Cover not available
Article published In:
Translation and Interpreting Studies
Vol. 14:1 (2019) ► pp.61–74

Linguistic ideology and the pre-modern English Bible

A look at arguments for and against an English translation through the lens of historical sociolinguistics

| Missouri Western State University
Can the prestige of a language be an argument for the translation of a sacred text? Conversely, if a language is perceived as substandard, is that an argument against translation? In the history of the English Bible, scholars and theologians have argued both for and against a vernacular scripture, but the debate has not always been based on religious beliefs. Following the Norman Invasion of 1066, the translation debate shifted from the religious to the linguistic. In other words, the argument against translation became based on the perception that English was “too rude” to properly convey the complex nature of Holy Scripture. Reformers like William Tyndale protested this view, arguing that the linguistic argument against a Bible in the vernacular really masked an almost maniacal desire on the part of the ecclesiastical establishment to control the message. This paper takes a closer look at historical arguments for and against an English Bible from the Anglo-Saxon period through the Tyndale Bible.
Keywords: Ӕlfric, John Wycliffe, Lollards, William Tyndale, English Bible, norman invasion, anglo-saxon, sociolinguistics, language ideology
Article outline
  • The notion of linguistic ideology, and the process of language change
  • The Old English Period (449 CE – 1100 CE)
  • The Middle English Period (1100 CE – 1500 CE)
  • The Early Modern English Period (1500 CE – 1800 CE)
  • Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 5 April 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/tis.00030.bel
References (19)
References
Anttila, Raimo. 1989. Historical and Comparative Linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bobrick, Benson. 2001. Wide as the Waters: The Story of the English Bible and the Revolution it Inspired. New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Canon, Elizabeth Bell. 2010. The Use of Modal Expression Preference as a Marker of Style and Attribution: The Case of William Tyndale and the 1533 English Enchiridion Militis Christiani. New York: Peter Lang Publishers. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Daniell, David. 2003. The Bible in English. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Green, D. H. 1998. Language and History in the Early Germanic World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hudson, Anne (ed). 1978. Selections from English Wycliffite Writings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lippi-Green, Rosina. 2012. English with an Accent: Language, Ideology, and Discrimination in the United States. New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Long, Lynne. 2001. Translating the Bible: From the 7th to the 17th Century. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Maveety, Stanley R. 1966. “Doctrine in Tyndale’s New Testament: Translation as a tendentious art.” Studies in English Literature, 1500–1900 6(1): 151–58. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Millar, Robert M. 2012. English Historical Sociolinguistics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
More, Thomas. 2015. A Dialogue Concerning Heresies. Edited by Mary Gottschalk. [URL]. Last accessed 30 May 2018.
Mullany, P. J. 1891. The Development of Old English Thought. New York: Appleton and Co.Google Scholar
Munday, Jeremy. 2016. Introducing Translation Studies: Theories and Applications. New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Price, Ira M. 1956. The Ancestry of Our English Bible. New York: Harper and Row, Publishers.Google Scholar
Su, Fang Ng. 2001. “Translation, interpretation, and heresy: The Wycliffite Bible, Tyndale’s Bible, and the contested origin.” Studies in Philology 98 (3): 315–38.Google Scholar
Tadmor, Naomi. 2015. “The social and cultural translation of the Hebrew Bible in early modern England: Reflections, working principles, and examples.” In Early Modern Cultures of Translation, ed. by Karen Newman and Jane Tylus, 175–188. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tyndale, William. 2000. The Obedience of a Christian Man. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
. 1989. Tyndale’s New Testament. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Watson, Nicholas. 1995. “Censorship and cultural change in late-medieval England: Vernacular theology, the Oxford translation debate, and Arundel’s Constitutions of 1409.” Speculum 70, no. 4: 822–64. DOI logoGoogle Scholar