of grammatical morphemes: Crosslinguistic evidence from Germanic and Romance languages. In A. Greenhill, H. Littlefield, & Cheryl Tano (Eds.), Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp.407–418). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
MacNeilage, P. F. (1980). The control of speech production. In G. Yeni-Komshian, J. Kaveanagh, & C. Ferguson (Eds.), Child phonology: Production (Vol. 1, pp.9–21). New York, NY: Academic Press.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
MacWhinney, B. (2000). The CHILDES Project: Tools for analyzing talk. Vol 2: The Database (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Miles, K., Cox, F., Yuen, I., & Demuth, K. (2016). The prosodic licensing of coda consonants in early speech: Interactions with vowel length. Journal of Child Language, 43, 265–283.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nespor, M., & Vogel, I. (1986). Prosodic phonology. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Ota, M. (1999). Phonological theory and the acquisition of prosodic structure: Evidence from child Japanese. Unpublished PhD dissertation. University of Georgetown.Google Scholar
Prieto, P. (2006). The relevance of metrical information in early prosodic word acquisition: A comparison of Catalan and Spanish. Language & Speech, 40, 231–259. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Prieto, P., Estrella, A., Thorson, J., & Vanrell, M. M. (2012). Is prosodic development correlated with grammatical development? Evidence from emerging intonation in Catalan and Spanish. Journal of Child Language, 39, 221–257. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Prince, A., & Smolensky, P. (2004). Optimality Theory: Constraint interaction in generative grammar. Malden, MA: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roark, B., & Demuth, K. (2000). Prosodic constraints and the learner’s environment: A corpus study. In S. C. Howell, S. A. Fish, & T. Keith-Lucas (Eds.), Proceedings of the 24th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp.597–608). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
Rose, S., & Walker, R. (2004). A typology of consonant agreement as correspondence. Language, 80, 475–531. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rose, Y., & MacWhinney, B. (2014). The PhonBank project: Data and software-assisted methods for the study of phonology and phonological development. In J. Durand, U. Gut, & G. Kristoffersen (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of corpus phonology (pp.380–401). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Selkirk, E. O. (1984). Phonology and syntax: The relation between sound and structure. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
(1996). The prosodic structure of function words. In J. L. Morgan, & K. Demuth (Eds.), Signal to syntax: Bootstrapping from speech to grammar in early acquisition (pp.187–213). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Snow, D. (1994). Phrase-final syllable lengthening and intonation in early child speech. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 37, 831–840. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stevens, K. N. (2002). Toward a model for lexical access based on acoustic landmarks and distinctive features. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 111, 1872–1891. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Song, J. Y., & Demuth, K. (2008). Compensatory vowel lengthening for omitted coda consonants: A phonetic investigation of children’s early representations of prosodic words. Language & Speech, 51, 382–399.Google Scholar
Song, J. Y., Demuth, K., & Shattuck-Hufnagel, S. (2012). The development of acoustic cues to coda contrasts in young children learning American English. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 131, 3036–3050. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Song, J. Y., Sundara, M., & Demuth, K. (2009). Phonological constraints on children’s production of English third person singular -s . Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 52, 623–642. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Spencer, A. (1986). Towards a theory of phonological development. Lingua, 68, 3–38. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vigário, M., Freitas, M. J., & Frota, S. (2006). Grammar and frequency effects in the acquisition of prosodic words in European Portuguese. Language and Speech, 49, 175–203. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wexler, K. (1994). Optional infinitives, head movement, and the economy of derivation in child language. In D. Lightfoot, & N. Hornstein (Eds.), Verb movement (pp.305–350). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yuen, I., Demuth, K., Johnson, M. (2011). Prosodic structure in child speech planning and production, Proceedings of ICPhS XVII – Hong Kong, 2248–2251.Google Scholar
Yuen, I., Xu Rattanasone, N., Schmidt, E., Macdonald, G., Holt, R., & Demuth, K. (2016). Accentual lengthening in 5-year-old AusE-speaking children: Preliminary results. Proceedings of the 16th Australasian International Conference on Speech Science and Technology – Sydney, 21.Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Pye, Clifton
2024. A prosodic account of complex predicate acquisition in Mam: A Mayan language. First Language DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.