Cover not available
Part of
The Acquisition of Differential Object Marking
Edited by Alexandru Mardale and Silvina Montrul
[Trends in Language Acquisition Research 26] 2020
► pp. 207–235

Chapter 8
Verbal lexical frequency and DOM in heritage speakers of Spanish

 | Rutgers University
This chapter examines the effect of lexical frequency of the verb on heritage speakers’ (HS) production of Differential Object Marking (DOM) in Spanish. Specifically, it examines whether HS are more likely to use DOM with animate direct objects that are the complement of high frequent telic verbs, as opposed to low-frequency telic verbs. Thirty HSs of different levels (intermediate and advanced) and 15 Spanish-dominant controls (SDC) completed an elicited production task (EPT). Results revealed that intermediate heritage speakers produced more DOM with high-frequency verbs but such an effect was not found in the advanced group. In explaining our data, we follow the activation approach that argues that the variability of DOM among HS is due to how frequently the HS activates the functional features (FF) of the heritage language (HL) for production purposes.
Keywords: heritage language, Spanish DOM, lexical activation, lexical frequency
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Literature overview
    • 2.1Differential Object Marking
    • 2.2Variability among heritage speakers of Spanish
    • 2.3Lexical frequency
    • 2.4Lexical development in the L2 and HS
  • 3.The study
    • 3.1Research questions and hypotheses
    • 3.2Methods
      • 3.2.1Participants
      • 3.2.2Tasks and procedures
        • 3.2.2.1DELE proficiency exam
        • 3.2.2.2Elicited Production Task: EPT
        • 3.2.2.3Language Background Questionnaire: LBQ
    • 3.3Statistical analysis
  • 4.Results
  • 5.Discussion
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 18 June 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/tilar.26.08hur
References (85)
References
Aissen, J. (2003). Differential Object Marking: Iconicity vs. economy. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 21(3), 435–483. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bayram, F., Rothman, J., Iverson, M., Kupisch, T., Miller, D., Puig-Mayenco, E., & Westergaard, M. (2017). Differences in use without deficiencies in competence: Passives in the Turkish and German of Turkish heritage speakers in Germany. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 22(8), 919–939.
CrossRef DOI logo with hyperlink to permanent DOI
Bossong, G. (1991). Differential Object Marking in Romance and beyond. In D. Wanner & D. A. Kibbee (Eds.), New analyses in Romance linguistics (pp. 143–170). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bowles, M., & Montrul, S. (2009). Instructed L2 acquisition of Differential Object Marking in Spanish. In R. P. Leow & H. Campos (Eds.), Little words: Their history, phonology, syntax, semantics, pragmatics and acquisition (pp. 199–210). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Bruhn de Garavito, J. (2002). Verb raising in Spanish: A comparison of early and late bilinguals. In B. Skarabela, S. Fish, & A. Do (Eds.), Proceedings of the 26th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (BUCLD) (pp. 84–94). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Bybee, J. L. (2001). Phonology and language use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2008). Usage-based grammar and second language acquisition. In P. Robinson & N. C. Ellis (Eds.), Handbook of cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition (pp. 226–246). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
(2010). Language, usage and cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Collins, C., Trofimovich, P., White, J., Cardoso, W., & Horst, M. (2009). Some input on the easy/difficult grammar question: An empirical study. Modern Language Journal, 93, 335–353. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Comrie, B. (1975). Definite and animate objects: A natural class. Linguistica Silesiona, 3,13–21.Google Scholar
Costa, A., Caramazza, A., & Sebastian-Galles, N. (2000). The cognate facilitation effect: Implications for models of lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26(5), 1283–1296. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cuza, A., Perez-Leroux, A. T., & Sánchez, L. (2013). The role of semantic transfer in clitic-drop among Chinese L1-Spanish L2 bilinguals. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 35(1), 93–125. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dahl, O., & Fraurud, K. (1996). Animacy in grammar and discourse. In T. Fretheim & J. K. Gundel (Eds.), Reference and referent accessibility (pp. 47–64). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Davies, M. (2016-). Corpus del Español: Two billion words, 21 countries. Retrieved from <[URL]> (20 January, 2020).
Dijkstra, T., Grainger, J., & Heuven, W. J. B. van. (1999). Recognition of cognates and interlingual homographs: The neglected role of phonology. Journal of Memory and Language, 41, 496–518. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dorian, N. C. (1981). Language death: The life cycle of a Scottish Gaelic dialect (p. 39). Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Duffield, N. & White, L. (1999). Assessing L2 knowledge of Spanish clitic placement: Convergent methodologies. Second Language Research, 15, 133–160. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Duyck, W., Van Assche, E., Drieghe, D., & Hartsuiker, R. J. (2007). Visual word recognition by bilinguals in a sentence context: Evidence for nonselective lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33(4), 663–679. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ellis, N. C. (2002). Frequency effects in language processing: A review with implications for theories of implicit and explicit language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24, 143–188. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2006a). Cognitive perspectives on SLA: The associative cognitive CREED. AILA Review, 19, 100–121. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2006b). Language acquisition as rational contingency learning. Applied Linguistics, 27, 1–24. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ellis, N. C., & Ferreira-Junior, F. (2009). Construction learning as a function of frequency, frequency distribution, and function. Modern Language Journal, 93, 370–385. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Erker, D., & Guy, G. R. (2012). The role of lexical frequency in syntactic variability: Variable subject personal pronoun expression in Spanish. Language, 78, 526–557. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fábregas, A. (2013). Differential Object Marking in Spanish: State of the art. Borealis, 2(2), 1–80.
CrossRef DOI logo with hyperlink to permanent DOI
Farley, A. P. & McCollam, K. (2004). Learner readiness and L2 production in Spanish: Processability theory on trial. Estudios de Linguística Aplicada, 22, 47–69.Google Scholar
Gal, S. (1989). Lexical innovation and loss: The use and value of restricted Hungarian. In N. C. Dorian (Ed.), Investigating obsolescence: Studies in language contraction and death (pp. 313–331). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
García, M. G. (2014). Differentielle Objektmarkierung bei unbelebten Objekten im Spanischen. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Giancaspro, D. (2017). Heritage speakers’ production and comprehension of lexically-and contextually-selected subjunctive mood morphology (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ.Google Scholar
Guijarro-Fuentes, P. (2012). The acquisition of interpretable features in L2 Spanish: Personal a. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 15(4), 701–720. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Guijarro-Fuentes, P., & Marinis, T. (2007). Acquiring phenomena at the syntax/semantics interface in L2 Spanish: The personal preposition a. Eurosla Yearbook, 7(1), 67–88. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2009). The acquisition of the personal preposition a by Catalan-Spanish and English-Spanish bilinguals. In J. Collentine, F. A. Marcos-Marín, & M. Garcia (Eds.), Selected proceedings of the 11th Hispanic Linguistics Symposium (pp. 81–92). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Grosjean, F. (1982). Life with two languages: An introduction to bilingualism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Gürel, A. (2000). Missing case inflection: Implications for second language acquisition. In C. Howell, S. A. Fish, & T. Keith-Lucas (Eds.), Proceedings of the 24th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 379–390). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, M. (2008). Parametric versus functional explanations of language universals. In T. Biberauer (Ed.), The limits of syntactic variation (pp. 75–107). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haznedar, B. (2006). Case morphology in L2 acquisition. In C. Lleó (Ed.), Interfaces in multilingualism. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hermans, D., Bongaerts, T., de Bot, K., & Schreuder, R. (1998). Producing words in a foreign language: Can speakers prevent interference from their first language? Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 1, 213–229. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hoshino, N., & Kroll, J. F. (2008). Cognate effects in picture naming: Does cross-language activation survive a change of script? Cognition, 106, 501–511. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hogeweg, L., & de Hoop, H. (2010). Children and transitivity. The subject-object asymmetry in a natural setting. In P. Brandt & M. García García (Eds.), Transitivity: Form, Meaning, Acquisition, and Processing (pp. 143–160). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heusinger, K. von, & Kaiser, G. A. (2003). The interaction of animacy, definiteness and specificity in Spanish. In K. von Heusinger & G. A. Kaiser (Eds.), Proceedings of the Workshop: Semantic and Syntactic Aspects of Specificity in Romance Languages (pp. 41–65). Konstanz: University of Konstanz.Google Scholar
Jiang, N. (2000). Lexical representation and development in a second language. Applied Linguistics, 21(1), 47–77. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johnston, M. (1995). Stages of acquisition of Spanish as a second language. Sydney: University of Western Sydney, Macarthur, The National Languages and Literacy Institute of Australia, Language Acquisition Research Center.Google Scholar
Kroll, J. F., Dussias, P. E., Bogulski, C. A., & Kroff, J. R. V. (2012). Juggling two languages in one mind: What bilinguals tell us about language processing and its consequences for cognition. In Psychology of learning and motivation (pp. 229–262). New York, NY: Academic Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kupisch, T., & Rothman, J. (2016). Terminology matters! Why difference is not incompleteness and how early child bilinguals are heritage speakers. International Journal of Bilingualism, 22(5), 564–582. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lardiere, D. (2008). Feature assembly in second language acquisition. In J. Liceras, H. Zobl, & H. Goodluck (Eds.), The role of formal features in second language acquisition (pp. 106–140). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Leonetti, M. (2004). Specificity and Differential Object Marking in Spanish. Catalan journal of linguistics, 3(1), 75-114. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2008). Specificity in Clitic doubling and in Differential Object Marking. Probus, 20(1), 33-66. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Linford, B., & Shin, N. L. (2013). Lexical frequency effects on L2 Spanish subject pronoun expression. In J. Cabrelli Amaro, G. Lord, A. de Prada Pérez, & J. E. Aaron (Eds.), Selected proceedings of the of the 16th Hispanic Linguistics Symposium (pp. 175–189). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
López, L. (2012). Indefinite objects. Scrambling, choice functions, and differential marking. Cambridge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mirman, D. (2017). Growth curve analysis and visualization using R. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman and Hall/CRC. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Montrul, S. (2002). Incomplete acquisition and attrition of Spanish tense / aspect distinctions in adult bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 5(1), 39–68. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2004). Subject and object expression in Spanish heritage speakers: A case of morpho-syntactic convergence. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 7(2), 125 – 142. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2005). Second language acquisition and first language loss in adult early bilinguals: Exploring some differences and similarities. Second Language Research, 21(3), 199–249. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2006). On the bilingual competence of Spanish heritage speakers: Syntax, lexical semantics and processing. International Journal of Bilingualism, 10(1), 37–69. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2007a). Interpreting mood distinction in Spanish as a heritage language. In K. Potowski & R. Cameron (Eds.), Spanish in contact policy, Social and linguistic inquiries (pp. 23–40). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2007b). On the (incomplete) acquisition of object expression in Spanish: How similar are L2 learners and Spanish Heritage Speakers (Unpublished manuscript). University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign.Google Scholar
Montrul, S. A. (2008). Incomplete acquisition in bilingualism: Re-examining the age factor (Vol. 39). John Benjamins Publishing. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Montrul, S. (2009). Incomplete acquisition of tense-aspect and mood in Spanish heritage speakers. The International Journal of Bilingualism, 13(3), 239–269. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Montrul, S., & Bowles, M. (2009). Back to basics: Incomplete knowledge of Differential Object Marking in Spanish heritage speakers. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 12(3), 363–383. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Montrul, S., & Sánchez-Walker, N. (2013). Differential Object Marking in child and adult Spanish heritage speakers. Language Acquisition, 20(2), 109–132. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Montrul, S., & Slabakova, R. (2003). Competence similarities between native and near native speakers: An investigation of the preterite/imperfect contrast in Spanish. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 25, 351–398. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Montrul, S., Foote, R., & Perpiñán, S. (2008). Gender agreement in adult second language learners and Spanish heritage speakers: The effects of age and context of acquisition. Language Learning, 58(3), 503–553. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Montrul, S., Bhatt, R., & Girju, R. (2015). Differential Object Marking in Spanish, Hindi, and Romanian as heritage languages. Language, 91(3), 564–610. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Montrul, S., & Perpiñán, S. (2011). Assessing differences and similarities between instructed heritage language learners and L2 learners in their knowledge of Spanish tense-aspect and mood (TAM) morphology. Heritage Language Journal, 8(1), 90–133.Google Scholar
Nediger, W., Pires, A., & Guijarro-Fuentes, P. (2016). Variable L2 acquisition of Spanish Differential Object Marking by L1 English speakers. In J. Scott & D. Waughtal (Eds.), BUCLD 40 Online Proceedings Supplement. <[URL]> (21 January, 2020).
O’Grady, W., Kwak, H. Y., Lee, O. S., & Lee, M. (2011). An emergentist perspective on heritage language acquisition. Studies in second language acquisition, 33(2), 223-245.. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pascual y Cabo, D., & Rothman, J. (2012). The (il) logical problem of heritage speaker bilingualism and incomplete acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 33(4), 450–455. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pensado, C., (1995). El complemento directo preposicional: estado de la cuestio´n y bibliografía comentada. In: Pensado, C. (Ed.), El complemento directo preposicional. Visor, Madrid, pp. 11-59.Google Scholar
Perez-Cortés, S. (2016). Acquiring obligatory and variable mood selection (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ.Google Scholar
Polinsky, M. (2006). Incomplete acquisition: American Russian. Journal of Slavic Linguistics, 14, 191–262.Google Scholar
(2011). Reanalysis in adult heritage language: New evidence in support of attrition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 33(2), 305–328. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Poulisse, N. (1999). Slips of the tongue: Speech errors in first and second language production. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Putnam, M. T., & Sánchez, L. (2013). What’s so incomplete about incomplete acquisition? A prolegomenon to modeling heritage language grammars. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 3(4), 478–508. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Robinson, P., & Ellis, N. C. (Eds.). (2008). Handbook of cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition (pp. 3-8). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Rodríguez-Mondoñedo, M. (2008). The acquisition of Differential Object Marking in Spanish. Probus, 20(1), 111–145. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rothman, J. (2009). Understanding the nature and outcomes of early bilingualism: Romance languages as heritage languages. International Journal of Bilingualism, 13(2), 155–163. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, A. I., Kroll, J. F., & Diaz, M. (2007). Reading words in Spanish and English: Mapping orthography to phonology in two languages. Language and Cognitive Processes, 22, 106–129. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Silva-Corvalán, C. (1994). The gradual loss of mood distinctions in Los Angeles Spanish. Language Variation and Change, 6(3), 255–272. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Torrego, E. (1998). The dependencies of objects. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1999). El complemento directo preposicional. In I. Bosque & V. Demonte (Eds.), Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española Vol. 2: Las construcciones sintácticas fundamentales. Relaciones temporales, aspectuales y modales (pp. 1779–1805). Madrid: Espasa Calpe.Google Scholar
Ticio, E. (2015). Differential Object Marking in Spanish-English early bilinguals. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 5(1), 62-90. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ura, H. (1996). Multiple theory checking: A theory of grammatical function splitting (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). MIT.Google Scholar
VanPatten, B., & Cardierno, T. (1993). Explicit instruction and input processing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15, 225–243. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vendler, Z. (1957). Verbs and times. The Philosophical Review, 66(2), 143–160. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wulff, S., Ellis, N. C., Römer, U., Bardovi-Harlig, K., & Leblanc, C. (2009). The acquisition of tense-aspect: Converging evidence from corpora and telicity ratings. Modern Language Journal, 93(3), 354–369. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zagona, K. (2002). The syntax of Spanish. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Thane, Patrick D.
2024. On the Acquisition of Differential Object Marking in Child Heritage Spanish: Bilingual Education, Exposure, and Age Effects (In Memory of Phoebe Search). Languages 9:1 ► pp. 26 ff. DOI logo
Perez-Cortes, Silvia & David Giancaspro
2022. (In)frequently asked questions: On types of frequency and their role(s) in heritage language variability. Frontiers in Psychology 13 DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.