Article published in:
Translation and Interpreting Studies
Vol. 14:1 (2019) ► pp. 75–94

‘Intersemiotic translating’

Time for a rethink?

| York University
Should transpositions between language and other sign systems be considered a kind of translation? The answer could be yes if the comparison is made to interlingual translating that features a high degree of variance. Here, however, the question will be whether there are any kinds of intersemiotic transposition that feature a high degree of invariance. Four criteria are suggested for defining invariance-oriented translation, and a variety of possible instances of invariant intersemiotic translation are considered, with special mention of transpositions to and from music.
Keywords: intersemiotic, invariance, translation and imagery, music
Article outline
  • Defining criteria for ‘translating’
  • Intersemiotic transposition
  • Trivial examples of intersemiotic invariance
  • Back-translatability
  • Regular correspondences
  • Freestandingness
  • FAFSiness (few additions, few subtractions)
  • Visual/linguistic transposition: The wrong place to look for translating
  • Linguistic/musical transposition: The right place to look?
  • Further investigation
  • Which criteria?
  • Coda – Jakobson dixit
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 05 April 2019
https://doi.org/10.1075/tis.00031.mos
References
Apter, Ronnie and Mark Herman
2016 Translating for Singing. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Bellos, David
2011 Is That a Fish in Your Ear? The Amazing Adventure of Translation. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Bluestone, George
1957 Novels into Film: The Metamorphosis of Fiction into Cinema. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Catford, John
1965 A Linguistic Theory of Translation. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cattrysse, Patrick
2014 Descriptive Adaptation Studies: Epistemological and Methodological Issues. Antwerp: Garant.Google Scholar
Eco, Umberto
2001 Experiences in Translation. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
2003 Mouse or Rat? Translation as Negotiation. London: Weidenfeld and Nicholson.Google Scholar
2003/2015 Dire presque la même chose [Saying almost the same thing], trans. by Myriem Bouzaher of Dire quasi la stessa cosa. Paris: Grasset.Google Scholar
Fraser, Ryan
2012 “Evading frames: D’Antin van Rooten’s homophonic Mother Goose.” TTR 25 (1): 51–82. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Guest, Ann H. and Claudia Jeschke
1991 Nijinsky’s Faune Restored. Philadelphia: Gordon and Breach.Google Scholar
Holmes, James S.
1972/1988 “The name and nature of translation studies.” In Translated! Papers on Literary Translation and Translation Studies, 67–80. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Hjelmslev, Louis
1943/1961 Prolegomena to a Theory of Language, trans. by Francis Whitfield of Omkring sprogteoriens grundlæggelse. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman
1959 “On linguistic aspects of translation.” In On Translation, ed. by Reuben A. Brower, 232–239. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1960 “Closing statement: Linguistics and poetics.” In Style in Language, ed. by Thomas Sebeok, 350–377. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Jencks, Charles
2003 The Garden of Cosmic Speculation. London: Frances Lincoln.Google Scholar
Lerdahl, Fred
2013 “Musical syntax and its relation to linguistic syntax.” In Language, Music and the Brain: A Mysterious Relationship, ed. by M. Arbib, 257–272. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Li, Charles
2007 “Foreign names into native tongues: How to transfer sound between languages.” Target 19 (1): 45–68. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mallarmé, Stéphane
1886/1945 “Ballets.” In Oeuvres complètes, 303–307. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Melnick, David
1983 Men in Aida. Tuumba 471. Berkeley, CA: Tuumba Press.Google Scholar
Mendelsund, Peter
2014 What We See When We Read. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Mossop, Brian
2016 “ ‘Intralingual translation’: A useful concept?” Across Languages and Cultures 17 (1): 1–24. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2017a “Invariance orientation: Identifying an object for translation studies.” Translation Studies 10 (3): 329–356. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2017b “When translation is not about meaning.” Babel 63 (5): 621–642. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2018 “Judging a translation by its cover.” The Translator 24 (1): 1–16. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Néagu, Philippe, Jean-Michel Nectoux, Claudia Jeschke and Ann H. Guest
1990 Nijinsky: Prélude à l’après-midi d’un faune. London: Thames & Hudson.Google Scholar
Newmark, Peter
2013 “Art song in translation.” In Music, Text and Translation, ed. by Helen J. Minors, 59–68. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Peirce, Charles Sanders
1897/1931 “On signs, ground, object, and interpretant.” In volume 21 of Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, ed. by Charles Hartshorne, Paul Weiss and Arthur W. Burks, 81 vol., 1931–1958, 134–136. Cambridge, MA: Belknap.Google Scholar
Pereira, Nilce
2008 “Book illustration as (intersemiotic) translation: pictures translating words.” Meta 53 (1): 104–119. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Raw, Laurence
(ed.) 2012 Translation, Adaptation and Transformation. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Risku, Hanna and Richard Pircher
2008 “Visual aspects of intercultural technical communication: A cognitive scientific and semiotic point of view.” Meta 53 (1): 154–166. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sonzogni, Marco
2011 Re-Covered Rose: A Case Study in Book Cover Design as Intersemiotic Translation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sütiste, Elin and Peeter Torop
2007 “Processual boundaries of translation: Semiotics and translation studies.” Semiotica 1631: 187–207.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Sütiste, Elin
2021.  In Handbook of Translation Studies [Handbook of Translation Studies, 5], ► pp. 128 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 11 november 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.