Chapter published in:
The Acquisition of Differential Object Marking
Edited by Alexandru Mardale and Silvina Montrul
[Trends in Language Acquisition Research 26] 2020
► pp. 261281
References

References

Arechabaleta Regulez, B.
(2020) The processing of Differential Object Marking by heritage speakers of Spanish. In A. Mardale & S. Montrul (Eds.), The acquisition of Differential Object Marking. pp. 237-260. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Baten, K. & Verbeke, S.
(2015) The acquisition of the Ergative Case in Hindi as Foreign Language. In Theoretical and Methodological Developments in Processability Theory edited by Kristof Baten, Aafke Buyl, Katja Lochtman, Mieke Van Herreweghe Amsterdam, John Benjamins. pp. 71-104Google Scholar
Baten, K., Ponnet, A., & Verbeke, S.
(2016) The acquisition of Differential Object Marking in Hindi as a foreign language. Dutch Journal of Applied Linguistics, 5(2), 101–125. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bowles, M.
(2011) Measuring implicit and explicit linguistic knowledge: What can heritage language learners contribute? Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 33, 247–272. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Butt, M.
(1993) Object specificity and agreement in Hindi/Urdu. In K. Beals, D. Testen, & K.-E. McCullough (Eds.), Papers from the 29th Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society (pp. 80–103). Chicago, IL: CLS.Google Scholar
Dayal, V.
(2011) Hindi pseudo-incorporation. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 29(1), 123–167. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goldschneider, J. M., & DeKeyser, R.
(2001) Explaining the “natural order of L2 morpheme acqusition” in English: A meta-analysis of multiple determinants. Language Learning, 51, 1–50. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, L.
(1986) Universals in relative clause acquisition: Evidence from child and adult L1 and L2 learners of Hindi-Urdu. Language Learning, 36,143–158. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hawkins, R., & Casillas, G.
(2008) Explaining frequency of verb morphology in early L2 speech. Lingua, 118, 595–612. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Junghare, I.
(1983) Markers of definiteness in Indo-Aryan. In A. Dahlstrom, C. Brugman, M. Macaulay, I. Civkulis, M. Emanatian, D. Sakima, & R. Teixeira (Eds.), Proceedings of the Ninth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society (pp. 116–127). Berkeley, CA: BLS.Google Scholar
Kim, K., O’Grady, W., & Schwartz, B.
(2018) Case in heritage Korean. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 8(2), 252–282. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lardiere, D.
(2009) Some thoughts on the contrastive analysis of features in second language acquisition. Second Language Research, 25, 173–227. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lakshmanan, U.
(1999) Object shift and the position of NegP in the child L2 grammars of Hindi. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Representation and process: Proceedings of the 1998 Pacific Second Language Research Forum (Vol. 1, pp. 23–36). Tokyo: Pacific Second Language Research Forum.Google Scholar
Lardiere, D.
(2016) Missing the trees for the forest: Morphology in second language acquisition. Second Language, 15, 5–30.Google Scholar
López, L.
(2012) Indefinite objects. Scrambling, choice functions and differential marking. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Magier, D.
(1987) The transitivity prototype: Evidence from Hindi. Word, 38, 187–199. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mahajan, A.
(1990) The A/A’ distinction and movement theory (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). MIT.Google Scholar
Masica, C.
(1982) Identified object marking in Hindi and other languages. In O. N. Koul (Ed.), Topics in Hindi linguistics (Vol. 2, pp. 16–50). New Delhi: Bahri Publications.Google Scholar
Mohanan, T.
(1993) Case alternation on objects in Hindi. South Asian Language Review, 3, 1–30.Google Scholar
(1994a) Argument structure in Hindi. Stanford, CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
1994bCase OCP: A constraint on word order in Hindi. In M. Butt, T. H. King, & G. Ramchand (Eds.), Theoretical perspectives on word order in South Asian languages (pp. 185–215). Stanford, CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Montaut, A.
(2018) The rise of Differential Object Marking in Hindi and related languages. In I. A. Seržant & A. Witzlack-Makarevich (Eds.), Diachrony of Differential Argument Marking (pp. 281–314). Berlin: Language Science Press.Google Scholar
Montrul, S.
(2008) Incomplete acquisition in bilingualism: Re-examining the age factor. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2011) Interfaces in bilingualism. Studies in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics, 4, 221–233. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2014) Searching for the roots of structural changes in the Spanish of the United States. Lingua, 151, 177–196. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2016) The Acquisition of Heritage Languages. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(2018) The bottleneck hypothesis and heritage language acquisition. In J. Cho, T. Judy, & T. Leal Mendez (Eds.), Meaning and structure in second language acquisition (pp. 149–177). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Montrul, S., & Bowles, M.
(2009) Back to basics: Differential Object Marking under incomplete acquisition in Spanish heritage speakers. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 12(3), 363–383. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Montrul, S., & Sánchez-Walker, N.
(2013) Differential Object Marking in child and adult Spanish heritage speakers. Language Acquisition, 20, 109–132. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Montrul, S., Bhatt, R., & Bhatia, A.
(2012) Erosion of case and agreement in Hindi heritage Speakers. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 2, 141–176. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Montrul, S., Bhatt, R., & Girju, R.
(2015) Differential Object Marking in Spanish, Hindi and Romanian as heritage languages. Language, 91(3), 564–610. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Montrul, S., Foote, R., & Perpiñán, S.
(2008) Gender agreement in adult second language learners and Spanish heritage speakers: The effects of age and context of acquisition. Language Learning, 58(3), 503–553. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Montrul, S. & Bateman, N.
(2020) Differential Object Marking in Romanian as a heritage language. In A. Mardale & S. Montrul (Eds.), The acquisition of Differential Object Marking. pp. 285-314. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. (this volume)Google Scholar
O’Grady, W., Kwak, H. Y., Lee, O.-S., & Lee, M.
(2011) An emergentist perspective on heritage language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 33, 223–246. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pascual y Cabo, D.
(2013) Agreement reflexes of emerging optionality in heritage speaker Spanish (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Florida.Google Scholar
Pires, A., & Rothman, J.
(2009) Acquisition of Brazilian Portuguese in late childhood: Implications for syntactic theory and language change. In A. Pires & J. Rothman (Eds.), Minimalist inquiries into child and adult language acquisition: Case studies across Portuguese (129–154). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rothman, J., Tsimpli, I., & Pascual y Cabo, D.
(2016) Formal linguistic approaches to heritage language acquisition: Bridges for pedagogically oriented research. In D. Pascual y Cabo (Ed.), Advances in Spanish as a heritage language (pp. 13–26). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Slabakova, R.
(2008) Meaning in the second language. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Singh, M.
(1994) Thematic roles, word order, and definiteness. In M. Butt, T. H. King, & G. Ramchand (Eds.), Theoretical perspectives on word order in South Asian languages (pp. 217–235). Stanford, CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Sorace, A.
(2004) Native language attrition and developmental instability at the syntax-discourse interface: Data, interpretation and methods. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 7, 143–145. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2011) Pinning down the concept of “interface” in bilingualism. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 1, 1–34. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ticio, E.
(2015) The acquisition of Differential Object Marking in Spanish-English Early Bilinguals. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 5(1), 62–90. CrossrefGoogle Scholar