Cover not available
Part of
Understanding Deafness, Language and Cognitive Development: Essays in honour of Bencie Woll
Edited by Gary Morgan
[Trends in Language Acquisition Research 25] 2020
► pp. 33–52

Chapter 3
Overlap in turn-taking in signed mother–child dyadic and triadic interactions

Little is known about the development of the rules of turn-taking when signing, such as the extent to which overlap is allowed and when, and which attention strategies are used by signers when overlapping. This topic was investigated by comparing the more complex triadic situation (involving three people) of a deaf mother and her two deaf twins aged 5;6 years, together with how the adult communicated with these two children individually. Visual attention for the beginning of utterances was mostly established, but more so in the dyadic than the triadic situation. Seating position appeared to be relevant. More explicit strategies to attract eye-gaze were used in the triadic than the dyadic situation, including less usual strategies. Despite the conversation being between three people and needing checks with all participants, there was not more overlap in the triadic situation. Development in turn-taking is clearly still continuing after age six years.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Turn-taking
  • Methodology
  • Results
  • Discussion and conclusion
  • Acknowledgment
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 26 February 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/tilar.25.03bak
References (40)
References
Bacchini, S, Kuiken, F., & Schoonen, R. (1995) Generalizability of spontaneous data: The effect of occasion and place on the speech production of children. First Language 15, 131–150. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baker, A. E., & Van den Bogaerde, B. (2008). Codemixing in sign and words in input to and output from children. In C. Plaza Pust & E. Morales Lopez (Eds.), Sign bilingualism: Language development, interaction and maintenance in language contact situations (pp.1–27). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baker, A. E. & Van den Bogaerde, B. (2012). Communicative interaction. In R. Pfau, M. Steinbach, & B. Woll (Eds.), A handbook of sign linguistics (pp.489–512). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Baker, A., Van den Bogaerde, B., & Woll, B. (2009). Methods and procedures in sign language acquisition studies. In A. Baker & B. Woll (Eds.), Sign language acquisition (pp.1–49). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baker, C. (1977). Regulators and turn-taking in American Sign Language discourse. In L. A. Friedman (Ed.), On the other hand (pp.2018–2236). New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Barton, M. E., & Tomasello, M. (1991). Joint attention and conversation in Mother–Infant–Sibling Triads. Child Development 62(3), 517–529. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blain-Brière, B., Bouchard, C., & Bigras, N. (2014). The role of executive functions in the pragmatic skills of children aged 4–5. Frontiers in Psychology 5, 240. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Casillas, M. (2014). Turn-taking. In D. Matthews (Ed.) Pragmatic development in first language acquisition (pp.53–70). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Casillas, M., Bobb, S. C. & Clark, E. V. (2016). Turn-taking, timing and planning in early language acquisition. Journal of Child Language 43, 1310–1337. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Cekaite, A. (2013). Child pragmatic development. In C. A. Chapelle (Ed.), The encyclopedia of applied linguistics (pp.1–7). Malden, MA: Blackwell. DOI: DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Coates, J. & Sutton-Spence, R. (2001). Turn-taking patterns in deaf conversation. Journal of Sociolinguistics 5(4), 507–529. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cramér-Wolrath, E. (2011). Attention interchange at story-time: A case study from a deaf and hearing twin pair acquiring Swedish Sign Language in their deaf family. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education 17(2), 141–162. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Vos, C., Torreira, F., & Levinson, S. C. (2015). Turn-timing in signed conversations: Coordinating stroke-to-stroke boundaries. Frontiers in Psychology 6, 268. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
ELAN. <[URL]>
Filipi, A. (2014). Conversation analysis and pragmatic development. In D. Matthews (Ed.), Pragmatic development in first language acquisition (pp.71–86). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Galloway, C., & Richards, B. J. (1994). Input and interaction in language acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Garrod, S. & Pickering, M. J. (2009). Joint action, interactive alignment, and dialog. Topics in Cognitive Science 1, 292–304. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Harris, M., Clibbens, J, Chasin, J. & Tibbitts, R. (1989). The social context of early sign language development. First Language 9(25), 81–97. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hoza, J. (2007). It is not what you sign, but how you sign it. Politeness in American Sign Language. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar
Kimmelman, V., & Pfau, R. (2016). Information structure in signed languages. In C. Féry & S. Ishihara (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of information structure (pp.814–833). New York, NY: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kotowicz, J. Woll, B., Herman, R., Schromová, M., Kiela-Turska, M. & Łacheta, J. (2017). Executive function in deaf native signing children: The relationship of language experience and cognition. Presentation at Formal and Experimental Advances in Sign Language Theory, June 2017.Google Scholar
Levinson, S. C., & Torreira, F. (2015). Timing in turn-taking and its implications for processing models of language. Frontiers in Psychology 6, 731. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McCleary, L. E., & Leite, T. (2012). Turn-taking in Brazilian Sign Language: Evidence from overlap. Journal of Interactional Research in Communication Disorders 4(1), 124–153. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Peters, K. (n.d.). Hierarchy of social/pragmatic skills as related to the development of executive function. Retrieved at <[URL]> (accessed February 2018).
Prinz, P. M. & Prinz, E. A. (1985). If only you could hear what I see. Discourse development in sign language. Discourse Processes 8, 1–19. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rendle-Short, J., Skelt, L., & Bramley, N. (2015). Speaking to twin children: Evidence against the “Impoverishment” thesis. Research on Language and Interaction 48(1), 79–99. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roos, C., Cramér-Wolrath, E., & Falkman, K. W. (2016). Intersubjective interaction between deaf parents/deaf infants during the infants’ first 18 months. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education 21(1), 11–22. <[URL]> DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, E. A. (2000). Overlapping talk and the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language in Society 29(1), 1–63. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schick, B., De Villiers, P., De Villiers, J., & Hoffmeister, R. (2007). Language and Theory of Mind: A study of deaf children. Child Development 78(2), 376–396. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stivers, Y., Enfield, N. J., Brown, P., Englert, C., Hayashi, M., Heinemann, T., Hoymann, G., Rossano, F., De Ruiter, J.-P., Yoon, K. R., & Levinson, S. (2009). Universals and cultural variation in turn taking in conversation. PNAS 106(26), 10587–10592. <[URL]> DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sutton Spence, R., & Woll, B. (1999). The linguistics of British Sign Language: An introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tomasello, T., Manle, S., & Kruger, A. (1986). Linguistic environment of 1- to 2-year-old twins. Developmental Psychology 22(2), 169–176. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van den Bogaerde, B. (2000) Input and interaction in deaf families (PhD dissertation). University of Amsterdam. <[URL]> DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van den Bogaerde, B. & Baker, A. E. (2002). Are young deaf children bilingual? In G. Morgan & B. Woll (Eds.), Directions in sign language acquisition (pp.183–206). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2006). Code mixing in mother–child interaction in deaf families. Sign Language and Linguistics 8(1/2), 155–178.Google Scholar
(2014). Eye-gaze in turn taking in sign language interaction. Paper to IASCL, July 2014, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Van Herreweghe, M. (2002). Turn-taking mechanisms and active participation in meetings with Deaf and hearing participants in Flanders. In C. Lucas (Ed.), Turn-taking, fingerspelling, and contact in signed languages: Sociolinguistics in Deaf communities (pp.73–103). Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar
Wilbur, R., & Petitto, L. A. (1983/2009). Discourse structure in American Sign Language conversations (or, how to know a conversation when you see one). Discourse Processes 6(3), 225–2241. Retrieved at <[URL]> (accessed August 2017). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Woll, B. (1978). Structure and function in language acquisition. In The development of communication (pp.321–331). New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
Woolfe, T., Want, S. C., & Siegal, M. (2003). Siblings and Theory of Mind in deaf native children. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education 8(3), 340–347. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Boyes Braem, Penny & Katja Tissi
2023. Chapter 2. In your face. In Multimodal Im/politeness [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 333], ► pp. 27 ff. DOI logo
Macqueen, Susy & Tobias Haug
2022. Discussion of Issues Related to Assessment Constructs in Spoken and Signed Languages. In The Handbook of Language Assessment Across Modalities, ► pp. 261 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.