Article published In:
Translation and Interpreting StudiesVol. 14:1 (2019) ► pp.61–74
Linguistic ideology and the pre-modern English Bible
A look at arguments for and against an English translation through the lens of historical sociolinguistics
Can the prestige of a language be an argument for the translation of a sacred text? Conversely, if a language is perceived as substandard, is that an argument against translation? In the history of the English Bible, scholars and theologians have argued both for and against a vernacular scripture, but the debate has not always been based on religious beliefs. Following the Norman Invasion of 1066, the translation debate shifted from the religious to the linguistic. In other words, the argument against translation became based on the perception that English was “too rude” to properly convey the complex nature of Holy Scripture. Reformers like William Tyndale protested this view, arguing that the linguistic argument against a Bible in the vernacular really masked an almost maniacal desire on the part of the ecclesiastical establishment to control the message. This paper takes a closer look at historical arguments for and against an English Bible from the Anglo-Saxon period through the Tyndale Bible.
Keywords: Ӕlfric, John Wycliffe, Lollards, William Tyndale, English Bible, norman invasion, anglo-saxon, sociolinguistics, language ideology
Article outline
- The notion of linguistic ideology, and the process of language change
- The Old English Period (449 CE – 1100 CE)
- The Middle English Period (1100 CE – 1500 CE)
- The Early Modern English Period (1500 CE – 1800 CE)
- Conclusion
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
-
References
References
Anttila, Raimo
Bobrick, Benson
2001 Wide as the Waters: The Story of the English Bible and the Revolution it Inspired. New York: Penguin Books.
Canon, Elizabeth Bell
2010 The Use of Modal Expression Preference as a Marker of Style and Attribution: The Case of William Tyndale and the 1533 English Enchiridion Militis Christiani. New York: Peter Lang Publishers. 
Daniell, David
2003 The Bible in English. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Green, D. H.
1998 Language and History in the Early Germanic World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hudson, Anne
(ed) 1978 Selections from English Wycliffite Writings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lippi-Green, Rosina
2012 English with an Accent: Language, Ideology, and Discrimination in the United States. New York: Routledge.
Long, Lynne
2001 Translating the Bible: From the 7th to the 17th Century. Aldershot: Ashgate.
Maveety, Stanley R.
1966 “Doctrine in Tyndale’s New Testament: Translation as a tendentious art.” Studies in English Literature, 1500–1900 6(1): 151–58.
Millar, Robert M.
2012 English Historical Sociolinguistics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
More, Thomas
Mullany, P. J.
1891 The Development of Old English Thought. New York: Appleton and Co.
Munday, Jeremy
2016 Introducing Translation Studies: Theories and Applications. New York: Routledge.
Price, Ira M.
1956 The Ancestry of Our English Bible. New York: Harper and Row, Publishers.
Su, Fang Ng
2001 “Translation, interpretation, and heresy: The Wycliffite Bible, Tyndale’s Bible, and the contested origin.” Studies in Philology 98 (3): 315–38.
Tadmor, Naomi
2015 “The social and cultural translation of the Hebrew Bible in early modern England: Reflections, working principles, and examples.” In Early Modern Cultures of Translation, ed. by Karen Newman and Jane Tylus, 175–188. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Tyndale, William
2000 The Obedience of a Christian Man. London: Penguin Books.
1989 Tyndale’s New Testament. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Watson, Nicholas
1995 “Censorship and cultural change in late-medieval England: Vernacular theology, the Oxford translation debate, and Arundel’s Constitutions of 1409.” Speculum 70, no. 4: 822–64.