Interpreting between a minority language speaker or user (a service user or client) and a representative of an authority (service provider) is frequently referred to as Community Interpreting. One of the challenges of such triadic communication between linguistically and culturally diverse participants is to establish who may speak for how long in order to maintain meaningful communication without any loss of information. At first glance, the service provider emerges as the apparent figure of authority, while the client often provides significant input concerning the content of the encounter. Nevertheless, the final responsibility for the information transfer rests with the interpreter. This article reports on how participants of a study conducted in the area of interpreting in mental healthcare in Dublin, Ireland viewed the issue of communication control. Interview respondents of the research, who comprised mental health professionals and interpreters working in mental healthcare, revealed that there is a constantly fluctuating delicate balance regarding the control of the communication flow when an interpreter is involved in an encounter between a service user and a service provider.
2020. Investigación con corpus cualitativos en los estudios de traducción: el problema de los constructos traductológicos complejos. Meta 65:1 ► pp. 237 ff.
KINCAL, Şeyda
2020. The interpreter in (inter)action: Divergent renditions in consecutive interpreting. RumeliDE Dil ve Edebiyat Araştırmaları Dergisi :20 ► pp. 774 ff.
Chatzidamianos, Gerasimos, Ian Fletcher, Laura Wedlock & Rachel Lever
2019. Clinical communication and the ‘triangle of care’ in mental health and deafness: Sign language interpreters’ perspectives. Patient Education and Counseling 102:11 ► pp. 2010 ff.
Liu, Yubo & Wei Zhang
2019. Unity in diversity: mapping healthcare interpreting studies (2007-2017). Medical Education Online 24:1 ► pp. 1579559 ff.
Costa, Beverley
2017. Team Effort – Training Therapists to Work with Interpreters as a Collaborative Team. International Journal for the Advancement of Counselling 39:1 ► pp. 56 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.