Chapter published in:
The Acquisition of Differential Object Marking
Edited by Alexandru Mardale and Silvina Montrul
[Trends in Language Acquisition Research 26] 2020
► pp. 2149
References
Aguado-Orea, J., & Pine, J. M.
2015Comparing different models of the development of verb inflection in early child Spanish. PLoS ONE, 10(3), e0119613. Crossref
Aissen, J. L.
2003Differential Object Marking: Iconicity vs. economy. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 21(3), 435–483. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Aksu-Koç, A.
1988The acquisition of aspect and modality: The case of past reference in Turkish. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Albirini, A.
2015Factors affecting the acquisition of plural morphology in Jordanian Arabic. Journal of Child Language, 42(4), 734–762. Crossref
Ambridge, B.
2017Syntactic categories in child language acquisition: Innate, induced or illusory? In H. Cohen & C. Lefebvre (Eds.), Handbook of categorization in cognitive science (pp. 567–580). Amsterdam: Elsevier. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ambridge, B., Kidd, E., Rowland, C. F., & Theakston, A. L.
2015The ubiquity of frequency effects in first language acquisition. Journal of Child Language, 42, 239–273. Crossref
Argus, R.
1998CHILDES’i eesti andmepank ja selle suhtluskeskne analüüs [The Estonian databank on CHILDES and its conversational analysis] (Hendrik, 1.6–2.6). Tallinn:Tallinn University.Google Scholar
2008Psühholingvistiline katse eesti keele objekti käändevahelduse omandamise uurimise meetodina [Psycholinguistic experiment as a method of studying the acquisition of case alternation of the object in Estonian]. Yearbook of the Estonian Mother Tongue Society, 54, 22–43.Google Scholar
2009aAcquisition of Estonian: Some typologically relevant features. Sprachtypologie Und Universalienforschung, 62, 91–108.Google Scholar
2009bThe early development of case and number in Estonian. In M. D. Voeikova & U. Stephany (Eds.), Development of nominal inflection in first language acquisition: A crosslinguistic perspective (pp. 111–152). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2015On the acquisition of Differential Object Marking in Estonian. Revue Roumaine de Linguistique, 60(4), 403–420.Google Scholar
Avram, L.
2015Editorial: The L1 acquisition of Differential Object Marking. Revue Roumaine de Linguistique, 60(4), 331–338.Google Scholar
Baerman, M., Brown, D., & Corbett, G. G.
2015Understanding and measuring morphological complexity: An introduction. In M. Baerman, D. Brown, & G. G. Corbett (Eds.), Understanding and measuring morphological complexity (pp. 3–10). Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S.
2015Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48. Crossref
Behrens, H., & Pfänder, S.
2016Experience counts: Frequencye effects in language acquisition, language change, and language processing. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Bickel, B., & Witzlack-Makarevich, A.
2008Referential scales and case alignment: Reviewing the typological evidence. In M. Richards & A. L. Malchukov (Eds.), Scales (pp. 1–38). Leipzig: University of Leipzig.Google Scholar
Blevins, J. P.
2008Declension classes in Estonian. Linguistica Uralica, 43(4), 241–267. Crossref
Bohnacker, U., & Mohammadi, S.
2012Acquiring Persian object marking: Balochi learners of L2 Persian. Orientalia Suecana, LXI, 59–89.Google Scholar
Bolonyai, A.
2000Elective affinities: Language contact in the abstract lexicon and its structural consequences. International Journal of Bilingualism, 4(1), 81–106. Crossref
Bossong, G.
1983Animacy and markedness in Universal Grammar. Glossologia, 39, 7–20.Google Scholar
Bybee, J. L.
2010Language, usage and cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bybee, J. L., & Hopper, P. J.
2001Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dabašinskienė, I.
2015Growing knowledge in Differential Object Marking: The view from L1 Lithuanian. Revue Roumaine de Linguistique, 60(4), 369–382.Google Scholar
Divjak, D., & Gries, S. T.
(Eds.) 2012Frequency effects in language representation. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ehala, M.
2011The diffusion of impositional innovations in the Estonian object-marking system. Diachronica, 28(3), 324–344. Crossref
Erelt, M., & Metslang, H.
(Eds.) 2017Eesti keele süntaks [Syntax of Estonian]. Tartu: University of Tartu Press.Google Scholar
Gagarina, N.
2004Does the acquisition of aspect have anything to do with aspectual pairs? ZAS Papers in Linguistics, 33, 39–61.Google Scholar
Goldschneider, J. M., & DeKeyser, R. M.
2001Explaining the “natural order of L2 morpheme acquisition” in English: A meta-analysis of multiple determinants. Language Learning, 51(1), 1–50. Crossref
Granlund, S., Kołak, J., Vihman, V.-A., Engelmann, F., Lieven, E., Pine, J., Theakston, A., & Ambridge, B.
2019Language-general and language-specific phenomena in the acquisition of inflectional noun morphology: A cross-linguistic elicited-production study of Polish, Finnish and Estonian. Journal of Memory and Language, 107, 169–194. https://​doi​.org10​.1016​/j​.jml​.2019​.04​.004.
Gries, S. T., & Divjak, D.
(Eds.) 2012Frequency effects in language learning and processing. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Guijarro-Fuentes, P., Pires, A., & Nediger, W.
2015The late acquisition of Differential Object Marking by English-Spanish teenagers. International Journal of Bilingualism, 19, 1–19.Google Scholar
Gülzow, I., & Gagarina, N.
(Eds.) 2007Frequency effects in language acquisition: Defining the limits of frequency as an explanatory concept. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hallap, M., Padrik, M., & Raudik, S.
2014Käändevormide kasutamise oskus eakohase arenguga vene-eesti kakskeelsetel ning spetsiifilise kõnearengu puudega ükskeelsetel lastel [Estonian case morphology in second language acquisition and Specific Language Impairment]. Eesti Rakenduslingvistika Ühingu Aastaraamat / Estonian Papers in Applied Linguistics, 10, 73–90. Crossref
Hoop, H. de, & Malchukov, A. L.
2008Case-marking strategies. Linguistic Inquiry, 39(4), 565–587. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hopper, P. J., & Thompson, S. A.
1980Transitivity in grammar and discourse. Language, 56(2), 251–299. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Huumo, T.
2010Nominal aspect, quantity, and time: The case of the Finnish object. Journal of Linguistics, 46(1), 83. Crossref
2013On the many faces of incompleteness: Hide-and-seek with the Finnish partitive object. Folia Linguistica, 47(1), 89–112. Crossref
Iemmolo, G.
2013Symmetric and asymmetric alternations in direct object encoding. STUF– Language Typology and Universals, 66(4), 378–403. Crossref
Janssen, B. E.
2016The acquisition of gender and case in Polish and Russian: A study of monolingual and bilingual children. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, P.
1998Partitive case and aspect. In M. Butt & W. Geuder (Eds.), The projection of arguments. Stanford, CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Kjaerbaek, L., dePont Christensen, R., & Basbøll, H.
2014Sound structure and input frequency impact on noun plural acquisition: Hypotheses tested on Danish children across different data types. Nordic Journal of Linguistics, 37(1), 47–86. Crossref
Laaha, S., & Dressler, W. U.
2012Suffix predictability and stem transparency in the acquisition of german noun plurals. In F. Kiefer, M. Ladanyi, & P. Siptar (Eds.), Current issues in morphological theory: (Ir)regularity, analogy and frequency (pp. 217–235). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Laaha, S., Kjaerbaek, L., Basbøll, H., & Dressler, W. U.
2011The impact of sound structure on morphology: An experimental study on the acquisition of German and Danish noun plurals focussing on stem change. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia, 43(2), 106–126. Crossref
Lees, A.
2015Case alternations in five Finnic languages: Estonian, Finnish, Karelian, Livonian and Veps. Leiden: Brill. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lieven, E., & Behrens, H.
2012Dense sampling. In E. Hoff (Ed.), Research methods in child language: A practical guide (pp. 226–239). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
MacWhinney, B.
2000The CHILDES project: Tools for analyzing talk (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
2005Item-based constructions and the logical problem. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Psychocomputational Models of Human Language Acquisition (pp. 53–68). Ann Arbor, MI: Association for Computational Linguistics. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Metslang, H.
2001On the developments of the Estonian aspect: The verbal particle “ära.” In O. Dahl & M. Koptjevskaja-Tamm (Eds.), The Circum-Baltic languages, Vol, 2: Grammar and typology (pp. 443–479). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Miljan, M., Kaiser, E., & Vihman, V.-A.
2017Interplay between case, animacy and number: Interpretations of grammatical role in Estonian. Finno-Ugric Languages and Linguistics, 6(1), 55–77.Google Scholar
Montrul, S.
2014Structural changes in Spanish in the United States: Differential Object Marking in Spanish heritage speakers across generations. Lingua, 151, 177–196. Crossref
Ogren, D.
2015aDifferential Object Marking in Estonian: Prototypes, variation, and construction-specificity. SKY Journal of Linguistics, 28, 277–312.Google Scholar
2015bWord order, information structure and object case in Estonian. Journal of Estonian and Finno-Ugric Linguistics, 6(3), 197. Crossref. Crossref
2018Object case variation in Estonian da-infinitive constructions. Tartu: University of Tartu.Google Scholar
Rodríguez-Mondoñedo, M.
2008The acquisition of Differential Object Marking in Spanish. Probus, 20(1), 111–145. Crossref
Rubino, R. B., & Pine, J. M.
1998Subject–verb agreement in Brazilian Portuguese: What low error rates hide. Journal of Child Language, 25(1), 35–59. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Shirai, Y., Slobin, D. I., & Weist, R. E.
1998Introduction: The acquisition of tense-aspect. First Language, 18, 245–253. Crossref
Sinnemäki, K.
2014A typological perspective on Differential Object Marking. Linguistics, 52(2), 281–313. Crossref
Slobin, D.
(Ed.) 1985Cross linguistic study of language acquisition. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Stoll, S.
2001The acquisition of Russian aspect. Berkeley, CA: University of California.Google Scholar
Tamm, A.
2004Relations between Estonian aspect, verbs, and case. Budapest: Eötvös Loránd University.Google Scholar
2007Perfectivity, telicity and Estonian verbs. Nordic Journal of Linguistics, 302, 229–255. Crossref
Team, R. C.
2016R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.Google Scholar
Ticio, E., & Avram, L.
2015The acquisition of Differential Object Marking in Spanish and Romanian: Semantic scales or semantic features? Revue de Roumaine Linguistique, 60(4), 383–402.Google Scholar
Tomasello, M.
1992First verbs: A case study of early grammatical development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Torn-Leesik, R., & Vija, M.
2012Acquisition of the impersonal voice by an Estonian child. Journal of Baltic Studies, 43(2), 251–271. Crossref
Vaiss, N.
2004Eesti keele aspekti väljendusvõimalusi vene keele taustal [Options for expressing the direct object in Estonian compared with Russian] (Unpublished MA thesis). University of Tartu.Google Scholar
Vija, M.
2007Pronoomenid lapsekeeles: Mõnda mina ja sina omandamisest eesti laste näitel. [Pronouns in child language: Some thoughts on the acquisition of I and you, based on Estonian]. Estonian Papers in Applied Linguistics, 3, 373–384.Google Scholar
Xanthos, A., Laaha, S., Gillis, S., Stephany, U., Aksu-Koç, A., Christofidou, A., Gagarina, N., Hrzica, G., Ketrez, F. N., Kilani-Schoch, M., Korecky-Kröll, K., Kovačević, M., Laalo, K., Palmović, Pfeiler, B., Voeikova, M. D., & Dressler, W. U.
2011On the role of morphological richness in the early development of noun and verb inflection. First Language, 31(4), 461–479. Crossref
Zupping, S.
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

Sagna, Serge, Virve‑Anneli Vihman, Marilyn Vihman & Dunstan Brown
2022. The acquisition of demonstratives in a complex noun class system. Word Structure 15:3  pp. 226 ff. Crossref logo
VIHMAN, VIRVE-ANNELI, FELIX ENGELMANN, ELENA V. M. LIEVEN & ANNA L. THEAKSTON
2021. Many ways to decline a noun: elicitation of children’s novel noun inflection in Estonian. Language and Cognition 13:4  pp. 693 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 06 january 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.