References

References

Anderson, D., & Reilly, J. (2002) The MacArthur communicative development inventory: Normative data for American Sign Language. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education 7(2), 83–106. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Baker, M.
(2008) The macroparameter in a microparametric world. In T. Biberauer (Ed.), The limits of syntactic variation (pp.351–373). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Berk, S.
(2003) Sensitive period effects on the acquisition of language: A study of language development (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Connecticut, Storrs.Google Scholar
Berk, S., & Lillo-Martin, D.
(2012) The two-word stage: Motivated by linguistic or cognitive constraints? Cognitive Psychology 65, 118–140. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Biberauer, T.
(2008) Doubling vs. omission: Insights from Afrikaans negation. In S. Barbiers, O. Koeneman, M. Lekakou, & M. van der Ham (Eds.), Microvariations in syntactic doubling (pp.103–140). Bingley: Emerald.Google Scholar
Boudreault, P., & Mayberry, R.
(2006) Grammatical processing in American Sign Language: Age of first-language acquisition effects in relation to syntactic structure. Language and Cognitive Processes 21(5), 608–635. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bruijnzeel, H., Ziylan, F., Stegeman, I., Topsakal, V., & Grolman, W.
(2016) A systematic review to define the speech and language benefit of early (<12 months) pediatric cochlear implantation. Audiology and Neurotology 21, 113–126. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, R., MacSweeney, M. & Woll, B.
(2014) Cochlear implantation (CI) for prelingual deafness: The relevance of studies of brain organization and the role of first language acquisition in considering outcome success. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, Article 834. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Caselli, N., Hall, W. & Lillo-Martin, D.
(2017) Operationalization and measurement of sign language. (Commentary on paper by Ann Geers et al.) Pediatrics 140(5), e20172655B. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chen Pichler, D.
(2012) Language acquisition. In R. Pfau, B. Woll & M. Steinbach (Eds.), Sign language: An international handbook (pp.647–686). Berlin: De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chen Pichler, D., & Koulidobrova, E.
(2015) Acquisition of sign language as a second language. In M. Marschark (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of deaf studies in language: Research, policy and practice (pp.218–230). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Chen Pichler, D., Kuntze, M., Lillo-Martin, D., de Quadros, R. M., & Stumpf, M.
(2018) Sign language acquisition by deaf and hearing children: A bilingual introduction. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar
Cormier, K., Schembri, A., Vinson, D., & Orfanidou, E.
(2012) First language acquisition differs from second language acquisition in prelingually deaf signers: Evidence from sensitivity to grammaticality judgement in British Sign Language. Cognition 124, 50–65. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Curtiss, S., Fromkin, V., Krashen, S., Rigler, D., & Rigler, M.
(1974) The linguistic development of Genie. Language 50(3): 528–554. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, K., Lillo-Martin, D., & Chen Pichler, D. (2014) Spoken English language development among native signing children with cochlear implants. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education 19(2), 238–250. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dodd, B.
(1979) Lip reading in infants: Attention to speech presented in-and out-of-synchrony. Cognitive Psychology 11, 478–484. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Emmorey, K.
(Ed.) (2003) Perspectives on classifier constructions in sign languages. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Emmorey, K., Bellugi, U., Friederici, A. & Horn, P.
(1995) Effects of age of acquisition on grammatical sensitivity: Evidence from on-line and off-line tasks. Applied Psycholinguistics 16(1), 1–23. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ferjan Ramirez, N., Lieberman, A., & Mayberry, R.
(2013) The initial stages of first-language acquisition begun in adolescence: When late looks early. Journal of Child Language 40(2), 391–414. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Flege, J., Yeni-Komshian, G., & Liu, S.
(1999) Age constraints on second-language acquisition. Journal of Memory and Language 41, 78–104. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Geers, A., Mitchell, C., Warner-Czyz, A., Wang, N., & Eisenberg, L.
(2017) Early sign language exposure and cochlear implantation benefits. Pediatrics 140, 1–9. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Haider, H.
(2012) Symmetry breaking in syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hassanzadeh, S.
(2012) Outcomes of cochlear implantation in deaf children of deaf parents: Comparative study. The Journal of Laryngology & Otology 126(10), 989–994. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hawkins, R., & Hattori, H.
(2006) Interpretation of English multiple wh-questions by Japanese speakers: A missing uninterpretable feature account. Second Language Research 22, 269–301. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jiménez, M., Pino, M., & Herruzo, J.
(2009) A comparative study of speech development between deaf children with cochlear implants who have been educated with spoken or spoken+sign language. International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology 73, 109–114. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, J., & Newport, E.
(1989) Critical period effects in second language learning: The influence of maturational state on the acquisition of English as a second language. Cognitive Psychology 21(1), 60–99. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kroffke, S., & Rothweiler, M.
(2006) Variation im frühen Zweitspracherwerb des Deutschen durch Kinder mit türkischer Erstsprache. In M. Vliegen (Ed.), Proceedings of the 39th Linguistics Colloquium (pp.145–153). Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Lardiere, D.
(1998) Dissociating syntax from morphology in a divergent L2 end-state grammar. Second Language Research 14, 359–375. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lenneberg, E.
(1967) Biological foundations of language. New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Levine, D., Strother-Garcia, K., Golinkoff, R., & Hirsh-Pasek, K.
(2016) Language development in the first year of life: What deaf children might be missing before Cochlear implantation. Otology & Neurotology 37(2), e56–e62. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lillo-Martin, D., & Meier, R.
(2011) On the linguistic status of ‘agreement’ in sign languages. Theoretical Linguistics 37, 95–141. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lyness, C., Woll, B., Campbell, R., & Cardin, V. (2013) How does visual language affect crossmodal plasticity and cochlear implant success? Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 37, 2621–2630. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Massaro, D., & Simpson, J.
(1987) Speech perception by ear and eye: A paradigm for psychological inquiry. Hove: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Mayberry, R.
(2010) Early language acquisition and adult language ability: What sign language reveals about the critical period for language. In M. Marschark & P. Spencer (Eds.), Oxford handbook of deaf studies, language and education (Vol. 2; pp.281–290). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mayberry, R., & Kluender, R.
(2018) Rethinking the critical period for language: New insights into an old question from American Sign Language. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 21, 886–905.Google Scholar
Meier, R., & Newport, E.
(1990) Out of the hands of babes: On a possible sign advantage in language acquisition. Language 66,1–23. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Meier, R., Cormier, K., & Quinto-Pozos, D.
(Eds.) (2002) Modality and structure in signed language and spoken language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Meier, R., Mauk, C., Cheek, A., & Moreland, C.
(2008) The form of children’s early signs: Iconic or motoric determinants? Language Learning and Development 4, 393–405. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, R., & Karchmer, M.
(2004) Chasing the mythical ten percent: Parental hearing status of deaf and hard of hearing students in the United States. Sign Language Studies 4(2), 138–163. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Moon, C., Cooper, R., & Fifer, W.
(1993) Two-day-olds prefer their native language. Infant Behav. Dev. 16, 495–500. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Morford, J.
(2003) Grammatical development in adolescent first-language learners. Linguistics 41(4), 681–721. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Morford, J., & Mayberry, R.
(2000) A reexamination of “Early Exposure” and its implications for language acquisition by eye. In C. Chamberlain, J. Morford, & R. Mayberry (Eds.), Language acquisition by eye (pp.111–128). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Newport, E.
(1990) Maturational constraints on language learning. Cognitive Science 14(1): 11–28. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Niparko, J., Tobey, E., Thal, D., Eisenberg, L., Wang, N.-Y., Quittner, A., & Fink, N.
(2010) Spoken language development in children following cochlear implantation. JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association 303(15), 1498–1506. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
O’Connor, N., & Hermelin, B.
(1991) A specific linguistic ability. American Journal on Mental Retardation 95, 673–680.Google Scholar
Padden, C.
(1983) Interaction of morphology and syntax in American Sign Language (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of California, San Diego.Google Scholar
Partanen, E., Kujala, T., Näätänen, R., Liitola, A., Sambeth, A., & Huotilainen, M.
(2013) Learning-induced neural plasticity of speech processing before birth. PNAS 110, 15145–15150. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Peterson, N., Pisoni, D., & Miyamoto, R.
(2010) Cochlear implants and spoken language processing abilities: Review and assessment of the literature. Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience 28, 237–250.Google Scholar
Roberts, I., & Holmberg, A. (2010) Introduction. In T. Biberauer, A. Holmberg, I. Roberts, & M. Sheehan (Eds.), Parametric variation: Null subjects in minimalist theory (pp.1–56). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schick, B.
(1990) The effects of morphosyntactic structure on the acquisition of classifier predicates in ASL. In C. Lucas (Ed.), Sign language research: Theoretical issues (pp.358–374). Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar
Schwartz, B.
(2009) Unraveling inflection in child L2 development. Acquisition et Interaction en Langue Étrangère 1(1), 63–88.Google Scholar
Slobin, D. I., Hoiting, N., Kuntze, M., Lindert, R., Weinberg, A., Pyers, J., et al.
(2003) A cognitive/functional perspective on the acquisition of “classifiers”. In K. Emmorey (Ed.), Perspectives on classifier constructions in sign languages (pp.271–296). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Smith, N.
(2002) Jackdaws, sex and language acquisition. In Language, bananas and bonobos: Linguistic problems, puzzles and polemics. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
(2005) Backlash. In Language, frogs and savants: More linguistic problems, puzzles and polemics. Oxford: Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Smith, N., & Tsimpli, I.
(1995) The mind of a savant: Language-learning and modularity. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Smith, N., Tsimpli, I., Morgan, G., & Woll, B.
(2011) The signs of a savant: Language against the odds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stone, A., Petitto, L.-A., & Bosworth, R.
(2017) Visual sonority modulates infants’ attraction to sign language. Language Learning and Development 14, 130–148. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tsimpli, I.
(2014) Early, late or very late? Timing acquisition and bilingualism. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 4(3), 283–313. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tsimpli, I., & Dimitrakopoulou, M.
(2007) The interpretability hypothesis: Evidence from Wh-interrogatives in L2 acquisition. Second Language Research 23, 215–242. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Werker, J., & Tees, R.
(1984) Cross-language speech perception: Evidence for perceptual reorganization during the first year of life. Infant Behavior and Development 7(1), 49–63. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Woll, B., & Morgan, G.
(2002) Conclusions and directions for future research. In G. Morgan & B. Woll (Eds.), Directions in sign language acquisition (pp.291–299). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Yoshinaga-Itano, C.
(2009) Universal newborn hearing screening programs and developmental outcomes. Audiological Medicine 1, 199–206. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Young, A., & Tattersall, H.
(2007) Universal newborn hearing screening and early identification of deafness: Parents’ responses to knowing early and their expectations of child communication development. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education 12, 209–220. CrossrefGoogle Scholar